PDF(1739 KB)
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Regional Differences of Land Use in Potential Desertification Areas in China
WANG Zhu, WANG Fang, LIU Yang, DENG Wei, ZHANG Guan-hua
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 0
PDF(1739 KB)
PDF(1739 KB)
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Regional Differences of Land Use in Potential Desertification Areas in China
[Objectives] Land use change within the potential extent of desertification in China (hereafter referred to as the desertification area) is jointly regulated by climate, geomorphology, and hydrological processes, while its spatiotemporal heterogeneity remains insufficiently characterized under a unified regionalization framework. [Methods] Based on the delineation of potential desertification areas in China, this study established a three-dimensional regionalization framework integrating eco-hydrological regionalization, climatic aridity regionalization, and geomorphic-functional dimensions. Using land use data from 1990, 2000, and 2020, we analyze the structural characteristics and evolutionary patterns of land use across different regions, and further examine desertification-related dynamics from five key processes, including transitions between vegetation and typical desert land types, vegetation cover changes, forest-grass conversions, variations in water bodies and wetlands, and cropland expansion. [Results] Results showed that, over the past three decades, both typical desert land types and vegetation (forest and grassland) have generally declined, while forest and grassland vegetation did not increase correspondingly. Grassland area and cover declined overall, while cropland, built-up land, and water bodies continued to expand, revealing that a reduction in typical desert land types could not be simply equated with vegetation recovery. Land use change exhibits pronounced regional heterogeneity. In the Northwest Inland Zone (I), vegetation recovery is mainly observed in mountainous areas, whereas degradation dominates in plains. In the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Zone (II), vegetation recovery is primarily concentrated in semi-humid zones. In the Yellow River-Hai River-Liao River Temperate Zone (III), the trend of cropland-to-forest conversion is significant and also concentrated in semi-humid areas. In the Northeast Cold Zone (IV), newly increased cropland mainly originates from grassland and water bodies, although its growth rate has slowed. [Conclusions] Overall, climatic aridity-humidity conditions determined the basic regional pattern of land use, while geomorphic functions further differentiated the pathways of vegetation recovery and degradation. These findings suggest that desertification control should avoid using the reduction of typical desert land types as the sole indicator of ecological recovery. Instead, regional management should account for the contrasting water-resource conditions between mountain runoff-generation zones and plain water-dissipation zones, with particular emphasis on grassland conservation and on coordinating land-use intensity with regional water-resource carrying capacity, thereby providing a basis for region-specific desertification management.
land use changes / eco-hydrological regionalization / climatic aridity regionalization / geomorphic regionalization / potential extent of desertification in China
| [1] |
United Nations Conference on Desertification. Desertification: its causes and consequences[M]. Pergamon, 1977.
|
| [2] |
王礼. 全球荒漠化防治现状及发展趋势[J]. 世界林业研究, 1994, 7(1): 10-14.
(
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
昝国盛, 王翠萍, 李锋, 等. 第六次全国荒漠化和沙化调查主要结果及分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2023,(1):1-7.
(
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
陈亚宁, 杨青, 罗毅, 等. 西北干旱区水资源问题研究思考[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(1): 1-9.
(
|
| [9] |
刘昌明. 关于荒漠化问题及其防治的水资源对策思考[C]// 北京: 中国治理沙漠化基金会;联合国开发计划署, 2007.
(
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
习静雯. 黄土高原土地利用变化对土壤侵蚀影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所), 2017.
(
|
| [13] |
红梅, 银山, 包玉海, 等. 内蒙古西辽河流域荒漠化分析研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2014, 21(6): 324-328.
(
|
| [14] |
李森, 高尚玉, 杨萍, 等. 青藏高原冻融荒漠化的若干问题--以藏西-藏北荒漠化区为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2005, 27(4): 476-485.
(
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
匡文慧, 张树文, 杜国明, 等. 2015-2020年中国土地利用变化遥感制图及时空特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(5):1056-1071.
(
|
| [18] |
何春阳, 张金茜, 刘志锋, 等. 1990-2018年土地利用/覆盖变化研究的特征和进展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(11): 2730-2748.
(
|
| [19] |
潘顺. 我国北方地区土地荒漠化时空分布特征分析[D]. 山东: 山东科技大学, 2020.
(
|
| [20] |
胡光印, 金会军, 董治宝, 等. 黄河源区土地利用/覆盖变化(LUCC)研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(3): 573-581.
(
|
| [21] |
任正超, 朱华忠, 柳小妮. 年际尺度上土地覆盖类型时空分异及其对气候和地形的响应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(15):205-214.
(
|
| [22] |
张凤荣, 周建, 徐艳, 等. 基于地学规律的科尔沁沙地土地整治与生态修复规划方法[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 35-41.
(
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
范建容, 张子瑜, 李立华. 四川省山地类型界定与山区类型划分[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(1): 65-73.
(
|
| [25] |
王秀兰, 包玉海. 土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J]. 地理科学进展, 1999, 18(1):81-87.
(
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
王慧, 张璐, 石兴东, 等. 2000年后青藏高原区域气候的一些新变化[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(8): 785-796.
(
|
| [28] |
王珂, 王娜, 雍斌. 青藏高原羌塘内流区降水时空特征[J]. 水资源保护, 2019, 35(3): 25-32.
(
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
张建云, 王国庆, 金君良, 等. 1956-2018年中国江河径流演变及其变化特征[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(2): 153-161.
(
|
| [31] |
王根绪, 张寅生. 寒区生态水文学理论与实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
(
|
| [32] |
吴波, 苏志珠, 杨晓晖, 等. 荒漠化监测与评价指标体系框架[J]. 林业科学研究, 2005, 18(4): 490-496.
|
| [33] |
李长龙, 王燕, 高志海, 等. 2000-2020年中国荒漠化潜在发生范围区林草覆被时空变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(11):2803-2816.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |