Differences between Harmonic Response Analysis and Time-historyAnalysis of Pressure Fluctuation

LIU Jian, WU He-gao

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2014, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8) : 93-97.

PDF(1887 KB)
PDF(1887 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2014, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8) : 93-97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.08.0182014,31(08):93-97
HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE AND MATERIAL

Differences between Harmonic Response Analysis and Time-historyAnalysis of Pressure Fluctuation

  • LIU Jian, WU He-gao
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Harmonic response analysis and time history analysis are both most commonly used to analyze the vibration responses of powerhouse structure. In order to analyze the differences between these two methods, we calculated the vibration responses of powerhouse structure of a pumped storage station under pressure fluctuations using the two methods. By comparing the vibration amplitude, vibration speed, vibration acceleration and dynamic stresses of powerhouse structure, we obtained the differences between these two methods. Results suggest that the root mean square values of vibration amplitude, vibration speed and acceleration calculated by harmonic response analysis are bigger and peak values are smaller than those calculated by time history analysis. The dynamic stress of powerhouse structure calculated by the two methods are both small and the difference between the results is also small. When the time-history data of pressure fluctuation is available, time history analysis method is preferable; if not, harmonic method can also be used to analyse the dynamic responses of powerhouse structure.

Key words

harmonic response analysis / time history analysis / pressure fluctuation / powerhouse structure / dynamic response

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Jian, WU He-gao. Differences between Harmonic Response Analysis and Time-historyAnalysis of Pressure Fluctuation[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2014, 31(8): 93-97 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.08.0182014,31(08):93-97

References

[1] 柴 山,吕凤军,孙义冈,等.计算汽轮机叶片动应力的谐响应分析法[J].汽轮机技术,2002,44(5):267-268,281.(CHAI Shan, LV Feng-jun, SUN Yi-gang, et al. Computation for Dynamic Stress of Steam Turbine Blade by Using the Method of Harmonic Response Analysis[J]. Turbine Technology, 2002, 44(5): 267-268, 281. (in Chinese))
[2] 陈 婧,马震岳,刘志明,等.三峡水电站主厂房振动分析[J].水力发电学报,2004,23(5): 36-39.(CHEN Jing, MA Zhen-yue, LIU Zhi-ming, et al. Dynamic Analysis of Three Gorges Hydropower House[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering,2004,23(5):36-39.(in Chinese))
[3] 田少强,潘 虹.轴流泵装置模型试验压力脉动特性研究[J].四川水力发电,2010,29(5):116-120.(TIAN Shao-qiang, PAN Hong. Research of Pressure Fluctuation Characteristics of Model Test of Axial Flow Pump[J]. Sichuan Water Power, 2010, 29(5): 116-120. (in Chinese))
[4] 欧阳金惠,陈厚群,李德玉.三峡电站厂房结构振动计算与试验研究[J].水利学报,2005,36(4):484-490.(OUYANG Jin-hui, CHEN Hou-qun, LI De-yu. Computation of Vibration in Powerhouse of Three Gorges Project and Prototype Verification[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2005, 36(4): 484-490.(in Chinese))
[5] 陈 婧,马震岳,戚海峰,等.宜兴抽水蓄能电站地下厂房结构振动响应分析[J].水电能源科学,2009,27(3):81-83,99.(CHEN Jing, MA Zhen-yue, QI Hai-feng, et al. Analysis on Vibration Responses of Underground Powerhouse Structure of Yixing Pumped Storage Station[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2009, 27(3):81-83,99. (in Chinese))
PDF(1887 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/