Durability and Life Prediction of Recycled Concreteunder Sulfate Attack and Wet-dry Cycle

LIU Da-qing, CHEN Liang-liang, WANG Sheng-yun, HAO Guo-chen

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10) : 137-142.

PDF(4018 KB)
PDF(4018 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10) : 137-142. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20170397
HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE AND MATERIAL

Durability and Life Prediction of Recycled Concreteunder Sulfate Attack and Wet-dry Cycle

  • LIU Da-qing1, CHEN Liang-liang1,2, WANG Sheng-yun1, HAO Guo-chen1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

In this paper the durability and expected life of recycled concrete under the combined action of sulfate attack and cyclic wetting and drying were investigated. Specimens of different recycled coarse aggregate ratio, water-binder ratio, and fly ash content were soaked in Na2SO4 solution of 5% concentration for three days, and dried in room temperature for three days as a complete wet-dry cycle.The cubic compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and mass loss rate of original specimen and specimens after 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 times of wet-dry cycles were measured to determine the durability and predict the life expectancy of recycled concrete. Results revealed that both the compressive strength and the splitting tensile strength decreased with the increase of water-binder ratio.The corrosion resistance of recycled concrete against sulfate attack and wet-dry cycles can be improved by adding 20%-30% of fly ash.However, when the content of fly ash was 40%, the anti-corrosion effect was not good. A recycled coarse aggregate rate of 70%, water-binder ratio of 0.3, and fly ash content of 30% would result in a sound corrosion resistance against sulfate attack and cyclic wetting and drying and a durability of 128 years according to prediction model.

Key words

recycled concrete / wet-dry cycle / cubic compressive strength / splitting tensile strength / mass loss rate / life prediction

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Da-qing, CHEN Liang-liang, WANG Sheng-yun, HAO Guo-chen. Durability and Life Prediction of Recycled Concreteunder Sulfate Attack and Wet-dry Cycle[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2018, 35(10): 137-142 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20170397

References

[1] 侯景鹏,宋玉普,史 巍. 再生混凝土技术研究与应用开发[J]. 低温建筑技术,2001,(2):9-10.
[2] 肖建庄,雷斌.再生混凝土耐久性能研究[J]. 混凝土,2008,(8):83-89.
[3] 尚永康. 再生混凝土抗冻性及力学性能试验研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2010.
[4] 侯星宇. 再生混凝土研究综述[J]. 混凝土,2011,(7):97-98.
[5] 郑 宇,聂 玮. 再生混凝土的初步探讨[J]. 安徽建筑,2011,(4):78-79.
[6] 高润东,赵顺波,李庆斌,等. 干湿循环作用下混凝土硫酸盐侵蚀劣化机理试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2010,43(2):48-54.
[7] 闫宏生. 再生混凝土的硫酸盐腐蚀试验研究[J]. 混凝土,2013,(5):13-15.
[8] 李年维.硫酸盐侵蚀中钙矾石的形成机理及硫酸盐侵蚀预防措施[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2011,(4):124-128.
[9] 何 斌,韩鹏举,白晓红. 硫酸盐侵蚀下粉煤灰混凝土力学性能的试验研究[J]. 混凝土,2015,(4):22-25.
[10]梁咏宁,王 佳,林旭健. 掺合料对混凝土抗硫酸盐侵蚀能力的影响[J]. 混凝土,2011,(2):63-65.
[11]SANTHANAM M,COHEN M D,OLEK J.Mechanisms of Sulfate Attack:A Fresh Look.Part 2:Proposed Mechanisms[J].Cement and Concrete Research,2003,33(3):341-346.
[12]李 婷. 再生骨料缺陷对再生混凝土力学性能影响的研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2013.
[13]孙家国,许彬斌,古艳玲.基于高掺量粉煤灰再生混凝土性能试验研究. 混凝土,2016,(2):96-98.
[14]谢本怡. 再生骨料混凝土抗硫酸盐侵蚀性能研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学,2014.
[15]张 明,李 敏. 粉煤灰掺量对混凝土耐久性的影响[J]. 住宅与房地产,2017,(3):105-107.
[16]许 颖,刘 杰,唐天佑.高强再生骨料混凝土的耐久性能及影响因素研究[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品,2017,(2):1-8.
[17]谷艳玲.水胶比和粉煤灰取代率对混凝土强度影响规律的试验研究[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版),2016,(4):72-76.
[18]肖建庄,胡 博,丁 陶.再生混凝土早期抗开裂性能试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2015,(11):1649-1655.
[19]SANTHANAM M, COHEN M D, OLEK J.Sulfate Attack Research—Whither Now?[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2001, 31(6): 845-851.
[20]刘崇熙.坝工混凝土耐久寿命的衰变规律[J]. 长江科学院院报,2000,35(4):20-24.
PDF(4018 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/