长江科学院院报 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 21-26.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2013.06.006

• 水土保持与生态建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京市转河生态修复评价

郭维1，2，高甲荣1，樊华2，王越1，顾岚1，刘培斌2   

  1. 1.北京林业大学 水土保持和荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室，北京100083；
    2.北京市水利规划设计研究院，北京 100048
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-01 修回日期:2013-06-04 出版日期:2013-06-04 发布日期:2013-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 高甲荣(1963-)，男，陕西韩城人，教授，主要从事水土保持研究，（电话）010-82308012（电子信箱）jiaronggao@sohu.com
  • 作者简介:郭维(1988-)，男，贵州毕节人，硕士研究生，主要从事山地灾害防治工程研究，（电话）15811017430（电子信箱）gw.huangyu@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国际科技合作项目(2009DFA32490) ；北京市水利规划设计研究院永定河生态构建与修复技术研究及示范项目（D090409004009003）

Assessment of Ecological Restoration of Zhuanhe River in Beijing

GUO Wei1, GAO Jia rong1, FAN Hua2, WANG Yue1, GU Lan1, LIU Pei bin2   

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating of the Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Beijing Institute of Water, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2012-05-01 Revised:2013-06-04 Online:2013-06-04 Published:2013-06-04

PDF

2363

摘要： 城市河流健康状况直接影响到人们的生活质量，因此其修复问题也越来越受到关注。研究通过对修复后的转河进行实地调查，共选择10个调查样点，以气味、流速比、水深比、河岸的坡度、坡长、河宽、河岸材质、河床材质、植物种类和盖度、底栖生物的多样性指数、防洪功能、公众满意程度、可亲水度为评价指标，并结合权重分析法和专家打分法确定各指标的权重，对转河的修复效果作出评价。经分析得出转河的综合评价得分为2.75，属中上等水平。其中，上游河段评分较高，修复措施完善，河流生态功能和社会功能基本恢复；下游河段评分较低，主要是受地形影响，河流两岸仍是竖直硬质护岸，阻隔河水交换，进而影响河流水质和生物多样性的恢复。

关键词: 城市河流, 转河, 生态修复, 评价

Abstract: Since urban river health affects the quality of citizen’s life, river restoration has received increasing concerns. A field survey on Zhuanhe River which had been restored was carried out and ten sampling points were selected. Investigation factors including odor, flow speed ratio, water depth ratio, bank slope gradient, bank slope length, river width, bank protection material, riverbed material, plant species and coverage, benthos diversity index, flood control function, public satisfaction degree, and water closeness degree were chosen as evaluation indexes. Weighted analysis method combined with expert scoring method were emloyed to determine the weights of the indexes and to assess the restoration result. Results showed that the comprehensive assessment score was 2.75 which is better than average level. In detail, the score of the upstream was higher than that of the downstream, which indicated that the measures in the upstream are more complete and the river’s ecological function and social function have better recovered in the upstream; while in the downstream, due to terrain influence, vertical hard bank revetment can cut off the water exchange and further affect the recovery of river water quality and biological diversity.

Key words: urban river, Zhuanhe River, ecological restoration, assessment

*严禁使用本系统存储、处理、传输涉密信息*
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持：support@magtech.com.cn