In order to analyze the dynamic seismic response and topographic amplification effect of Kangding Ms6.3 and Ms5.8 earthquakes, we excavated adits at different altitudes and placed monitoring instruments on both sides of the slope at Mogangling segment of Dadu River. The monitoring data reveals that 1) the peak ground accelerations (PGA) in both horizontal and vertical directions at 1# monitoring site are the biggest. In Ms6.3 earthquake, the PGA in horizontal and vertical direction is respectively 16.5-22.2 cm/s2 and 8.9 cm/s2, and in Ms5.8 earthquake the horizontal and vertical PGA is 9.9-11.8 cm/s2 and 4.1 cm/s2, respectively; 2) with the horizontal and vertical PGA at 2# monitoring site as reference, the horizontal and vertical PGA amplification factors of 1# monitoring site are the biggest, reaching 5.4 and 4.2 respectively in Ms6.3 earthquake and 3.7 and 2.2 respectively in Ms5.8 earthquake; 3) difference of predominant period of each monitoring site is not big in the same period frequency from Fourier spectrum in both earthquakes; 4) the acceleration response spectrum at each monitoring site shows that the horizontal and vertical amplitudes of 1# monitoring site (which is in the highest altitude) are the biggest. For the same site, horizontal and vertical amplitudes of Ms6.3 earthquake are both larger than those of Ms5.8 earthquake. Studies suggest that under strong earthquake, seismic wave is amplified selectively in different parts of slope at different elevations, and topographic amplification effect of ground motion is bigger at higher altitude.
Key words
Kangding Earthquake /
Mogangling /
dynamic response of slope under earthquake /
amplification coefficient of PGA /
acceleration response spectrum
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] CELEBI M. Topographic and Geological Amplification Determined from Strong Motion and Aftershock Records of March 1985 Chile Earthquake[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1987, 77: 1147-1167.
[2] GELI L, BARD P Y, JULLIEN B. The Effect of Topography on Earthquake Ground Motion: A Review and New Results[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1988, 78: 42- 63.
[3] 罗永红,王运生. 汶川地震诱发山地斜坡地震动地形放大效应研究[J]. 山地学报,2013,31(2):200-210.
[4] 王海云,谢礼立. 自贡市西山公园地形对地震动的影响[J]. 地球物理学报,2010,53(7):1631-1638.DOI:10.3969／j.issn.0001-5733.2010.07.014.
[5] 黄润秋,王运生,裴向军,等. “4·20”芦山Ms7.0级地震地质灾害特征[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2013,48(4):581-589.
[6] 罗永红,王运生,何 源,等. “4·20”芦山地震冷竹关地震动响应监测数据分析[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013,40(3):232-241.
[7] 贺建先, 王运生, 罗永红, 等. 康定Ms6. 3 级地震斜坡地震动响应监测分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2015, 23(3): 383-393.
[8] 王运生, 贺建先, 罗永红, 等. 康定Ms5. 8 级地震冷竹关坡体内地震动响应特征[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2015, 50(5): 838-844.
[9] 许 强, 刘汉香, 邹 威, 等. 斜坡加速度动力响应特性的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(12): 2420-2428.
[10]徐光兴,姚令侃,高召宁,等. 边坡动力特性与动力响应的大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(3):624-632.
[11]祁生文, 伍法权, 孙进忠. 边坡动力响应规律研究[J]. 中国科学: E辑, 2003, 33(B12): 28-40.
[12]何先龙, 杨立志, 赵立珍, 等. 基于多重互相关函数计算地探信号到时差[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2009,(4): 1516-1520.
[13]何先龙, 赵立珍. 基于多重互相关函数分析剪切波速[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(8): 2541-2545.
[14]唐 晖,李小军,李亚琦. 自贡西山公园山脊地形场地效应分析[J]. 振动与冲击,2012,31(8):74-79.
[15]BOIT M A.A Mechanical Analyzer for Prediction of Earthquake Stress[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1941, 31: 151-171.
[16]HOUSNER G W. Behavior of Structures During Earthquakes[J]. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1959, 85(EM4): 109-129.
[17]李 杰. 几类反应谱的概念差异及其意义[J]. 世界地震工程,1993,9(4): 9-14.
[18]GB/50011—2010,建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
PDF(2038 KB)
