PDF(588 KB)
Research on the Evaluation Indicator System for Happy Rivers Based on River Typology
TANG Jian, ZHOU Tong, RU Ze-long, LUO Ping-an, LIANG Meng-si
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 0
PDF(588 KB)
PDF(588 KB)
Research on the Evaluation Indicator System for Happy Rivers Based on River Typology
The Evaluation Guidelines for Happy Rivers and Lakes (GB/T 46336.1—2025) (hereinafter referred to as the Guidelines) establish a unified evaluation framework, providing a baseline benchmark for happiness assessment of small and medium-sized rivers. However, given the high diversity of river types, the application of certain indicators without type-specific implementation rules may lead to misinterpretation risks. This paper systematically examines the causes and manifestations of these risks. On this basis, it proposes a three-tier indicator optimization scheme consisting of a “basic general module + type-specific characteristic module + additional value-added module” (1+N+X). The basic general module retains all 14 second-level indicators of the Guidelines to safeguard the common baseline. The type-specific characteristic module is automatically matched and activated via a river attribute classification card, and sets differentiated indicator packages for fan-shaped rivers, seasonal rivers, high-background rivers, and underground rivers, to adjust or supplement specific indicators. The additional value-added module reserves bonus space for rivers in multicultural areas. Under the premise of maintaining the uniformity and authority of the Guidelines, this scheme realizes type-specific supplementation and refined expansion of the indicator system through three operations: retention, adjustment, and supplementation, thereby providing a pathway for the targeted assessment of different river types.
Happiness River and Lake / index system / river types / attribute classification cards
| [1] |
GB/T 46336. 1-2025, 幸福河湖评价导则[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2025.
( GB/T 46336.1-2025, Guidelines for Rivers and Lakes Happiness Evaluation[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2025. (in Chinese))
|
| [2] |
黄锡荃, 苏法崇, 梅安新. 我国的河流[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1982.
(
|
| [3] |
刘昌明. 中国水文地理[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.
(
|
| [4] |
何萍, 史培军, 刘树坤, 等. 河流分类体系研究综述[J]. 水科学进展, 2008, (3): 434-442.
(
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
钟平安, 唐洪武. 淮河中下游洪涝综合治理的思考与初探[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, (5): 746-753.
(
|
| [7] |
王浩, 王建华, 贾仰文. 海河流域水循环演变机理与水资源高效利用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
(
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
汤从沧, 李巧, 陶洪飞, 等. 基于改进遥感生态指数模型的塔里木河流域生态环境质量评价[J]. 环境科学, 2025, (7): 4485-4498.
(
|
| [11] |
陈亚宁, 李卫红, 陈亚鹏, 等. 新疆塔里木河下游断流河道输水与生态恢复[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(2): 538-545.
(
|
| [12] |
姚仕明, 唐见, 罗平安. 高原幸福河湖建设成效评估指标体系研究[J]. 中国水利, 2025, 19: 54-59.
(
|
| [13] |
沈照理. 水文地球化学基础[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1986.
(
|
| [14] |
滕彦国, 倪师军, 张成江. 应用地球化学基线研究进展[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 2001, (2): 135-139.
(
|
| [15] |
袁道先. 岩溶学词典[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1988.
(
|
| [16] |
夏日元, 卢海平, 曹建文, 等. 南方岩溶区地下水资源特征与水资源保障对策[J]. 中国地质, 2022, (4): 1139-1153.
(
|
| [17] |
何大明, 冯彦, 胡金明, 等. 中国西南国际河流水资源利用与生态保护[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007.
(
|
| [18] |
李先明. 幸福河的文化内涵及其启示[J]. 中国水利, 2020, (11): 55-59.
(
|
| [19] |
李原园, 郦建强, 石海峰, 等. 中国防洪若干重大问题的思考[J]. 水科学进展, 2010, (4): 490-495.
(
|
| [20] |
褚俊英, 原康琦, 周祖昊, 等. 季节性河流及其生态环境治理的理论与技术[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41(3): 46-54.
(
|
| [21] |
赵渔亨, 晁立强, 王远坤, 等. 基于水文学法的生态流量适宜性评价研究[J]. 人民长江, 2024, 55(2): 101-108.
( ZHAO Yu-heng CHAO Li-qiang,
|
| [22] |
邹一飞, 许明家, 丁爱中, 等. 地下水生态系统健康评价研究进展[J]. 环境科学研究, 2024, 37(11): 2341-2351.
(
|
| [23] |
王何予, 郭生练, 王俊, 等. “幸福河”综合评价指标体系研究-以汉江湖北省域为例[J]. 水文, 2023, 43(2): 35-40.
(
|
| [24] |
陈茂山, 王建平, 乔根平. 关于“幸福河”内涵及评价指标体系的认识与思考[J]. 水利发展研究, 2020, (1): 3-5.
(
|
| [25] |
陈敏芬, 马骏, 钱学诚. 杭州幸福河湖评价指标体系构建[J]. 中国水利, 2022, (2): 40-42.
(
|
| [26] |
刘聚涛, 李孙鹏, 胡芳, 等. 基于GRA-TOPSIS模型的宜水幸福河综合评价[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2026, 43 (2): 211-219.
(
|
| [27] |
彭欣雨, 刘昭辰, 陈敏. 基于马斯洛需求层次理论的幸福河评价方法[J]. 人民珠江, 2025, (9): 43-53.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |