Deformation and Failure Characteristics of Deep-buried Water Diversion Tunnel Crossing Active Fault Zone and Corresponding Adaptive Measures

ZHANG Guo-qiang, CUI Zhen, YAN Tian-you, ZHANG Mao-chu, LI Jian-he

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 152-161.

PDF(2573 KB)
PDF(2573 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 152-161. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20230935
Rock-Soil Engineering

Deformation and Failure Characteristics of Deep-buried Water Diversion Tunnel Crossing Active Fault Zone and Corresponding Adaptive Measures

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The safety of the tunnel traversing an active fault is a critical issue for the deep-buried long tunnel crossing the Tongcheng River in the Yangtze-to-Hanjiang River Diversion Project. This study addresses this challenge by employing an analysis of the geostress field and numerical simulation methods.Specifically,it examines the lining’s response in scenarios where adaptive structures are not utilized, estimates the design parameters for hinges, and verifies the lining’s behavior under these hinge parameters. Findings reveal that: 1) The angle between the horizontal principal stress and the tunnel axis is approximately 35°. The horizontal stress component along the tunnel axis is about 20 MPa, while the horizontal stress component perpendicular to the axis is around 21 MPa. The vertical stress component is approximately 18 MPa. 2) Without any fault mitigation measures,the tunnel’s relative deformation primarily exhibits convergence between the vault and floor. This convergence is most pronounced within the fault zone. The maximum principal stress values in the vault and floor occur in the fault zone and its affected area, with most of the lining in these regions experiencing damage. 3) Using the proposed method for estimating tunnel hinge design parameters, a reinforcement section length of 6 meters and a hinge section width of 2-4 cm are initially suggested. Following sensitivity analysis of these parameters, it is recommended that the reinforcement section length remains 6 meters, while the hinge section width is set to 5 cm. 4) When the tunnel is reinforced according to the proposed hinge structure parameters, the design effectively reduces the tension experienced by the entire lining in the fault zone. Under hinge design conditions, there is a significant decrease in relative deformation, stress levels, and lining damage. This demonstrates that the hinge structure enhances the tunnel’s resistance to fault-related issues.

Key words

long-distance water diversion project / water diversion tunnel / active fault / rupture response / hinged lining

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Guo-qiang , CUI Zhen , YAN Tian-you , et al . Deformation and Failure Characteristics of Deep-buried Water Diversion Tunnel Crossing Active Fault Zone and Corresponding Adaptive Measures[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(1): 152-161 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20230935

References

[1]
徐锡伟, 郭婷婷, 刘少卓, 等. 活动断层避让相关问题的讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(3):477-502.
Abstract
2008年汶川地震、2010年玉树地震、2014年鲁甸地震等大量震例研究表明,严重的地震灾害损失和人员伤亡主要源于发震断层的同震地表破裂、近断层的强地面运动和地基失效引起的建(构)筑物倒塌。因此,避让活动断层是有效减轻可能遭遇的地震灾害损失的一项重要措施。但如何避让活动断层和避让多少距离能够保证地面建(构)筑物不受活动断层同震错动引起的直接毁坏,一直是国内外学者争论的焦点科学问题。1)首先基于历史地震地表破裂资料,定量分析了活动断层同震地表破裂的局部化特征、同震地表破裂与建(构)筑物的破坏关系,得出了地震地表破裂带及其直接严重地震灾害带宽度的平均统计值约为30m的认识。2)通过1999年集集地震、2008年汶川地震等地表破裂带宽度资料和地震灾害空间分布关系的分析,指出了倾滑断层具有明显的上盘效应,断层上、下盘地表破裂带或严重地震灾害带宽度之比为2︰1至3︰1。3)基于上述分析获得的最新认识,进一步讨论了避让对象、活动断层定位要求、不同类型活动断层最小避让距离、特殊建(构)筑物避让和“抗断”设计理念等问题。最后,呼吁立法机构加强活动断层避让和活动断层探测的立法工作,规范活动断层上及其邻近地段土地利用规划和基础设施建设过程中合理避让活动断层的行为,防患于未然,提高中国防震减灾的基础能力。
(XU Xi-wei, GUO Ting-ting, LIU Shao-zhuo, et al. Discussion on Issues Associated with Setback Distance from Active Fault[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2016, 38(3):477-502. (in Chinese))

Living with disaster is an objective reality that human must face especially in China. A large number of earthquake case studies, such as the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, 2010 Yushu earthquake, 2014 Ludian earthquake, have demonstrated that earthquake heavy damage and casualties stem from ground-faulting or rupturing along seismogenic active fault, near-fault high ground accelerations and building catastrophic structural failure. Accordingly, avoidance of active faults may be an important measure to effectively reduce earthquake hazard, which may encounter in the future, but how to avoid an active fault and how much a setback distance from the active fault is required to ensure that the ground faulting and rupturing has no any direct impact on buildings. This has been the focus of debate both for domestic and foreign scholars. This paper, first of all, introduces the definition of active fault. Then, quantitative analyses are done of the high localization of earthquake surface ruptures and relationship between the localized feature of the coseismic surface ruptures and building damages associated with the measured widths of the historical earthquake surface rupture zones, and an average sstatistic width is obtained to be 30m both for the earthquake surface rupture zones and heavy damage zones along the seismogenic fault. Besides, the widths of the surface rupture zones and spatial distribution of the building damages of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake and 2008 Wenchuan earthquake have also been analyzed to reveal a hanging-wall effect:Width of surface rupture zone or building damage zone on the hanging-wall is 2 or 3 times wider than that on its foot-wall for a dip-slip fault. Based on these latest knowledge learnt above, issues on avoidance object, minimum setback distance, location requirement of active fault for avoidance, and anti-faulting design for buildings in the surface rupture zone are further discussed. Finally, we call for national and local legislatures to accelerate the legislation for active fault survey and avoidance to normalize fault hazard zoning for general land-use planning and building construction. This preventive measure is significantly important to improve our capability of earthquake disaster reduction.

[2]
薛翊国, 孔凡猛, 杨为民, 等. 川藏铁路沿线主要不良地质条件与工程地质问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(3): 445-468.
(XUE Ling-guo, KONG Fan-meng, YANG Wei-min, et al. Main Unfavorable Geological Conditions and Engineering Geological Problems along Sichuan—Tibet Railway[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(3): 445-468. (in Chinese))
[3]
张新辉, 付平, 尹健民, 等. 滇中引水工程香炉山隧洞地应力特征及其活动构造响应[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(1): 130-139.
(ZHANG Xin-hui, FU Ping, YIN Jian-min, et al. In-situ Stress Characteristics and Active Tectonic Response of Xianglushan Tunnel of Middle Yunnan Water Diversion Project[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(1):130-139. (in Chinese))
[4]
王威, 任青文. 活动断裂对深埋隧洞影响的研究概述[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2006, 26(1): 175-180.
(WANG Wei, REN Qing-wen. General Introduction to the Effect of Active Fault on Deeply Buried Tunnel[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2006, 26(1): 175-180. (in Chinese))
[5]
丁秀丽, 张雨霆, 张传健, 等. 隧洞穿越活动断层应对措施及其适应性研究综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 20-35.
(DING Xiu-li, ZHANG Yu-ting, ZHANG Chuan-jian, et al. Review on Countermeasures and Their Adaptability Evaluation to Tunnels Crossing Active Faults[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 20-35. (in Chinese))
[6]
张威, 李明, 姬云平, 等. 青海门源M6.9地震典型隧道破坏特征分析与启示[J]. 地震工程学报, 2022, 44(3): 661-669.
(ZHANG Wei, LI Ming, JI Yun-ping, et al. Analysis and Enlightenment of Typical Failure Characteristics of Tunnels Caused by the Menyuan M6.9 Earthquake in Qinghai Province[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2022, 44(3): 661-669. (in Chinese))
[7]
崔光耀, 伍修刚, 王明年, 等. 汶川8.0级大地震公路隧道震害调查与震害特征[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2017, 54(2): 9-16.
(CUI Guang-yao, WU Xiu-gang, WANG Ming-nian, et al. Earthquake Damages and Characteristics of Highway Tunnels in the 8.0-magnitude Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2017, 54(2): 9-16. (in Chinese))
[8]
陈宇龙, 黄栋. 正断层与逆断层错动引起的上覆黏土变形特性离心试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(增刊1):189-194.
(CHEN Yu-long, HUANG Dong. Centrifuge Test of Deformation Characteristics of Overburden Clay Subjected to Normal and Reverse Fault Rupture[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(Supp.1): 189-194. (in Chinese))
[9]
蔡奇鹏, 吴宏伟, 胡平, 等. 跨越走滑断层黏土地层动力响应离心机试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(7):2424-2432.
(CAI Qi-peng, WU Hong-wei, HU Ping, et al. Centrifuge Experimental Study of Dynamic Responses of Clay Stratum Overlying a Strike-slip Fault[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(7): 2424-2432. (in Chinese))
[10]
骆冠勇, 吴宏伟, 蔡奇鹏. 地层错动引起的上覆砂层变形特性的离心试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(8):1649-1656.
(LUO Guan-yong, WU Hong-wei, CAI Qi-peng. Centrifuge Experimental Study of Deformation Characteristics of Overlying Sand Induced by Fault Rupture[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(8):1649-1656. (in Chinese))
[11]
徐诗蒙, 陈新民, 黄莹, 等. 断层倾角对隧道影响振动台模型试验[J]. 南京工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(6): 69-74, 124.
(XU Shi-meng, CHEN Xin-min, HUANG Ying, et al. Shaking Table Test in Tunnel through Fault with Different Dip Angles[J]. Journal of Nanjing Tech University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 37(6): 69-74, 124. (in Chinese))
[12]
刘学增, 林亮伦. 75°倾角逆断层黏滑错动对公路隧道影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(12): 2523-2530.
(LIU Xue-zeng, LIN Liang-lun. Research on Model Experiment of Effect of Thrust Fault with 75°Dip Angle Stick-Slip Dislocation on Highway Tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(12): 2523-2530. (in Chinese))
[13]
刘学增, 王煦霖, 林亮伦. 60°倾角正断层黏滑错动对山岭隧道影响的试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47(2): 121-129.
(LIU Xue-zeng, WANG Xu-lin, LIN Liang-lun. Model Experimental Study on Influence of Normal Fault with 60° Dip Angle Stick-Slip Dislocation on Mountain Tunnel[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(2): 121-129. (in Chinese))
[14]
陈斌辉. 跨活断层公路隧道损伤规律研究[J]. 河南科技, 2023, 42(10): 59-62.
(CHEN Bin-hui. Study on Damage Law of Highway Tunnel Crossing Active Fault[J]. Henan Science and Technology, 2023, 42(10): 59-62. (in Chinese))
[15]
赵伯明, 赵天次, 周玉书. 跨活断层隧道抗拉错精细化分析方法研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2022, 44(8): 146-157.
(ZHAO Bo-ming, ZHAO Tian-ci, ZHOU Yu-shu. Research on Refined Analysis Method for Dislocation Resistance of Tunnels Across Active Fault[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2022, 44(8): 146-157. (in Chinese))
[16]
张建, 陈宏斌, 王永刚, 等. 隧道穿越活动断层抗拉错量研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16(增刊1):297-302.
(ZHANG Jian, CHEN Hong-bin, WANG Yong-gang, et al. Research on Anti-dislocation Amount of Tunnel Crossing Active Fault[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020,16(Supp. 1):297-302. (in Chinese))
[17]
张伟喜. 乌鲁木齐地铁1号线穿越活动地质断层的技术措施[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2017, 30(2): 58-62.
(ZHANG Wei-xi. Technical Measures of Crossing Active Geological Fault Adopted for Line 1 of Urumqi Metro[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2017, 30(2): 58-62. (in Chinese))
[18]
戈秦松. 川藏线康玉隧道穿越活断层区抗错断技术研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2021.
(GE Qin-song. Study on Anti-fault Technology of Kangyu Tunnel Crossing Active Fault Area on Sichuan-Tibet Line[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2021. (in Chinese))
[19]
未征. 柿子园隧道穿越映秀-北川活动断裂段施工技术[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2020(2): 99-102, 114.
(WEI Zheng. Construction Technology for Shiziyuan Tunnel Crossing Yingxiu-Beichuan Active Fault Section[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2020(2): 99-102, 114. (in Chinese))
PDF(2573 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/