PDF(9262 KB)
Evolution Characteristics of Hydrological Drought and Its Meteorological Driving Mechanisms in Yuanjiang River Basin under Climate Change
LIAO Yi-han, ZHAN Qian, LONG Yuan-nan, HUANG Chun-fu, LIAO De-hai
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8) : 61-71.
PDF(9262 KB)
PDF(9262 KB)
Evolution Characteristics of Hydrological Drought and Its Meteorological Driving Mechanisms in Yuanjiang River Basin under Climate Change
[Objective] This study aims to quantitatively assess the contributions of individual meteorological factors to hydrological drought evolution in the Yuanjiang River Basin, a typical humid region in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, and to reveal the climatic mechanisms. [Methods] We integrated historical hydrometeorological observations (1975-2022) with future climate projections (2026-2050) derived from five CMIP6 global climate models (GCMs) under three Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP126, SSP245, and SSP370). To ensure regional accuracy, the future meteorological projections were bias-corrected using the quantile delta mapping method. Subsequently, we developed and validated a monthly streamflow prediction model across six hydrological stations utilizing the XGBoost algorithm. This model incorporated a comprehensive set of predictors, including meteorological variables (precipitation, relative humidity, radiation, and temperature) and human activity indicators (reservoir operation and land use changes). To ensure the interpretability of the machine learning model, the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) framework was employed to quantify the marginal contributions and unravel the directional influences of each driving factor on streamflow variations. Finally, the validated XGBoost model was driven by the bias-corrected future data to project long-term streamflow dynamics. Based on these projections, hydrological drought events were characterized using the standardized runoff index (SRI) at 3- and 6-month scales, with key drought features (frequency, duration, severity, and intensity) systematically extracted via the run theory. [Results] From 1975 to 2022, the XGBoost model demonstrated excellent performance, achieving average Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values of approximately 0.90 for calibration and 0.80 for validation. SHAP analysis revealed precipitation as the dominant driver of streamflow variability, accounting for 69.8% of the total explained variance, followed by relative humidity (11.9%). Furthermore, analysis of the daily-to-monthly aggregation methods showed that the monthly mean contributed 58.2% of the variance, whereas metrics capturing intra-monthly fluctuations and extreme distributions (std, p90, and p10) cumulatively contributed 41.8%. Specifically, standard deviation (20.8%) and the 90th percentile (14.4%) had high explanatory weights, highlighting the critical importance of intra-monthly meteorological variability. Historically, hydrological droughts exhibited distinct spatiotemporal heterogeneity, with more frequent occurrences in winter and spring and greater frequency and severity at upstream stations (e.g., Taoyi). Under future climate scenarios (2026-2050), precipitation was projected to follow a “drier dry season and wetter wet season” pattern, with reductions of approximately 25 mm from September to November and increases of up to 50 mm from April to August. Concurrently, relative humidity was projected to decline throughout the year, with pronounced decreases of 0.05-0.10 during the dry season. Consequently, hydrological droughts were expected to worsen, with projected increases in frequency (0.04-0.06), duration (0.2-0.4 months), and intensity (0.05). A significant structural shift in drought categories was also anticipated: moderate drought frequency increased markedly (0.04-0.08), while severe drought frequency generally declined, dropping by approximately 0.06 at Taoyi Station. This structural transition from “long-duration, high-intensity” to “high-frequency, moderate-intensity” droughts in the future was driven by seasonal moisture dynamics. Sharp declines in precipitation and relative humidity in June acted as the trigger for drought onset (with the combined SHAP negative contribution reaching approximately -230 m3/s), followed by continuous moisture deficits from July to October that drove the progression into moderate drought. However, steady moisture increases from November to May created a significant compensation effect, interrupting the deep accumulation of streamflow deficits and preventing the evolution into severe droughts. These findings highlighted that future drought mitigation in the Yuanjiang River Basin should prioritize managing seasonal consecutive droughts and the cumulative impacts of moderate droughts. [Conclusion] Precipitation and relative humidity are the dominant meteorological factors controlling hydrological drought in the Yuanjiang Basin. The XGBoost-SHAP framework effectively quantifies their individual contributions and reveals that the seasonal coupling between precipitation reduction and enhanced evapotranspiration due to declining relative humidity is the primary mechanism driving future drought intensification. Future hydrological drought across the basin is projected to intensify, characterized by increased frequency, prolonged duration, and a structural shift toward more frequent moderate drought events. Machine-learning interpretability approach provides a valuable and robust supplement to traditional physical models for understanding and projecting climate change impacts on hydrological drought. This integrated analytical framework offers scientific support for adaptive water resource management and drought mitigation strategies in the Yuanjiang River Basin and similar humid regions facing escalating drought risks under climate change.
hydrological drought / climate change / XGBoost model / SHAP / precipitation / relative humidity / Yuanjiang River Basin
| [1] |
王云, 李文鑫, 张建云, 等. 长江上游流域水文干旱历史演变及未来预估[J]. 中国工程科学, 2024, 26(6):157-168.
受全球气候变化影响,长江流域水文干旱事件频发且强度不断增加,严重威胁粮食安全和经济发展。本文利用水量平衡(RCCC-WBM)模型,分析了长江上游直门达、朱沱、寸滩、宜昌4个水文站及以上流域的水文要素历史演变和未来发展趋势,并基于标准化径流指数(SRI)识别了长江上游流域的水文干旱事件及特征。结果表明:① 1961—2020年,朱沱、寸滩和宜昌3个水文站的径流量及对应长江上游干流区、岷沱江、嘉陵江及乌江各子流域的SRI均呈减少趋势,即微弱变旱化趋势,而直门达水文站径流及以上金沙江流域SRI呈增加趋势,即无旱化趋势。② 2021—2090年,各水文站及以上流域SRI均呈增大趋势,说明长江上游流域未来呈无旱化趋势,这可能与未来预估降水、径流大幅增加密切相关;未来水文干旱频次、频率、历时及烈度均表现为近期较强,远期较弱。鉴于长江上游流域极端水文干旱现象日益显著,防旱减灾工作紧迫,建议完善抗旱机制体制,提升基础设施建设和应急管理能力,强化数字技术赋能,构建智慧防旱减灾体系并突出创新驱动,以强化防旱减灾科技支撑。
(
|
| [2] |
杨肖丽, 崔周宇, 任立良, 等. 1966-2015年长江流域水文干旱时空演变归因[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, 34(3):349-359.
(
|
| [3] |
高歌, 李莹, 陈逸骁, 等. 30年来中国干旱时空规律演变特征[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2023, 33(7): 1-8.
(
|
| [4] |
张强, 姚玉璧, 李耀辉, 等中国干旱事件成因和变化规律的研究进展与展望[J]. 气象学报, 2020, 78(3): 500-521.
(
|
| [5] |
韩兰英, 张强, 贾建英, 等. 气候变暖背景下中国干旱强度、频次和持续时间及其南北差异性[J]. 中国沙漠, 2019, 39(5): 1-10.
在全球气温日趋升高和极端降水增加的气候背景下,近年来中国干旱变化特征异常突出,新形势下需进一步深入认识干旱灾害影响机制。利用1960—2014年中国527个气象站逐日气温和降水量数据,选用改进的综合气象干旱指数(MCI)作为监测指标,详细分析了中国干旱强度、频次和持续时间变化特征及其南北差异性。结果表明:气候变暖背景下,中国干旱范围扩大、程度加剧、频次增加;干旱发生的范围发生了明显的转移,北方干旱加剧的同时,南方干旱明显加重,尤其是大旱范围明显增加。中国干旱范围主要在黄河流域以南和长江以北地区。干旱频次北方高于南方,东部高于西部,长江流域以北干旱频次较高。中国干旱持续时间较长,而且四季都有可能发生干旱。干旱不仅发生在干旱区和半干旱区,湿润和半湿润区域也常有干旱发生。不同年代、不同区域干旱发生的程度、持续时间和频次有一定的差异。中国20世纪90年代中后期至21世纪初期干旱范围最广、持续时间最长,造成的损失最严重。中国干旱强度、频次和持续时间南北差异性显著。气候变暖后,中国干旱强度加重、范围扩大、频次增加和持续时间增加明显。
(
This paper examines daily air temperature and precipitation data from 1960 to 2014 from 527 meteorological stations in China. The improved Meteorological Comprehensive Drought Index (MCI) is taken as indication of drought monitoring to analyze the spatial-temporal characteristics of drought severity, frequency, duration, and regional differences in China. The results show that drought scope has expanded in China, and the severity and frequency has increased in the context of climate warming. The scope of the drought is also changing, with drought intensifying in the north China and increasing substantially in the south China, especially in areas of severe drought. The drought was the most widespread and sustained in the late 1990s and 2001-2010 in China, mainly afflicting to the south of the Yellow River and north of the Yangtze River. In general, the drought level, duration, and frequency were higher in the north China than the south China and higher in the east China than the west China. Drought is likely to occur year-round in China, but the degree of occurrence, range, duration, and frequency differs across years and regions. The north-south differences of drought frequency and duration are significant.
|
| [6] |
周芷菱, 汤正阳, 沈柯言, 等. 长江流域多时间尺度水文干旱演变特征分析[J/OL]. 长江科学院院报, DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250881.
(
|
| [7] |
刘仲藜, 章新平, 黎祖贤, 等. 洞庭湖流域各季节旱涝及其与大气环流和关键区海温的关系[J]. 热带地理, 2021, 41(5): 987-999.
利用逐月降水数据和NCEP/NCAR再分析数据,分析了洞庭湖流域春、夏、秋季57年来旱涝异常的年际变化以及典型旱涝异常年份的全球海温分布形势,并利用降尺度和趋势分析方法探究气象因子对ENSO和关键区海温的响应,以加强对流域旱涝前期影响因素的认识。结果表明:1)流域在春、秋季旱涝变化趋势不明显,在夏季较明显地变湿。2)前期冬、夏季ENSO事件分别对流域春、秋季旱涝产生显著影响,而与夏季呈不显著的统计特征。3)在消除前期ENSO信号后,阿留申群岛附近海域(S3)、澳大利亚东部海域(S4)海温和印度洋偶极子(Indian Ocean Dipole, IOD)现象仍分别为春、夏、秋季与流域旱涝有密切联系的海温因素。4)S3区SST对流域春季旱涝的影响通过西风带环流实现,S4区SST偏高似乎是东亚夏季风强度偏弱的表现,成熟的IOD现象为流域秋季旱涝的主导因子。
(
Droughts are the most common natural disasters with the most significant impact on human society. They are caused by water deficiency over extended periods. The Dongting Lake Basin is alternately controlled by winter, southwest, and southeast monsoons throughout a year, with meteorological droughts occurring each season. Additionally, the controlling factors for these droughts are distinct. The precipitation amount directly illustrates droughts and floods, affected by atmospheric circulation and water vapor conditions. Anomalies in atmospheric circulation are closely related to the evolution of Sea Surface Temperature (SST), which changes over long durations and is of significant importance for drought and flood forecasting over the basin. At present, studies that determine the linkage between SST and droughts/floods over the Dongting Lake Basin primarily show the statistical relationship between them; however, atmospheric circulation is the direct influencing factor of floods/droughts over the basin. Therefore, determining the relationship between meteorological elements and SST is conducive to revealing the mechanism of their statistical relationship. There are few studies on this research field in the Dongting Lake Basin. To determine the mechanism of the linkage between sea surface temperature and droughts/floods over Dongting Lake Basin and improve the understanding of forecast-improved factors for droughts/floods, this study analyzed the interannual evolution of droughts and floods in spring, summer, and autumn within the Dongting Lake Basin from 1960 to 2016 based on monthly precipitation data and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data, investigated the distribution of global SST in typical drought/flood years, and studied the responses of meteorological factors (including precipitable water, sea level pressure, and wind fields at 850 hPa) to El Ni?o and Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and SST over key sea areas, using downscaling technologies and tendency analysis. Results show that in spring, the basin experienced interannual dry and wet alternations and an insignificant drying trend. In summer, droughts were slightly more severe than floods before 1990, and it was the wettest period from 1990 to the beginning of the 21st century. In autumn, the regional flood index (H) and regional drought index (G) remained almost stable, and typical drought and flood years appeared alternately. In spring, ENSO events in the preceding winter exerted a significant impact on droughts/floods in the basin. In addition, the SST over the southwest maritime continent (S1), the Masklin Islands (S2), and the Aleutian Islands (S3) all showed significant correlations with spring precipitation in the basin. These correlations last from the preceding winter to spring. The correlation between the SST at S3 and ENSO was weak. In summer, there was an insignificant statistical correlation between ENSO in the preceding winter and summer precipitation over the basin. The SST over the eastern Australian sea (S4) and the Bay of Bengal (S5) correlated with the summer precipitation in the basin from the preceding winter to summer; the SST signal over S5 was partially covered by the ENSO signal in the preceding winter. In autumn, the global SST had an approximately inverse phase compared to the typical drought and flood years of the basin. The SST anomaly in typical drought (flood) years of the basin was in the negative (positive) phase of the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) and La Ni?a (El Ni?o) pattern from the preceding summer to autumn; the two kinds of SST signals (IOD and ENSO) could independently affect droughts/floods in the basin. El Ni?o events in the preceding winter generated high pressures in the South China Sea and the east of the Philippines region in spring and summer, conducive to the transport of moisture from the South China Sea to the basin, resulting in greater precipitation in the basin. The high SST over the Nino3.4 region in the preceding summer also exerted a similar impact in the following autumn. When the SST at S3 was high in spring, the East Asian trough tended to be strong and westerly. In summer, a higher SST at S4 was likely to coincide with a weak East Asian summer monsoon. The mature phase of IOD in autumn was the dominant factor of droughts/floods over the basin. |
| [8] |
宋佳佳. 基于气象指标SPI的洞庭湖流域洪旱灾害分析[J]. 水资源开发与管理, 2020, 6(7): 66-71.
(
|
| [9] |
孙丁旭, 李伟, 李杨, 等. 沅江流域气象-水文干旱时空演变及传播特征[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 47(1): 73-83.
(
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
刘君龙, 袁喆, 许继军, 等. 长江流域气象干旱演变特征及未来变化趋势预估[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(10): 28-36.
基于长江流域及周边范围在内的318个气象站点1956—2018年的实测资料和CMIP5全球气候模式在3种RCPs情景下的预估数据,以标准化降水蒸散发指数作为干旱等级的划分指标,对流域历史气象干旱时空演变特征进行了分析,并预估了流域未来不同排放情景下的气象干旱时空变化趋势。结果表明:①近60 a,流域干旱率年际变化较大,平均干旱率为18.21%。从年代变化来看,近20 a干旱影响范围普遍较大;干旱频发地区主要位于岷江流域,干旱次数呈从上游向下游递减的趋势;高强度的干旱多发生于金沙江中下游地区和成都平原地区,平均场次干旱强度也呈从上游向下游递减的趋势;②在RCP2.6、RCP4.5和RCP8.5情景下,2020—2050年长江流域多年平均干旱面积分别为74.1万km<sup>2</sup>、75.7万km<sup>2</sup>和126.4万km<sup>2</sup>;流域上、中、下游干旱频次多年平均值分别为1.1~1.2次/a、1.0~1.1次/a、1.0~1.1次/a。预估时段内上、中、下游干旱频次较历史时段分别增加38.4%~50.7%,33.7%~45.3%和32.6%~49.6%;预估时段内上、中、下游干旱强度多年平均值分别为-1.68,-1.64,-1.60,与历史时段差别不大。研究结果可为相关部门制订科学合理的干旱灾害防范措施和对策提供科学依据。
(
The temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of historical meteorological drought in the Yangtze River basin (YRB) were analyzed, and the temporal and spatial variation trend of meteorological drought under different discharge scenarios in the basin in the future was predicted. The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index is used as the index to classify drought grade according to the observed data of 318 meteorological stations in the basin and its surrounding areas from 1956 to 2018 and the predicted data of CMIP5 global climate model under three typical RCPs. Results show that: 1) In the past six decades, the drought rate in the YRB has changed greatly, with an average drought rate of 18.21%, while in ages scale, drought has had a widespread impact in the past two decades; the drought-prone areas in the YRB were mainly located in the Minjiang River basin, and the number of droughts decreased from the upper to the lower reaches; the high-intensity droughts in the YRB mostly occurred in the middle and lower reaches of the Jinsha River and in the Chengdu Plain, and the average drought intensity followed the trend of drought frequency. 2) Under RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, the annual average drought area of the YRB in 2020-2050 was 741 000 km<sup>2</sup>, 757 000 km<sup>2</sup> and 1 264 000 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively; the annual average drought frequency of the upper, middle and lower reaches of the basin is 1.1-1.2 per year, 1.0-1.1 per year, and 1.0-1.1 per year, respectively. The frequency of drought in the upper, middle and lower reaches of the YRB increases by 38.4%-50.7%, 33.7%-45.3% and 32.6%-49.6% respectively compared with that in historical period; the average annual drought intensity of the upper, middle and lower reaches of the river basin in the predicted period is -1.68, -1.64, -1.60 respectively, which is not significantly different from that in historical period. The research results offer scientific basis for scientific and reasonable drought disaster prevention measures and countermeasures.
|
| [12] |
邓翠玲, 佘敦先, 邓瑶, 等. 基于多模式情景的长江中下游未来气象干旱时空演变特征分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(6): 9-17.
为了分析未来时期(2020—2099年)长江中下游区域气象干旱演变特征,选取跨行业影响模式比较计划(ISIMIP)的4个全球气候模式,基于不同代表性浓度路径(RCP)的排放情景(RCP-2.6、RCP-6.0和RCP-8.5),分别计算了标准化降水指数(SPI)和标准化蒸散发指数(SPEI),探讨了两种指数对研究区气象干旱的刻画能力,分析了研究区未来气象干旱变化规律。研究结果表明:未来时期SPI整体呈增加趋势,汉江流域和洞庭湖水系西北区域增加幅度较大,说明该区域干旱减缓趋势明显;SPEI呈显著减小趋势,且随着排放浓度的增加,减小幅度逐渐增加,洞庭湖水系和鄱阳湖水系东南区域减小趋势较大,说明该区域未来时期干旱增加趋势明显;不同情景下SPI减小的区域SPEI也呈减小趋势且减小幅度更大;研究区SPI与SPEI的相关性从北到南、从西到东逐渐增强;SPI与SPEI的整体相关性随着排放浓度的增加逐渐减弱。研究成果有助于预估未来长江中下游区域干旱发生演变规律。
(
To reveal the change trend and evolution patterns of future drought during 2020-2099 in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin, we calculated the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) based on precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET) data from 4 Global Climate Models (GCMs) under RCP-2.6,RCP-6.0 and RCP-8.5 scenarios, which are derived from Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Inter-comparison Project (ISIMIP). We also looked into the performance of SPI and SPEI in detecting and depicting drought features. Results unveil an overall climbing trend of SPI in future, with the Hanjiang River basin and the northwest Dongting Lake network witnessing a surge, which means that drought in these regions will relieve obviously in the future. SPEI shows a reducing trend in most regions under all scenarios, and such reduction escalates with the rising of emission concentration; particularly, in the southeast of Dongting Lake network and Poyang Lake network,the reductions are larger than that in other regions,implying a notable drying trend in future.SPEI drops greater in regions where SPI declined under all scenarios.The correlation between SPI and SPEI gradually intensifies from north to south and from west to east in the study area.The overall correlation between SPI and SPEI weakens gradually from RCP-2.6,to RCP-6.0 and to RCP-8.5 scenario.
|
| [13] |
赖雨曈, 徐影. CMIP6全球气候模式对中国地区干旱模拟能力评估与预估[J]. 大气科学, 2024, 48(6): 2157-2177.
(
|
| [14] |
黄进, 邱波, 安慧, 等. 基于CMIP6气候模式的丹江流域未来径流变化[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2026, 43(4):61-70.
基于丹江流域2个水文站2005—2021年的实测数据构建SWAT水文模型,使用6个全球气候模式(GCMs)在3种共享社会经济路径(SSPs)下的气象数据驱动模型。研究时段分为基准期(1963—2022年)和3个未来时期(2025—2050年、2051—2075年、2076—2100年),模拟未来气候变化情景并分析流域未来径流变化。结果表明:①SWAT模型在径流模拟中表现优异,校正后降水、最高和最低气温的相关系数分别达0.72、0.85和0.89。②2025—2100年流域气温呈显著上升趋势,降水呈波动上升趋势;SSP5-8.5情景下末期升温幅度可达7.11 ℃,为SSP1-2.6情景的2.72倍;SSP1-2.6情景下可能出现最大降水增幅,达11.63%。③流域年均径流呈现由近期减少转向远期增加趋势,碳排放增加使径流突变和显著增加时间延后;年内变化表现为春冬季显著增加、夏秋季减少;空间上径流增加主要集中于流域下游;研究成果可为丹江流域水资源科学管理和决策提供依据。
(
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
王彪, 夏春龙, 宋峥, 等. 未来气候变化情景下嫩江流域极端水文演变特征[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2025, 56(7):109-123.
(
|
| [17] |
刘丽博, 索梅芹, 宋亚轩. 基于CMIP6的漳河上游气温、降水及径流预估研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2024, 55(12):79-91.
(
|
| [18] |
唐文评, 唐慧雅, 魏冲, 等. 气候变化背景下横江流域气象-水文干旱时空演变特征[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2026, 57(6):38-57.
(
|
| [19] |
苗正伟, 刘璐. 气候变化和人类活动对滹沱河上游流域水文干旱演变的影响[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 60(6):870-880.
(
|
| [20] |
王农, 韩会明. 鄱阳湖水文干旱演变过程及归因[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2025, 44(10):155-160.
(
|
| [21] |
晏红波, 梁雨豪, 卢献健, 等. 基于XGBoost融合多维度时空数据的干旱遥感建模及应用研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2024, 26(6): 1531-1546.
西南地区是我国重要的生态环境保护区,复杂的气候与地理条件导致干旱事件频繁发生,准确掌握干旱的空间分布情况及变化趋势对保护西南地区生态环境具有重要意义。本研究基于极端梯度提升算法,利用表征多维度特征变量的遥感干旱指标,构建了一种考虑植被状态、地表状态、气候状态及环境因素的干旱遥感监测模型(eXtreme Gradient Boosting Drought Monitor, XGBDM)。利用该模型对西南地区2001—2020年干旱情况进行监测,选取典型干旱事件与土壤墒情数据对模型精度进行评价,并结合Theil-Sen Median趋势分析、Mann-Kendall显著性检验、Hurst指数、重心迁移模型,揭示了西南地区干旱时空演变特征、未来变化趋势及干旱重心迁移情况。结果表明:① 在不同季节中,XGBDM模型均能准确监测西南地区干旱事件,模型精度指标R<sup>2</sup>为0.816~0.897,MAE为0.200~0.283,RMSE为0.296~0.424,模型与土壤墒情相关性为-0.60~0.86。相比于站点SPEI-3监测方法,XGBDM模型监测结果与土壤墒情相关性更高,且更能准确反映旱情的空间分布细节特征;② 时间上,2001—2020年西南地区XGBDM年均值整体呈波动下降趋势,表明干旱情况呈加重趋势,其中春季和夏季干旱呈加重趋势,秋季和冬季干旱呈减轻趋势。空间上,西南地区XGBDM值变化斜率在春季和夏季呈“北高南低”的空间分布格局,在秋季和冬季呈“南高北低”的空间分布格局,其中不同季节干旱呈加重趋势的面积占比分别为春季69.17%、夏季76.02%、秋季34.43%、冬季47.5%; ③ 西南地区XGBDM值整体呈弱反持续性变化,春季、夏季以及冬季未来旱情以减轻为主,旱情由加重转为减轻的区域面积在不同季节占比为28.44%~63.82%。旱情持续加重面积在春季最高,占比为17.97%,持续减轻情况在冬季占比最高,为15.92%; ④ 2001—2020年干旱重心主要分布于研究区中部,呈西北至东南的分布格局,未来干旱重心在西北至东南方向进行迁移的概率更高。研究结果可为西南地区干旱监测及治理提供理论依据。
(
|
| [22] |
陈镜元. 基于机器学习模型的汉江上游径流预测及水文干旱评价[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2025.
(
|
| [23] |
The China Meteorological Forcing Dataset (CMFD) is the first high spatial-temporal resolution gridded near-surface meteorological dataset developed specifically for studies of land surface processes in China. The dataset was made through fusion of remote sensing products, reanalysis datasets and in-situ station data. Its record begins in January 1979 and is ongoing (currently up to December 2018) with a temporal resolution of three hours and a spatial resolution of 0.1°. Seven near-surface meteorological elements are provided in the CMFD, including 2-meter air temperature, surface pressure, and specific humidity, 10-meter wind speed, downward shortwave radiation, downward longwave radiation and precipitation rate. Validations against observations measured at independent stations show that the CMFD is of superior quality than the GLDAS (Global Land Data Assimilation System); this is because a larger number of stations are used to generate the CMFD than are utilised in the GLDAS. Due to its continuous temporal coverage and consistent quality, the CMFD is one of the most widely-used climate datasets for China.
|
| [24] |
湖南省水利厅. 沅江流域大中型水库建设数据[R]. 长沙: 湖南省水利厅, 2024.
(Hunan Provincial Water Resources Department. Construction Data of Large and Medium-sized Reservoirs in the Yuanjiang River Basin[R]. Changsha: Hunan Provincial Water Resources Department, 2024. (in Chinese))
|
| [25] |
A spatially explicit cropland distribution time-series dataset is the basis for the accurate assessment of biogeochemical processes in terrestrial ecosystems and their feedback to the climate system; however, this type of dataset is lacking in China. Existing cropland maps have a coarse resolution, are intermittently covered, or the data are inconsistent. We reconstructed a continuously covered cropland distribution dataset in China spanning from 1900 to 2016 by assimilating multiple data sources. In total, national cropland acreage expanded from 77.72 Mha in 1900 to a peak of 151.00 Mha in 1979, but it consistently decreased thereafter to 134.92 Mha in 2016. The cropland was primarily distributed in three historically cultivated plains in China: the Sichuan Plain, the Northern China Plain, and the Northeast China Plain. Cropland abandonment was approximately 43.12 Mha: it was mainly concentrated in the Northern China Plain and the Sichuan Plain and occurred during the 1990-2010 period. Cropland expansion was over 74.37 Mha: it was primarily found in the southeast, northern central, and northeast regions of China and occurred before 1950. In comparison, the national total and spatial distribution of cropland in the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations and the History Database of the Global Environment (HYDE) were distorted during the period from 1960 to 1980 due to the biased signal from the Chinese Agricultural Yearbook. We advocate that newly reconstructed cropland data, in which the bias has been corrected, should be used as the updated data for regional and global assessments, such as greenhouse gas emission accounting studies and food production simulations.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
王晓峰, 张园, 冯晓明, 等. 基于游程理论和Copula函数的干旱特征分析及应用[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(10):206-214.
(
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
韩会明, 孙军红, 简鸿福, 等. 变化环境下气候因素对赣江径流的影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(4): 44-50.
为探究变化环境下赣江流域水文极端事件季节性变化的新特征,基于赣江流域1960—2018年气象水文数据,引入Copula函数和条件概率分布建立径流与气候因素之间的概率依存关系,分析季节性径流与气候因素之间的相关性和敏感性,以及不同气候情景下水文极端事件发生的概率特征及变化。结果表明:赣江流域春季径流和降水量均呈减少趋势,其他季节呈增多趋势;对数正态分布、威布尔分布、伽玛分布和广义极值分布对气象水文要素拟合效果良好,气象要素与径流的最优Copula函数以Frank-Copula函数为主;径流与降水量、相对湿度和水汽压呈正相关,与潜在蒸散量、日照时长呈负相关,且春夏冬对降水量最敏感,秋季对日照时长最敏感;降水量从中值降至低值时,径流特枯事件发生概率平均增多16.6%,由中值增至高值时,洪水发生概率平均增多13.6%。
(
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
秦爽. 融合CMIP6的汉江上游流域径流预测研究[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2023.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |