旭龙水电站库区岸坡陡峻,不良地质体发育,为确保水电站正常运行,准确评价不良地质体稳定性和滑坡堵江及涌浪风险至关重要。经工程地质测绘确定库区分布18处不良地质体,均为第四系堆积体,蓄水前稳定,不存在堵江风险。蓄水后有8处堆积体可能存在变形破坏,其中7处堆积体可能发生塌岸,规模小,不会堵江;16#堆积体可能发生滑坡,规模较大,可能堵江和产生涌浪。利用GeoStudio软件对16#堆积体进行了稳定性分析,采用分析模拟法和潘家铮法对滑坡堵江风险进行了预测,并利用滑坡涌浪经验公式分析了涌浪对滑坡区、水库上下游岸坡和大坝的影响。结果表明,16#堆积体失稳不会造成堵江,滑坡涌浪不会影响大坝安全。研究思路与方法可为金沙江上游相关工程的风险预测提供借鉴。
Abstract
The reservoir area of Xulong hydropower station is featured with steep bank slope and unfavorable geological bodies. To ensure the normal operation of Xulong hydropower station,it is essential to accurately evaluate the stability of unfavorable geological bodies and the risks of landslide dam and surge wave. According to engineering geological mapping,18 unfavorable geological bodies were found in the reservoir area,which belong to Quaternary accumulation bodies and were stable before impoundment with no risk of landslide dam. However,eight of the unfavorable geological bodies may be deformed and damaged after impoundment,and seven may collapse,which is small in scale and will not block the river;accumulation body 16# may be subject to large-scale landslide which may block the river and generate surges.The stability of accumulation body 16# was analyzed by using GeoStudio software,and the landslide dam risk was predicted by analytical simulation method and Pan Jiazheng's method. Besides,the influences of surge wave on landslide area,reservoir bank slope and dam were analyzed by empirical formula of landslide surge waves. In conclusion,the instability of accumulation body 16# will not block the river and landslide surge will not affect the safety of the dam. The research ideas and methods can provide reference for the risk prediction of related projects in the upper reaches of Jinsha River.
关键词
堵江风险 /
涌浪风险 /
稳定性评价 /
滑速预测 /
旭龙水电站
Key words
landslide dam risk /
landslide surge risk /
stability evaluation /
landslide speed prediction /
Xulong hydropower station
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 王兰生.意大利瓦依昂水库滑坡考察[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2007,18(3):145-148.
[2] 肖诗荣,刘德富,胡志宇.世界三大典型水库型顺层岩质滑坡工程地质比较研究[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(1):52-59.
[3] 许 强,郑 光,李为乐,等.2018年10月和11月金沙江白格两次滑坡-堰塞堵江事件分析研究[J].工程地质学报,2018,26(6):1534-1551.
[4] 胡卸文,黄润秋,朱海勇,等.唐家山堰塞湖库区马铃岩滑坡地震复活效应及其稳定性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(6):1270-1278.
[5] 肖诗荣,刘德富,胡志宇.世界三大典型水库型顺层岩质滑坡工程地质比较研究[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(1):52-59.
[6] 崔 杰,王兰生,徐 进,等.金沙江中游滑坡堵江事件及古滑坡体稳定性分析[J].工程地质学报,2008,16(1):6-10.
[7] 张万奎,王文远,黄德凡.黄登水电站大型不良地质体勘察研究[J].云南水力发电,2015,31(5):120-124,148.
[8] 万智勇,黄耀英,陈勋辉,等.基于潘家铮法的某滑坡体涌浪敏感性分析[J].水力发电,2016,42(1):23-28.
[9] 余 国,谢谟文,胡庆忠,等.基于GIS的库岸滑坡滑速计算方法[J].岩土力学,2019,40(7):2781-2788.
[10]蔡耀军,徐复兴,朱 萌,等.金沙江白格滑坡残留体失稳堵江风险分析[J].工程科学与技术,2021,53(6):33-42,148.
[11]谭 海,徐 青,陈胜宏,等.基于DEM-SPH耦合模型的散粒体滑坡涌浪仿真模拟[J].岩土力学,2020,41(增刊2):505-514.
[12]丁军浩,邓 辉,吴敬清,等.澜沧江某库区滑坡涌浪物理模型试验[J].长江科学院院报,2017,34(10):39-44.
[13]黄筱云,刘 灿,程永舟,等.V型河道下滑坡涌浪的传播与爬高[J].长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版),2017,14(1):70-77.
[14]韩林峰,王平义,王梅力,等.碎裂岩体滑坡运动特征及近场涌浪变化规律[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2019,53(12):2325-2334.
[15]蔡耀军,李建清,彭文祥,等.堰塞湖应急处置技术[M].武汉:长江出版社,2021.
[16]潘家铮.建筑物的抗滑稳定和滑坡分析[M].北京:水利出版社,1980.
[17]殷坤龙,刘艺梁,汪 洋,等.三峡水库库岸滑坡涌浪物理模型试验[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2012,37(5):1067-1074.
[18]汪 洋,殷坤龙.水库库岸滑坡涌浪的传播与爬高研究[J].岩土力学,2008,29(4):1031-1034.
基金
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1508605);中国电力建设股份有限公司重大科技专项(DJ-ZDXM-2019-3)