丹江口水库消落带总氮和总磷变化特征及通量研究

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20220031

长江科学院院报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 58-62.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20220031

丹江口水库消落带总氮和总磷变化特征及通量研究

金海洋¹, 王立², 赵良元¹, 秦赫², 陶晶祥¹

1.长江科学院流域水环境研究所,武汉 430010;
2.南水北调中线水源有限责任公司,湖北丹江口 442700

收稿日期:2022-01-11 修回日期:2022-03-07 出版日期:2023-05-01 发布日期:2023-05-22
作者简介:金海洋(1990-),男,湖北鄂州人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事流域水资源保护与水环境治理领域研究。E-mail:haiyang@whu.edu.cn
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2019177/SH,CKSF2021442/SH,CKSF2019210/SH);国家自然科学基金项目(51809010,41907155);湖北省自然科学基金一般面上项目(2020CFB663);湖北省自然科学青年基金项目(2019CFB406)

Variation Characteristics and Flux of TN and TP in Water Level Fluctuation Zone of Danjiangkou Reservoir

JIN Hai-yang¹, WANG Li², ZHAO Liang-yuan¹, QIN He², TAO Jing-xiang¹

1. Basin Water Environment Department, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China;
2. Water Source of Middle Route of South-to-North Water Diversion Project Co., Ltd., Danjiangkou 442700, China

Received:2022-01-11 Revised:2022-03-07 Published:2023-05-01 Online:2023-05-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 开展丹江口水库消落带土壤总氮(TN)和总磷(TP)变化特征与通量研究,对明晰消落带污染输出特征、保护水库水质安全有着重要的实践作用。将丹江口水库划分为汉库和丹库两个区域,以不同区域内典型消落带为研究对象,监测分析了2020年9月—2021年9月不同时期不同区域消落带土壤TN和TP的变化特征,并通过收支平衡法构建模型,估算了丹江口水库消落带在不同时期的TN和TP通量。结果表明,2020年9—12月淹水期内,丹江口水库不同区域消落带TN、TP含量变化显著,汉库耕地和园地的TN、TP含量显著上升,其余区域消落带土壤均存在TN、TP流失现象。2021年3—6月落干期内,丹江口水库不同区域消落带TN、TP含量总体上呈现上升积累趋势。2020年9月—2021年9月,丹江口水库不同区域消落带TN、TP含量整体呈下降趋势。丹江口水库消落带在淹水期表现为氮和磷的释放源,TN通量834.66 t,TP通量10 422.12 t;在落干期表现为氮和磷的吸收汇,TN通量-8 623.69 t,TP通量-10 032.94 t。2020年9月—2021年9月,丹江口水库消落带总体上表现为氮和磷的释放源,TN通量20 122.22 t,TP通量1 509.52 t。丹江口水库消落带污染物释放对水库水质安全的风险不容忽视。

关键词: 消落带, TN, TP, 通量, 丹江口水库

Abstract: Study on the variation characteristics and flux of total nitrogen(TN) and total phosphorous (TP) in soil in the water-level-fluctuation zone of Danjiangkou reservoir is of practical significance for clarifying the pollution output characteristics and protecting the water quality of the reservoir. In this paper, Danjiangkou reservoir was divided into Hanku reservoir and Danku reservoir. The variation characteristics of TN and TP in soil in the typical water-level fluctuation zone of Danjiangkou reservoir in different periods from September 2020 to September 2021 were monitored and analyzed. In addition, the TN and TP fluxes were estimated by using the break-even model. Results reveal that during the flooding period from September 2020 to December 2020, the content of TN and TP in different water-level-fluctuating areas of Danjiangkou reservoir changed significantly. To be specific, the content of TN and TP in the farmland and garden fields of Hanku reservoir increased notably, while TN and TP were lost in other areas. During the water-level-falling dry period from March 2021 to June 2021, the content of TN and TP in different water-level-fluctuation zones of Danjiangkou reservoir showed an increasing trend on the whole. From September 2020 to September 2021, the content of TN and TP in different water-level-fluctuation zones of Danjiangkou reservoir displayed a decreasing trend. During flooding period, the water-level-fluctuation zone of Danjiangkou reservoir acted as the release source of nitrogen and phosphorus, with TN flux reaching 834.66 t and TP flux 10 422.12 t. During water-level falling dry period, the water-level-fluctuation zone of Danjiangkou reservoir acted as the sink of nitrogen and phosphorus, with TN flux of -8 623.69 t and TP flux -10 032.94 t. From September 2020 to September 2021, the water-level-fluctuation zone of Danjiangkou reservoir acted as the release source of nitrogen and phosphorus on the whole, with TN flux amounting to 20 122.22 t and TP flux 1 509.52 t. The pollutant release risk of water-level-fluctuation zone of Danjiangkou reservoir should not be ignored as it poses a threat to the water quality of the reservoir.

Key words: water-level-fluctuating zone, TN, TP, flux, Danjiangkou reservoir

中图分类号:

金海洋, 王立, 赵良元, 秦赫, 陶晶祥. 丹江口水库消落带总氮和总磷变化特征及通量研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(5): 58-62.

JIN Hai-yang, WANG Li, ZHAO Liang-yuan, QIN He, TAO Jing-xiang. Variation Characteristics and Flux of TN and TP in Water Level Fluctuation Zone of Danjiangkou Reservoir[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(5): 58-62.

[1]	刘成堃, 张航, 靖争, 杨星玥, 张力. 面向数字孪生场景的三维水质推演仿真方法[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(8): 189-196.
[2]	金可, 常世举, 万丹, 周火明, 刘富强, 马萧萧. 抽水蓄能电站水库岩质边坡消落带生态修复探讨[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(6): 51-57.
[3]	秦赫, 潘璐, 彭晓然, 倪雪峰, 黄玄敏. 新时期南水北调中线工程水源地水质监测体系建设构想[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(10): 1-5.
[4]	翟文亮, 唐见, 汪成刚, 李晓萌, 赵科锋. 耦合改进输出系数法-SWAT模型的丹江口水库流域非点源污染模拟[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(7): 50-58.
[5]	黄大观, 牛荻涛, 刘云贺, 苏丽, 夏倩. 玄武岩-聚丙烯纤维增强混凝土力学性能、渗透性能和孔结构研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(2): 147-152.
[6]	左建, 林云发, 邓山, 连雷雷, 王现正. 丹江口水库兴利效益影响因素分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(5): 22-27.
[7]	何士华, 赖毅舟, 叶凤艳, 沈春颖, 潘锋. 滇中引水工程主要受水区水汽输送时空变化[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(5): 36-44.
[8]	周火明, 于江, 万丹, 甘国权, 卢阳, 金可. 乌东德库区消落带生态修复植物遴选与配置[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(2): 50-55.
[9]	吴帆, 张云旆, 寇甲兵, 刘立鹏, 李鹏宇. 基于扭矩贯入指标和神经网络的围岩质量预判方法[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(12): 33-41.
[10]	范璐璐, 张延杰, 王凌航, 王娅萍, 李奕柏, 何苗. 基于OSU的OTN技术在滇中引水工程中的部署策略[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(12): 147-153.
[11]	袁兴中. 三峡库区澎溪河消落带生态系统修复实践探索[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(1): 1-9.
[12]	张为, 胡园, 陶晶祥, 黄华伟, 吴敏. 洋澜湖沉积物中磷的分布及污染评价[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(9): 35-39.
[13]	胡月, 卢阳, 金可, 周火明, 万丹, 张乾柱, 闫建梅. 干热河谷生态治理探讨[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(10): 69-75.
[14]	张乾柱, 邓浩俊, 卢阳, 周火明, 高强, 周裕红. 丹江口水库水化学特征现状分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(9): 24-30.
[15]	张笛梦, 胡艳平, 王振华, 李青云, 李冠亚. 外源腐殖酸对黏质农田土壤Cd活性的影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(2): 68-71.

丹江口水库消落带总氮和总磷变化特征及通量研究

Variation Characteristics and Flux of TN and TP in Water Level Fluctuation Zone of Danjiangkou Reservoir

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价