Evolution Process and Regulation Modes of Low Water Level Scouring in the Kizil Reservoir

QI Yin-xin, ZHANG Jia-ming, LU San-qiang, TAN Yi-hai, AI Yu-lin

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11) : 1-9.

PDF(5354 KB)
PDF(5354 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11) : 1-9. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20251047
RIVER-LAKE PROTECTION AND REGULATION

Evolution Process and Regulation Modes of Low Water Level Scouring in the Kizil Reservoir

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] This study aims to analyze the evolutionary process and operational methods of sediment scouring at low water levels in the Kizil Reservoir. Specific objectives include the evolutionary process, influencing factors of the sediment transport ratio, typical timing for sediment scouring, and the impacts of scouring water levels and auxiliary measures on sedimentation and erosion changes in the reservoir area. [Methods] For the 22-kilometer typical reservoir area of the Muzati River and Kizil River sections in the Kizil Reservoir, we utilized measured topographic data and recorded water-sediment data to analyze topographic erosion and deposition changes, influencing factors of sediment discharge ratio, as well as the erosion and deposition processes in the reservoir area under typical scouring timings, scouring water levels, and auxiliary measures. The core innovative aspects of this method include (1) High-precision DEM data:Through underwater topographic laser bathymetry and aerial laser surveys conducted during low-water periods in May 2023, August 2023, July 2024, and August 2024, interference from suspended sediments was minimized, and a high-resolution 5-meter digital elevation model was generated to depict the process of topographic erosion and deposition changes. (2) Daily average water-sediment data during scouring operations:obtained through sampling analysis, with samples typically collected daily at 10:00, 17:00, and 19:00. Two samples were taken each time to ensure the accuracy of the daily sediment discharge ratio. (3) Two-dimensional erosion and deposition model:model validity was verified by comparing measured and simulated values of water levels near the dam, typical cross-sections, and erosion/deposition volumes. The model was used to simulate erosion and deposition processes in the reservoir area under typical scouring timings, scouring water levels, and auxiliary measures, outputting data on erosion and deposition changes in the reservoir area. [Results] During low-water-level sediment flushing operations at the Kizil Reservoir, the reservoir area exhibits a “one main channel with two floodplains” pattern, with water flow concentrated in the main channel for erosion and deposition evolution. This study integrates parameters such as inflow and outflow discharge, sediment concentration, and water levels to establish relationships between the sediment discharge ratio (η) and influencing factors, including the discharge coefficient (Qout/Qin), the regulation factor ((QoutSout)/(QinSin)), and the flow capacity factor (${Q}_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}}^{2}$/(VQin)). These factors are identified as the primary influences on sediment discharge efficiency. Under typical scouring timing, scouring water levels, and auxiliary measures, lower scouring water levels combined with longer scouring durations yield better results. Additionally, sediment flushing initiated when the water level in front of the dam is lowered to a certain elevation can also achieve effective outcomes. The arrangement of auxiliary measures, such as diversion channels, is influenced by their length and number. Diversion channels should not be excessively long, and simultaneous scouring through both the No. 1 and No. 2 flushing channels proves more effective. [Conclusions] This study reveals for the first time the evolutionary process, influencing factors, and operational approaches of low-water-level sediment flushing in the Muzati River section of the Kizil Reservoir. We have clearly confirmed a negative correlation between the sediment discharge ratio (η) and the water level in front of the dam. Furthermore, correlations were identified between the sediment discharge ratio (η) and the discharge coefficient (Qout/Qin), the regulation factor ((QoutSout)/(QinSin)), and the flow capacity factor (${Q}_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}}^{2}$/(VQin)). It was established that sediment deposition after low-water-level flushing is significantly reduced compared to scenarios without flushing, with lower flushing water levels and longer durations leading to more pronounced effects. The timing and control of flushing water levels must be determined based on the reservoir’s water supply scheduling. If existing scheduling constraints prevent lowering the water level in front of the dam to the free-discharge level, reducing it to an appropriate height for flushing can still yield favorable results.

Key words

Kizil reservoir / reservoir sediment / reservoir desilitation / low-water-level sediment scouring / erosion-deposition evolution / MIKE21

Cite this article

Download Citations
QI Yin-xin , ZHANG Jia-ming , LU San-qiang , et al . Evolution Process and Regulation Modes of Low Water Level Scouring in the Kizil Reservoir[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(11): 1-9 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20251047

References

[1]
邓安军, 陈建国, 胡海华, 等. 我国水库淤损情势分析[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(3): 325-332.
(Deng Anjun, Chen Jianguo, Hu Haihua, et al. Analysis of reservoir siltation in China[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(3): 325-332. (in Chinese))
[2]
张金良, 胡春宏, 刘继祥. 多沙河流水库“蓄清调浑”运用方式及其设计技术[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(1): 1-10.
(Zhang Jinliang, Hu Chunhong, Liu Jixiang. Operation mode and design technology of “storing clean water and regulating muddy flow” of reservoirs in sediment-laden river[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(1): 1-10. (in Chinese))
[3]
Ren S, Gao Y, Wang W J, et al. Estimating sediment trap efficiency of flood events during flood season in the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Water Resources Research, 2024, 60(10): e2023WR036975.
[4]
张明旺, 侍克斌, 孔选昭, 等. 基于多种神经网络的水沙预测模型研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2023, 56(9):1057-1065.
(Zhang Mingwang, Shi Kebin, Kong Xuanzhao, et al. Research on water and sediment prediction model based on multiple neural networks[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2023, 56(9): 1057-1065. (in Chinese))
[5]
Zhang M W, Shi K B. Comprehensive analysis of water-sediment variation characteristics at the confluence of the upper reaches of the Weigan River and Heizi River with multiple methods and multiple influencing factors[J]. Water Supply, 2022, 22(2): 1275-1292.
In-depth analysis of the characteristics of water and sedimentary changes at the confluence of the upper reaches of Weigan River and Heizi River is the prerequisite and basis for studying the future water and sedimentary situation in the Kizil Reservoir. This article analyzes the trend, mutation point and periodicity of the water and sedimentary sequence with multi-methods. The double cumulative curve method and the attenuation analysis method were used to analyze the impact of precipitation and human activities on runoff and sedimentary transport, and other influencing factors were qualitatively analyzed also. The results showed that: (1) In the past 60 years, Kizil Reservoir's runoff and sedimentary transport have shown an upward trend; the mutation point of the reservoirs' runoff was in 1994; the annual runoff had a periodicity of 7, 13, and 28 years; the annual sedimentary transport had a periodicity of 4, 12, and 26 years. (2) The impact of precipitation and human activities on runoff were 485.37% and −385.37%, respectively; the impact of precipitation on sedimentary transport was first high and then low, while the impact of human activities on sedimentary transport was first low and then high. Solar activities, ENSO, underlying surface changes and glacier snow melt also contributes to water-sediment changes to some extent.
[6]
成斌. 新疆克孜尔水库排沙清淤方案研究与应用[C]//2025(第十三届) 中国水利信息化技术交流会, 2025: 10-14.
(Cheng Bin. Research and Application of Sand Discharge and Dredging Programme in Xinjiang Kezir Reservoir[C]//Proceedings of the 2025 (13th) China Water Resources Informatization Technology Conference, 2025: 10-14.(in Chinese))
[7]
胡浩, 侍克斌, 夏新利. 堤渠联合排沙减淤技术在克孜尔水库的应用[J]. 人民黄河, 2015, 37(5): 24-26, 30.
(Hu Hao, Shi Kebin, Xia Xinli. Application of canal embankment combined sedimentation reduction technology on Kizil Reservoir[J]. Yellow River, 2015, 37(5): 24-26, 30.(in Chinese))
[8]
孔选昭. 多沙河流大库盘水库水沙预测及排沙方案研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2025.
(Kong Xuanzhao. Research on water and sediment prediction and sediment discharge schemes for large-scale reservoirs on high-sediment rivers[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2025.) (in Chinese)
[9]
申冠卿, 张原锋, 王平, 等. 小浪底水库降水排沙对其下游河床演变的影响[J]. 水科学进展, 2024, 35(6):927-937.
(Shen Guanqing, Zhang Yuanfeng, Wang Ping, et al. Impacts of sediment flushing of Xiaolangdi Reservoir on fluvial processes in the Lower Yellow River[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2024, 35(6):927-937. (in Chinese))
[10]
孙书琪, 董占地, 王志国. 新疆和田玉龙喀什水库排沙效率影响因素研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2025, 43(12):73-77.
(Sun Shuqi, Dong Zhandi, Wang Zhiguo. Study on sediment dispatching and operation mode of Yulong Kashi Reservoir in Hotan, Xinjiang[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2025, 43(12): 73-77. (in Chinese))
[11]
陈翠霞, 王海霞, 温志超, 等. 多沙河流水库径流泥沙联合调节方式研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2025, 47(4): 32-37.
(Chen Cuixia, Wang Haixia, Wen Zhichao, et al. Study on the joint regulation of runoff and sediment of water supply reservoirs in sediment-laden river[J]. Yellow River, 2025, 47(4): 32-37. (in Chinese))
[12]
朱呈浩, 谢慰, 陈翠霞, 等. 西霞院水库排沙控制水位优化研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2024, 46(10): 33-37.
(Zhu Chenghao, Xie Wei, Chen Cuixia, et al. Optimization of controlled water level for sediment discharge of xixiayuan reservoir[J]. Yellow River, 2024, 46(10): 33-37. (in Chinese))
[13]
郭静怡, 李晓英, 李新杰. 海勃湾水库排沙方式优化研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2025, 43(10): 79-83.
(Guo Jingyi, Li Xiaoying, Li Xinjie. Research on optimization of sediment flushing methods in Haibowan Reservoir[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2025, 43(10): 79-83. (in Chinese))
[14]
肖玉健. 新疆乌鲁瓦提水库泥沙淤积研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2022, 44(增刊1):7-9,16.
(Xiao Yujian. Study on sediment deposition of wuluwati reservoir in Xinjiang[J]. Yellow River, 2022, 44(S1):7-9, 16.(in Chinese)) :7-9, 16.(in Chinese))
[15]
王增辉, 夏军强, 周美蓉, 等. 三门峡水库水沙调度过程的数值模拟研究[J]. 中国科学(技术科学), 2024, 54(4): 722-733.
(Wang Zenghui, Xia Junqiang, Zhou Meirong, et al. Numerical simulation study for the operation procedure and flow and sediment transport in the Sanmenxia Reservoir[J]. Scientia Sinica (Technologica), 2024, 54(4): 722-733. (in Chinese)) )
[16]
黄仁勇, 高宇, 王敏, 等. 乌东德水库蓄水运用后主汛期排沙特性模拟[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2026, 43(5):17-22,41.
Abstract
为支撑乌东德水库实际调度排沙,建立乌东德水库干支流河道一维非恒定流水沙数学模型,利用蓄水后实测资料验证模型的可行性,继而模拟乌东德水库蓄水运用初期典型水沙过程的排沙特性。结果表明:7—8月份,乌东德水库在入库水量较大时均具有较强的排沙能力,水库具备利用大水排沙的有利条件;受入库沙量大幅减小影响,7—8月份乌东德水库变动回水区泥沙淤积量及占比均相对较小,水库具备开展优化调度的有利条件;汛期(7月份),来水较大时库水位>965 m后,变动回水区淤积占比开始逐步增加但淤积量很小,来水较小时变动回水区淤积规律类似,但对应临界库水位为960 m;蓄水期(8月份),来水较大时起蓄水位抬高对变动回水区淤积量及占比影响很小,来水较小时变动回水区淤积占比会随起蓄水位抬高而相应增大,但淤积量仍较小。研究成果可为水库优化调度提供参考。
(Huang Renyong, Gao Yu, Wang Min, et al. Simulation of sediment discharge characteristics of wudongde reservoir in main flood season after impoundment[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2026, 43(5): 17-22, 41.(in Chinese))
[17]
Liu X M, Wang K Z, Liu T X, et al. Operational mode for water-sediment regulation in plain-type sand-laden reservoirs: a case study of the Haibowan Reservoir[J]. Water, 2024, 16(5): 747.
Excessive sedimentation in sand-laden rivers significantly hinders the normal operation and overall effectiveness of reservoirs. This is observed particularly in plain-type sand-laden reservoirs where weak hydraulic conditions in the reservoir area contribute to sediment deposition. Water–sediment regulation is essential in reducing sedimentation and prolonging the lifespan of such reservoirs. Taking the plain-type reservoir of the primary stream of the Yellow River—Haibowan Reservoir as an example, based on a two-dimensional shallow water equation, a two-dimensional mathematical model of water and sediment in the reservoir area is established, the corresponding boundary conditions are improved, and the reliability of the model is verified. Under the premise of ensuring the flood control safety of the reservoir dam, considering the impact on the power generation of the reservoir and the downstream river, and maintaining the long-term large effective storage capacity of the reservoir as the basic principle, the water–sediment regulation scheme is proposed. A two-dimensional kinetic model of sediment transport and representative water–sediment series are employed to simulate the erosion and sedimentation processes in the reservoir under different schemes. The optimisation and comparison of multiple schemes reveal that the sediment-flushing scheme, which lowers the water level to 1072 m above sea level when the inflow discharge is 1500–2760 m3/s and inflow sediment concentration is 5–10 kg/m3, can yield an effective reservoir capacity of 97 million m3 and an average annual hydropower generation of 389.5 million kWh after 15 years of operation. This scheme outperforms the existing sediment-flushing scheme and is recommended as an optimised approach for water–sediment regulation in reservoirs. The results of this study provide technical support for the application of water–sediment regulation in the Haibowan Reservoir and may be useful in the exploration and management of water–sediment regulation for plain-type reservoirs on sand-laden rivers.
[18]
刘心愿, 李凌云, 张金武, 等. 陆水水库建库近60年泥沙淤积、库区演变及影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(9): 10-16.
Abstract
研究库区泥沙淤积情况对于水库的运行和管理十分重要,结合陆水水库建库前及近期库区地形,复核了陆水水库建库前库容曲线,采用断面法和栅格地形法分析了陆水水库库区的淤积时空分布特征,开展了淤积重点区域的河道演变分析,并从多个方面综合分析了库区淤积的影响。总体而言,陆水水库泥沙淤积总量不大,但局部库段淤积比较突出,对防洪、航运、灌溉、发电等功能发挥带来了不利影响,建议采取机械清淤、加强汛期排沙调度等措施,控制库区泥沙淤积,保持水库有效库容。研究成果可为水库相关管理工作提供参考。
(Liu Xinyuan, Li Lingyun, Zhang Jinwu, et al. Sedimentation and evolution of Lushui Reservoir and their impacts over the past 60 years since construction[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(9): 10-16. (in Chinese))

[Objective] This study systematically examines the characteristics of sediment deposition and river evolution in Lushui Reservoir over 60 years since its construction and evaluates their comprehensive impacts. [Methods] Based on pre-construction (1959) 1∶10 000 topographic maps and recent (2018) 1∶5 000 maps, sediment volumes and stage-capacity curves were calculated using the cross-section method and 10 m × 10 m grid-based method (combined with Simpson’s 3/8 rule). [Results] The total deposition was 32.397 million m3, accounting for only 4.6% of the total storage below the design flood level, indicating overall light siltation. However, the spatial distribution was highly uneven—74% of the deposition was concentrated below the flood-limit water level, with the Hongshang-Shikeng downstream 11km reach becoming the core deposition zone, accounting for 51% of the total (local maximum deposition thickness up to 11.79 m), while the Hongshang-Langkou reach was likely in a scouring state due to unregulated sand mining and reduced sediment inflow. For channel evolution, the thalweg in the Hongshang-Shikeng reach rose on average 6.27 m, and the shoreline at the 45 m dead water level elevation shrank markedly; maximum thalweg migration reached 660 m (at the Lashupu widening), and the depositional pattern tended toward a deltaic form—with the Hongshang-Shikeng reach dominated by main-channel deposition, and sections above Hongshang mainly showing floodplain deposition. Deposition significantly impaired reservoir functions: (1) For flood control, 6.856 million m3 of flood-control capacity was lost (4.2% loss rate), and the cross-section area in the Hongshang-Shikeng reach was reduced by 26% on average (up to 54%), markedly lowering discharge capacity and raising the regulated flood levels under design floods. (2) For beneficial use, 17.193 million m3 of active storage lost (equal to an annual power loss of 842 000 kW·h), and 12.29 million m3 between the dead water level and flood-limit level was lost (8.1% of mean annual irrigation withdrawal). (3) For navigation, thalweg elevations were generally at or above the 45 m dead water level elevation, severely restricting navigation during low-flow periods. [Conclusion] Although the overall sedimentation rate of Lushui Reservoir is low, local deposition poses a significant threat to flood-control and navigation functions. Mechanical dredging in the key reach (Hongshang-Shikeng) and optimization of sediment-flushing schedules during the flood season are urgently needed to control sediment and maintain effective storage capacity. These findings provide a scientific basis for sediment management in long-operating reservoirs and for the development of “modern reservoir operation and management matrix” proposed by the Ministry of Water Resources.

[19]
康远泰, 卢陈, 高时友, 等. 2002—2020年深圳湾河床冲淤特性及驱动机制[J]. 水科学进展, 2024, 35(6):947-959.
(Kang Yuantai, Lu Chen, Gao Shiyou, et al. Riverbed erosion-deposition dynamics and driving mechanisms in Shenzhen Bay, 2002-2020[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2024, 35(6): 947-959. (in Chinese))
[20]
李昆鹏, 刘强中, 王振凡, 等. 西霞院水库流路演变及泥沙淤积分布特征[J]. 人民黄河, 2025, 47(1):51-54,103.
(Li Kunpeng, Liu Qiangzhong, Wang Zhenfan, et al. Evolution of flow path and distribution characteristics of sediment deposition in xixiayuan reservoir[J]. Yellow River, 2025, 47(1): 51-54, 103.(in Chinese))
[21]
裴柯雄, 史红玲, 陈建国, 等. 三门峡水库汛期壅水排沙影响因素分析[J]. 泥沙研究, 2025, 50(1): 61-67.
(Pei Kexiong, Shi Hongling, Chen Jianguo, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of backwater sediment discharge in flood season of Sanmenxia Reservoir[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2025, 50(1): 61-67. (in Chinese))
[22]
朱玲玲, 许全喜, 董炳江, 等. 金沙江下游溪洛渡水库排沙效果及影响因素[J]. 水科学进展, 2021, 32(4):544-555.
(Zhu Lingling, Xu Quanxi, Dong Bingjiang, et al. Study on the effect and influencing factors of sand discharge of Xiluodu Reservoir in the Lower Jinsha River[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2021, 32(4): 544-555. (in Chinese))
[23]
王克志, 刘晓民, 刘廷玺, 等. 海勃湾水库排沙效果及影响因素[J]. 中国沙漠, 2023, 43(5):9-17.
Abstract
海勃湾水库是黄河内蒙古段龙头水库,其排沙效果对水库运行及黄河内蒙古段泥沙淤积有着重要影响。水库排沙比是描述水库输沙特性的关键指标,排沙比越大,入库泥沙占水库淤积比例就越小。以海勃湾水库建成蓄水(2014年)至2021年实测资料为基础,分析水库排沙特征,并采用相关性分析探讨影响排沙比变化主要因素。结果表明:水库多年平均排沙比为19.35%,较设计值明显偏小,未产生理想排沙效果,淤积和排沙主要发生在汛期,大流量期间呈现“多来多排”的特点;排沙比变化主要受水沙条件和水库运行方式以及地形影响:排沙比与入库流量及入出库水沙协调性具有正相关关系,与坝前水位及滞洪时间具有负相关关系,水库地形上窄下宽、上陡下缓分布以及乌兰布和沙漠风沙入库对排沙比造成负面影响;汛期排沙比主要受滞洪时间影响。还建立了汛期排沙比经验计算式。
(Wang Kezhi, Liu Xiaomin, Liu Tingxi, et al. Effect and influencing factors of sediment discharge in Haibowan Reservoir[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(5):9-17. (in Chinese))

Haibowan Reservoir is a leading reservoir in the Inner Mongolia section of the Yellow River, and its sediment discharge effect has an important impact on the operation of the reservoir and the sediment deposition in the Inner Mongolia section of the Yellow River. The sediment discharge ratio of the reservoir is a key indicator to describe the sediment transport characteristics of the reservoir. The larger the sediment discharge ratio, the smaller the proportion of sediment in the reservoir. Based on the measured data of Haibowan Reservoir from 2014 to 2021, the characteristics of sediment discharge were analyzed, and the main factors affecting the change of sediment discharge ratio were discussed by correlation analysis. The results show that the annual average sediment discharge ratio of the reservoir is 19.35%, which is obviously smaller than the design value, and the ideal sediment discharge effect is not produced. The siltation and sediment discharge mainly occur in flood season, and the characteristics of "more coming and more discharging" are presented during large discharge period. The change of sediment discharge ratio is mainly affected by the water and sediment conditions, the operation mode of the reservoir and the topography. The sediment discharge ratio has a positive correlation with the inflow flow and the coordination of water and sediment in and out of the reservoir, and has a negative correlation with the water level in front of the dam and the flood detention time. The distribution of the reservoir topography is narrow at the top and wide at the bottom, steep at the top and slow at the bottom, and the inflow of wind-blown sand in the Ulanbu Desert have a negative impact on the sediment discharge ratio. The regression analysis shows that the sediment discharge ratio in flood season is mainly affected by the flood detention time and the empirical formula for sediment discharge ratio in flood season is established. The results can provide reference for the optimization of water and sediment control in Haibowan Reservoir.

[24]
陈翠霞, 赵东晓, 王振凡, 等. 小浪底水库排沙规律及调控指标[J]. 人民黄河, 2025, 47(2):36-41.
(Chen Cuixia, Zhao Dongxiao, Wang Zhenfan, et al. Sediment discharge law and regulation indicators of the Xiaolangdi Reservoir[J]. Yellow River, 2025, 47(2):36-41. (in Chinese))
[25]
徐志国, 杨帆, 汪敏. 克孜尔水库低水位水力排沙清淤技术应用与实践[J]. 东北水利水电, 2024, 42(11):43-45.
(Xu Zhiguo, Yang Fan, Wang Min. Application and practice of low water level hydraulic sediment removal technology in Kezier Reservoir[J]. Water Resources & Hydropower of Northeast China, 2024, 42(11): 43-45. (in Chinese))
[26]
张小莹, 刘淇, 肖玉磊, 等. 近10年塔里木河干流中游蜿蜒形态演变规律[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(4):27-35.
Abstract
为了揭示塔里木河干流典型蜿蜒型河流形态的形成及河道冲淤演变规律,基于遥感影像,用套绘的形式总结了塔里木河中游乌斯满—阿其克段近10 a河道边界的平面形态变化类型。结合实测大断面和水文资料,用河相关系分析了河道在不同时间下横断面的稳定性。结果表明:①塔里木河中游乌斯满—阿其克段河流平面几何形态演变主要分为4种单一变形(正偏、负偏、延伸、缩拢)以及4种组合变形(正偏+延伸、正偏+缩拢、负偏+延伸、负偏+缩拢)共8种形式,研究河段正偏+延伸变形占比最大。②提出描述河道平面的主要演变类型的形态参数偏移度与展宽度及其计算方法,发现影响偏移度的最主要因素是年径流量,其次是年输沙量和造床流量,洪水是影响展宽度的重要因素。③研究河段近年来河相系数增大,河床纵向趋于稳定,河床横向的稳定性沿程增大。研究成果对于塔里木河中游蜿蜒型河流防洪工程建设、河道整治具有重要的参考价值。
(Zhang Xiaoying, Liu Qi, Xiao Yulei, et al. Evolutionary patterns of meandering morphology in the middle reach of the mainstream Tarim River over the past decade[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(4): 27-35. (in Chinese))

To reveal the formation and evolutionary patterns of typical meandering river morphology in the main stream of the Tarim River, this study used remote-sensing images and overlaying techniques to summarize the types of planform changes in the river boundaries of the middle reach of Tarim River from Wusiman to Aqike over the past decade. Moreover, integrating measured cross-sections and hydrological data, river regime analysis was employed to evaluate the stability of river cross-sections at different times. The results are as follows: 1) The planform geometric evolution of the middle reach from Wusiman to Aqike can be categorized into four single patterns (positive shift, negative shift, extension, and contraction) and four combined patterns (positive shift plus extension, positive shift plus contraction, negative shift plus extension, and negative shift plus contraction). Among them, the positive shift plus extension pattern is the most prevalent in the study reach. 2) Morphological parameters, namely the offset degree and widening degree, along with their calculation methods, were proposed to depict the main types of planform evolution in river channels. Annual discharge was found to be the primary factor influencing the offset degree, followed by the annual sediment transport and bedload discharge. Flood was identified as the key factor affecting the widening degree. 3) In recent years, the hydraulic geometric relation coefficient has increased, suggesting an enhanced longitudinal stability of the riverbed. Meanwhile, the transverse stability of the riverbed has also improved along the study reach. This research offers significant reference for flood control engineering and river channel regulation of meandering rivers in the middle reach of the Tarim River.

[27]
韩其为. 水库淤积[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.
(Han Qiwei. Reservoir sedimentation[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2003.) (in Chinese)
[28]
陕西省水利科学研究所河渠研究室, 清华大学水利工程系泥沙研究室. 水库泥沙[M]. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1979.
(Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Water Resources Research. Reservoir sediment[M]. Beijing: Water Resources and Electric Power Press, 1979.) (in Chinese)
[29]
Liu S, Li D, Liu D, et al. Characteristics of sedimentation and sediment trapping efficiency in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J]. Catena, 2022, 208: 105715.
[30]
周王敏, 李晓萌, 谭皓月, 等. 三峡水库生态清淤技术初探[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(7): 60-68.
Abstract
水库泥沙淤积是制约水库综合效益发挥的关键因素,采用传统工程清淤方式会引起底泥的再悬浮,导致底泥向水体释放营养盐,进而影响库区水环境。研究提出合理、切实可行的生态清淤方案,合理规避泥沙清淤所产生的水环境污染,是水库泥沙综合利用的前提。围绕新水沙情势下三峡水库淤积泥沙生态清淤需求,对比评估了现有水库清淤技术的特点、适用性及环保性,并结合三峡水库分段淤积特征,提出了适合三峡水库的环境友好型生态清淤技术。在此基础上,选取涪陵、忠县典型淤积河段作为典型区域,建立了二维水动力-悬浮泥沙数学模型,模拟该河段在不同清淤设备下的清淤效果,提出了典型河段生态清淤技术方案。研究成果为三峡水库库容保障及其长期有效使用和综合效益的可持续发挥提供科学依据。
(Zhou Wangmin, Li Xiaomeng, Tan Haoyue, et al. Preliminary study of ecological dredging technology for the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(7): 60-68. (in Chinese))
[31]
任实, 胡兴娥, 邢龙, 等. 三峡水库坝前深水清淤疏浚技术研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(1): 24-28.
Abstract
水库泥沙淤积问题普遍存在于全球水库中,影响防洪、发电、航运、水资源利用等水库功能的正常发挥,尤其是坝前泥沙淤积,可能会堵塞电站进水口和泄流底孔,严重影响水库发电效益和泄洪安全。对于大型水库而言,坝前水深一般在100 m以上,高效安全地进行坝前深水清淤疏浚是有效控制水库泥沙淤积、保持水资源可持续利用的一种重要途径。研究了气动力式深水清淤技术,并在三峡水库坝前深水环境进行了清淤试验。研究结果表明气动力式清淤技术可在百米级的深水环境中安全高效运行,清淤成本可控。研究成果可为大型水库清淤疏浚提供技术参考。
(Ren Shi, Hu Xing’e, Xing Long, et al. Aerodynamic dredging technology for deep water in front of Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(1): 24-28. (in Chinese))
Reservoir sedimentation is a worldwide problem which affects the normal functioning of flood control,power generation,shipping,and water resources utilization. In particular,sediment deposition in front of dam may block the water intake of hydropower station and bottom outlet,severely affecting the power generation efficiency and flood discharge safety. The water depth in front of the dam of large reservoirs is generally over 100 meters. Efficient and safe dredging is an important approach to effectively control sediment deposition and maintain sustainable development of water resources. In this paper,the aerodynamic deep-water dredging technology is studied and applied to the Three Gorges Reservoir. Application result manifests that aerodynamic dredging technology can be operated safely and efficiently in 100-meter deep water environment. The research results can be taken as a technical reference for the dredging of large reservoirs.
[32]
闫霞, 姚仕明, 夏炜, 等. 窎鱼嘴浅滩2018年航道维护性疏浚工程后评估[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(8): 9-13.
Abstract
窎鱼嘴浅滩位于三峡水库变动回水区,水道具有弯、急、险的特点。为防止水道碍航,2018年汛期首次实施了维护性疏浚工程。通过对窎鱼嘴浅滩疏浚工作的设计方案、施工过程及时机、航道可持续性等方面进行分析和评价,综合评估年度疏浚维护效果并总结归纳维护性疏浚工作中存在的问题和不足。研究结果表明:2018年窎鱼嘴浅滩维护疏浚方案设计与河段河床演变及年度水沙输移规律相适应;疏浚时机选在汛后三峡蓄水河段水位抬高时,有效缓解了施工与通航的矛盾,并且利用汛后冲刷的规律达到了事半功倍的效果;但由于疏浚工程未改变引起河床演变的水沙条件及边界条件,维护疏浚工程难以保证航道的稳定性和可持续性。因此,建议继续加强河段水下地形观测,根据浅滩演变趋势 适时开展航道整治工程。该疏浚工程合理性、适应性的评估可为今后航道维护工作提供技术参考。
(Yan Xia, Yao Shiming, Xia Wei, et al. Post-assessment of the 2018 maintenance dredging project of Diaoyuzui shoal[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(8): 9-13. (in Chinese))
Diaoyuzui Shoal, located in a large curved passageway in the fluctuating backwater area of the Three Gorges Reservoir, was featured with curved and dangerous waterway and rapid current. A maintenance dredging project was first carried out in 2018. In this paper we analyzed the rationality, adaptability and sustainability of the dredging work based on summarizing the characteristics of shoals obstructing navigation, the dredging plan and the implementation process, etc., and then evaluated the effect of the dredging work and summarized its problems and shortcomings. Results demonstrated that the dredging design was well adaptive to riverbed evolution and annual water-sediment transport rules; the dredging was conducted when the water level of the Three Gorges storage reach rose, which not only alleviated the contradiction between construction and navigation, but also doubled the effect by taking the advantage of post-flood scouring. Nevertheless, the stability and sustainability of the channel are difficult to be maintained because the dredging project does not change the water and sediment conditions and boundary conditions that cause the riverbed evolution. Therefore, we suggested to strengthen the underwater terrain observation of the reach and carry out waterway regulation works in time according to the evolution trend of the shoal.
[33]
李炜. 水力计算手册[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2006.
(LI W. Handbook of hydraulic calculations[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2006.) (in Chinese)
PDF(5354 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉