长江中下游河型转化研究进展

金中武, 陈栋, 郭小虎, 刘亚, 何子灿, 楚栋栋, 柯帅

长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 9-19.

PDF(11158 KB)
PDF(11158 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 9-19. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20231356
河湖保护与治理

长江中下游河型转化研究进展

作者信息 +

Research Progress of River Pattern Changes in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

正确预测河型发展趋势,因势利导,是保障河流功能稳定的前提条件。三峡工程等水库运用后,长江中下游干流河道持续长期冲刷,局部河势剧烈调整,可能导致河型转化,进而将对防洪、生态、供水、通航等河流功能的发挥产生一系列影响。对河型成因、分类与判别、转化机理,长期冲刷状态下长江中下游不同河型演化规律与预测方法以及河型转化的影响和治理对策进行了综述。在此基础上,对今后的研究工作提出了若干展望,包括河型亚类细化、非连续约束边界条件下不同河型形态参数对水沙条件等因素变化的响应模式、冲刷过程中长河道纵向冲刷调整对河型转化的作用机制、河型转化临界条件定量识别以及百年尺度河型转化预测方法构建和趋势预估等。

Abstract

Accurately predicting the development trend of river patterns and leveraging their advantages is a prerequisite for ensuring stable river function. After the operation of the Three Gorges and other reservoirs, the continuous long-term erosion of channels in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and the drastic adjustments of local river regimes may lead to river pattern transformation. Such transformation will have a series of impacts on river functions such as flood control, ecology, water supply, and navigation. This paper reviews the causes, classification and discrimination, river pattern transformation mechanisms, evolution laws, and prediction methods of different river patterns in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River under long-term erosion. It also scrutinizes the impacts of river pattern transformation and corresponding governance strategies. On this basis, several directions for future research are proposed: the refinement of river pattern subcategories, the responses of shape parameters of different river patterns to changes in water and sediment conditions under discontinuous constraint boundaries, effects of longitudinal erosion adjustment of long channels on river pattern transformation, the quantitative identification of critical conditions for river pattern transformation, and prediction methods for century-scale river pattern transformation as well as trend estimation.

关键词

河型 / 演化规律 / 驱动机制 / 预测方法 / 治理对策 / 长江中下游

Key words

river pattern / evolution regularities / driving mechanism / prediction methods / governance measures / middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River

引用本文

导出引用
金中武, 陈栋, 郭小虎, . 长江中下游河型转化研究进展[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2025, 42(3): 9-19 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231356
JIN Zhong-wu, CHEN Dong, GUO Xiao-hu, et al. Research Progress of River Pattern Changes in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(3): 9-19 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231356
中图分类号: TV147   

参考文献

[1]
许全喜, 董炳江, 袁晶, 等. 三峡工程运用后长江中下游河道冲刷特征及其影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2023, 35(2): 650-661.
(XU Quan-xi, DONG Bing-jiang, YUAN Jing, et al. Scouring Effect of the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River and Its Impact after the Impoundment of the Three Gorges Project[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2023, 35(2): 650-661. (in Chinese))
[2]
长江治理与保护科技创新联盟. 长江治理与保护报告2021[M]. 武汉: 长江出版社, 2021.
(League of Science and Technology Innovation for Changjiang Rehabilitation and Protection. Report on Yangtze River Governance and Protection 2021[M]. Wuhan: Chanjiang Press, 2021. (in Chinese))
[3]
卢金友, 姚仕明, 邵学军, 等. 三峡工程运用后初期坝下游江湖响应过程[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.
(LU Jin-you, YAO Shi-ming, SHAO Xue-jun, et al. Response Process of Rivers and Lakes Downstream of the Three Gorges Project in the Early Stage after Its Operation[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012. (in Chinese))
[4]
唐日长. 蜿蜒性河段成因的初步分析和造床试验研究[J]. 人民长江, 1964(2):13-21.
(TANG Ri-chang. Preliminary Analysis on the Causes of Meandering Channels and Bed-forming Experiments[J]. Yangtze River, 1964(2):13-21. (in Chinese))
[5]
尹学良. 弯曲性河流形成原因及造床试验初步研究[J]. 地理学报, 1965, 20(4): 287-303.
(YIN Xue-liang. Preliminary Study on the Formation Causes of Curved Rivers and Bed-building Tests[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1965, 20(4): 287-303. (in Chinese))
[6]
余文畴. 长江中下游河道水力和输沙特性的初步分析: 初论分汊河道形成条件[J]. 长江科学院院报, 1994, 11(4): 16-22,56.
摘要
本文在描述长江下游来水来沙条件和分析河道形态的基础上,对长江中下游河道的水力和输沙特性作了初步分析,获得了区别长江中下游分汊河道和婉蜒型河道河型综合指标及有利于形成分汊河道的来水来沙条件。文中概略分析了长江中下游分汊河道形态特征,水力和输沙特性与边界条件和河床演变特性之间的关系。
(YU Wen-chou. Preliminary Analysis of Hydraulic and Sediment Transport Characteristics in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River:Preliminary Discussion on the Formation Conditions of Bifurcated Channels[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 1994, 11(4):16-22,56. (in Chinese))
[7]
方宗岱. 河型分析及其在河道整治上的应用[J]. 水利学报, 1964(1): 1-12.
(FANG Zong-dai. River Pattern Analysis and Its Application in Channel Regulation[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1964(1): 1-12. (in Chinese))
[8]
尹学良. 河型成因研究[J]. 水利学报, 1993, 24(4):1-11,69.
(YIN Xue-liang. Formation of River Patterns[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1993, 24(4):1-11, 69. (in Chinese))
[9]
许炯心. 河型对含沙量空间变异的响应及其临界现象[J]. 中国科学(D辑: 地球科学), 1997, 27(6): 548-553.
(XU Jiong-xin. Response of River Pattern to Spatial Variation of Sediment Concentration and Its Critical Phenomenon[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 1997, 27(6): 548-553. (in Chinese))
[10]
王延贵, 胡春宏, 周文浩, 等. 塔里木河干流河道的河型及其成因[J]. 泥沙研究, 2002(6): 19-25.
(WANG Yan-gui, HU Chun-hong, ZHOU Wen-hao, et al. Study on River Patterns of the Tarim River[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2002(6): 19-25. (in Chinese))
[11]
余文畴. 长江中游下荆江蜿蜒型河道成因初步研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2006, 23(6): 9-13.
摘要
描述了下荆江蜿蜒型河道河型特点。在前人所作下荆江成因研究的基础上,分析指出了下荆江蜿蜒型河道形成条件,即通过加大河长耗散富余能量并与相对较大的含沙量相适应形成蜿蜒河型,表现为河道纵向输沙平衡条件和适度抗冲的二元相结构边界条件。并将其与长江中下游分汊型河道成因进行对比分析,提出了二者在河型调整中的共性和特性。  
(YU Wen-chou. Preliminary Study on Forming Condition of Lower Jingjiang Meandering Channels of Middle Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2006, 23(6): 9-13. (in Chinese))
[12]
余文畴. 长江下游分汊河道节点在河床演变中的作用[J]. 泥沙研究, 1987, 12(4): 12-21.
(YU Wen-chou. Action of Nodes of the Braided Channel at the Lower Yangtze River in the Fluvial Processes[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 1987, 12(4): 12-21. (in Chinese))
[13]
尤联元. 分汊型河床的形成与演变: 以长江中下游为例[J]. 地理研究, 1984, 3(4): 12-24.
摘要
本文根据多年的地质、地貌,来水来沙等考察资料,河道变迁的历史记载以及实验研究成果,分析了分汊型河床的两个必要条件及三方面的演变特征,最后用河流力图使自己的能量损耗率达于最小的假说对汊河的形成和演变作了解释。
(YOU Lian-yuan. A Study on the Formaton and Evolution of Braided Channel with Stable Island:Taking the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River as an Example[J]. Geographical Research, 1984, 3(4): 12-24. (in Chinese))
[14]
张仁, 倪晋仁. 江心洲型河流的成因分析[J]. 水科学进展, 1991, 2(3): 171-178.
(ZHANG Ren, NI Jin-ren. Formative Causes of the Anabranched Rivers[J]. Advances in Water Science, 1991, 2(3): 171-178. (in Chinese))
[15]
李志威, 刘晶, 胡世雄, 等. 中国冲积大河的河型分布与成因[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2017, 37(2): 7-13, 87.
(LI Zhi-wei, LIU Jing, HU Shi-xiong, et al. Distribution and Formation of River Patterns of Large Alluvial Rivers in China[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2017, 37(2):7-13, 87. (in Chinese))
[16]
倪晋仁, 张仁. 河型成因的各种理论及其间关系[J]. 地理学报, 1991, 46(3): 366-372.
摘要
本文较为系统地将河型成因的各种研究方法按其所依据的理论分类,并指出了各种理论之间的内在联系。文中讨论了各种研究方法所具有的优缺点、各研究方法之间的互补作用以及各种研究方法在表面处理方式不同的背后所隐藏的使河流趋向某一极值状态(或稳定状态)的共同倾向,并据此指出了进一步研究河型成因问题时的侧重面。
(NI Jin-ren, ZHANG Ren. Theories on the Cause of Channel Pattern Formation[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1991, 46(3): 366-372. (in Chinese))
The approaches for studying channel pattern used by various investigators have been classi-fied according to their theoretical basis in this paper, such as hypothesis on geomorphic thre-sholds, extremal hypothesis on energy dissipation rate, theory of stability, theory of stochastic analysis and method of statistic analysis.
[17]
LEOPOLD L B, WOLMAN M. River Channel Patterns: Braided, Meandering, and Straight[J]. US Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1957, 282B: 39-85.
[18]
MIALL A D. A Review of the Braided-river Depositional Environment[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 1977, 13(1): 1-62.
[19]
RUST B. A Classification of Alluvial Channel Systems[J]. Dallas Geological Society, 1978(3):187-198.
[20]
钱宁. 关于河流分类及成因问题的讨论[J]. 地理学报, 1985, 40(1): 1-10.
摘要
河床演变学是一门正在发展中的年轻学科,在很多问题上都存在不同的看法,河型的分类及成因就是其中之一。本文对国外流行的观点作出评价,并提出自己粗浅的看法,以期澄清某些概念,有助于统一认识。文中所讨论的仅限于冲积河流。
(QIAN Ning. On the Classification and Causes of Formation of Different Channel Patterns[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1985, 40(1): 1-10. (in Chinese))
Based on the plain view, manner of channel shifting, stability and bank credibili-ty, channel patterns of alluvial streams a.re divided into four categories, namely, (1) wandering, (2) anabranched, (3) meandering, and (4) straight pattern.Streams, as an integrated part of a drainage ibasin, assume their characteristics in accordance with the amount and hydrograph of wafer and sediment and the type of ma- terial carried to the reach from the upstream watershed. The type of sediment manife-sts its effects in two aspects, i.e., the material which fronis the boundary of the channel and the ’bed material load which governs the formation of the channel. Whenever the conditions of the drainage ibasin change, the morphologic character of the river do-wn-streaxn will vary conformably. Such an adjustment is aoeomplished through the proce-sses of erosion, ’transportation and deposition of the sediment. The interrelationships between (1) the oncoming bed material load and. the sediment carrying capacity of the flow, and (2) the erodiblity of the river banks and the erosive power of the water decide essentially the general direction of the adjustment.Based on the concepts as depicted abov. it is argued that the production rate of tlie ’bed material load in relation to the water production rate of the watershed and the relative credibility of the stream banks are the two governing factors which control the-formation of different ohaomel patterns. Subsidiary factors in channel patterns forma-tion are given in Table 2. The existence of certain subsidiary factors may prove to be beneficial to the development of a certain chrannel pattern, or may even play a deciding-role when the stream is in a critical state of geomorpbologic (channel pattern shifting) threshold.
[21]
陈宝冲. 河型分类[J]. 泥沙研究, 1992, 18(1): 100-104.
(CHEN Bao-chong. River Pattern Classification[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 1992, 18(1): 100-104. (in Chinese))
[22]
宋晓龙, 白玉川. 基于河流阻力规律的河型统计与分类[J]. 水力发电学报, 2018, 37(1): 49-61.
(SONG Xiao-long, BAI Yu-chuan. Statistics and Classification of River Patterns Based on River Resistance Law[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2018, 37(1): 49-61. (in Chinese))
[23]
WOOLFE K J, BALZARY J R. Fields in the Spectrum of Channel Style[J]. Sedimentology, 1996, 43(5): 797-805.
[24]
王随继, 任明达. 根据河道形态和沉积物特征的河流新分类[J]. 沉积学报, 1999, 17(2): 240-246.
(WANG Sui-ji, REN Ming-da. A New Classification of Fluvial Rivers according to Channel Planform and Sediment Characteristics[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1999, 17(2): 240-246. (in Chinese))
[25]
余文畴. 长江中下游河道平面形态指标分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 1994, 11(1): 48-55.
摘要
在作者曾对长江中下游河道平面形态进行统计和河型分类的基础上,本文对不同河型的形态指标作了进一步分析,获得了不同河型的平面形态诸因素之间的关系及河型转换中的形态条件,初步阐述了形态分析在河道整治中的作用。
(YU Wen-chou. Analysis on Geometry Criterion of the Middle and Lower Yangtze River-reaches[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 1994, 11(1): 48-55. (in Chinese))
[26]
谢鉴衡. 河床演变及整治[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 1997.
(XIE Jian-heng. Evolution of Riverbed and Regulation[M]. Edition 2. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 1997. (in Chinese))
[27]
ROSGEN D L. A Classification of Natural Rivers[J]. Catena, 1994, 22(3): 169-199.
[28]
陆中臣, 舒晓明. 河型及其转化的判别[J]. 地理研究, 1988, 7(2): 7-16.
摘要
本文分析了影响河型的内外营力,建立了河型与河流能量、河岸不稳定系数、流域形状系数和地壳相对升降强度间的相关关系式。以汉江和黄河下游为例,用水力参数和河床形态指标,判别河型的转化趋势。
(LU Zhong-chen, SHU Xiao-ming. Discrimination about Channel Pattern and Its Changes[J]. Geographical Research, 1988, 7(2): 7-16. (in Chinese))
[29]
SONG X L, BAI Y C. A New Empirical River Pattern Discriminant Method Based on Flow Resistance Characteristics[J]. Catena, 2015, 135: 163-172.
[30]
史传文, 吴保生, 马吉明. 冲积河流河型的成因及分类与判别计算方法研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2007, 26(5):107-111.
(SHI Chuan-wen, WU Bao-sheng, MA Ji-ming. Cause of Formation and Discrimination of Channel Patterns for Alluvial Rivers[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2007, 26(5):107-111. (in Chinese))
[31]
许炯心. 砂质河床与砾石河床的河型判别研究[J]. 水利学报, 2002, 33(10): 14-20.
(XU Jiong-xin. Channel Pattern Discrimination for Sandy Bed Rivers and Gravelly Bed Rivers[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002, 33(10): 14-20. (in Chinese))
[32]
YAN C D, LI Z W, BOOTA M W, et al. River Pattern Discriminant Method Based on Rough Set Theory[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2023, 45: 101285.
[33]
刘贝贝, 朱立俊, 陈槐, 等. 冲积性河流的河型分类及判别方法研究综述[J]. 泥沙研究, 2020, 45(1): 74-80.
(LIU Bei-bei, ZHU Li-jun, CHEN Huai, et al. Review on River Classification and Distinguish Methods of Alluvial Rivers[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2020, 45(1): 74-80. (in Chinese))
[34]
GRAF W L. Applications of Catastrophe Theory in Fluvial Geomorphology[M]//ANDERSON M G. Modeling Geomorphologic Systems. Chichester: Wiley, 1988: 33-47.
[35]
徐国宾, 练继建. 应用耗散结构理论分析河型转化[J]. 水动力学研究与进展(A辑), 2004, 19(3): 316-320.
(XU Guo-bin, LIAN Ji-jian. Analysis on the Change of River Patterns Using the Theory of Dissipative Structure[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2004, 19(3): 316-320. (in Chinese))
[36]
SCHUMM S A, KHAN H R, WINKLEY B R, et al. Variability of River Patterns[J]. Nature Physical Science, 1972, 237(74): 75-76.
[37]
倪晋仁, 王随继, 王光谦. 现代冲积河流的河型空间转化模式探讨[J]. 沉积学报, 2000, 18(1): 1-6, 35.
(NI Jin-ren, WANG Sui-ji, WANG Guang-qian. Spatial Variations of Channel Patterns[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2000, 18(1):1-6, 35. (in Chinese))
[38]
HUANG H Q, NANSON G C. Why Some Alluvial Rivers Develop an Anabranching Pattern[J]. Water Resources Research, 2007, 43(7): 2006WR005223.
[39]
刘警阳, 刘宗堡, 曹兰柱, 等. 松花江干流中下游河型转化控制因素研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2023, 41(2):485-497.
(LIU Jing-yang, LIU Zong-bao, CAO Lan-zhu, et al. Influences Affecting River Pattern Transformation in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Main Stream, Songhua River[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2023, 41(2): 485-497. (in Chinese))
[40]
王随继, 倪晋仁, 王光谦. 河型的时空演变模式及其间关系[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 40(增刊1): 96-100.
(WANG Sui-ji, NI Jin-ren, WANG Guang-qian. Temporal and Spatial Evolution Models of Fluvial Channels Patterns and Their Interrelation[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2000, 40(Supp.1):96-100. (in Chinese))
[41]
DEAN D J, SCHMIDT J C. The Role of Feedback Mechanisms in Historic Channel Changes of the Lower Rio Grande in the Big Bend Region[J]. Geomorphology, 2011, 126(3/4): 333-349.
[42]
RINALDI M. Recent Channel Adjustments in Alluvial Rivers of Tuscany, Central Italy[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2003, 28(6): 587-608.
[43]
DAVID M, LABENNE A, CAROZZA J M, et al. Evolutionary Trajectory of Channel Planforms in the Middle Garonne River (Toulouse, SW France) over a 130-year Period: Contribution of Mixed Multiple Factor Analysis (MFAmix)[J]. Geomorphology, 2016, 258: 21-39.
[44]
陈绪坚, 陈清扬. 黄河下游河型转换及弯曲变化机理[J]. 泥沙研究, 2013(1): 1-6.
(CHEN Xu-jian, CHEN Qing-yang. Theory of River Pattern Transformation and Change of Channel Sinuosity Ratio in Lower Yellow River[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2013(1): 1-6. (in Chinese))
[45]
姚仕明, 黄莉, 卢金友. 三峡、丹江口水库运行前后坝下游不同河型稳定性对比分析[J]. 泥沙研究, 2012(3):41-45.
(YAO Shi-ming, HUANG Li, LU Jin-you. Comparative Analysis of River Bed Stability of Different River Patterns below Reservoirs before and after Commissioning of Three Gorges Project and Danjiangkou Project[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2012(3): 41-45. (in Chinese))
[46]
韩其为, 杨克诚. 三峡水库建成后下荆江河型变化趋势的研究[J]. 泥沙研究, 2000(3): 1-11.
(HAN Qi-wei, YANG Ke-cheng. The Tendency of River Pattern Variation in the Lower Jingjiang River after Completion of the Three Gorges Project[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2000(3): 1-11. (in Chinese))
[47]
余文畴. 长江河道探索与思考[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2017.
(YU Wen-chou. Exploration and Reflections on Yangtze River Channel[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2017. (in Chinese))
[48]
张俊勇, 陈立, 何娟, 等. 流量过程对河型影响的试验研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2004, 22(3): 61-64.
(ZHANG Jun-yong, CHEN Li, HE Juan, et al. Experimental Study on Influence of Discharge Process Upon Channel Patterns[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2004, 22(3): 61-64. (in Chinese))
[49]
许炯心. 水库下游河道复杂响应的试验研究[J]. 泥沙研究, 1986(4): 50-57.
(XU Jiong-xin. An Experimental Study on the Complex Response in River Channel Adjustment Downstream a Reservoir[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 1986(4): 50-57. (in Chinese))
[50]
CHIEN N. Changes in River Regime after the Construction of Upstream Reservoirs[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1985, 10(2): 143-159.
[51]
PETTS G E. Complex Response of River Channel Morphology Subsequent to Reservoir Construction[J]. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 1979, 3(3): 329-362.
[52]
唐武, 王英民, 赵志刚, 等. 河型转化研究进展综述[J]. 地质论评, 2016, 62(1): 138-152.
(TANG Wu, WANG Ying-min, ZHAO Zhi-gang, et al. A Review of Fluvial Pattern Transformation[J]. Geological Review, 2016, 62(1): 138-152. (in Chinese))
[53]
余文畴, 姚仕明. 长江河道研究传承与弘扬[M]. 武汉: 长江出版社, 2022.
(YU Wen-chou, YAO Shi-ming. Inheritance and Promotion of the Changjiang River Channel Research[M]. Wuhan: Changjiang Press, 2022. (in Chinese))
[54]
贺秋华, 余德清, 王伦澈, 等. 近400多年下荆江河段古河道演变过程及特征[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(6): 1928-1936.
(HE Qiu-hua, YU De-qing, WANG Lun-che, et al. Evolution Process and Characteristics of Lower Jingjiang Paleo-channel in Recent 400 Years[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(6): 1928-1936. (in Chinese))
[55]
姚仕明, 余文畴, 董耀华. 分汊河道水沙运动特性及其对河道演变的影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2003, 20(1): 7-9, 16.
摘要
以实测资料为依据,从理论上分析得出了稳定分汊河段的水面纵比降大于单一河段;分析了分汊河道进口段的水沙运动及输沙特性以及对汊道演变的影响;基于平衡输沙原理,分析得出了分流分沙变化对分汊河道冲淤影响的关系式,即分汊河道的冲淤演变与上游来沙量、主支汊分流分沙比及其变化等因素有关。
(YAO Shi-ming, YU Wen-chou, DONG Yao-hua. Characteristics of Water Flow and Sediment Motion in Braided River and Their Effects on Fluvial Evolution[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2003, 20(1):7-9, 16. (in Chinese))
Based on the prototype data, the article theoretically analyzes and concludes that the water surface longitudinal slope of the stable braided river is greater than that of its single river. It analyzes characteristics of water flow and sediment motion and sediment transportation in the inlet reach of the braided river and their effects on fluvial evolution. According to the principle of sediment transportation equilibrium, a formula that describes the influences of the change of flow division and sediment division on its evolution is derived. That is to say, the evolution of the braided river is relevant to the upstream factors including sediment inflow, flow division and sediment division ratios of the braided river and their changes etc..
[56]
刘亚, 李义天, 卢金友. 鹅头分汊河型河道演变时空差异研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2015, 23(4):705-714.
(LIU Ya, LI Yi-tian, LU Jin-you. Spatio-temporal Differences of Fluvial Process of Goose-head-shaped Anabranching River Reaches[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2015, 23(4):705-714. (in Chinese))
[57]
许炯心. 汉江丹江口水库下游河床调整过程中的复杂响应[J]. 科学通报, 1989, 34(6):450-452.
(XU Jiong-xin. Complex Responses in Riverbed Adjustment in the Downstream of Danjiangkou Reservoir[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1989, 34(6): 450-452. (in Chinese))
[58]
HE Z C, SUN Z H, LI Y T, et al. Response of the Gravel-Sand Transition in the Yangtze River to Hydrological and Sediment Regime Changes after Upstream Damming[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2022, 47(2):383-398.
[59]
朱玲玲, 许全喜, 熊明. 三峡水库蓄水后下荆江急弯河道凸冲凹淤成因[J]. 水科学进展, 2017, 28(2): 193-202.
(ZHU Ling-ling, XU Quan-xi, XIONG Ming. Fluvial Processes of Meandering Channels in the Lower Jingjiang River Reach after the Impoundment of Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2017, 28(2): 193-202. (in Chinese))
[60]
WANG H, YAO S, LU Y, et al. Morphological Changes of Sharp Bends in Response to Three Gorges Project Operation at Different Discharges[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 10: 876631.
[61]
郭小虎, 唐峰, 陈栋, 等. 三峡工程运行后水库下游弯曲河道演变规律[J]. 水电能源科学, 2023, 41(6): 26-30.
(GUO Xiao-hu, TANG Feng, CHEN Dong, et al. Evolution Law of Curved River Channel Downstream of Reservoir after Operation of Three Gorges Project[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2023, 41(6): 26-30. (in Chinese))
[62]
LOU Y Y, MEI X F, DAI Z J, et al. Evolution of the Mid-channel Bars in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Changjiang (Yangtze) River from 1989 to 2014 Based on the Landsat Satellite Images: Impact of the Three Gorges Dam[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, 77(10):394.
[63]
WANG J, DAI Z J, MEI X F, et al. Immediately Downstream Effects of Three Gorges Dam on Channel Sandbars Morphodynamics between Yichang-Chenglingji Reach of the Changjiang River, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(5): 629-646.

Sandbars are of vital ecological and environmental significance, which however, have been intensively influenced by human activities. Morphodynamic processes of sandbars along the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach of the Changjiang River, the channel immediately downstream of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD), are assessed based on remote sensing images between 2000 and 2016. It can be found that the entire area of sandbars reduces drastically by 19.23% from 149.04 km2 in 2003 to 120.38 km2 in 2016, accompanied with an increase in water surface width. Owing to differences in sediment grain size and anti-erosion capacity, sandbar area in the upstream sandy gravel reach (Yichang-Dabujie) and downstream sandy reach (Dabujie-Chenglingji) respectively decreases by 45.94% (from 20.79 km2 to 11.24 km2) and 14.93% (from 128.30 km2 to 109.14 km2). Furtherly, morphological evolutions of sandbars are affected by channel type: in straight-microbend channel, mid-channel sandbars exhibit downstream moving while maintaining the basic profile; in meandering channel, point sandbars show erosion and deposition in convex and concave bank respectively, with mid-channel sandbars distributing sporadically; in bending-branching channel, point sandbars experience erosion and move downstream while mid-channel sandbars show erosion in the head part along with retreating outline. We document that the primary mechanism of sandbars shrinkages along the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach can be attributed to TGD induced suspended sediment concentration decreasing and increasing in unsaturation of sediment carrying capacity. Additionally, channel type can affect the morphological evolution of sandbars. Along the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach, sandbars in straight-microbend channel are more affected by water flow than that in bending-branching channel.

[64]
HAN J Q, ZHANG W, YUAN J, et al. Channel Evolution under Changing Hydrological Regimes in Anabranching Reaches Downstream of the Three Gorges Dam[J]. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2018, 12(3): 640-648.

Elucidating the influence of dams on fluvial processes can benefit river protection and basin management. Based on hydrological and topographical data, we analyzed channel evolution in anabranching reaches under changing hydrological regimes influenced by the Three Gorges Dam. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) the channels of specific anabranching reaches were defined as flood trend channels or low-flow trend channels according to the distribution of their flow characteristics. The anabranching reaches were classified as T1 or T2. The former is characterized by the correspondence between the flood trend and branch channels, and the latter is characterized by the correspondence between the flood trend and main channels; 2) on the basis of the new classification, the discrepant patterns of channel evolution seen in anabranching reaches were unified into a pattern that showed flood trend channels shrinking and low-flow trend channels expanding; 3) flood abatement and the increased duration of moderate flow discharges are the main factors that affect channel adjustments in anabranching reaches after dam construction; and 4) in the next few decades, the pattern of channel evolution will remain the same as that of the Three Gorges Dam operation. That is, the morphology will fully adapt to a flow with a low coefficient of variation. Our results are of interest in the management of the Yangtze River and other rivers influenced by dams.

[65]
李明, 胡春宏, 方春明. 三峡水库坝下游河道断面形态调整模式与机理研究[J]. 水利学报, 2018, 49(12): 1439-1450.
(LI Ming, HU Chun-hong, FANG Chun-ming. Study on Pattern and Mechanism of River Section Topography Adjustment in the Downstream of the Three Gorges Project[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2018, 49(12): 1439-1450. (in Chinese))
[66]
ASHMORE P E. Laboratory Modelling of Gravel Braided Stream Morphology[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1982, 7(3): 201-225.
[67]
KUANG H W. Physical and Numerical Modelling Study of Meandering in Fluvial Rivers[D]. Cardiff, Wales, UK: Cardiff University, 2011.
[68]
黄悦, 姚仕明, 卢金友. 三峡水库运用对坝下游干流河道水文情势的影响研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2011, 28(7): 76-81.
(HUANG Yue, YAO Shi-ming, LU Jin-you. Impact of TGP Operation on the Hydrologic Regime in the Downstream Main Channel of the Dam[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2011, 28(7): 76-81. (in Chinese))
[69]
胡春宏, 方春明. 三峡工程泥沙问题解决途径与运行效果研究[J]. 中国科学(技术科学), 2017, 47(8): 832-844.
(HU Chun-hong, FANG Chun-ming. Research on Sediment Problem Solutions for the Three Gorges Project and Its Operational Effects[J]. Scientia Sinica (Technologica), 2017, 47(8): 832-844. (in Chinese))
[70]
方红卫, 王光谦. 平面二维全沙泥沙输移数学模型及其应用[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2000, 8(2):165-178.
(FANG Hong-wei, WANG Guang-qian. Depth-averaged 2-D Numerical Simulation for Total Sediment Transport and Its Application[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2000, 8(2): 165-178. (in Chinese))
[71]
董耀华. 长江流域河流泥沙与治河防洪研究及实践[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(10): 7-15.
摘要
按照河流与泥沙基本理论研究、河流水沙模拟与专题研究和长江治理与防洪实践应用3个领域,对长江流域河流泥沙与治河防洪研究及实践进行综述。①河流与泥沙基本理论研究包括河流分级、干流河道分段与河势贴体网格等河流分类及形态研究,以及泥沙分界、长江水沙变化与输沙地形对比等泥沙特性及运动研究。②河流水沙模拟与专题研究包括河流水沙模拟研究与河流水沙专题研究,河流水沙模拟研究涉及河流水沙数学模型、应用及关键技术;河流水沙专题研究列举了弯道水流基本特性及数值模拟、空腔回流区水沙特性及模型变态影响研究,以及河湖岸线洲滩利用对河湖功能影响研究。③长江治理与防洪实践应用包括重大治江工程(三峡、葛洲坝、南水北调)研究、治江重大问题研究和长江防洪实践应用3个方面。建议加强基于泥沙的河流研究、不限于河流的泥沙研究以及河流与泥沙相互影响研究,并强化河流泥沙理论研究与治河防洪实践应用之间关联研究与成果转化。
(DONG Yao-hua. Researches and Practices on River & Sediment and River Regulation & Flood Control of the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(10): 7-15. (in Chinese))
Researches and practices on river & sediment and river regulation & flood control of the Yangtze River are comprehensively reviewed in terms of three aspects: theoretical researches on river & sediment, researches of river modeling and special study on flow & sediment, and practical application of river regulation & flood control. First, theoretical researches on river & sediment includes: river classification and morphology research such as stream-order gradation, river segmentation and river-regime-fitted grid, as well as sediment characteristics and movement while of demarcating grain size of river sediment, changes in runoff and sediment load, and methodological contrast between sediment budget and morphological change. Second, researches of river modeling and special study on flow & sediment consists of modeling on river flow and sediment transport and special studies on river and sediment, in which the modeling researches include development, applications and key technologies of river models, while the special studies give examples of essential features and numerical modeling of bend flow, features of cavity flow and sediment transportation and influence of physical model distortion, and impact of shoreline and island utilization on river-lake functions. Third, practical applications of river regulation & flood control comprises researches on large hydro-engineerings (e.g. Three Gorges Project, Gezhouba Project, and South-to-North Water Diversion Project), researches on major issues of river regulation, and practical application of flood control of the Yangtze River. Last but not the least, issues such as river research based on sediment, sediment research unlimited to river, and interaction between river and sediment should be enhanced, while interactive connection and achievement transformation between theoretical researches on river and sediment and practical application for river regulation and flood control should be also strengthened.
[72]
假冬冬, 邵学军, 王虹, 等. 考虑河岸变形的三维水沙数值模拟研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2009, 20(3):311-317.
(JIA Dong-dong, SHAO Xue-jun, WANG Hong, et al. 3D Mathematical Modeling for Fluvial Processes Considering Bank Erosion[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2009, 20(3): 311-317. (in Chinese))
[73]
周刚, 王虹, 邵学军, 等. 河型转化机理及其数值模拟:Ⅰ.模型建立[J]. 水科学进展, 2010, 21(2): 145-152.
(ZHOU Gang, WANG Hong, SHAO Xue-jun, et al. Mechanism of Channel Pattern Changes and Its Numerical Simulation: Ⅰ. Numerical Model[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2010, 21(2): 145-152. (in Chinese))
[74]
CHEN D, DUAN J G. Case Study: Two-dimensional Model Simulation of Channel Migration Processes in West Jordan River, Utah[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 134(3): 315-327.
[75]
COULTHARD T J, VANDE WIEL M J. A Cellular Model of River Meandering[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2006, 31(1): 123-132.
[76]
赵丽娜, 徐国宾. 基于超熵产生的河型稳定判别式[J]. 水利学报, 2015, 46(10): 1213-1221, 1232.
(ZHAO Li-na, XU Guo-bin. Discriminant of Stability for Channel Pattern Based on Excess Entropy Production[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015, 46(10):1213-1221, 1232. (in Chinese))
[77]
肖毅, 邵学军, 周建银. 基于尖点突变的河型稳定性判定方法[J]. 水科学进展, 2012, 23(2): 179-185.
(XIAO Yi, SHAO Xue-jun, ZHOU Jian-yin. A Cusp Catastrophe Model for Alluvial Channel Stability[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2012, 23(2): 179-185. (in Chinese))
[78]
韩其为, 何明民. 三峡水库建成后长江中、下游河道演变的趋势[J]. 长江科学院院报, 1997, 14(1):62-66.
(HAN Qi-wei, HE Ming-min. Tendency of River Channel Evolution in Yangtze River’s Middle and Lower Reaches after Three Gorges Project Being Completed[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 1997, 14(1): 62-66. (in Chinese))
[79]
黄文典, 王兆印. 长江中下游的河床纵剖面演变分析及预测[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 47(12):2131-2134.
(HUANG Wen-dian, WANG Zhao-yin. Fluvial Process Forecasting for the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2007, 47(12): 2131-2134. (in Chinese))
[80]
景唤, 张红武, 王彦君, 等. 基于冲积系统趋衡响应模型的河床冲刷研究与预测[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(11): 1350-1360.
(JING Huan, ZHANG Hong-wu, WANG Yan-jun, et al. Study on the Riverbed Erosion and Prediction Based on Equilibrium Response Model in Fluvial Channels[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(11): 1350-1360. (in Chinese))
[81]
HUANG H Q, DENG C, NANSON G C, et al. A Test of Equilibrium Theory and a Demonstration of Its Practical Application for Predicting the Morphodynamics of the Yangtze River[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2014, 39(5): 669-675.
[82]
HUANG H Q, CHANG H H, NANSON G C. Minimum Energy as the General Form of Critical Flow and Maximum Flow Efficiency and for Explaining Variations in River Channel Pattern[J]. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40(4): 2003WR002539.
[83]
韩其为. 对小浪底水库修建后黄河下游游荡性河段河型变化趋势的几点看法[J]. 人民黄河, 2002, 24(4): 9-10.
(HAN Qi-wei. Some Views on Changing Trend of Wandering Reach Type of the Lower Yellow River after Completion of Xiaolangdi Reservoir[J]. Yellow River, 2002, 24(4): 9-10. (in Chinese))
[84]
李长安, 张玉芬, 李国庆, 等. 滨江平原的形成模式是江—湖、洲—陆转化: 以长江武汉段武昌北部为例[J]. 湖泊科学, 2022, 34(3): 1006-1017.
(LI Chang-an, ZHANG Yu-fen, LI Guo-qing, et al. Formation Model of Riverside Plains in Wuhan Reach of the Yangtze River: River-lake and Island-land Interaction Transformations in Northern Wuchang[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2022, 34(3): 1006-1017. (in Chinese))
[85]
杨霄. 1570—1971年长江镇扬河段江心沙洲的演变过程及原因分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1512-1522.
摘要
受黄河夺淮的影响,从1570年开始淮河下游由向东独流入海逐渐演变为南下入江,成为长江一条支流。这一变化为长江河流地貌的演变增加了新的变量,改变了长江镇扬河段原有的河槽特征和水流结构,洲滩冲淤、岸线进退随之发生变化。本文使用历史文献考证与古地图判读相结合的研究方法,对淮河入江口外沙洲群的形成年代与演变过程进行考证,认为裕民洲、南新洲等沙洲至少在17世纪前已经存在于淮河入江口外,是成化、弘治年间藤料沙等沦没后新淤长的沙洲。淮河入江后上述沙洲不断扩大、与新淤长沙洲一起向北并岸,致使镇扬河段北汊消亡,并由江心洲型河床向弯曲型河床转化。曲流的形成又使位于上游凹岸的瓜洲受到侵蚀,而位于凸岸的镇江不断淤积,长江镇扬河段逐渐演变为今天的面貌。
(YANG Xiao. Evolution Processes of the Sandbanks in the Zhenjiang-Yangzhou Reach of the Yangtze River and Their Driving Forces (from 1570 to 1971)[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1512-1522. (in Chinese))

Under the influence of the changing relationship between the Yellow River and the Huaihe River, the lower reaches of the Huaihe River had gradually drained into the Yangtze River since 1570 AD, and finally became a tributary of the Yangtze River. This transformation added new variations to the evolution of the Yangtze River's fluvial processes by changing the original riverbed features and currents of the Zhenjiang-Yangzhou reach. This article analyzed three surveyed maps, discussed related historical literature and investigated some antique maps to explore the formation and the evolution of the sandbanks outside the estuary of the Huaihe River. Some sandbanks including the Yumin Sandbar and Nanxin Sandbar appeared before the 17th century due to the disintegration of original sandbars such as Tengliao Sandbar,which disappeared during the Chenghua and Hongzhi reigns in the Ming Dynasty (1465-1505 AD). Since the Huaihe River entered into the Yangtze River, the Yumin Sandbar and Nanxin Sandbar had continued to expand and banked to the north along with the newly-formed sandbanks. At last, the northern channel of the Zhenjiang-Yangzhou reach demised and the riverbed transformed from a straightforward bifurcation into a curved one. Accordingly, the formation of meandering flow began to erode Guazhou Town on the upstream concave bank and silt Zhenjiang Town on the convex bank, gradually reshaping the Zhenjiang-Yangzhou reach of the Yangtze River into its current configuration.

[86]
张向萍, 江恩慧, 李军华, 等. 游荡型河道河势突变调整的内涵与研究方法[J]. 人民黄河, 2022, 44(5): 51-56.
(ZHANG Xiang-ping, JIANG En-hui, LI Jun-hua, et al. Connotation and Research Method of River Regime Abrupt Change in Wandering Channels[J]. Yellow River, 2022, 44(5): 51-56. (in Chinese))
[87]
潘庆燊. 下荆江人工裁弯30年[J]. 人民长江, 2001, 32(5):27-29.
(PAN Qing-shen. Over 30 Years about the Artificial Cut-off Project on the Lower Jingjiang River[J]. Yangtze River, 2001, 32(5):27-29. (in Chinese))
[88]
卢金友. 长江中下游河道整治理论与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020.
(LU Jin-you. Theories and Technologies of Channel Regulation in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2020. (in Chinese))
[89]
潘庆燊, 胡向阳. 长江中下游河道整治研究[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2011.
(PAN Qing-shen, HU Xiang-yang. Channel Regulation in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2011. (in Chinese))
[90]
卢金友, 朱勇辉. 三峡水库下游江湖演变与治理若干问题探讨[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2014, 31(2):97-107.
(LU Jin-you, ZHU Yong-hui. Issues on Evolution and Regulation of Yangtze River and Lakes Downstream of TGP[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2014, 31(2): 97-107. (in Chinese))
[91]
陈肃利, 胡春燕, 王永忠. 三峡工程建成后长江中下游干流河道治理对策[J]. 人民长江, 2009, 40(16): 8-10.
(CHEN Su-li, HU Chun-yan, WANG Yong-zhong. Countermeasures of Channel Regulation for Main Stem of the Mid-lower Yangtze River after Completion of TGP[J]. Yangtze River, 2009, 40(16): 8-10. (in Chinese))
[92]
张细兵, 王敏, 朱勇辉. 三峡水库坝下游河道反应与治理对策探讨[J]. 人民长江, 2017, 48(11): 1-6.
(ZHANG Xi-bing, WANG Min, ZHU Yong-hui. Discuss on River Channel Response at Downstream of Three Gorges Reservoir and Control Measures[J]. Yangtze River, 2017, 48(11): 1-6. (in Chinese))
[93]
丁兵, 姚仕明, 栾华龙. 新形势下长江中下游干流河道治理思路探讨[J]. 长江技术经济, 2023, 7(1):35-42.
(DING Bing, YAO Shi-ming, LUAN Hua-long. Thoughts on River Regulation in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Changjiang River under the New Situation[J]. Technology and Economy of Changjiang, 2023, 7(1):35-42. (in Chinese))
[94]
张曼, 周建军, 黄国鲜. 长江中游防洪问题与对策[J]. 水资源保护, 2016, 32(4): 1-10.
(ZHANG Man, ZHOU Jian-jun, HUANG Guo-xian. Flood Control Problems in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River and Countermeasures[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2016, 32(4): 1-10. (in Chinese))
[95]
李云生, 王浩, 王昕竑, 等. 长江流域生态环境治理的瓶颈及对策分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(5): 1262-1267.
(LI Yun-sheng, WANG Hao, WANG Xin-hong, et al. Analysis of Bottlenecks and Countermeasures of Ecological Environment Governance in Yangtze River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(5): 1262-1267. (in Chinese))

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3209505)
国家自然科学基金长江水科学研究联合基金项目(U2240206)

编辑: 罗 娟
PDF(11158 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/