Effect of L-shaped Sediment Barrier Geometry with Backwater Impact on the Flow Capacity of Stormwater Drainage System

CHEN Ding-li, XU Zheng, ZHOU Jun, ZHANG Yun-qing, LONG Yu, ZHOU Jian-xu, CAI Fu-lin

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 227-234.

PDF(1313 KB)
PDF(1313 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 227-234. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20260097
Structural And Non-Structural Measures

Effect of L-shaped Sediment Barrier Geometry with Backwater Impact on the Flow Capacity of Stormwater Drainage System

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] Frequent urban waterlogging caused by insufficient flow capacity of stormwater drainage systems under extreme weather conditions has become a pressing issue. This study aims to investigate the variation in flow capacity of a stormwater drainage system with rectangular box culverts,considering the geometric parameters of an L-shaped sediment barrier at the inlet and the backwater effect (downstream water-level-induced backwater). [Methods] A dual-method approach was adopted,combining hydraulic model tests with 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The hydraulic model,based on a gravity-driven similarity criterion (λL=20),simulated a typical stormwater drainage system in Eastern China consisting of rectangular box culverts and multiple manholes. Flow rates were measured using standard thin-walled triangular weirs,and downstream water levels were precisely regulated to simulate backwater conditions. Hydraulic model tests were conducted to analyze the flow capacity of stormwater drainage system inlet structures under conditions with and without L-shaped sediment barriers and backwater effects. Following the hydraulic model tests,numerical simulations were conducted using ANSYS Fluent. The SST k-ω model was selected,and the numerical model was validated against experimental data,with deviations in total head and piezometric head kept within 10%. To quantify the impact of the L-shaped sediment barrier,three primary geometric dimensions were systematically varied: the opening size in the flow direction (a),the opening size perpendicular to the flow direction (c),and the vertical height of the barrier (e). [Results] Sediment barriers and water level differences significantly dictate the system’s drainage efficiency. Hydraulic model tests showed that removing the sediment barrier entirely could increase flow capacity by up to 64.69% compared to the test with the barrier in place. The numerical analysis of the barrier’s geometric parameters provided deeper insights into structural optimization. Among the studied variables,the dimension perpendicular to the flow direction (c) was found to be the most influential factor,resulting in a 7.68% increase in flow rate. In contrast,the dimension in the flow direction (a) showed a moderate impact,resulting in a 4.98% improvement in drainage efficiency. The vertical height (e) proved to be the least sensitive parameter,with reducing it from 650 mm to 350 mm yielding only a 2.27% gain in capacity. Furthermore,the study highlighted a strong positive correlation between the inlet-outlet water level differential and the overall flow rate. When the downstream backwater effect was minimized by lowering the water level to 86.00 m,the flow capacity showed a dramatic increase even without any structural changes. Crucially,the benefits of geometric optimization became more pronounced under low water levels. Specifically,with the high head difference provided by the 86.00 m downstream level,optimizing the perpendicular dimension (c) yielded a 17.54% improvement rate,significantly outperforming the gains observed at higher downstream levels. [Conclusions] While structural optimization of inlet components is beneficial,addressing downstream backwater effects in the primary lever for enhancing stormwater drainage performance.Among the geometric parameters of L-shaped sediment barriers,widening the opening perpendicular to the flow direction is identified as the most effective structural modification for inlets. Accordingly,a dual-stage strategy combining water level regulation and structural optimization is proposed.The study provides a scientific basis for urban waterlogging mitigation under extreme rainfall scenarios and offers novel insights into the optimized design of stormwater drainage systems,demonstrating substantial engineering application value.

Key words

flow capacity / L-shaped sediment barriers / backwater / hydraulic model test / three-dimensional numerical simulation

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHEN Ding-li , XU Zheng , ZHOU Jun , et al . Effect of L-shaped Sediment Barrier Geometry with Backwater Impact on the Flow Capacity of Stormwater Drainage System[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(6): 227-234 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20260097

References

[1]
Allen M R, Ingram W J. Constraints on Future Changes in Climate and the Hydrologic Cycle[J]. Nature, 2002, 419(6903): 224-232.
[2]
林珲, 吴贤宇, 潘家祎, 等. 中国城市洪涝实时预报研究: 现状与挑战[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1306-1316.
(Lin Hui, Wu Xian-yu, Pan Jia-yi, et al. Real-time Forecast of Urban Flood in China: Past, Present and Future[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2022, 51(7): 1306-1316.) (in Chinese)
[3]
张建云, 王银堂, 贺瑞敏, 等. 中国城市洪涝问题及成因分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2016, 27(4): 485-491.
(Zhang Jian-yun, Wang Yin-tang, He Rui-min, et al. Discussion on the Urban Flood and Waterlogging and Causes Analysis in China[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2016, 27(4): 485-491.) (in Chinese)
[4]
宋晓猛, 张建云, 王国庆, 等. 变化环境下城市水文学的发展与挑战:Ⅱ.城市雨洪模拟与管理[J]. 水科学进展, 2014, 25(5):752-764.
(Song Xiao-meng, Zhang Jian-yun, Wang Guo-qing, et al. Development and Challenges of Urban Hydrology in a Changing Environment: Ⅱ.Urban Stormwater Modeling and Management[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2014, 25(5): 752-764.) (in Chinese)
[5]
徐宗学, 程涛. 城市水管理与海绵城市建设之理论基础: 城市水文学研究进展[J]. 水利学报, 2019, 50(1): 53-61.
(Xu Zong-xue, Cheng Tao. Basic Theory for Urban Water Management and Sponge City—Review on Urban Hydrology[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2019, 50(1): 53-61.) (in Chinese)
[6]
刘成帅, 许营营, 孙悦, 等. 产流模式空间分布对城市雨洪过程模拟的影响[J]. 水资源保护, 2024, 40(2): 28-34, 116.
(Liu Cheng-shuai, Xu Ying-ying, Sun Yue, et al. Effect of Spatial Distribution of Runoff Generation Patterns on Urban Storm Flood Process Simulation[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2024, 40(2): 28-34, 116.) (in Chinese)
[7]
杨柳, 李小英, 王莹, 等. 海绵城市雨水调蓄设施优化设计与运行调度研究进展[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41(1): 140-149.
(Yang Liu, Li Xiao-ying, Wang Ying, et al. Research Progress on Optimization Design and Operation Dispatch of Rainwater Storage Facilities in Sponge Cities[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2025, 41(1): 140-149.) (in Chinese)
[8]
李文钰, 侯精明, 李轩, 等. 基于雨洪数值模型的城市雨水调蓄池优化运行方案研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2024, 35(5):82-89.
(Li Wen-yu, Hou Jing-ming, Li Xuan, et al. Optimal Operation Scheme for Urban Rainwater Storage Tanks Based on Storm Water Management Model[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2024, 35(5): 82-89.) (in Chinese)
[9]
张闯, 黄河, 蒋水华, 等. 城市内涝洪水演进模拟及影响分析:以江西省某城市片区为例[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2024, 35(6):23-32.
(Zhang Chuang, Huang He, Jiang Shui-hua, et al. Flood Evolution Simulation and Impact Analysis of Urban Waterlogging:A Case Study of a City District in Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2024, 35(6):23-32.) (in Chinese)
[10]
宋瑞宁, 谢芳, 李小宁, 等. 设计降雨特征对城市内涝模拟结果的影响分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2023, 34(3): 136-143.
(Song Rui-ning, Xie Fang, Li Xiao-ning, et al. Design Rainfall Characteristics Affects Urban Flood Inundation Simulation[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2023, 34(3): 136-143.) (in Chinese)
[11]
乔贤玲, 侯精明, 刘园, 等. 降雨空间分辨率对城市内涝模拟敏感性研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2024, 35(3): 81-89.
(Qiao Xian-ling, Hou Jing-ming, Liu Yuan, et al. Sensitivity of Rainfall Data Spatial Resolution to Urban Inundation Simulation[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2024, 35(3): 81-89.) (in Chinese)
[12]
张雨山, 王双银, 臧聪敏, 等. 基于原型观测的输水渠道糙率取值及变化分析[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2021, 41(1): 24-29, 73.
(Zhang Yu-shan, Wang Shuang-yin, Zang Cong-min, et al. Variation Analysis of Roughness Coefficient Value for Water Conveyance Channels Based on Prototype Observation[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2021, 41(1): 24-29, 73.) (in Chinese)
[13]
胡普年. 盘道岭隧洞除险加固工程糙率原型观测及过流能力分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2019, 36(4): 67-70, 76.
(Hu Pu-nian. Prototype Observation of Roughness and Overflow Capacity in Pandaoling Tunnel[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2019, 36(4): 67-70, 76.) (in Chinese)
[14]
龚科, 李学海, 王世奎, 等. 导流隧洞泄流能力预测偏差影响因素分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(10): 147-150.
(Gong Ke, Li Xue-hai, Wang Shi-kui, et al. Factors Affecting the Prediction Deviation of Diversion Tunnel’s Discharge Capacity[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(10): 147-150.) (in Chinese)
[15]
鲜志斌, 王庆国, 王兆斌, 等. 雨水管网中局部水头损失对设计排水能力的影响[J]. 水电能源科学, 2015, 33(10):97-99.
(Xian Zhi-bin, Wang Qing-guo, Wang Zhao-bin, et al. Impact of Local Head Loss in Rainwater Pipe Network on Design Drainage Capacity[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2015, 33(10):97-99.) (in Chinese)
[16]
林金海. 雨水检查井局部损失对雨水系统过流能力的影响[J]. 中国给水排水, 2010, 26(20): 34-38.
(Lin Jin-hai. Impact of Minor Losses in Manholes on Flow Capacity of Storm Drainage System[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2010, 26(20): 34-38.) (in Chinese)
[17]
茅泽育, 赵凯, 赵璇, 等. 管道汇流口局部阻力试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2007, 38(7):812-818.
(Mao Ze-yu, Zhao Kai, Zhao Xuan, et al. Experimental Study on Local Flow Resistance at Junctions of Circular Pipes[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007, 38(7): 812-818.) (in Chinese)
[18]
茅泽育, 罗昇, 赵璇, 等. 矩形断面压力管道汇流口局部能量损失[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2006, 26(3):62-66.
(Mao Ze-yu, Luo Sheng, Zhao Xuan, et al. Local Energy Loss at Junction of Pressurized Pipes with Rectangular Cross Section[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2006, 26(3): 62-66.) (in Chinese)
[19]
郑子萱, 郑飞飞, 唐洪武, 等. 城市入河雨水管道水动力特性试验研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2025, 36(1):132-142.
(Zheng Zi-xuan, Zheng Fei-fei, Tang Hong-wu, et al. Exploring Hydraulic Dynamics between the Urban Stormwater Pipe and the Downstream River Based on Experiment Tests[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2025, 36(1): 132-142.) (in Chinese)
[20]
Zheng Z, Zheng F, Ma Y, et al. Exploring Hydraulic Impacts of Downstream Water Levels on the Drainage Capacity of a Stormwater Pipe[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2024, 150(5): 04024028.
[21]
张家立, 丁华凯, 高成, 等. 外河水位顶托下雨水管网排水能力变化的SWMM模拟[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2017, 28(6): 44-49, 55.
(Zhang Jia-li, Ding Hua-kai, Gao Cheng, et al. Simulation of Changes of Drainage Capacity of Rainwater Pipe Network Caused by the Jacking of Outer Rivers[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2017, 28(6):44-49, 55.) (in Chinese)
[22]
罗鸣, 叶兴成, 王以超, 等. 河道边界水位对管道排水能力的影响分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2018, 29(3): 169-174.
(Luo Ming, Ye Xing-cheng, Wang Yi-chao, et al. Impact Analysis of River Boundary Water Level on Drainage Capacity of Pipeline[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2018, 29(3): 169-174.) (in Chinese)
[23]
冯思源, 贺蔚, 姚启文, 等. 城市河道水位对暴雨内涝影响效应及蓄水方案研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2025, 43(2):1-5.
(Feng Si-yuan, He Wei, Yao Qi-wen, et al. Study on Effect of Urban River Level on Rainstorm Waterlogging and Water Storage Scheme[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2025, 43(2): 1-5.) (in Chinese)
[24]
Zscheischler J, Westra S, et al. Van den Hurk B J J M, Future Climate Risk from Compound Events[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8(6): 469-477.
[25]
Moftakhari H R, Salvadori G, AghaKouchak A, et al. Compounding Effects of Sea Level Rise and Fluvial Flooding[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(37):9785-9790.
[26]
王建龙, 王泽熙, 李晗, 等. 雨水管道沉积物累积对过流能力影响的模拟试验[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(3): 732-737.
(Wang Jian-long, Wang Ze-xi, Li Han, et al. Simulation Test on the Influence of Sediment Accumulation on the Drainage Capacity of Rainwater Pipeline[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022, 12(3): 732-737.) (in Chinese)
[27]
柳园园, 王船海, 吴朱昊, 等. 城市排水管网明满交替非恒定流数学模型的研究[J]. 水动力学研究与进展A辑, 2016, 31(2): 210-219.
(Liu Yuan-yuan, Wang Chuan-hai, Wu Zhu-hao, et al. Study on Free-surface-pressurized Flow Mathematical Model for Urban Drainage Networks[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 31(2): 210-219.) (in Chinese)
[28]
何帅, 周兵, 张静, 等. 基于SWMM研究不同断面形式对雨水管网排水能力的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2015(4):60-64.
(He Shuai, Zhou Bing, Zhang Jing, et al. The Impact of Different Cross-section on Storm Sewer Drainage Capacity Based on SWMM[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2015(4):60-64.) (in Chinese)
[29]
Hua Y, Cai F, Zhou J, et al. Study of Self-induced Sloshing in Model Test of a Water Retaining Weir[J]. Water, 2017, 9(9): 646.
PDF(1313 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/