PDF(7483 KB)
Dynamic Risk Assessment for Flood Detention Areas with Diversion Volume as the Basis: A Case Study of the Honghu Lake East Flood Detention Area
WANG Han, LIU Jia-ming, TAN Zheng-yu, LU Cheng-wei, GUO Peng, ZHOU Man, MA Hao-yu
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 135-142.
PDF(7483 KB)
PDF(7483 KB)
Dynamic Risk Assessment for Flood Detention Areas with Diversion Volume as the Basis: A Case Study of the Honghu Lake East Flood Detention Area
[Objective] To provide technical support for the precise regulation of upstream and downstream floods, the scientific arrangement of excess flood volume management, and the timely organization of emergency evacuation, we construct a risk assessment system for the operation of flood storage and detention areas (FSDAs) to accurately evaluate their dynamic operational risks. [Method] We construct an operational risk assessment system for FSDAs based on the coupling of Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Combined with a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model and a set of operational schemes based on flood diversion volumes, the flood routing process at various stages was simulated. The dynamic risk characteristics of FSDA operation, specifically the “flood diversion volume-water level-loss-population relocation” relationship, were extracted. The Honghu Lake East Sub-block FSDA was selected as a typical case for risk analysis. [Result] (1) There is a strong linear relationship between the flood diversion volume and the average water level in the Honghu East Sub-block FSDA. For every 0.5 billion m3 increase in flood diversion volume, the average water level rises by 0.57 m. (2) The variation of various risks with flood diversion volume is comprehensively affected by loss rates and land cover distribution. Direct economic losses in this area increase most rapidly when the flood diversion volume ranges from 2.0 to 4.5 billion m3, while indirect economic losses and relocated populations grow fastest during the initial stage of flood diversion (volume <0.5 billion m3). (3) When the flood diversion volume reaches 2.0 billion m3, the entire area is inundated, requiring the complete relocation of 183 700 people. When the volume exceeds 2.5 billion m3, the economic loss structure shifts from being dominated by indirect losses to direct losses, with secondary and tertiary industry losses stabilizing at 980 million RMB. At a flood diversion volume exceeding 3.0 billion m3, the fishery output value in the area is completely lost, amounting to approximately 3.6 billion RMB. At a volume of 6.0 billion m3, the direct and indirect economic losses are approximately 17.36 billion RMB and 6.55 billion RMB, respectively. [Conclusion] The dynamic risk assessment method established in this study can be extended to other FSDAs. The dynamic correlation characteristics of “flood diversion volume-water level-loss-population relocation” can simulate in real-time the changes in inundation extent, economic losses, and population risks under different diversion schemes. This provides a quantitative basis for selecting the timing and magnitude of flood diversion, supporting refined trade-offs in cross-regional flood volume allocation. However, the nighttime remote sensing and population distribution data used in this study have relatively low accuracy, making it difficult to apply the method to smaller FSDAs. Future research should focus on improving the accuracy of fundamental data.
dynamic flood risk / risk assessment / flood detention area / remote sensing technology / geographic information system
| [1] |
余启辉, 刘佳明, 卢程伟. 长江流域防洪规划修编关键问题探讨[J]. 中国水利, 2024(12): 29-34.
(
|
| [2] |
胡维忠, 王乐, 刘佳明. 长江流域防洪工程体系能力提升建设思路[J]. 中国水利, 2022(5):31-34.
(
|
| [3] |
钮新强, 胡维忠, 刘佳明, 等. 构建适应新阶段高质量发展的长江防洪体系[J]. 中国水利, 2022(5): 20-23.
(
|
| [4] |
王静, 李娜, 丁志雄, 等. 蓄滞洪区洪水风险区划方法及典型案例研究[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2022, 32(4):8-14.
(
|
| [5] |
李时, 秦毅, 刘强, 等. 基于洪灾风险管理的蓄滞洪区道路规划[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2020, 18(3): 81-90.
(
|
| [6] |
周洁, 董增川, 朱振业. 洪泽湖周边滞洪区洪水风险分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2017, 35(4):63-66.
(
|
| [7] |
覃莲超, 涂澜涛, 王彩虹, 等. 蓄滞洪区转移道路工程规划布设研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024(7): 191-195.
(
|
| [8] |
张念强, 王静, 李娜. 洪水动态风险分析技术对防汛应急工作的支撑: 以海河“23·7”流域性特大洪水期间兰沟洼蓄滞洪区运用为例[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2023, 33(9): 39-44.
(
|
| [9] |
沈定涛. 基于机载LiDAR数据的洞庭湖蓄滞洪区洪水灾害风险评估技术与方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2017.
(
|
| [10] |
文志英, 井竹君. 分形几何和分维数简介[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 1995, 25(4):20-34.
(
|
| [11] |
韩向娣, 周艺, 王世新, 等. 基于夜间灯光和土地利用数据的GDP空间化[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2012, 27(3): 396-405.
(
|
| [12] |
潘思东. 基于夜光遥感和小区POI的住宅发展与经济增长的空间耦合研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(5): 646-652.
(
|
| [13] |
蒋水华, 黄中发, 黄劲松, 等. 蓄滞洪区洪水演进模拟及堤防溃决损失评估方法[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2020, 31(1): 131-139, 145.
(
|
| [14] |
吴滨滨, 马奉泉, 胡珊珊, 等. 海河“23·7”流域性特大洪水东淀蓄滞洪区洪水演进复盘分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41(5): 96-105.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |