长江科学院院报 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 49-54.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20171069

• 工程安全与灾害防治 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于PFC2D的土体缓冲落石冲击能力研究

江巍,宋鹏程,陈玮,王彦海,毛聪   

  1. 三峡大学 防灾减灾湖北省重点实验室, 湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-18 修回日期:2017-11-15 出版日期:2019-04-01 发布日期:2019-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 陈玮(1994-),男,湖北咸宁人,助理工程师,硕士,主要从事岩土工程数值计算方法的研究。E-mail:1530292511@qq.com
  • 作者简介:江巍(1981-),男,湖北宜昌人,副教授,博士,主要从事岩土工程数值计算方法的研究。E-mail:13205193@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51409150)

Cushioning Capacity of Soils Against Rockfall’s Impact Force Based on Two-dimensional Particle Flow Code

JIANG Wei, SONG Peng-cheng, CHEN Wei, WANG Yan-hai, MAO Cong   

  1. Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
  • Received:2017-09-18 Revised:2017-11-15 Published:2019-04-01 Online:2019-04-18

摘要: 常用的拦石墙、棚洞等落石防护措施均需布置土体来缓冲落石造成的冲击力,其缓冲能力在进行防护措施结构设计时应合理考虑。颗粒流程序PFC2D(Two-dimensional Particle Flow Code)可有效模拟落石冲击土体和结构的动态过程,用来分析不考虑土体缓冲效应下的落石冲击力,结果与瑞士算法基本一致,略大于日本算法。进一步地,取不同厚度的素填土、粉质黏土和砂质粉土3种缓冲土层,分析不同坠落高度条件下落石经过土体缓冲后对结构的冲击力,发现土体的缓冲能力与土层厚度、缓冲能力与坠落高度均大致呈指数函数关系;坠落高度对缓冲能力的影响基本不随缓冲土体选材改变而变化;同样厚度条件下粉质黏土缓冲能力最大,素填土次之,砂质粉土最小。研究成果表明实际工程中缓冲土层厚度宜设定为2~3 m。

关键词: 落石防护措施, 土体缓冲能力, 落石冲击力, PFC2D, 缓冲土层厚度

Abstract: In the design of rockfall protection structure, the cushioning capacity of soils on stone cutoff wall or shed-tunnel against rockfall’s impact force should be taken into consideration properly. PFC2D could simulate the dynamic process of rockfall impacting on the soil and structure effectively. The calculated result of rockfall’s impact force by PFC2D with no consideration of soil’s cushioning capacity is consistent with that by Swedish algorithm (proposed by Dr. Vincent Labiouse) and slightly larger than that by Japanese algorithm (proposed by Japanese Road Association). Furthermore, the impact forces of rockfall from different heights on structure with soil cushions—plain filling soil, silty clay, and sandy silty soil each of different thicknesses—are analyzed. The cushioning capacity of soil is in exponential function relation with soil cushion’s thickness and rockfall’s height; while the influence of falling height on cushioning capacity does not change with the change of soil material. Given the same soil thickness, the cushion capacity of silty clay is the largest, followed by that of plain filling soil and sandy silty soil in sequence. From an economic point of view, the thickness of soil cushion is recommended to be within 2-3 meters in engineering practice.

Key words: protective measures against rockfall, cushioning capacity of soil, rockfall’s impact force, PFC2D, thickness of soil cushion

中图分类号: