Performance of Electrokinetic Removal of Cadmium from Contaminated Soil Treated with CaCl2-Humic Acid

HU Yan-ping; WANG Zhen-hua; LI Qing-yun; TANG Xian-qiang; ZHANG Di-meng

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20200498

PDF(4259 KB)

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8) : 60-65. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20200498

WATER-SOIL CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION

Performance of Electrokinetic Removal of Cadmium from Contaminated Soil Treated with CaCl₂-Humic Acid

HU Yan-ping^1,2, WANG Zhen-hua^1,2, LI Qing-yun^1,2, TANG Xian-qiang^1,2, ZHANG Di-meng^1,2

Author information +

History +

Abstract

In an attempt to enhance the removal of Cadmium(Cd) from paddy field soil and meanwhile alleviate the influence on soil's pH value, we conducted electrokinetic removal test with CaCl₂-humic acid solution activating the mobility of Cd in soil. We observed the changes in the content of available Cd and the pH value of soil by changing the concentration of CaCl₂-humic acid and the time of activation. In addition, we examined the changes in the removed content of Cd, the total concentration of Cd , the concentration of available-state Cd, and the pH value of soil after activation and electrokinetic drainage. Results manifest that the solution with 0.5% CaCl₂ and 1% humic acid has an optimum activation effect on the Cd in soil, by raising the available-state Cd from 0.3 mg/kg to 0.44 mg/kg and cutting the pH value by only 0.4. After the drainage of the overlying water, Cd can be further removed by electrokinetic drainage. The electrokinetic removal content of Cd was about three times that in the overlying water. After both activation and electrokinetic drainage, the total content of Cd dropped from 1.72 mg/kg to about 1.20 mg/kg, the content of available-state Cd declined to 0.27-0.31 mg/kg, while the pH value of each section of the soil was relatively uniform and barely changed, ranging between 5.45 and 6.30. The present research method could maximize the removal of Cd in soil while reducing the impact on pH value, which ensures the safe production of crops.

Key words

cadmium in paddy soil / removal performance / CaCl₂-humic acid / activation / electrokinetic geosynthetics (EKG) / electrokinetic drainage

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

HU Yan-ping, WANG Zhen-hua, LI Qing-yun, TANG Xian-qiang, ZHANG Di-meng. Performance of Electrokinetic Removal of Cadmium from Contaminated Soil Treated with CaCl₂-Humic Acid[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2021, 38(8): 60-65 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20200498

References

[1] 陈楠,谢湉,周歆, 等. 原位化学淋洗技术对湖南省重金属复合污染稻田土壤处理效果研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2015,43(28):247-249,274.
[2] 纪雄辉, 梁永超, 鲁艳红, 等. 污染稻田水分管理对水稻吸收积累镉的影响及其作用机理[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(9):3930-3939.
[3] 董萌,赵运林,库文珍,等. 蒌蒿(Artemisia selengensis L.)修复洞庭湖土壤Cd污染的强化措施研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(7):937-944.
[4] 温东东,付融冰,张卫, 等. 不锈钢电极对重金属污染土壤的强化电动修复及电极腐蚀结晶现象与机制[J]. 环境科学,2017,38(3):1209-1217.
[5] ZHOU D M, CANG L, DENG C F. Electrokinetic Processes of Chromium in Yellow Brown Soil as Affected by Hydrogen Peroxide[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2005, 42(1):59-63.
[6] REDDY K R , CHINTHAMREDDY S. Effects of Initial Form of Chromium on Electrokinetic Remediation in Clays[J]. Advances in Environmental Research, 2003, 7(2): 353-365.
[7] PASCAL S, GITYE K, ALLARDB. Speciation and Transport of Heavy Metals and Macroelements during Electroremediation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(1):177-181.
[8] TANG X Q, LI Q Y, WU M, et al. Review of Remediation Practices Regarding Cadmium-enriched Farmland Soil with Particular Reference to China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 181: 646-662.
[9] YEUNG A T.Contaminant Extractability by Electrokinetics[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2006, 23(1): 202-224.
[10]YEUNG A T. Remediation Technologies for Contaminated Sites[M]//CHEN Y, TANG X, ZHAN L. Advances in Environmental Geotechnics. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2009: 328-369.
[11]陈春乐,田甜,王果.淋洗对农田土壤镉铅锌的去除、移动性和有效性的影响[J].安全与环境学报,2019,19(2):674-682.
[12]李玉姣. 有机酸和无机盐复合淋洗修复Cd、Pb污染农田土壤的研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2015.
[13]罗希, 林莉,李青云,等.镉污染稻田土壤土柱淋洗修复研究[J].长江科学院院报,2017,34(6):24-28,34.
[14]OH S,BADE R,LEE H,et al. Risk Assessment of Metal (Loid)-contaminated Soils before and after Soil Washing[J].Environmental Earth Science,2015,74(1):703-713.
[15]刘培亚. Cd、Pb重度污染农田土壤化学淋洗及淋洗污水处理的研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2015.
[16]UDOVIC M, LESTAN D. Pb, Zn and Cd Mobility, Availability and Fractionation in Aged Soil Remediated by EDTA Leaching[J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 74(10): 1367-1373.
[17]陈楠. 土壤pH对镉在土壤-水稻系统中的迁移、积累与分布的影响[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2018.
[18]张振兴, 纪雄辉, 谢运河, 等. 水稻不同生育期施用生石灰对稻米镉含量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(10):1867-1872.
[19]邓小华,陈金,李玉辉,等.酸化土壤修复中石灰施用量的确定方法:中国,CN108664755A[P].2018-10-16.
[20]何电源. 稻田土壤合理施用石灰的研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 1989(增刊1):19-24.
[21]王洪. 氯化钙及黄腐酸盐对镉污染水稻田土壤的淋洗修复[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2017.
[22]柏宏成. 低分子有机酸、腐殖酸对土壤镉污染淋洗修复研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2015.
[23]胡艳平,王振华,汤显强, 等.基于EKG电动脱水去除稻田土壤重金属Cd的试验研究[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(5):23-27.
[24]盖荣银, 孙友宝, 马晓玲, 等. 二乙烯三胺五乙酸提取结合火焰原子吸收光谱法测定土壤中的有效态元素[J]. 环境化学, 2016(5):1096-1097.
[25]廉梅花. 根际土壤中重金属的活化因素及作用机理研究[D].沈阳:东北大学,2016.
[26]李颖. 水体中重金属、腐殖酸和粘土颗粒物之间的相互作用研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2010.
[27]胡园, 林莉, 胡艳平, 等. 农田土壤重金属Cd的环保淋洗剂筛选研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2019, 36(9):23-28.
[28]冯源. 城市污水污泥电动脱水机理试验研究及多场耦合作用理论分析[D].杭州:浙江大学,2012.
[29]CHAVEZ E, HE Z L, STOFFELLA P J, et al. Chemical Speciation of Cadmium: An Approach to Evaluate Plant-available Cadmium in Ecuadorian Soils under Cacao Production[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 150: 57-62.
[30]RAURET G. Extraction Procedures for the Determination of Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soil and Sediment[J]. Talanta, 1998, 46(3): 449-455.
[31]GÜNGÖR E B Ö, BEKBÖLET M. Zinc Release by Humic and Fulvic Acid as Influenced by pH, Complexation and DOC Sorption[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 159(1):131-138.
[32]沈欣, 朱奇宏, 朱捍华,等. 农艺调控措施对水稻镉积累的影响及其机理研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(8):1449-1454.
[33]万玉山,沈梦,陈艳秋,等.Cd污染土壤的电动修复及其强化[J].环境工程学报,2018,12(7):2075-2083.