PDF(1783 KB)
Microstructural Characteristics and Comprehensive Treatment Measures of Expansive Soil on Canal Slope
CHANG Xiao-hui
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11) : 138-145.
PDF(1783 KB)
PDF(1783 KB)
Microstructural Characteristics and Comprehensive Treatment Measures of Expansive Soil on Canal Slope
[Objective] The primary objectives of this study were to fundamentally characterize the microstructural, compositional, and physical attributes of the region’s expansive soils, to quantitatively identify the causal factors and failure modes behind recurrent slope failures through advanced numerical simulation, and to synthesize these insights into a robust, comprehensive treatment strategy. The research seeks to establish a definitive, cause-effect relationship linking the intrinsic micro-scale properties of expansive soil to its macro-scale mechanical response and instability, thereby offering a scientifically grounded and practical framework for slope stabilization in expansive soil regions, which is of paramount importance for the safety and longevity of large-scale irrigation projects. [Methods] Laser particle size analysis was performed to determine the detailed particle size distribution; scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to visually examine the microstructural morphology and fabric of the soil; and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) for qualitative and quantitative elemental composition analysis. Furthermore, basic physical and index properties, including dry density, natural water content, liquid limit, plastic limit, plasticity index, and free swell ratio, were measured. A finite element model of a representative canal slope was constructed using MIDAS GTX-NX. This model incorporated the Mohr-Coulomb constitutive relation to represent soil behavior and applied the strength reduction method to accurately identify potential slip surfaces, compute the factor of safety under natural conditions, and analyze the associated displacement and strain fields. [Results] Particle size analysis revealed a poorly graded soil with grain sizes predominantly concentrated in the 10-100 μm range (fine silt to clay), with characteristic diameters D10, D30, and D60 being 12.364, 24.146,49.236 μm, respectively. The calculated uniformity coefficient (Cu) of 3.982 and curvature coefficient (Cc) of 0.957 definitively classified the soil as poorly graded, indicating a structurally loose arrangement with high porosity and susceptibility to structural collapse upon hydrological changes. SEM imagery confirmed a heterogeneous microstructure composed of irregular, angular particles with a loose, flocculated fabric and well-developed pores, which facilitates easy water ingress and weakens interparticle bonds. EDS analysis quantitatively identified the primary elements as Oxygen (51.16%), Silicon (25.97%), and Aluminum (5.59%), along with smaller amounts of Carbon, Calcium, and Iron, confirming the dominance of hydrophilic clay minerals like illite, which directly account for the material’s pronounced swelling-shrinkage potential and high plasticity (liquid limit of 41.3%, plasticity index of 23.82). Finite element simulation under natural conditions powerfully corroborated these findings, identifying a distinct, deep-seated arc-shaped slip surface. The equivalent shear strain and horizontal displacement cloud maps clearly illustrated that the sliding mass was primarily concentrated in the middle and upper sections of the slope—the zone most susceptible to seasonal water-level fluctuations and repeated wet-dry cycles. This numerical result directly linked the microstructurally observed water sensitivity to the macroscopic failure mode, demonstrating that strength degradation due to moisture ingress in these zones is the dominant trigger for instability, even while the slope may retain a marginally high safety factor in a transient, natural state. [Conclusions] Poor gradation, hydrophilic mineral composition, and disordered, porous microstructure collectively engender high water sensitivity, significant swell-shrink potential, and low shear strength. A comprehensive treatment framework is proposed: 1) surface drainage and internal seepage guidance involving cutoff drains, drainage ditches, and blind pipes to actively control water infiltration and reduce pore pressures; 2) slope cutting and soil modification & reconstruction involving the removal of sliding mass and the replacement with cement-stabilized soil or other modified materials to enhance overall stability and create a protective cap; 3) anti-slide piles and rigid retaining structures to provide direct mechanical resistance against residual driving forces; and 4) slope anchoring and soil locking using soil nailing walls and tie-back systems to physically key the unstable sliding mass into the deeper, stable bedrock, thereby improving overall integrity and shear resistance.
expansive soil / channel landslide / particle size analysis / finite element analysis / governance principles / microstructure
| [1] |
包承纲. 非饱和土的性状及膨胀土边坡稳定问题[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2004, 26(1): 1-15.
(
|
| [2] |
王天亮, 王林, 刘松松, 等. 黄原胶和瓜尔胶改良膨胀土力学特性试验研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2023, 44(2):1-10.
(
|
| [3] |
喻成成, 卢正, 姚海林, 等. 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀改性膨胀土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(增刊1):157-163,172.
(
|
| [4] |
吴燕开, 乔晓龙, 李丹丹, 等. 干湿循环下钢渣粉水泥改良膨胀土室内试验研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 53(3): 319-329.
(
|
| [5] |
李威, 王协群, 申雅卓, 等. 固化剂在膨胀土改良中的应用[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2018(8):141-144.
膨胀土是一种典型的区域性特殊土,因具有显著的吸水膨胀软化和失水收缩开裂等变形特性,而对渠道、路基和挡墙等工程具有严重的破坏性。目前已知治理膨胀土的方法中,固化剂改良法因具有良好的改性效果和高性价比而在工程界得到广泛应用。分析了固化剂改良膨胀土的作用机理,并据此对膨胀土固化剂的类型进行了划分。在此基础上,对比分析了各类膨胀土固化剂的改良效果,进而探讨了膨胀土改性研究的基本思路与方法。
(
Expansive soil is a typically regional special soil with remarkable deformation characteristics variated with the change of moisture content. It has a serious destruction on the engineered practices, such as channels, roadbeds and retaining walls. Curing agent is now known to be used widely because of its good modified effect and high cost performance in the field of improving the expansive soil. In the present study, the mechanism of curing agent was analyzed, and the category of curing agent was also classified. On that basis, the comparison of modified effect for the different curing agents was studied, and then the basic analysis thought and method on improving the expansive soil was discussed.
|
| [6] |
刘宇翼. 电石渣-稻壳灰基胶凝材料固化膨胀土机理及其物理力学特性研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
(
|
| [7] |
张艺, 李永强, 章定文, 等. 粉土改良膨胀土的路用性能与现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2942-2952.
(
|
| [8] |
边加敏. 石灰改良膨胀土重塑后抗剪强度特性及应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(10): 103-109.
为研究石灰改良膨胀土重塑后的抗剪强度性能,进行了素土、石灰改良膨胀土及重塑石灰改良膨胀土3种土体在0,12.5,25,50,75,100,150 kPa下的直剪(快剪)试验。试验结果显示,重塑石灰改良膨胀土各上覆压力下的抗剪强度均低于石灰改良膨胀土而大于素土。采用《公路土工试验规程》(JTG E40—2007)拟合土体的抗剪强度时,素土在低应力下的偏差最大,而石灰改良膨胀土最小,采用双直线法拟合时各应力段的抗剪强度值偏差最小。重塑石灰改良膨胀土的抗剪强度劣化系数随着上覆压力的增大而减小,且呈明显的2段。当上覆压力<25 kPa时,上覆压力对于土体性能劣化系数影响较大;当上覆压力>25 kPa时,抗剪强度性能劣化系数随着上覆荷载的增大而减小的幅度逐渐减小。重塑后石灰改良膨胀土土体的黏聚力大于素土而小于石灰改良膨胀土,内摩擦角大于素土及石灰改良膨胀土。从试验结论来看,在素土强度满足路堤填芯的情况下,重塑后的石灰改良弱膨胀土可以直接用于路堤填芯;但用于路堤表面填筑时,需要再改良。
(
Direct(quick) shear tests were conducted on plain soil, line-treated expansive soil, and remoulded lime-treated expansive soil for comparison under 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 kPa to examine the shear strength of remoulded lime-treated expansive soil. Results demonstrated that the values of shear strength of remoulded lime-treated expansive soil under all loading levels were lower than those of lime-treated expansive soil while higher than those of plain soil. Fitted with the method in <i>Test Methods of Soils for Highway Engineering</i> (JTG E40-2007), the shear strength of plain soil saw the largest deviation under low stress, and lime-treated expansive soil the smallest. Fitted with the bilinear method, the shear strength showed the smallest deviation under all stress levels. Moreover, the coefficient of deterioration of shear strength of remoulded lime-treated expansive soil declined with the rising of overlying pressure, displaying two obvious stages. When overlying pressure is smaller than 25 kPa, the deterioration coefficient is largely affected by overlying pressure; when larger than 25 kPa, the recession of deterioration coefficient attenuated with the rising of overlying load. The cohesive force of remoulded lime-treated soil is larger than that of plain soil while smaller than that lime-treated expansive soil, and the internal friction angle is larger than that of plain soil and lime-treated expansive soil. When the strength of plain soil meets the requirements for embankment filling, the remoulded lime-treated weak expansive soil can be used directly in core filling, but needs to be improved for surface filling.
|
| [9] |
黄震, 边林林, 刘莹, 等. 牡蛎壳粉改良膨胀土的工程特性及微观机理研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2023, 20(5): 1729-1739.
(
|
| [10] |
惠会清, 胡同康, 王新东. 石灰、粉煤灰改良膨胀土性质机理[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 26(2): 34-37.
(
|
| [11] |
黄春丽, 阮永芬, 李志伟, 等. 改性膨胀土的膨胀率研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(12): 3759-3766.
对取自不同场地的膨胀土,掺入4种常用改性剂生石灰、熟石灰、粉煤灰、水泥后,对膨胀土在不同掺入比情况下,改性膨胀土的自由膨胀率、有荷及无荷条件下的膨胀率及变形量的变化规律进行试验研究.研究结果表明:具有强膨胀潜势的膨胀土改性剂的最佳掺量为10%,掺人生石灰后自由膨胀率降幅最大,熟石灰的最小;中膨胀潜势的膨胀土改性剂最佳掺量为8%,掺人生石灰后其自由膨胀率降幅最大,掺入水泥的最小.最佳掺量条件下生石灰和水泥改性土的有荷及无荷膨胀率均较小,且无荷膨胀稳定时间较短,即水泥及生石灰的改性土变形较小,利于其上建构筑物的稳定.生石灰改性效果优于熟石灰,相关研究应明确选用的是生石灰还是熟石灰.
(
|
| [12] |
张坤勇, 徐娜, 陈恕, 等. 膨胀土完全软化强度指标试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(11): 1988-1995.
(
|
| [13] |
徐永福. 膨胀土的水力作用机理及膨胀变形理论[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(11): 1979-1987.
(
|
| [14] |
龚壁卫, 程展林, 胡波, 等. 膨胀土裂隙的工程特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(7): 1825-1830,1836.
(
|
| [15] |
陈冠一, 肖杰, 陈强, 等. 不同毛细阻滞覆盖层处治膨胀土边坡的渗流及稳定性研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(1): 199-213.
(
|
| [16] |
林宇亮, 张震, 罗桂军, 等. 膨胀土边坡的水平膨胀力及桩板结构内力分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(1): 140-149.
(
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
GB/T 50123—2019 土工试验方法标准[S].(GB/T50123—2019 Standard for geotechnical testing method[S].) (in Chinese)
|
| [21] |
贾善坡, 陈卫忠, 杨建平, 等. 基于修正Mohr-Coulomb准则的弹塑性本构模型及其数值实施[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(7): 2051-2058.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |