研究重塑黄土试样实验室内的制备效果,为工程活动提供准确的指标参数。以压实与击实2种制样方法所制备的三轴重塑黄土试样为对象,通过高精度μCT扫描试验,借助VG Studio MAX2.2图像处理软件,实现了土样微结构的三维重建,量化分析试样结构、孔隙三维信息以及孔隙分布情况,并通过三轴剪切试验简要分析了孔隙均匀性和围压对极限强度的影响。结果表明:①分层压实易造成重塑样内部结构的严重破坏,而不同工序下的分层击实试样孔隙分布极不均匀;一次压实试样较击实试样体积主频率孔径降低了40 μm,且不同区域的孔隙率差值＜3%。②土体内孔隙率分布差距越大,其极限强度越小。重塑样孔隙空间分布影响测得的黄土特性,故宜采用一次压实法制重备塑黄土样。
Abstract
The effect of preparing remoulded loess samples by different methods in laboratory is studied in this paper to provide accurate index parameters for geotechnical engineering. Triaxial remoulded loess samples prepared by pressing and bumping were scanned by high precision μCT to reconstruct the soil’s microstructure in three dimensions by VG Studio MAX2.2 image processing software. The structure, 3D information of pores, and pore distribution of loess samples were quantified; the influences of pore uniformity and confining pressure on the ultimate strength of loess samples were examined by means of triaxial shear test. Results show that: (1) layered pressing is prone to result in severe damage to the internal structure of loess sample; layered bumping lead to the non-uniform distribution of pores. The pore size of main volume frequency of samples undergone one-time pressing is 40 μm smaller than that of bumped samples, and the difference of porosity in different zones is less than 3%. (2) The greater the gap between the soil porosity distribution, the smaller the ultimate strength. Conclusion was drawn as follows: the characteristics of loess is affected by the spatial distribution of porosity, and one-time bumping method is recommended for the preparation of remoulded loess sample.
关键词
重塑黄土 /
均匀性 /
μCT扫描试验 /
3D重构 /
孔隙分布 /
压实制样法 /
分层击实法
Key words
remolded loess /
uniformity /
μCT scanning test /
3D reconstruction /
pore distribution /
pressing /
bumping
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 王娟娟. 考虑物质结构和制样差异的黄土强度问题研究.西安:西安建筑科技大学,2014.
[2] 胡海军,蒋明镜,赵 涛,等. 制样方法对重塑黄土单轴抗拉强度影响的初探.岩土力学,2009,30(增刊2):196-199.
[3] 卢良青. 基于三轴试验的中低压缩性土变形时效性分析.成都:西南交通大学,2014.
[4] 郑剑锋,马 巍,赵淑萍,等. 重塑土室内制样技术对比研究. 冰川冻土,2008, 30(3): 494-500.
[5] 周伟红,崔自治. 重塑黄土成样均匀性研究. 科学技术与工程,2015, 15(2): 266-269.
[6] JIANG M J, KONRAD J M, LEROUEIL S. An Efficient Technique for Generating Homogeneous Specimens for DEM Studies. Computers and Geotechnics, 2003, 30(7): 579-597.
[7] 孔金鹏,胡海军,樊恒辉. 压缩过程中饱和原状和饱和重塑黄土孔隙分布变化特征. 地震工程学报,2016,38(6): 903-908.
[8] 郑剑锋,赵淑萍,马 巍,等.CT检测技术在土样初始损伤研究中的应用. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2009, 45(2): 20-25.
[9] BULTREYS T, BOONE M A, BOONE M N, et al. Fast Laboratory-based Micro-computed Tomography for Pore-scale Research: Illustrative Experiments and Perspectives on the Future. Advances in Water Resources,2016, 95: 341-351.
[10] SABA S, DELAGE P, LENOIR N, et al. Further Insight into the Microstructure of Compacted Bentonite-Sand Mixture. Engineering Geology, 2014, 168: 141-148.
[11] CNUDDE V, BOONE M N. High-resolution X-ray Computed Tomography in Geosciences: A Review of the Current Technology and Applications. Earth-Science Reviews, 2013, 123: 1-17.
[12] 汪海年,李 磊,尤占平. 基于细观结构特征的沥青混合料空隙三维分布特征研究. 武汉理工大学学报,2012, 34(8): 61-67.
[13] SL 237—1999,土工试验规程. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,1999.
[14] 胡迟春,王端宜, THYAGARAJAN S. 基于CT技术的沥青混合料动态压实均匀性评价. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 30(6): 24-28.
[15] PETH S, NELLESEN J, FISCHER G,et al. Non-invasive 3D Analysis of Local Soil Deformation under Mechanical and Hydraulic Stresses by mCT and Digital Image Correlation. Soil and Tillage Research, 2010, 111(1): 3-18.
[16] 雷祥义. 中国黄土的孔隙类型与湿陷性. 中国科学(B辑),1987(12): 1309-1318.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(41172255,41572264,41440044)
PDF(2435 KB)
