PDF(8152 KB)
顺层碎裂岩质滑坡地下水动态迁移规律及变形机理——以三峡库区木鱼包滑坡为例
邓茂林, 梁之康, 王国法, 汪标, 周露露, 万航, 彭旭, 苏鹏民, 朱晓涵
长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 215-222.
PDF(8152 KB)
PDF(8152 KB)
顺层碎裂岩质滑坡地下水动态迁移规律及变形机理——以三峡库区木鱼包滑坡为例
Dynamic Migration Pattern of Groundwater and Deformation Mechanism in Cataclastic Bedding Rock Landslides: A Case Study of Muyubao Landslide in Three Gorges Reservoir Area
库水升降及降雨引起库岸地下水动态变化,地下水动态升降是顺层碎裂岩质滑坡变形破坏的直接诱发因素之一。通过三峡库区木鱼包滑坡近7 a监测数据、勘察资料等,研究了降雨、库水位与地下水位之间的定量关系,以及坡体变形对地下水的响应机制。研究表明:①地下水升降明显先于坡体变形,由降雨和库水位来预测地下水位,可进一步判断坡体变形情况,这为滑坡预警预报提供了有力依据。② 当坡体前部地下水位超过最高库水位(175 m)时,坡体变形在浮托减重效应影响下,动水压力作用逐渐增强。③获得了降雨抬升地下水位的阈值,持续降雨10 d降雨量达150 mm,坡体前部地下水位抬升3.22~6.88 m;30 d内降雨量300 mm,坡体前部地下水位抬升10 m左右。④2017年10—12月,前部平台QSK1钻孔地下水位高达184.2 m,比库水位(175 m)高近10 m,72 d坡体位移量为88.5 mm。该研究成果为库区顺层岩质滑坡监测预警、防灾减灾和库水调度提供理论支撑。
[Objective] Since the impoundment of the Three Gorges Dam in 2003, many cataclastic bedding landslides in the reservoir area have been reactivated due to the influence of external factors such as reservoir water level fluctuations, variations in groundwater levels, and rainfall. These landslides are typically large in scale, exhibit complex deformation mechanisms, and pose significant challenges for early warning and disaster prevention. This paper attempts to establish an interaction model linking rainfall, reservoir water, and groundwater with groundwater as the main triggering factor of landslide deformation, and to further reveal the dynamic migration patterns of groundwater under the coupled effects of reservoir water level fluctuations and rainfall. [Methods] The study took the Muyubao Landslide, a cataclastic bedding landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, as a case study. By integrating data statistics with field investigations, a statistical analysis was conducted on nearly seven years of manual and automated monitoring data, field investigation materials, and hydrometeorological information to investigate the quantitative relationship among reservoir water level, rainfall, and groundwater level, as well as the interaction between groundwater level and slope displacement and deformation. [Results] The research results indicated that: (1) A groundwater level of 175 meters at the front platform of the slope served as the critical threshold for the initiation of landslide deformation. When the groundwater level at the front platform approached 175 m, deformation began under the influence of buoyancy-induced weight reduction. When the groundwater level at the front platform exceeded 175 m, both buoyancy-induced reduction and dynamic water pressure acted on the slope, with the effect of dynamic water pressure intensifying as the groundwater level rose.(2) Statistical analysis of monitoring data revealed thresholds for rainfall-induced groundwater level rise. Ten consecutive days of rainfall totaling 150 mm increased the groundwater level at the front of the slope by 3.22 m to 6.88 m. In the case of 300 mm of cumulative rainfall within 30 days, the groundwater level at the front of the slope increased by approximately 10 m. A “lag effect” was observed in groundwater response to rainfall, typically lasting 3 to 13 days.(3) From October to December 2017, rainfall occurred on 27 out of first 32 days, totaling 310.6 mm. As a result, the groundwater level in borehole QSK1 at the front platform of the slope rose to 184.2 m, nearly 10 m above the highest reservoir water level (175 m). Over the 72-day period, the slope displacement totaled 88.5 mm. [Conclusion] (1) Groundwater level fluctuations significantly precede slope deformation. Given known reservoir water levels, it is possible to forecast groundwater level based on reservoir water level and rainfall data, and further predict slope deformation based on the groundwater level. This approach provides a strong basis for landslide early warning and prediction.(2) The effective contribution of rainfall to groundwater recharge varies with different types of rainfall. Compared to intense rainstorms, prolonged and continuous rainfall causes a more significant rise in groundwater levels, especially around periods of high reservoir water levels, posing greater risks to slope stability. Therefore, in landslide disaster prevention, the role of rainfall and groundwater should be carefully considered. It is crucial to optimize the layout of monitoring points, enhance real-time automated groundwater monitoring capacity and service quality, and better understand the impact of groundwater dynamics on slope deformation.
地下水位 / 降雨 / 库水位 / 碎裂顺层岩质滑坡 / 变形机理
groundwater level / rainfall / reservoir water level / cataclastic bedding rock landslide / deformation mechanism
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
殷跃平, 张晨阳, 闫慧, 等. 三峡水库蓄水运行滑坡渗流稳定和防治设计研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(4): 649-659.
(
|
| [6] |
刘才华, 徐健, 曹传林, 等. 岩质边坡水力驱动型顺层滑移破坏机制分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(19): 3529-3533.
(
|
| [7] |
黄达, 顾东明, 陈智强, 等. 三峡库区塔坪H2古滑坡台阶状复活变形的库水-降雨耦合作用机制[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(12): 2203-2211.
(
|
| [8] |
汤明高, 马旭, 张婷婷, 等. 顺层斜坡溃屈机制与早期识别研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2016, 24(3):442-450.
(
|
| [9] |
邓茂林, 易庆林, 韩蓓, 等. 长江三峡库区木鱼包滑坡地表变形规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8):3145-3152,3166.
(
|
| [10] |
谭淋耘, 黄润秋, 裴向军. 库水位下降诱发的特大型顺层岩质滑坡变形特征与诱发机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(2): 302-314.
(
|
| [11] |
黄达, 匡希彬, 罗世林. 三峡库区藕塘滑坡变形特点及复活机制研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2019, 46(5):127-135.
(
|
| [12] |
冯文凯, 易小宇, 孟睿, 等. 三峡库区木鱼包滑坡不同库水升降速率变形响应离心模型试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2021, 52(5): 578-588.
(
|
| [13] |
肖诗荣, 刘德富, 胡志宇. 世界三大典型水库型顺层岩质滑坡工程地质比较研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2010, 18(1): 52-59.
(
|
| [14] |
王尚晓, 李士垚, 牛瑞卿. 木鱼包滑坡形变特征的InSAR监测分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(4): 77-84.
三峡库区地质条件复杂,问题库岸斜坡众多,滑坡灾害问题一直十分突出,需要对三峡库区的灾害隐患进行日常监测。然而常规的监测手段往往需要耗费大量的人力物力,监测效果也容易受到外界条件的限制。以三峡巴东县城长江沿岸为研究区,基于ALOS-2数据,使用PS InSAR(永久散射体干涉测量)处理技术对2016年8月—2017年10月共22景ALOS-2数据进行处理,结合水文、地质和实地调查资料对木鱼包滑坡的滑动速率和规模等变形特征做了分析。结果表明:木鱼包滑坡在监测周期内处于缓慢的蠕动变形阶段,平均形变速率为10.4 mm/a,形变的主要影响因素是库水位的变化。
(
The Three Gorges Reservoir area has been suffering from striking landslid disasters due to complex geological conditions and numerous slope problems, posing daily monitoring requirements. Conventional monitoring not only costs large amounts of manpower and material resources, and also is prone to be limited by external conditions. In the present research, 22 views of ALOS-2 satellite data from August 2016 to October 2017 of the Yangtze River bank in Badong County as the research area were processed using PS InSAR (permanent scatterer interferometry) technology to obtain accurate regional surface deformation results. In association with hydrology, geology and field investigation, the deformation characteristics such as sliding rate and scale of Muyubao landslide were analyzed. Results manifested that in the monitoring period, the Muyubao landslide was in a slow creep deformation stage, with an average deformation rate of 10.4 mm/a. Water level fluctuation was the major influential factor of landslide deformation.
|
| [15] |
汪发武, 宋琨. 库水位涨落条件下不同结构边坡的变形破坏机制分析: 以千将坪滑坡和树坪滑坡为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 2021, 29(3): 575-582.
(
|
| [16] |
汪标, 易庆林, 牛岩, 等. 地下水动态作用下大型碎裂顺层岩质滑坡变形响应规律分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2023, 42(增刊2): 4140-4151.
(
|
| [17] |
邓茂林, 周剑, 易庆林, 等. 三峡库区靠椅状土质滑坡变形特征及机制分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(7): 1296-1303.
(
|
| [18] |
张富灵. 库水及降雨作用下滑移-弯曲型滑坡形成条件与演化机制研究: 以木鱼包滑坡为例[D]. 宜昌: 三峡大学, 2021.
(
|
| [19] |
仵彦卿, 张倬元. 岩体水力学导论[M]. 成都: 西南交通大学出版社, 1995.
(
|
| [20] |
张倬元, 王士天, 王兰生, 等. 工程地质分析原理[M]. 4版. 北京: 地质出版社, 2016.
(
|
| [21] |
朱朋, 卢书强, 薛聪聪, 等. 库水位升降与降雨条件下滑坡的渗流及稳定性分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2015, 32(11): 87-92.
(
Groundwater played a significant role in the stability of reservoir slopes. A landslide in reservoir area was taken as an example through analyzing its deformation characteristics and professional monitoring data. By the regulated scheme of Three Gorges Reservoir and rainfall conditions, based on theories of unsaturated seepage and limit equilibrium, eight working conditions were set for seepage and stability analysis of the landslide. Under conditions of water level fluctuation from 175 meters to 145 meters and rainfall, the analysis adopted Geo-Studio software based on finite element method. Results show that the reservoir water level changes exactly in accordance with the groundwater level, and rainfall has some effect on water level of the landslide’s back. Slope safety factor decreases with the rise of water level or the increase of rising rate. Moreover, slope safety factor firstly decreases and then increases with the drop of water level. Finally, slope safety factor decreases a little under the conditions of rainfall.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |