Blasting Characteristics of Eccentric Uncoupled Charges under Different Damage Models

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20230666

Abstract

Abstract:

In practical blasting engineering, the charge often assumes an eccentric and uncoupled position relative to the blast hole due to its own weight. This charge arrangement results in a non-uniform distribution of blasting load on the surrounding rock mass, leading to variations in explosion energy and damage patterns near the blast hole. Single-hole rock blasting structure was numerically simulated by using the HJC model and RHT model to investigate the blasting dynamic response and damage characteristics of eccentric uncoupled charge under different constitutive models. Results reveal that, in the simulation environment in this study, concentric uncoupled charges cause uniform damage around the hole. However, the damage range predicted by the RHT model is nearly twice that predicted by the HJC model. As the eccentricity coefficient increases, the HJC model shows greater damage on the coupled side of the hole, while the RHT model exhibits an uneven distribution of damage between the coupled and uncoupled sides of the borehole. In conclusion, the RHT model more accurately describes rock crack propagation in actual blasting scenarios.

Key words: numerical simulation, eccentric uncoupling, damage model, blasting load, extent of damage

CLC Number:

X932爆炸安全与防火、防爆

LIANG Rui, QI Fang-xia, ZHOU Wen-hai, LI Sheng-rong, LOU Xiao-ming. Blasting Characteristics of Eccentric Uncoupled Charges under Different Damage Models[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(9): 98-105.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1 Diagram of HJC constitutive model

Fig. 2 Diagram of RHT constitutive model

Table 1 Model parameters[16]

HJC模型数值数值ρ/(kg·m^-3)ρ/(kg·m^-3)	RHT模型参数参数2 6602 660
G/GPaSHEAR/GPa	1717
f_c/MPaf_c/MPa	150150
AA₀	0.792.50
BN'	0.610.85
Nn	1.63
CA₁/GPa	0.00743.87
S_maxA₂/GPa	7.049.40
D₁A₃/GPa	0.0411.62
D₂B₁	1.01.22
T/MPaB₂	1.01.22
P_c/MPaB_Q	160.010 5
$P l$ /MPaT₁/GPa	80043.87
μ_cT₂	0.0010
μ_l $D 1$	0.10.04
$SFMAXD 2$	5.01.0
EFMINP_l/MPa	0.01600
K₁/GPaP_c/MPa	85133
$K 2$ /GPaB^*	-1711.6
K₃/GPaGC^*	2080.4
GT^*	0.7
M	0.85
Q_2,0	0.685
AF	1.62
NF	0.6
NP	4
ALPHA	1.10

Table 1 Model parameters[16]

HJC模型数值数值ρ/(kg·m^-3)ρ/(kg·m^-3)	RHT模型参数参数2 6602 660
G/GPaSHEAR/GPa	1717
f_c/MPaf_c/MPa	150150
AA₀	0.792.50
BN'	0.610.85
Nn	1.63
CA₁/GPa	0.00743.87
S_maxA₂/GPa	7.049.40
D₁A₃/GPa	0.0411.62
D₂B₁	1.01.22
T/MPaB₂	1.01.22
P_c/MPaB_Q	160.010 5
$P l$ /MPaT₁/GPa	80043.87
μ_cT₂	0.0010
μ_l $D 1$	0.10.04
$SFMAXD 2$	5.01.0
EFMINP_l/MPa	0.01600
K₁/GPaP_c/MPa	85133
$K 2$ /GPaB^*	-1711.6
K₃/GPaGC^*	2080.4
GT^*	0.7
M	0.85
Q_2,0	0.685
AF	1.62
NF	0.6
NP	4
ALPHA	1.10

Table 2 Physical and mechanical parameters of blast charge

$ρ 0$ / (kg·m^-3)	$v$ / (m·s^-1)	P/ GPa	A'/ GPa	B'/ GPa	$R 1$	$R 2$	ω	E₀/ GPa
1 500	5 122	9.53	276.2	8.44	5.2	2.1	0.5	3.87

Table 2 Physical and mechanical parameters of blast charge

$ρ 0$ / (kg·m^-3)	$v$ / (m·s^-1)	P/ GPa	A'/ GPa	B'/ GPa	$R 1$	$R 2$	ω	E₀/ GPa
1 500	5 122	9.53	276.2	8.44	5.2	2.1	0.5	3.87

Fig.3 Contours of effective stress of HJC model and RHT model at different moments

Fig.4 Rock damage clouds of HJC model and RHT model at different moments

Fig. 5 Comparison between numerical simulation and test results

Fig.6 Schematic diagram of monitoring points

Fig.7 Effective stresses of rock body at 230 μs

Fig.8 Effective stresses of rock body at 630 μs

Fig.9 Time-history curves of effective stress under different eccentricity coefficients of HJC model and RHT Model

Fig.10 Rock damage clouds under different eccentricity coefficients of HJC model and RHT model

Fig.11 Curves of damage radius of rock mass under different eccentricity coefficients

[1]	NIU Yun-gang, MA Feng-hai, WANG Qiong-yi. Deformation of Foundation Pit Retaining Piles in Footwall Zone Influenced by Normal Fault [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(9): 130-137.
[2]	YANG Zhong-yong, LI Lin, SUN Shi-wei, ZHANG Yong, TANG Yan-ping, WANG Zi-yang, LIU Xin-jian, XU Yang. Abnormal Water Level Increase in the Valve Shaft of a Ship Lock Induced by High Density Currents in Impounded River [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(9): 79-85.
[3]	GAO Xue-ping, WEI Nan-jiang, LIU Yin-zhu. Hydraulic Characteristics at Side Outlet of Tunnel Elbow [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(7): 94-102.
[4]	LI Hai-tao, REN Guang-ming, FENG Chuan, TANG Yang, WANG Ting, WANG Liang. Load Bearing Characteristics of Micropile Group Foundation in Plateau Mountainous Area under Combined Vertical-Horizontal Loads [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(7): 139-147.
[5]	HAN Lei, LÜ Chun-wei, WANG Zheng-jun, ZHANG Shuai-kang, LI Yang. Influence of Pier Head Angle on Hydraulic Characteristics of Vertical Slot Fishway [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(6): 84-90.
[6]	CAO Fu-bo, HUANG Xu-tong, YANG Xiao-gang, LIANG Wei-guo, WU Ya-xuan, LI Ming-yuan, SU Tian, WANG Chen-xia. Frost Resistance of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Based on Compound Salt Solution Concentration [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(5): 187-194.
[7]	ZHOU Ye-kai, QIN Peng, LI Jie-cheng, KUANG Yi, TIAN Lei, WU Shi-qi, XU Xin-yue. Wave Prevention and Energy Dissipation Effect of a New Type of Seawall Revetment Structure with Hyperbolic Arc Surface [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(4): 89-94.
[8]	ZHANG Jian, MA Jian-lin, WANG Qin-ke, SU Wei. Stability of Tunnel Anchorage of Long-span Suspension Bridge in Fractured Rock Interlayer [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(4): 149-156.
[9]	MA Peng-jie, WEI Kai, KANG Jing-wei, RUI Rui, CAI Zheng-qian, XIA Rong-ji. Mechanical Mechanism of Single Row of Micro Piles Strengthening Gently Inclined Long Fissured Soil Slope [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(3): 178-185.
[10]	LIU Yu-jiao, YU Ming-hui, HUANG Yu-yun, WU Hua-li. Impacts of the Poyang Lake Water Conservancy Hub Project on Hydrodynamic Process in Flood Period of Yangtze River and Poyang Lake [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(3): 9-15.
[11]	FAN Yong-feng, ZHAO Yang, SHI Xian-li, LU Zheng, YAO Hai-lin. Numerical Study on Shear Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Layer Based on Direct Shear Test [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(2): 98-104.
[12]	FU Yu, TONG Si-chen, WANG Xiao, JIANG Pin-feng, HUANG Guo-xian. Numerical Simulation of Inverse Time Tracking of Oil Spill Pollution Sources in Inland Waterways [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(2): 61-66.
[13]	TANG Dong, JIAN Hui-xiang, WANG Cun-li, LI Yi, JIANG Zhong-ming. Migration Law and Control Measures of Oil Vapor Leakage from Underground Oil Storage Cavern Based on Two Phase Flow [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(2): 173-180.
[14]	REN Ji-xun, JIA Lin, YANG Jian-xin, HU Jun, LIN Xiao-qi, ZENG Dong-ling. Numerical Simulation on the Effect of Groundwater Salinity on Freezing Temperature Field at the Bottom of Foundation Pit under Seepage Conditions [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(1): 151-158.
[15]	LI Wen-qiang, WU Yan-kai, ZHU Jia-yi, ZHANG Tong, MA Yan-hui. Influence of Soft Soil Subgrade Construction on Adjacent Pipeline and Protection Measures [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(1): 167-174.