Risk matrix analysis (LS) and operating condition risk analysis (LEC) have some limitations in rating the safety risks of water conservancy project, including unclear quantitative evaluation indicators, inconsistent criteria, and limited guidance for result application. In view of this, we developed a multidimensional and multi-spatiotemporal scale safety risk assessment system based on the risk matrix principle. Our research demonstrated the following outcomes: 1) the likelihood (L) of all types of hazard accidents in water conservancy projects can be assessed in detail by considering various combinations of control measures (M), frequency of hazard exposure (E), and working behavior (C) in the operation cycle. 2) The assessment criterion of M should be consistent with the standard of water conservancy project management. 3) The interaction between physical hazards evolution and environmental change can be assessed through the risk assessment factor C. 4) In consideration of the unbalanced spatiotemporal distribution of accident consequences, the safety risks of water conservancy projects can be assessed dynamically by incorporating the upstream water level (H) and operation period (F) and identifying whether hazard sources are directly related to downstream flood control or the casualties and economic losses caused by accidents can be quantified. This dynamic and real-time evaluation approach for water conservancy project safety risks offers a valuable reference for constructing a double prevention mechanism for safe production in the industry.
Key words
water conservancy project /
safe operation /
safe production /
multi-dimensional multi-spatiotemporal /
safety risk assessment system
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 王 翔, 郑淇文, 张志勇, 等. 高质量发展阶段中国水利工程安全监测现状及提升策略[J]. 水利水电快报, 2023, 44(3): 76-83, 88.
[2] 李玉峰, 刘袁春, 胡大山, 等. 基于风险矩阵的水电站项目风险分级评估方法研究: 以乌东德水电站为例[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(1): 130-134.
[3] 龚远平, 阴 彬, 杨建业, 等. 大型水电工程构建双重预防机制的探索与实践: 以白鹤滩水电站为例[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(2): 155-160.
[4] 刘 昶. 水库大坝危险源辨识及风险评价[J]. 黑龙江水利科技, 2018, 46(9): 76-77, 95.
[5] 苗新虎, 杨胜品, 王彦红, 等. 基于风险矩阵的胶凝砂砾石坝安全风险分级管控研究[J]. 大坝与安全, 2022(5): 4-9.
[6] 龙 艺, 万忠海, 刘双美, 等. 水库(水闸)工程运行危险源辨识与风险评价的应用方法与技术[J]. 四川水利, 2021, 42(4): 161-164.
[7] RUAN X, YIN Z, FRANGOPOL D. Risk Matrix Integrating Risk Attitudes Based on Utility Theory[J]. Risk Analysis, 2015, 35(8): 1437-1447.
[8] PRITCHARD D, HANNEGAN D. Drilling Hazard Management: The Value of Risk Assessment[J]. World Oil, 2010, Corpus ID: 55561946.
[9] HOLT J, LEACH A, SCHRADER G, et al. Eliciting and Combining Decision Criteria Using a Limited Palette of Utility Functions and Uncertainty Distributions: Illustrated by Application to Pest Risk Analysis[J]. Risk Analysis, 2014, 34(1): 4-16.
[10]NI H, CHEN A, CHEN N. Some Extensions on Risk Matrix Approach[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(10): 1269-1278.
[11]JR C L A. What’s Wrong with Risk Matrices?[J]. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2008, 28(2): 497-512.
[12]DUIJM N J. Recommendations on the Use and Design of Risk Matrices[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 76: 21-31.
[13]朱启超, 匡兴华, 沈永平. 风险矩阵方法与应用述评[J]. 中国工程科学, 2003, 5(1): 89-94.
[14]阮 欣, 尹志逸, 陈艾荣. 风险矩阵评估方法研究与工程应用综述[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(3): 381-385.