Key Technologies of Hydraulic Control and Predictive Disaster Control for the Construction of Large-scale Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Projects

HUANG Guo-bing

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7) : 1-8.

PDF(2013 KB)
PDF(2013 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7) : 1-8. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20180383
SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION

Key Technologies of Hydraulic Control and Predictive Disaster Control for the Construction of Large-scale Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Projects

  • HUANG Guo-bing1,2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The construction of large-scale cascade hydropower projects in mountainous area of west China has encountered new problems in complex circumstances, such as design standards for river diversion and closure and risk control, safe hydraulic control of steep slope tunnel diversion, safe and economic hydraulic control of river bed closure with thick overburden layer, and predictive control of disasters in river diversion and closure process, among others. After 28 years of systematic research, some technical problems related to hydraulic control and disaster reduction for large-scale cascade hydropower projects have been solved. The achievements are presented as follows: (1) A risk assessment model of diversion system and a decision-making model for the standard of river closure based on real-time hydrological monitoring and forecasting were built for synchronous construction of multiple cascade projects; standard selection methods were proposed to meet safety and economy requirements, and design specifications of construction diversion were modified. (2) The causes and mechanisms of adverse hydraulic characteristics such as alternative free surface and pressure flow in steep-slope tunnels were revealed; some composite hydraulic control techniques were proposed to guarantee tunnel safety, including obstructive floating embankment for vortex reduction in the upstream of tunnel inlet, inlet form with sharp edges alleviating alternative free surface and pressure flow in tunnel, and outlet form with downward slope for increasing pressure in tunnel; an innovative protection technology has addressed the safety problem in flood season in the presence of large flow and thick cover layer by adopting flexible blanket of reinforced cage and multi-stage flow rectifying for overflow cofferdam. (3) An innovative and practical formula for the stability calculation of natural closure blocks was proposed in consideration of water depth, flow velocity distribution, river bed roughness, and circumfluence coefficient; a formula for the stability calculation of artificial closure block of hexahedron stone-gabion reinforced cage was also established. Both the formulae are of good precision close to practice. (4) A tetrahedral reinforced cage with infiltrated geomembrane embedded and a new type of river closure material of cylindrical line bar were invented. (5) The technology of “wide underwater dike” was proposed to reduce river closure difficulty. (6) The second surge in the process of high-steep bank landslide was defined as the first wave for the first time; a practical formula for the height of first wave was obtained, and a model for predicting the generating and spreading of surges was built. (7) A high-resolution technology for simulating the process of earth-rock cofferdam breaking and flood routing was developed. These key technologies have boosted the development of relative disciplines and stimulated the technological progress in water conservancy and hydropower industry.

Key words

large-scale water conservancy and hydropower project / hydraulic control of river diversion and closure / disaster prediction control / alternative free surface and pressure flow / risk assessment / wide underwater dike / first wave height / mountainous area in west China

Cite this article

Download Citations
HUANG Guo-bing. Key Technologies of Hydraulic Control and Predictive Disaster Control for the Construction of Large-scale Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Projects[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2018, 35(7): 1-8 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20180383

References

[1] 刘 全,胡志根,任金明,等. 梯级建设环境下水电工程施工导流风险分析[J]. 水力发电学报,2014,33(1):147-153.
[2] 胡志根,刘 全,贺昌海,等. 基于Monte-Carlo方法的土石围堰挡水导流风险分析[J]. 水科学进展,2002,(5):634-638.
[3] 胡志根,刘 全,贺昌海,等. 水利水电工程施工初期导流标准多目标风险决策研究[J]. 中国工程科学,2001,3(8):58-63.
[4] 徐唐锦,李 蘅,马永锋.坝体度汛及导流泄水建筑物洪水标准研究与探讨[J],人民长江,2011,42(16):69-72.
[5] 郑守仁,杨文俊. 河道截流及流水中筑坝技术[M]. 武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,2009.
[6] 杨文俊,郑守仁.三峡工程施工水流过程控制关键技术与工程效果[J].水力发电学报,2009,28(6):59-64.
[7] 任金明,陈炜旻,蔡建国,等.梯级电站水库调蓄对施工导截流影响研究综述[J].大坝与安全,2012,(4):1-4,8.
[8] 孙志禹,周剑岚,宋四新. 基于贝叶斯理论的工程施工事故发生的人为因素分析[J]. 水力发电学报,2014,33(1):241-245.
[9] 李学海,李 蘅,石教豪.陡坡隧洞明满交替流成因及改善措施[J].长江科学院院报,2013,30(8):40-45.
[10]李 蘅,李学海,杜泽金.陡坡隧洞不同进口形式的水力特性分析[J].长江科学院院报,2014,31(1):38-41.
[11]黄国兵,李学海,程子兵,等.截流块体稳定影响因素及实用计算公式[J].长江科学院院报,2013,30(8):25-30,36.
[12]李学海,程子兵,汪世鹏,等.截流钢筋笼的稳定性及其计算方法[J].长江科学院院报,2013,30(8):31-36.
[13]郭熙灵,黄国兵,李学海.深厚覆盖层条件下施工导截流关键技术问题研究[J].长江科学院院报,2011,28(6):10-15.
[14]蔡 莹,黄国兵,车清权,等.降低截流难度及江河护堤抛投材料研究[J].长江科学院院报,2011,28(6):20-24.
[15]刘珊燕,刘力中,车清权.瀑布沟水电站宽戗堤截流水工模型试验及应用[J].人民长江,2010,41(2):25-27.
[16]姜治兵,金 峰,盛 君.滑坡涌浪的数值模拟[J].长江科学院院报,2005,22(5):1-3.
[17]任坤杰,韩继斌,陆 虹.滑坡涌浪首浪高度试验研究[J].人民长江,2012,43(2):43-45,61.
[18]段文刚,周 赤,杨金波.土坝漫顶冲蚀溃决过程和峰值流量试验研究[J].人民长江,2013,41(11):76-80.
[19]段文刚,杨文俊,王思莹,等.无黏性土坝漫顶溃决过程及机理研究[J].长江科学院院报,2012,29(10):68-72.
[20]姜治兵,金 峰,王才欢.围堰溃决的数值模拟[J].水利水电技术,2005,36(10):38-41.
[21]姜治兵,崔 丹,程子兵. 坝体溃决过程与溃坝洪水演进耦合数值模拟[J]. 长江科学院院报,2018,35(5):63-67.
PDF(2013 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/