Differences in Erosion and Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Three Kinds of Residues in Mining Area

LI Jian-ming,SUN Bei,WANG Yi-feng,WANG Wen-long,ZHANG Chang-wei,GUO Ming-ming

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10) : 24-30.

PDF(1659 KB)
PDF(1659 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10) : 24-30. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20160667
WATER SOIL CONSERVATION AND ECOCONSTRUCTION

Differences in Erosion and Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Three Kinds of Residues in Mining Area

  • LI Jian-ming1,SUN Bei1,WANG Yi-feng1,WANG Wen-long2,3,4,ZHANG Chang-wei1,GUO Ming-ming2,3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Affected by man-made factors, ground surface in coal mine area is disturbed in a wide range, with complex waste soils and residues accumulating into steep slopes, resulting in heavy soil and water loss under rainfall action. On the basis of field investigations, runoff plot and outdoor artificial rainfall field were selected and constructed to study the differences of erosion and hydrodynamic characteristics among three underlying surfaces, namely, waste soil, coal mine residue with more sand and less stone, and residue with less sand and more stone.Results showed that 1) the average runoff rate of residues increased in a range from 33.7% to 276.2% with rainfall intensity increasing by 1.5 times to 3.0 times; the average runoff velocity of waste soil and residues increased by 13.6%-43.3% as rainfall intensified, and the average runoff velocity of residue with more sand and less stone was larger than the other two; under the same rainfall intensity, the average erosion rate of residue with more sand and less stone was 1.8 times and 11.2 times that of the waste soil and the residue with less sand and more stone, respectively; 3) the average Reynolds number revealed waste soil and residue as transition flow in slow motion; 4) the relations between average runoff rate and average stream power and average shear stress, respectively, can be expressed by linear function, with the coefficient of determination greater than 0.8; the relations between erosion rate and average stream power and average shear stress of waste soil and residue with less sand and more stone can be expressed by linear function, with the coefficient of determination greater than 0.9; while a power function for residue with more sand and less stone with the coefficient of determination about 0.5.

Key words

waste soil and residues / runoff and sediment yield / hydrodynamic parameter / disturbance / simulated field rainfall experiment / Shenfu-Dongsheng coalmine field

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Jian-ming,SUN Bei,WANG Yi-feng,WANG Wen-long,ZHANG Chang-wei,GUO Ming-ming. Differences in Erosion and Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Three Kinds of Residues in Mining Area[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2017, 34(10): 24-30 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20160667

References

李 强, 李占斌, 鲁克新, 等.神府东胜矿区不同下垫面产流产沙试验研究. 水土保持研究, 2008, 15(3):1-3.
王文龙, 李占斌, 李 鹏, 等. 神府东胜煤田开发建设弃土弃渣冲刷试验研究. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(5):68-71.
郭明明, 王文龙, 李建明, 等. 神府矿区弃土弃渣体侵蚀特征及预测. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(5): 1044-1057.
倪含斌,张丽萍,张登荣.模拟降雨试验研究神东矿区不同阶段堆积弃土的水土流失.环境科学学报,2006, 26(12): 2065-2071.
BIAN Z F, INYANG H I, DANIELS J L, et al. Environment Issues from Coal Mining and Their Solutions. Mining Science and Technology, 2010, 20(2): 215-223.
DONG J Z,ZHANG K L,GUO Z L.Runoff and Soil Erosion from Highway Construction Spoil Deposits: A Rainfall Simulation Study.Transportation Research Part D, 2012, 17(1): 8-14.
HAIGH M J, GENTCHEVA-KOSTADINOVA S V. Ecological Erosion Control on Coal-spoil Banks: An Evaluation. Ecological Engineering, 2002, 18(3): 371-377.
王 贞, 王文龙, 罗 婷, 等. 神府东胜煤田扰动地面水流水动力学特征. 水土保持通报, 2011, 31(2):42-45.
胡世雄, 靳长兴. 坡面流与坡面侵蚀动力过程研究的最新进展.地理研究,1998, 17(3):326-335.
刘俊娥, 王占礼, 高素娟, 等. 黄土坡面片蚀过程动力学机理试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(7):144-149.
张乐涛, 高照良, 田红卫. 工程堆积体陡坡坡面土壤侵蚀水动力学过程. 农业工程学报,2013,29(24):94-102.
康宏亮, 王文龙, 薛智德, 等. 北方风沙区砾石对堆积体坡面径流及侵蚀特征的影响.农业工程学报, 2016 ,32(3) : 125 -134.
吴淑芳, 吴普特, 宋维秀, 等. 黄土坡面径流剥离土壤的水动力过程研究. 土壤学报, 2010,47(2):223-228.
RIEKE-ZAPP D, POESEN J, NEARING M A. Effects of Rock Fragments Incorporated in the Soil Matrix on Concentrated Flow Hydraulics and Erosion. Earth Surface Processes Landforms, 2007, 32(7): 1063-1076.
谭克龙, 王晓峰. 农牧交错区生态环境监测与动态变化分析——以神府东胜地区为例. 地球信息科学, 2006,8(3):109-113.
侯新伟, 张发旺, 韩占涛, 等. 神府-东胜矿区生态环境脆弱性成因分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2006, 20(3): 55-57.
李建明, 王文龙, 王 贞, 等. 神府东胜煤田弃土弃渣体径流产沙过程的野外试验. 应用生态学报, 2013,24(12): 3537-3545.
雷廷武, 张晴雯, 闫丽娟. 细沟侵蚀物理模型. 北京: 科学出版社,2009: 117-129.
沙际德, 白清俊. 粘性土坡面细沟流的水力特性试验研究. 泥沙研究,2001,(6):39-43.
魏 霞, 李勋贵, 李占斌, 等. 黄土高原坡沟系统径流水动力学特性试验. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(10):19-24.
FOSTER G R, HUGGINS L F, MEYER L D. Laboratory Study of Rill Hydraulics(II). Shear Stress Relationships. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 1984, 27(3): 797-804.
BAGNOLD R. An Approach to the Sediment Transport Problem from General Physics.Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1966.
PDF(1659 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/