Numerical Simulation Coupling Dam Break Process and Flood Routing

JIANG Zhi-bing; CUI Dan; CHENG Zi-bing

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20171175

PDF(2287 KB)

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5) : 63-67. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20171175

HYDRAULICS

Numerical Simulation Coupling Dam Break Process and Flood Routing

JIANG Zhi-bing, CUI Dan, CHENG Zi-bing

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The study of dam break process and dam break flood routing is of great significance for dealing with flood disasters caused by dam break and improving water security. Most models at present could not reflect the interaction between soil and water flow by only simulating dam break process or flood routing, hence resulting in a limited accuracy. In this article, a 2-D numerical model coupling dam break process and flood routing was established in consideration of the finite erosion resistance of soil. The erosion rate expressions of hyperbolic type was employed to describe the rate of dam erosion; simplified Bishop method was adopted to search the critical slip surface for describing slope collapse at breach; and the Mac-Cormack finite volume method with total variation diminishing was adopted to discrete the control equations. A computation example demonstrates that the model could reasonably simulate the process of breach development and the flood routing process with strong stability and good conservativeness in breach transition zone from rapid flow to slow flow. The model can be used as a powerful tool for flood risk assessment and flood disaster forecast.

Key words

dam break process / flood routing / numerical simulation / coupling / conservativeness / finite volume

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

JIANG Zhi-bing, CUI Dan, CHENG Zi-bing. Numerical Simulation Coupling Dam Break Process and Flood Routing[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2018, 35(5): 63-67 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20171175

References

[1] 刘宁.21世纪中国水坝安全管理、退役与建设的若干问题[J].中国水利,2004,(23):27-30.
[2] HANSON G J, ROBINSON K M, COOK K R. Prediction of Headcut Migration Using a Deterministic Approach[J].Transactions of ASAE, 2001, 44(3):525-531.
[3] TEMPLE D M, MOORE J S. Headcut Advance Prediction for Earth Spillways[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1997, 40(3):557-562.
[4] 朱勇辉,廖鸿志,吴中如. 国外土坝溃坝模拟综述[J].长江科学院院报,2003,20(2):26-29.
[5] 陈生水, 方绪顺, 钟启明, 等. 土石坝漫顶溃坝过程离心模型试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014,(5):922-932
[6] FRACCAROLLO L, TORO E F. Experimental and Numerical Assessment of the Shallow Water Model for Two-dimensional Dam-break Type Problems[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1995, 33(6):843-864.
[7] 崔丹,槐文信,姜治兵. 溃坝洪水演进的数值模拟[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,(7):34-37.
[8] 夏军强,王光谦,LIN Bin-liang,等.复杂边界及实际地形上溃坝洪水流动过程模拟[J].水科学进展,2010,21(3):289-298.
[9] 杨志,冯民权. 溃口近区二维数值模拟与溃坝洪水演进耦合[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2015,(1):8-19.
[10]岳志远,曹志先,闫军.滑坡体溃决洪水数学模型研究[J].水动力学研究与进展,2008,23(5):492-500.
[11]李相南,陈祖煜. 两种溃坝模型在唐家山堰塞湖溃决模拟中的对比[J].水利水电科技进展, 2017,(2):20-26.
[12]YEE H C. Explicit and Implicit Multidimensional Compact High-resolution Shock-capturing Methods: Formulation[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1997,131(1):216-232.
[13]YEE H C, SJÖGREE B. Adaptive Filtering and Limiting in Compact High Order Methods for Multiscale Gas Dynamics and MHD Systems[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2008, 37(5):593-619.