江西省河长制效能分级分区评价体系构建

张磊, 谢颂华, 莫明浩

长江科学院院报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11) : 16-22.

PDF(5458 KB)
PDF(5458 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11) : 16-22. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20221219
河湖保护与治理

江西省河长制效能分级分区评价体系构建

  • 张磊1,2, 谢颂华1, 莫明浩1
作者信息 +

Construction of Graded and Zonal Evaluation System for the Effectiveness of River Chief System in Jiangxi Province

  • ZHANG Lei1,2, XIE Song-hua1, MO Ming-hao1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为实现河长制分级分区评价,提出行政分级和地形地貌分区相结合的矩阵化效能评价模式,从河长制的六大任务和社会公众等7个方面分别构建市县(18个指标)、乡村(16个指标)2个级别的河长制效能评价指标体系,利用层次分析法得出山丘区、平原和滨湖区2个区域不同特性的指标权重,建立二级模糊综合评价模型对江西省赣州市、南昌市、上犹县、樟树市、梅水乡和张家山街道等典型区域进行评价,评价结果分别为好、中、好、好、中、好。结果表明:在山丘区,水资源保护是影响各级河长制效能的主要因素,水生态修复影响了赣州市、上犹县效能,水污染防治影响了上犹县、梅水乡效能,而在平原和滨湖区水污染防治是影响各级河长制效能的主要因素,此外水资源保护影响了南昌市、樟树市效能,水生态修复影响了樟树市效能。结果与实际情况基本一致,表明该评价体系适用于河长制效能分级分区评价。

Abstract

To evaluate the river chief system in different levels and zones, we propose a matrix-based efficiency evaluation model that combines administrative grading with terrain and geomorphic zoning. Our evaluation index system for the river chief system is constructed based on seven aspects, including the six tasks of the river chief system and public involvement. We divide the index system into two levels: city and county level (18 indicators) and town and village level (16 indicators). We employ the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine the index weights for different characteristics of mountain and hilly areas, as well as plain and lakeside areas, and subsequently, we establish a two-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model to evaluate representative regions such as Ganzhou City, Nanchang City, Shangyou County, Zhangshu County, Meishui Town, and Zhangjiashan Street in Jiangxi Province. The evaluation results for these regions are categorized as good, medium, good, good, medium, and good, respectively. Our findings indicate that in hilly areas, the efficiency of the river chief system at all levels is mainly affected by water resource protection, whereas water ecological restoration influences the effectiveness of the system in Ganzhou City and Shangyou County. Additionally, water pollution control affects the effectiveness of the system in Shangyou County and Meishui Town. On the other hand, in plain and lakeside areas, water pollution control is identified as the primary factor impacting the efficiency of the river chief system at all levels. Water resource protection affects the effectiveness of the system in Nanchang City and Zhangshu County, while water ecological restoration also influences the effect in Zhangshu County. The evaluation results align well with the actual situation, affirming the suitability of our evaluation system for grading and zoning the efficiency of the river chief system.

关键词

河长制 / 效能 / 分级分区 / 评价体系 / 市县级 / 乡村级 / 山丘区 / 平原和滨湖区

Key words

river chief system / effectiveness / grading and zoning / evaluation system / city and county level / town and village level / mountain and hilly area / plain and lakeside area

引用本文

导出引用
张磊, 谢颂华, 莫明浩. 江西省河长制效能分级分区评价体系构建[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2023, 40(11): 16-22 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20221219
ZHANG Lei, XIE Song-hua, MO Ming-hao. Construction of Graded and Zonal Evaluation System for the Effectiveness of River Chief System in Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2023, 40(11): 16-22 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20221219
中图分类号: TV213.4   

参考文献

[1] 吕兰军. 丰水地区节水对策研究: 以江西省为例[J]. 水利发展研究, 2015, 15(4): 11-14, 21.
[2] 王美慧, 唐德善, 尚 静. 基于G1-EVM-SPA模型的河长制实施效果及协调发展度评价[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2022(1): 21-27.
[3] 唐新玥,唐德善,常文倩,等. 基于云模型的区域河长制考核评价模型[J]. 水资源保护,2019,35(1):41-46.
[4] 李慧敏,陈 星,许 钦,等. 基于河长制的河流健康与可持续利用评价[J].中国农村水利水电,2020(9): 157-162.
[5] 王渊博, 杜冬阳, 常文娟, 等. 基于AHP-模糊评价的广州市河长管理效能评价研究[J]. 人民珠江, 2022, 43(2): 61-69.
[6] 余晓彬, 唐德善. 基于AHP-EVM的江苏省全面推行河长制成效评价[J]. 人民黄河, 2020, 42(11): 63-68, 73.
[7] 张 磊. 基于模糊评价的基层河长制实施成效评价[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(11): 8-13.
[8] 王冠军, 刘 卓, 郎劢贤, 等. 河长制湖长制成效评价及思考[J]. 中国水利, 2021(2): 15-18.
[9] 韩 美, 李艳红, 李海亭, 等. 山东寿光沿海湿地生态系统健康诊断[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2006, 16(4): 78-83.
[10] 冯 彦, 何大明, 杨丽萍. 河流健康评价的主评指标筛选[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(3): 389-398.
[11] SL/Z 738—2016,水生态文明城市建设评价导则[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2016.
[12] 胡 芳, 刘聚涛, 温春云, 等. 江西省水生态文明镇评价方法及其应用研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2018(4): 58-62.
[13] 温春云, 刘聚涛, 胡 芳, 等. 江西水生态文明县评价方法构建及其应用[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(增刊2): 49-53.
[14] 莫明浩, 谢颂华, 张 磊, 等. 南方红壤侵蚀区生态清洁小流域评价研究: 以江西省为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(6): 1016-1023.
[15] GB/T 32000—2015,美丽乡村建设指南[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2015.
[16] 陈 进. 把脉长江水资源: 二谈长江水资源利用和保护[J]. 中国水利, 2016(14): 62-64.
[17] 栾华龙, 刘同宦, 杨文俊, 等. 鄱阳湖五河及湖区生态岸坡及滨水带综合治理关键技术体系初探[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(6): 137-142.
[18] 彭 欢, 韩 青, 曹菊萍, 等. 太湖流域片河湖长制考核评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国水利, 2019(6): 11-15, 5.
[19] 陈淑霞, 石 林, 吴凤平, 等. 河长制背景下丰水山区样板河建设和谐度评价: 以湘西芷江县县级河流为例[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(11): 28-33.
[20] 章运超, 王家生, 朱孔贤, 等. 基于TOPSIS模型的河长制绩效评价研究: 以江苏省为例[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(1): 237-242.
[21] 严子奇, 周祖昊, 温天福. 大湖流域水生态文明特征与评价体系研究: 以鄱阳湖流域为例[J]. 水利水电技术, 2018, 49(3): 97-105.

基金

江西省科技厅重大科技研发专项(20213AAG01012-12);江西水利科技重大项目(201821ZDKT19) ;江西省水利行业地方标准项目(202324BZKT01);江西省科协决策咨询青年课题(20230209)

PDF(5458 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/