Dynamic elastic modulus and damping ratio are two of the most important parameters in soil dynamic analysis. In this paper, we studied the methods of multi-stage test on remolded clay with varying confining pressure and consolidation ratio by using dynamic triaxial instrument. In consideration of pre-consolidation pressure, we put forward two test methods and obtained the dynamic elastic modulus and damping ratio and then compared them with those from conventional method. We found that the dynamic elastic modulus and damping ratio obtained by method 1 differed slightly from those by conventional method, while the dynamic elastic modulus by method 2 was larger than that by conventional method. Therefore method 1 could effectively save the number of samples compared with conventional method. Furthermore, we analyzed the influence of vibration frequency on the dynamic elastic modulus based on the theory of viscous element, and obtained the effect of frequency on the dynamic characteristics of clay through the tests. Finally, we studied a multi-stage frequency test method on one single sample and propose that the dynamic load test with large frequency has little effect on the subsequent test with small frequency; but the dynamic load test with small frequency would have impact on the following test with large frequency, resulting in attenuation of dynamic elastic modulus and decrease in maximum damping ratio. The results of multi-stage frequency test following the sequence of large frequency and then small frequency are consistent with those of conventional test. The research results are helpful to improving the soil dynamic test technology and have positive effect on dynamic characteristics research.
Key words
dynamic triaxial test /
multi-stage loading /
remolded clay /
dynamic elastic modulus /
damping ratio /
vibration frequency
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 何昌荣.动模量和阻尼的动三轴试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,1997, 19(2): 39-48.
[2] 郭 莹, 刘 洋.确定动模量与阻尼比的试验技术研究[C]∥第七届全国土动力学学术会议论文集.北京:清华大学出版社,2006:266-269.
[3] 聂 影,肖启华,梁义聪. 重塑黏土和原状粉质黏土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 重庆建筑大学学报,2008,30(6):66-71.
[4] 王权民,李 刚,陈正汉,等. 厦门砂土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学,2005,26(10):1628-1632.
[5] DRNEVICH V P, RICHART F E. Dynamic Prestraining of Dry Sand[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 1970, 96(2): 453-467.
[6] 尚守平, 刘方成, 杜运兴, 等. 应变累积对黏土动剪模量和阻尼比影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(5):683-688.
[7] WICHTMANN T, TRIANTAFYLLIDIS T H. Influence of a Cyclic and Dynamic Loading History on Dynamic Properties of Dry Sand, Part I: Cyclic and Dynamic Torsional Prestraining[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 24(2): 127-147.
[8] 张 茹, 涂扬举, 费文平, 等. 振动频率对饱和黏性土动力特性的影响 [J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(5):699-704.
[9] YASUHARA K, YAMANOUCHI T, HIRAO K. Cyclic Strength and Deformation of Normally Consolidated Clay[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1982, 22(3):77-79.
[10] MATSUI T, ITO T, OHARA H. Cyclic Stress-strain History and Shear Characteristics of Clay[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1980, 106(10):1101-1120.
[11] BROWN S F, LASHINE A K F, HYDE A F L. Repeated Load Triaxial Testing of a Silty Clay[J]. Géotechnique, 1975, 25(1):95-114.
[12] HARDIN B O, DRNEVICH V P. Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils: Measurement and Parameter Effects[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1972, 98(6): 603-624.
Funding
国家自然科学基金项目(51378403); 国家科技支撑计划课题项目(2014BAL05B07)