PDF(3658 KB)
PDF(3658 KB)
PDF(3658 KB)
深埋隧洞穿高压富水断层涌水突泥分析与处置技术
Management Technology for Water and Mud Inrush in Deeply Buried Tunnel Crossing High-pressure Water-rich Faults
针对隧洞穿越高压富水断层涌水突泥破坏性强、可灌性差的难题,以滇中引水工程香炉山隧洞过大栗树断裂次级断层涌水突泥灾害治理为例,通过分析隧洞涌水突泥洞段的地质特征、灾害过程与成因,提出了超前钻探、超前灌浆、超前泄压、超前支护组合处置对策。针对隧洞下半断面围岩碎粉含量高、阻止浆液扩散导致注浆效果不佳的问题,提出了置换式注浆加固技术,即注浆孔分A孔、B孔,通过A孔注浆,B孔泄压并冲出岩粉的方式进行注浆,以利于岩粉排出和浆液扩散,成功解决了香炉山隧洞DLI3+681.5涌水突泥灾害治理技术难题。研究成果对类似地质条件下隧洞涌水突泥灾害治理提供参考。
Water and mud inrush in tunnels crossing high-pressure water-rich faults is highly destructive with low groutability. To address this challenge, we examined the geological characteristics, disaster processes, and causes associated with water and mud inrush in the Xianglushan Tunnel of Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project as a case study. We propose a combined management strategy consisting of drilling, grouting, pressure relief, and support all in advance. To tackle the high content of fine powder in the surrounding rock of the tunnel’s lower half section, which impedes the diffusion of grouting slurry, we introduce a replacement grouting reinforcement technique. This technique involves dividing the grouting holes into top holes and back (or horizontal) holes. Grout is injected through the top holes, while pressure is released through the back or horizontal holes to flush out rock powder. This approach facilitates the removal of rock powder and improves slurry diffusion. Our method successfully resolves the water and mud inrush disaster in DLI3+681.5 section of Xianglushan Tunnel. The research findings offer valuable insights for managing water and mud inrush disasters in tunnels with similar geological conditions.
深埋隧洞 / 富水断层 / 涌水突泥 / 处置对策 / 置换式注浆加固技术 / 灾害治理
deeply buried tunnel / water-rich fault / water and mud inrush / management measures / replacement grouting reinforcement technology / disaster management
| [1] |
李术才, 许振浩, 黄鑫, 等. 隧道突水突泥致灾构造分类、地质判识、孕灾模式与典型案例分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(5):1041-1069.
(
|
| [2] |
李术才, 张庆松. 隧道及地下工程突涌水机理与治理[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2014:19-22.
(
|
| [3] |
张旭东, 汪海滨, 封明君, 等. 释能降压工法在高压富水岩溶隧道风险规避中的应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(增刊1):2782-2791.
(
|
| [4] |
张成平, 张顶立, 叶英, 等. 高压富水岩溶隧道注浆机理及作用效果分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2009, 5(5): 996-1002.
摘 要:高压富水岩溶隧道施工中存在很高的安全风险,常面临涌突水防治、围岩稳定性控制和衬砌高水压处理等技术难题,实施可靠的超前地质预报和有效的注浆是解决上述难题的关键。基于穿越高压富水岩溶区的圆梁山隧道工程,采用综合地质预报技术准确探明了溶洞的形态及其充填物性质;通过理论分析揭示了岩溶隧道的注浆机理;利用数值模拟确定了合理的注浆参数;通过复合注浆形成了可靠的注浆加固圈。监测结果表明:注浆圈起到了加固围岩、稳定工作面、封堵地下水和降低衬砌外水压力的综合作用,隧道施工中工作面稳定,围岩变形不大,堵水效果显著,达到了5m3 ·m- 1 ·d- 1的隧道限量排水控制标准,并实现了小排水量条件下有效降低衬砌外水压力的目的。研究成果对高压富水岩溶隧道建设具有借鉴意义。
(
<p>Abstract: Karst tunnels with high water pressure and rich water have very high risk during construction. They are commonly faced with the technical problems such as preventing water burst, keeping surrounding rocks stable and treating high water pressure on lining. Reliable geology forecasting and effective grouting is the key to solve the problems. Based on the project case of Yuanliangshan tunnel that locates at high water pressure and rich water regions, the methods of exactly forecasting the site, shape and filing of karst caves were introduced; the mechanisms of grouting were systemically analyzed; and the appropriate grouting parameters were decided according to numerical analyasis. By multiple grouting the effective grouting circle were formed. The monitoring data show that grouting circle attains the effects of reinforcing surrounding rocks, steadying working face, blocking ground water and reducing water pressure on tunnel lining. The surrounding rocks keep stable and its deformation is very small when tunneling. The drainage control standard of 5m3•m-1•d-1 is also achieved, and the water pressure on tunnel lining is reduced remarkably with low discharge. The research result can provide references for similar karst tunneling in high water pressure and water-enriched region.</p>
|
| [5] |
黄雄军. 岩溶隧道突水突泥影响因素及对策[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2013, 30(1): 45-48, 53.
(
|
| [6] |
包德勇. 高压富水隧道断层破碎带突涌水分析与工程对策[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2012, 49(5): 123-127, 131.
(
|
| [7] |
张金夫, 汶文钊. 大瑞铁路大柱山隧道高压富水断层处理技术[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018, 55(3): 160-166.
(
|
| [8] |
蒋良文, 易勇进, 杨翔, 等. 渝怀铁路圆梁山隧道桐麻岭背斜东翼岩溶涌水突泥灾害与整治方案比选[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(增刊1):340-345.
(
|
| [9] |
李鸣冲. 宜万铁路马鹿箐隧道“+978” 溶洞处理技术研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2012(2): 30-33, 38.
(
|
| [10] |
李睿, 吕言新, 李丰果, 等. 高压富水岩溶区特长隧道注浆堵水综合技术研究[J]. 中国矿山工程, 2011, 40(5): 55-59.
(
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
杨坪, 唐益群, 彭振斌, 等, 砂卵(砾)石层中注浆模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(12): 2134-2138.
(
|
| [14] |
张忠苗, 邹健, 贺静漪, 等. 黏土中压密注浆及劈裂注浆室内模拟试验分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(12):1818-1824.
(
|
| [15] |
王凯, 李术才, 杨磊, 等. 全风化花岗岩加固特性注浆模拟试验[J]. 天津大学学报:自然科学与工程技术版, 2017, 50(11):1199-1209.
(
|
| [16] |
袁敬强, 陈卫忠, 黄世武, 等. 全风化花岗岩注浆加固特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(增刊l): 2876-2882.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |