湄公河与洞里萨湖水量交换特征

李昌文, 游中琼, 徐照明, 黄瓅瑶

长江科学院院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7) : 29-34.

PDF(4471 KB)
PDF(4471 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7) : 29-34. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20190248
水资源与环境

湄公河与洞里萨湖水量交换特征

  • 李昌文, 游中琼, 徐照明, 黄瓅瑶
作者信息 +

Variation Characteristics of Water Exchange Between Mekong River and Tonle Sap Lake

  • LI Chang-wen, YOU Zhong-qiong, XU Zhao-ming, HUANG Li-yao
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

洞里萨湖是湄公河最大的连通湖泊,湄公河与洞里萨湖水量交换特征一直是国际社会关注的热点问题,但相关研究成果较少。利用4个河湖控制站的长系列水文资料,分析了湄公河与洞里萨湖水量交换特征,结果表明:湄公河与洞里萨湖的水量交换强度大,洞里萨湖对湄公河径流调峰补枯作用明显,每年汛期5—9月份均会发生倒灌,1995—2011年年均倒灌历时122 d,倒灌水量377亿m3,占湄公河干流同期来水的14.4%,倒灌洪峰流量8 402 m3/s,占干流同期来水的20%,其中7—9月份倒灌水量占全年的88.6%;汛后10月份—次年4月份洞里萨湖向湄公河补水,年均补水历时244 d,补水水量711亿m3,是湄公河倒灌入湖水量的1.96倍,占湄公河下游同期来水的29.9%,其中10月份—次年1月份补水量占全年的83.1%。年倒灌历时、水量与洪峰流量,年补水历时、水量与峰值的年际变化较小,变幅分别为76 d、283亿m3、6 095 m3/s和76 d、474 亿m3、4 677 m3/s,变差系数为0.07~0.24。倒灌、补水水量不仅与湄公河和洞里萨湖的来水大小有关,还受到河湖水位差及洞里萨河水位等因素影响。研究成果可为湄公河三角洲和洞里萨湖区治理提供科学依据。

Abstract

Tonle Sap Lake is the largest river-connected lake of Mekong River. The water exchange between Tonle Sap Lake and Mekong River has always been a major focus in the international community. Long series of hydrological data of four river-lake controlling stations were employed to analyze the time and magnitude variation characteristics of the water exchange between Mekong River and Tonle Sap Lake. Results show that the water exchange between Mekong River and Tonle Sap Lake is highly intensive. Tonle Sap Lake has obvious peak clipping and dry replenishing effect on the runoff of Mekong River. During flood season (May to September), backward flow from Mekong River to Tonle Sap Lake lasts 122 days on average every year, with a total volume of 37.7 billion m3, accounting for 14.4% of the incoming flow from upper Mekong River in the same period; in particular, the backwater volume from July to September occupies 88.6% of the total annual backwater volume. The average flood peak of backwater is 8 402 m3/s, accounting for 20% of the inflow from Mekong River in the same period. After the flood season, from October to next April, the stored flood of Tonle Sap Lake replenishes to Mekong River, lasting for 244 days on average every year, with a total volume of 71.1 billion m3, which is 1.96 times of the backwater volume from Mekong River and accounts for 29.9% of flood volume of lower Mekong River. Particularly, the replenishing flow from October to next January occupies 83.1% of the total supplementing volume. The interannual variations of duration, volume, and peak discharge of backflow as well as duration, volume, and peak discharge of replenishing flow are stable. The amplitudes reach 76 days, 28.3 billion m3, 6 095 m3/s, and 76 days, 47.4 billion m3 and 4 677 m3/s respectively, with the variation coefficient at 0.07-0.24. The volume of backwater and supplementing water is not only related to the volume of inflow from Mekong River and Tonle Sap Lake, but also affected by the difference of water level between river and lake. The research findings offer scientific evidence for the governance of the Mekong Delta and Tonle Sap Lake Area.

关键词

湄公河 / 洞里萨湖 / 水量交换 / 变化特征 / 河湖关系

Key words

Mekong River / Tonle Sap Lake / water exchange / variation characteristics / river-lake relation

引用本文

导出引用
李昌文, 游中琼, 徐照明, 黄瓅瑶. 湄公河与洞里萨湖水量交换特征[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2020, 37(7): 29-34 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20190248
LI Chang-wen, YOU Zhong-qiong, XU Zhao-ming, HUANG Li-yao. Variation Characteristics of Water Exchange Between Mekong River and Tonle Sap Lake[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2020, 37(7): 29-34 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20190248
中图分类号: TV212.4   

参考文献

[1] Mekong River Commission. Overview of the Hydrology of the Mekong Basin[R]. Vientiane:Mekong River Commission, 2005.
[2] 李昌文, 游中琼, 要 威. 洞里萨湖调蓄洪水作用研究[C]∥中国水利学会2018学术年会论文集:第三分册. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2018: 351-355.
[3] MATTI K, JUHA S. Impact of the Mekong River Flow Alteration on the Tonle Sap Flood Pulse[J]. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2008, 37(3): 185-192.
[4] 赵军凯, 李立现, 张爱社, 等. 再论河湖连通关系[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016(4): 118-128.
[5] COCHRANE T A, ARIAS M E, PIMAN T. Historical Impact of Water Infrastructure on Water Levels of the Mekong River and the Tonle Sap System[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2014, 18: 4529-4541.
[6] 万荣荣, 杨桂山, 王晓龙, 等. 长江中游通江湖泊江湖关系研究进展[J]. 湖泊科学, 2014, 26(1): 1-8.
[7] 李昌文, 游中琼, 要 威, 等. 湄公河与洞里萨湖河湖水量交换的水文条件研究[C]∥中国水利学会2018学术年会“一带一路·走出去”论文集. 武汉:长江出版社,2018: 166-174.
[8] 仲志余, 胡维忠. 试论江湖关系[J]. 人民长江, 2008, 39(1): 20-22.
[9] 韩其为. 江湖关系变化的内在机理[J].长江科学院院报, 2014, 31(6) : 104-112.
[10]HU Q,FENG S,GUO H,et al. Interactions of the Yangtze River Flow and Hydrologic Processes of the Poyang Lake,China[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2007,347(1/2):90-100.
[11]郭 华, 张 奇. 近50年来长江与鄱阳湖水文相互作用的变化[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(5): 609-618.

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0405301)

PDF(4471 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/