河道实测冲淤量不同计算方法结果比较分析

段光磊; 彭严波; 郭满姣

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.02.021

PDF(1533 KB)

长江科学院院报 ›› 2014, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2) : 108-113,118. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.02.021

三峡工程运用10年后长江中游江湖演变与治理学术研讨会专栏

河道实测冲淤量不同计算方法结果比较分析

段光磊, 彭严波, 郭满姣

作者信息 +

Comparative Analysis on Riverbed Erosion and Deposition Amount Calculated by Different Methods

DUAN Guang-lei, PENG Yan-bo, GUO Man-jiao

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

在生产实践中,采用不同计算方法得出的冲淤量结果往往差别很大,部分河段、部分时段甚至存在冲淤性质相反情况。采用大量的实测水沙、地形资料,运用断面地形法、网格地形法和输沙量平衡法3种方法计算了三峡水库蓄水后三峡坝下游宜昌至监利河段的实测河床冲淤量,对不同计算方法的计算结果和影响计算精度的因素进行了分析,运用非线性分形理论对河床起伏程度与断面代表性关系进行了研究。研究结果表明输沙量平衡法需对悬沙测验成果进行改正,并考虑泥沙测验定线误差、水量不平衡、河道采砂和分流洪道冲淤;断面地形法需在弯道、汊道、河道急剧放宽和束窄的局部河段布置相对较密的断面;网格地形法需选择适宜的插值方法,且网格尺寸不宜大于施测断面点间距。

Abstract

In practice, the amount of riverbed erosion and deposition in the same reach or in the same period calculated by different methods differs significantly from each other. At present, the calculation methods by using cross-section morphological variation, DEM grid morphological variation, and sediment balance are widely used. The amount of riverbed erosion and deposition in the reach from Yichang to Jianli of Yangtze River downstream of Three Gorges Project after impoundment was calculated using the above mentioned three methods based on topographic map, cutting cross-section on topographic map and sediment data of hydrologic stations. Furthermore, the calculation results and the factors affecting the calculation accuracy were analyzed, and the nonlinear fractal theory wasused to study the relation between riverbed fluctuation degree and section’s representativeness. Research results suggest that to improve the sediment balance method, suspended load near riverbed needs to be modified, and the alignment error of sediment measurement, water imbalance, sand mining and sediment diversion should be taken into consideration; as for the method of cross-section’s morphological variation, relatively close sections must be laid in river bends, bifurcated reaches or contractive and expansive reaches; while appropriate interpolation method must be employed for the method of grid morphological variation, and the grid space should be no larger than the distance between measuring points.

导出引用

段光磊, 彭严波, 郭满姣. 河道实测冲淤量不同计算方法结果比较分析[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2014, 31(2): 108-113,118 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.02.021

DUAN Guang-lei, PENG Yan-bo, GUO Man-jiao. Comparative Analysis on Riverbed Erosion and Deposition Amount Calculated by Different Methods[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2014, 31(2): 108-113,118 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.02.021

中图分类号： TV147.5

参考文献

[1] 申冠卿,姜乃迁,张原锋,等. 黄河下游断面法与沙量法冲淤计算成果比较及输沙率资料修正[J]. 泥沙研究,2006,(1):32-37. (SHEN Guan-qin,JIANG Nai-qian,ZHANG Yuan-feng, et al. Comparison of the Calculated Sedimentation Amount by Different Methods in the Lower Yellow River[J]. Journal of Sediment Research,2006,(1):32-37.(in Chinese))

[2] 程龙渊,刘拴明,肖俊法,等. 黄河下游河道冲淤量计算问题研究[J],人民黄河,1998,20(2):4-7.(CHENG Long-yuan,LIU Shuan-ming,XIAO Jun-fa,et al. Research on the Problem for Calculating the Sedimentation Amount in the Lower Yellow River[J]. Yellow River,1998,20(2):4-7.(in Chinese))

[3] 李义天,邓金运,孙昭华,等. 输沙量法和地形法计算螺山汉口河段淤积量比较[J]. 泥沙研究,2002,(4): 20-24. (LI Yi-tian,DENG Jin-yun,SUN Zhao-hua,et al. Comparison of Sedimentation Amount in the Reach from Luoshan to Hankou by Sediment Method and Topographical Method[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2002,(4): 20-24.(in Chinese))

[4] 董耀华. 输沙量法与地形法估算河道冲淤量的对比研究[J]. 长江科学院院报,2009,26(8):1-5.(DONG Yao-hua. Contrast Study on Estimation of River Deposition-Erosion Amount by Sediment Budget Method and Morphological Change Method[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2009,26(8):1-5.(in Chinese))

[5] 何必. 基于克里金法的数字高程模型插值研究[J]. 科技信息,2011,(9):22-31.(HE Bi. Research on the Interpolation of DEM Based on Kriging[J]. Science and Technology Information, 2011,(9):22-31.(in Chinese))

[6] 靳国栋,刘衍聪,牛文杰. 距离加权反比插值法和克里金插值法的比较[J]. 长春工业大学学报,2003,24(3):53-57. (JIN Guo-dong, LIU Yan-cong, NIU Wen-jie. Comparison between Inverse Distance Weighting Method and Kriging[J]. Journal of Changchun University of Technology, 2003,24(3):53-57.(in Chinese))

[7] 罗亦泳,张立亭,陈竹安,等. 基于Surfer的数据网格化与体积计算精度分析[J]. 测绘科学,2009,34(5): 97-99. (LUO Yi-yong, ZHANG Li-ting, CHEN Zhu’an, et al. Precision Analysis of Data Gridding and Calculation Volume Based on Surfer[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2009,34(5): 97-99. (in Chinese))

[8] 韩其为. 粗颗粒悬移质测验误差分析[J]. 水文,2008,28(1):1-6. (HAN Qi-wei. Error Analysis of Coarse Suspended Load Measuring[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008,28(1):1-6. (in Chinese))

[9] 长江水利委员会水文局. 2006—2007年度临底悬移质输沙观测试验成果分析[R]. 武汉:长江水利委员会水文局,2007. (Bureau of Hydrology of Changjiang Water Resources Commission. Analysis on the Test Result of Suspended Load near Riverbed from 2006 to 2007[R]. Wuhan:Bureau of Hydrology of Changjiang Water Resources Commission,2007.(in Chinese))

[10]长江水利委员会水文局荆江水文水资源勘测局. 2011年度沙市站临底悬移质泥沙观测试验成果分析报告[R]. 荆州:长江水利委员会水文局荆江水文水资源勘测局,2012. (Jingjiang Bureau of Hydrology and Water Resources Survey under Bureau of Hydrology of Changjiang Water Resources Commission. Analysis on the Test Result of Suspended Load near Riverbed in Shashi Station in 2011[R]. Jingzhou: Jingjiang Bureau of Hydrology and Water Resources Survey under Bureau of Hydrology of Changjiang Water Resources Commission,2012.(in Chinese))