The effect of sharp-edge inlet and curved inlet on the discharge capacity and flow regime of steep tunnel is researched by using hydraulic calculation analysis and model test verification. The long steep diversion tunnel of a hydropower project is taken as the research object. Research shows that curved inlet could increase the discharge capacity and reduce the cofferdam height,but brings about free-surface-pressure flow in the tunnel,which is harmful to the safety of tunnel structure; whereas sharp-edge inlet reduces the discharge capacity,but avoids free-surface-pressure flow. Therefore,when the cofferdam scale of hydropower project is small,the sharp-edge inlet is recommended.
Key words
steep slope tunnel /
inlet type /
hydraulic calculation /
model test verification
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 李 炜.水力计算手册(第二版)[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006.(LI Wei. Handbook of Hydraulic Calculations (Second Edition)[M]. Beijing: China Water Power Press,2006. (in Chinese))
[2] 汪 俊,桂 林.有压输水管道中明满流产生与进口段布置的关系探讨[J].四川水利,2007,(4):32-34.(WANG Jun,GUI Lin. Study on Relation of the Free-surface-pressure Flow and Import Layout of Pressure Tunnel[J]. Sichuan Water Conservancy,2007,(4):32-34.(in Chinese))
[3] 漆力健.大底坡泄洪管道明满流的水力特性[D].成都:四川大学,2005.(QI Li-jian. Hydraulic Characteristic of the Free-surface-pressure Flow in the Outlet Pipeline with Steep Base Slope[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan University,2005.(in Chinese))
[4] 韩继斌,李学海,石教豪.某水电站混凝土重力坝方案支流施工导流1∶85水工整体模型试验研究报告[R].武汉:长江科学院,2011.(HAN Ji-bin,LI Xue-hai,SHI Jiao-hao. Report on the 1∶85 Hydraulic Model Test for the Diversion Tunnel of a Hydropower Project[R]. Wuhan: Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2011.(in Chinese))
[5] 张从联,钟伟强,江 洧.泄洪洞有压流问题试验研究与初探[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2003,31 (增l):70-73.(ZHANG Cong-lian,ZHONG Wei-qiang,JIANG Wei. Experimental Research and Simple Discussion on the Pressure Flow of Discharge Tunnel[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science),2003,31(Sup.l):70-73.(in Chinese))
PDF(1118 KB)
