Water-related Disasters
LU Qing, TU Guan-yu, YAN Bing, ZHAO Dong-sheng
[Objective] Drought-flood abrupt alternation (DFAA), characterized by high suddenness, strong complexity, and great destructive power, has emerged as a significant risk source threatening regional ecological security and social sustainable development. This study aims to systematically review the progress of DFAA research, clarify its development trajectory, research hotspots, and knowledge structure, identify existing research gaps, and provide scientific guidance for future research directions. [Methods] Based on Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Chinese and English publications related to drought-flood abrupt alternation (DFAA) between 2005 and 2024 are systematically retrieved. The bibliometric analysis tool CiteSpace software is utilized to visually analyze annual publication trends, keyword co-occurrences, and keyword bursts. On this basis, existing research is summarized and compared from three dimensions—identification methods, causal mechanisms, and disaster impacts—and, accordingly, optimization pathways for future research are proposed. [Results] (1) From 2005 to 2024, a total of 322 DFAA-related publications were issued globally, with China accounting for 53.2%. The development of CNKI literature went through three stages: preliminary exploration (2005-2010), rapid development (2011-2018), and stable development (2019-2024). Publications in the WOS have accelerated since 2018 and reached a peak in 2023, reflecting a rapid increase in international attention. (2) Domestic research focuses on the spatiotemporal evolution patterns and atmospheric circulation mechanisms of DFAA, with keyword bursts concentrated in trend analysis, spatiotemporal characteristics, and low-frequency oscillations. International research places greater emphasis on the long-term changes of DFAA and its ecological impacts in the context of climate change, with hotspot keywords including the Yangtze River, vegetation, and climate change. (3) First, there is a lack of a unified, multi-scale coupled DFAA identification system, as existing indices are mostly limited to a single temporal scale and consider limited factors in index construction. Second, causal analysis relies excessively on meteorological factors, with insufficient consideration of underlying surface changes and human activities. Third, impact assessment focuses on agricultural yield reduction and vegetation response, while research on the long-term impacts on urban resilience, water resource security, socio-economic systems, and ecosystem service functions remains inadequate. [Conclusion] Research on DFAA is currently at a critical stage of transitioning from phenomenon description to mechanism analysis and comprehensive impact assessment. Future research should focus on constructing a comprehensive identification indicator system that integrates multiple temporal scales and considers regional heterogeneity, while integrating multi-source data such as precipitation, soil moisture, temperature, topography, and vegetation to improve the accuracy and applicability of event identification. Future efforts are needed to deepen investigations into the formation mechanisms of DFAA and to strengthen regional comparisons and global-scale correlation analysis. In addition, the dimensions of impact research should be expanded to systematically assess the compound effects of DFAA on urban infrastructure, water resource allocation, ecological service functions, and socio-economic resilience, and to establish long-term monitoring networks that can provide scientific support for disaster risk management and climate adaptation policy formulation.