断层破碎带是矿山突水的重要通道,大多数破碎带由土石混合体组成,其渗流特性对矿山突水的预测和防治具有重要影响。为了研究含石率对断层破碎带土石混合体渗流特性的影响,采用现场取样、实验室重塑的方法,应用 GDS 三轴试验系统研究了不同含石率土石混合体试样在不同围压和轴向压力作用下的渗透特性,并分析了渗透系数对含石率变化的敏感性;采用RFPA数值模拟方法,研究了不同含石率土石混合体试样的渗流特性和开裂破坏演化规律。研究表明:含石率越高,初始渗透系数越高,土石混合体强度也越高;土石混合体的渗透系数随围压的增大而减小,与轴压的关系可以用指数函数来描述;含石率为40%和60%时,含石率对渗透系数影响的程度最大;土石混合体渗透破坏时裂纹的扩展主要出现在块石之间的土体内,渗透系数的突变点与试样峰值强度破坏点及声发射次数最高点存在一致性。对断层破碎带土石混合体渗流特性的研究可为防治不同含石率断层区工程突水等地质灾害提供参考。
Abstract
Fault fracture zone is an important channel for mine water inrush. Most of the fracture zone is composed of soil-rock mixture(SRM) whose seepage characteristics have an important influence on the prediction and prevention of mine water inrush. To investigate the impact of rock content on the seepage characteristics of SRM in fault fracture zone,SRM samples were remolded in lab from the field-collected mixture of fault gouge and rubble. The permeability characteristics of samples with different rock block proportions were examined under different confining pressures and axial pressures by using GDS tri-axial test system,and the sensitivity of permeability coefficient to rock content change was analyzed. Moreover,the seepage characteristics,the crack propagation and failure of SRM samples with different rock-bearing rates were investigated by using RFPA. Results demonstrated that 1)higher rock content resulted in larger initial permeability coefficient and higher strength of SRM;2)the permeability coefficient reduced with the increase of confining pressure,and the relation between permeability coefficient and axial pressure can be described by exponential function;3)rock content of 40% and 60% had a largest influence on permeability coefficient;4)cracks during the seepage failure of SRM mainly propagated in the soil between the rocks;5)the sudden change point of permeability coefficient was consistent with the peak strength failure point of the sample and the highest point of acoustic emission frequency. The research results offer reference for preventing and controlling geological disasters such as engineering water inrush in fault areas with varied rock content.
关键词
土石混合体 /
渗透系数 /
含石率 /
断层破碎带 /
RFPA
Key words
soil-rock mixture(SRM) /
permeability coefficient /
rock block proportion /
fault fracture zone /
RFPA
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 杨天鸿,唐春安,谭志宏,等.岩体破坏突水模型研究现状及突水预测预报研究发展趋势[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(2):268-277.
[2] 石少帅.深长随道充填型致灾构造渗透失稳突涌水机理与风险控制及工程应用[D].济南:山东大学,2014.
[3] 金 磊,曾亚武,叶 阳.土石混合体单轴压缩试验的三维颗粒流数值模拟[J].长江科学院院报,2016,33(7):93-99,104.
[4] 金 磊,曾亚武,叶 阳,等.基于不规则颗粒离散元的土石混合体三维随机模型及其数值试验[J].长江科学院院报,2016,33(5):94-101.
[5] 董 辉,彭搏程,邹畅宇,等.成层状堆沉积土石混合体的结构量化表征及其应用[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(12):112-118.
[6] 周 中,傅鹤林,刘宝琛,等.土石混合体渗透性能的正交试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(9):1134-1138.
[7] JANSSEN C,WIRTH R,LIN Ai-ming,et al.TEM Microstructural Analysis in a Fault Gouge Sample of the Nojima Fault Zone,Japan[J].Tectonophysics,2013,583(6):101-104.
[8] RING U,UYSAL T,GLODNY J,et al.Fault-gouge Dating in the Southern Alps,New Zealand[J].Tectonophysics,2017,717(10):321-338.
[9] 罗亦琦.土石混合体渗流特性的分形研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2019.
[10] 邱贤德,阎宗岭,刘 立,等.堆石体粒径特征对其渗透性的影响[J].岩土力学,2004,25(6):950-954.
[11] 徐 扬,高 谦,李 欣.土石混合体渗透性现场试坑试验研究[J].岩土力学,2009,30(3):283-286.
[12] 李晶晶,金 磊,程 涛.土石混合体细观渗流场的格子Boltzmann模拟[J].科学技术与工程,2019,19(29):235-241.
[13] 徐文杰,王永刚.土石混合体细观结构渗流数值试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(4):542-550.
[14] 沈 辉,罗先启,毕金锋.土石混合体渗透侵蚀特性数值模拟研究[J].岩土力学,2017,38(5):1497-1502,1509.
[15] 胡瑞林,李 晓,王 宇,等.土石混合体工程地质力学特性及其结构效应研究[J].工程地质学报,2020,28(2):255-281.
[16] 王鹏飞,李长洪,马学文,等.断层带不同含石率土石混合体渗流特性试验研究[J].岩土力学,2018,39(增刊2):53-61.
[17] MEDLEY E W.The Engineering Characterization of Melanges and Similar Rock-in-matrix Rocks (Bimrocks) [D].Berkeley:University of California at Berkeley,1994.
[18] 徐文杰,胡瑞林,岳中琦.基于数字图像处理的土石混合体细观结构[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2008,27(1):51-53.
[19] 冯上鑫,柴军瑞,许增光,等.基于核磁共振技术研究渗流作用下土石混体细观结构的变化[J].岩土力学,2018,39(5):1-9.
[20] 张 铭.低渗透岩石实验理论及装置[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(6):919-925.
[21] 王 宇,李 晓,李守定.单轴压缩条件下土石混合体开裂特征研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(增刊1):3541-3552.
[22] 王振伟,马 克,田洪圆,等.基于RFPA2D-Flow软件对裂隙岩体渗透特性表征单元体的研究[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(10):3012-3021.
基金
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0804103)
PDF(6681 KB)
