[Objective] To improve the accuracy of groundwater level time series prediction and explore the application effects of 17 decomposition techniques—EMD, EEMD, CEEMD, ICEEMD, LMD, RLMD, ITD, ESMD, WT, WPT, EWT, VMD, SSA, TVF-EMD, FDM, SGMD, and SVMD—in the decomposition of groundwater level time series data, a love evolution algorithm (LEA) - fast learning network (FLN) prediction model based on these 17 decomposition techniques is proposed. [Methods] Firstly, 17 decomposition techniques including EMD were used to decompose the groundwater level time series data, and several decomposition components were obtained. Secondly, based on the training set of each decomposition component, a fitness function was constructed, and LEA was used to optimize the fitness function to obtain the optimal FLN input layer weight and hidden layer threshold for FLN. Seventeen models, including EMD-LEV-FLN, were established to predict and reconstruct each decomposition component. Finally, the daily water level time series prediction of the Caoba groundwater monitoring well in Yunnan Province from 2019 to 2023 was used as an example to verify each model. [Results] (1) WPT-LEV-FLN, EWT-LEV-FLN, FDM-LEV-FLN, TVF-EMD-LEV-FLN models achieved the highest prediction accuracy, with average absolute percentage error (MAPE), average absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) ranging 0.000%-0.001%, 0.002-0.020 m, and 0.002-0.032 m, respectively. The determination coefficients (R2) were all 1.000 0. The SSA-LEV-FLN, WT-LEV-FLN, and VMD-LEV-FLN models came in second place, with predicted MAPE, MAE, RMSE, and R2 ranging 0.003%-0.007%, 0.041-0.087 m, 0.063-0.131 m, and 0.999 5-0.999 9, respectively. Other models had relatively poor prediction accuracy, with predicted MAPE, MAE, RMSE, and R2 ranging 0.017%-0.033%, 0.221-0.417 m, 0.385-0.705 m, and 0.985 3-0.995 6, respectively. Among them, WPT-LEV-FLN model had high prediction accuracy and small computational scale, demonstrating the greatest practical value and significance. (2) WPT, EWT, FDM, and TVF-EMD showed the best decomposition performance, among which WPT not only had good decomposition performance, but also produced fewer decomposition components, making it the most advantageous. SSA, WT, and VMD showed relatively good decomposition performance, and increasing the number of decomposition components could further improve the decomposition effectiveness. The other models performed relatively poorly, among which SGMD and SVMD had the least decomposition components and the greatest potential. [Conclusion] This study compares the application performance of 17 current mainstream time series decomposition techniques for processing groundwater level time series decomposition and proposes 17 prediction models, providing reference and guidance for the selection of time series decomposition methods and research on groundwater time series prediction.