The present study aims to provide basis for the temperature and crack control of mass concrete by investigating the difference of hydration heat between low-heat Portland cement and mineral-mixed cementitious material. Firstly, the processes of hydration heat release in low-heat Portland cement and mineral-mixed cementitious material were determined via direct method. According to the calculated hydration heat release curve and hydration rate curve, the differences between the two in terms of hydration law were analyzed. Furthermore, the hydration processes were characterized by the integral equations of Krstulovic-Dabic model in three stages and the differences in the process of hydration were further studied. Research results show that in the early stage of hydration, the hydration heat of cementitious material with slag was lower than that of low-heat Portland cement, but was higher than that of low-heat Portland cement in the later stage; compared with those of low-heat Portland cement, the initial and final setting time was delayed and the accelerating period and the deceleration period was prolonged by adding a certain amount of mineral admixture. In addition, in nucleation and crystal growth period (NG), hydration resistance increased as the n value became larger, and the initial setting time was delayed; as the kNG value climbed, rate of hydration increased and the acceleration period shortened, so that the final setting time was in advance; while in the phase boundary reaction period (I) and diffusion period (D), the greater values of kI and kD, the faster hydration speed and the longer deceleration period would be.
Key words
mass concrete /
low-heat Portland cement /
cementitious material /
hydration heat /
Krstulovic-Dabic model /
thermal properties /
hydration process
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 冯乃谦. 混凝土与混凝土结构的耐久性. 北京: 机械工程出版社, 2009.
[2]DE FREITAS J A T, CUONG P T, FARIA R,et al. Modelling of Cement Hydration in Concrete Structures with Hybrid Finite Elements. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2013, 77(3): 16-30.
[3]SAKATA K.A Study on Moisture Diffusion in Drying and Drying Shrinkage of Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 1983, 13(2): 216–224.
[4]杨和礼. 原材料对基础大体积混凝土裂缝的影响与控制. 武汉:武汉大学, 2004.
[5]熊华飞. 一次性浇筑厚尺寸承台大体积混凝土温控防裂研究. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2013.
[6]张旭龙. 水泥基材料水化热动力学研究. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2011.
[7]谢莎莎. 水泥-火山灰质胶凝体系水化机理研究. 武汉:长江科学院, 2011.
[8]KNUDSEN T. On Particle Size Distribution in Cement Hydration∥第七届国际水泥化学论文选集.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1995:169-231.
[9]吴学权. 矿渣水泥水化动力学的研究. 硅酸盐学报, 1988, 16(5): 423-428.
[10]KRSTULOVIC R, DABIC P.A Conceptual Model of the Cement Hydration Process. Cement Concrete Research, 2000, 30(5): 693-698.
[11]阎培渝, 郑 峰. 水泥基材料的水化动力学模型. 硅酸盐学报, 2006, 34(5): 555-559.
[12]文 静, 余红发, 吴成友, 等. 氯氧镁水泥水化历程的影响因素及水化动力学. 硅酸盐学报, 2013, 41(5): 588-596.
[13]袁润章. 胶凝材料学. 2版.武汉: 武汉理工大学出版社, 1996.
[14]GB/T 12959—2008,水泥水化热测定方法. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.