长江科学院院报 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 23-28.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20160021

• 野外科学考察与观测 • 上一篇    下一篇

以三江源为例探讨江河源头确定原则

陈进a,b, 许珍b   

  1. 长江科学院 a.院长办公室; b流域水资源与生态环境科学湖北省重点实验室,武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-08 出版日期:2016-03-01 发布日期:2016-03-09
  • 作者简介:陈 进(1959-),男,湖北武汉人,教授级高级工程师,博士生导师,主要从事流域水资源与环境研究,(电话)027-82829755(电子信箱)chenjin@mail.crsri.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    “湖北省高端人才引领培养计划第一层次人选” 资助项目(2013-2017)

Principles of Determining River Source: Case Study on the Sources of Three Rivers

CHEN Jin1,2, XU Zhen2   

  1. 1.Administration Office, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China;
    2.Hubei Provincial Key Lab of Basin Water Resource and Eco-environmental Science, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China
  • Received:2015-01-08 Published:2016-03-01 Online:2016-03-09

摘要: 江河源头的确定历来存在争议。根据现代几次重要的科学考察成果,分析了长江、黄河和澜沧江源头争议的原因,参照国际著名大河河源确定方法,探索江河源头确定原则和方法。分析结果表明:河流长度、走向、流量、流域面积和河势是确定河源的自然因素,目前争议的焦点是谁为主要因素。建议河流长度和走向为确定河源的主要因素,流量和河势作为次一级因素,而约定俗成等文化因素对于江河源头确定也有重要影响。

关键词: 江河源头, 科学考察, 三江源, 自然因素, 传统习惯, 确定原则

Abstract: The determining of river’s headstream has always been controversial. According to the findings of several important recent scientific investigations, we analyse the causes of controversy in determining the river sources of Yangtze River, Yellow River and Lantsang River. Moreover in line with the methods of determining the river sources of international famous rivers, we explore the principles and methods of determining river source. We conclude that river length, direction, flow, watershed area and river regime are natural factors to determine the river source. At present the focus of controversy lies in the main factor. We suggest river length and direction as the main factors, flow and river regime as secondary factors, and conventional custom and cultural factors also have important influence on the determination.

Key words: river source, scientific investigation, sources of three rivers, natural factor, conventional custom, principle of determining

中图分类号: