The influence of cyclic drying and wetting on shear parameters (cohesion and internal friction angle) must be identified in calculating the earth pressure of filling by Xigeda soil involved with water. The shear stress-displacement curve of Xigeda soil was acquired from consolidated drained shear test under cyclic drying and wetting. Soil specimens were humidified by vacuum saturation and dehumidified in natural status to simulate the drying-wetting progress. The variations of peak shear stress, cohesion and internal friction angle with the number of drying-wetting cycles were analyzed. Furthermore, the relationship between macroscopic and microcosmic parameters was discussed by the parallel contact model, and the differences between bond and friction characteristics among micro particles were revealed. Test results showed that the wetting action reduced the cohesion and internal friction angle of the soil. As the number of drying-wetting cycles increased, the stress-displacement curves displayed strain hardening features to strain softening features, and peak strength, cohesion and internal friction angle all decreased and tended to be stable. In the first three cycles, cohesion decreased by 55.42%, while from the second to the forth cycle, internal friction angle decreased by 11.04%. The effect of drying-wetting cycle on cohesion was apparently greater than that on internal friction, and the deterioration effect on internal friction angle delayed. We recommend to weaken the influence of drying-wetting cycles on the mechanical properties of Xigeda soil by means from the aspect of the bonding effect among micro particles.
Key words
Xigeda soil /
dry-wet cycle /
shear properties /
shear parameter /
peak strength
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 第四纪冰川考察队. 西南第四纪昔格达组的初步研究. 北京: 地质出版社, 1977.
[2] 阮小龙, 黄双华, 罗 强. 不同石灰配合比对昔格达土性能的影响试验研究. 西华大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 33(1): 99-103.
[3] 彭盛恩.昔格达组粘土的工程地质特性研究. 水文地质工程地质, 1986(2): 16-18,2.
[4] 张瑞端, 郭长宝, 孙进忠, 等. 雅西高速冕宁段主要地质灾害类型及发育规律. 地质力学学报, 2013, 19(4): 364-376.
[5] 王英杰, 朱宝龙, 郭华伟, 等. 溯源侵蚀作用下昔格达地层土质边坡的稳定性. 水土保持通报, 2014, 34(5): 25-28,33.
[6] 周 罕, 曹 平, 张 科. 昔格达组黏土岩和粉砂岩现场直剪试验研究. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(10): 3544-3550.
[7] 余明东. 泥岩含量对昔格达土填料路用性质的影响研究. 工程地质学报, 2017, 25(2): 317-321.
[8] 周洪福, 聂德新, 钟华介. 昔格达土用作高速公路路基填料的工艺试验.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 40(1): 59-65.
[9] 王维早, 许 强. 昔格达土路基填料压实度影响因素的试验研究. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 29(6): 934-937.
[10]向贵府, 任光明, 聂德新, 等. 含水量对昔格达土填料工程地质性质的影响研究. 工程地质学报, 2004,12(2): 136-140.
[11]曾 晋. 压实昔格达土料及其与既有填土界面剪切特性研究. 水电能源科学, 2018, 36(4): 154-157.
[12]孙金坤, 陈科材, 焦 涛,等. 紫茎泽兰筋材改良昔格达土物理力学试验研究. 工业建筑, 2016, 46(5):124-127.
[13]袁志辉, 倪万魁, 唐 春,等. 干湿循环下黄土强度衰减与结构强度试验研究. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(7):1894-1902.
[14]简富献, 张宏伟, 张钧堂, 等. 浸水时间对砂泥岩填料压缩特性影响试验研究. 水利水运工程学报, 2016(4):111-117.