A meandering channel model with variable-height sediment barriers at its outlet is designed to research the effect of base-level fall on riverbed evolution in a meandering riverway. The instantaneous flow velocity and water level data at 13 characteristic cross-sections and the digital elevations of bed surfaces were measured by an acoustic Doppler velocimeter and a digital water level altimeter and a handheld laser scanner, respectively. The experimental results showed that the static armoring layer protects the riverbed and resists the increasing flow intensity caused by a small extent of base-level fall. When the base-level falls to a larger extent, the riverbed will be eroded globally. But the erosion extent varies in local areas: the mainstream areas in the straight-line crossover segments are eroded slightly, while the mainstream head-on areas near the concave sides are eroded largely. The closer to the base level, the easier will the base-level fall enhance the flow intensity, and hence the easier the riverbed is to be eroded. When the base-level falls slightly and the flume bottom is not exposed, the elevation frequency distribution of bed surface in a complete meander is close to a normal distribution on the whole; but if we look into the details, the distribution presents a double peak. Double peak is specifically featured by the elevation frequency distribution of bed surface in a half meander; the double peak corresponding to a complete meander is merely a superposition generated by that of two half meanders. When the base level falls to the flume bottom, the flume bottoms near the mainstream head-on areas will be seriously exposed, and the elevation frequency distribution of bed surface in a complete meander also presents a double-peak characteristic, but its overall shape has obviously deviated from a normal distribution.
Key words
meandering channel /
base-level fall /
riverbed evolution /
armoring layer /
elevation frequency distribution of bed surface
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 王兆印, 李昌志, 王费新. 潼关高程对渭河河床演变的影响[J]. 水利学报, 2004, 35(9): 1-8.
[2] OUIMET W B, WHIPPLE K X, GRANGER D E. Beyond Threshold Hillslopes: Channel Adjustment to Base-Level Fall in Tectonically Active Mountain Ranges[J]. Geology, 2009, 37(7): 579-582.
[3] MERRITTS D, WALTER R, RAHNIS M, et al. Anthropocene Streams and Base-level Controls from Historic Dams in the Unglaciated Mid-Atlantic Region, USA[J]. Philosophical Transactions Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 2011, 369(1938): 976-1009.
[4] 李昌志, 王兆印, 吴保生, 等. 潼关高程下降对渭河下游河床演变的影响[J]. 泥沙研究, 2005(2): 45-53.
[5] COOK S J, QUINCEY D J, BRASINGTON J. Geomorphology of the Rees Valley, Otago, New Zealand[J]. Journal of Maps, 2014, 10(1): 136-150.
[6] 王之晗, 夏 叶, 于合理, 等. 侵蚀基准面对石亭江双盛段河床演变的影响[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2017, 49(增刊2): 67-73.
[7] 向诗月, 程和琴, 滕立志. 鄱阳湖流域侵蚀基准面近期变化及其影响[J]. 泥沙研究, 2021, 46(5): 48-54.
[8] 许 栋, 白玉川, 谭 艳. 正弦派生曲线弯道中水沙运动特性动床试验[J]. 天津大学学报, 2010, 43(9): 762-770.
[9] 胡旭跃, 张青松, 马利军. 过渡段对连续弯道水流影响的数值模拟[J]. 水科学进展, 2011, 22(6): 851-858.
[10] PAN Y W, LIU X, YANG K. Effects of Discharge on the Velocity Distribution and Riverbed Evolution in a Meandering Channel[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 607: 127539.