Landslide Deformation Prediction Model Based on CEEMDAN Decomposition and BAS-HKELM and Its Application Analysis

ZHANG Xiao-lei, LEI Yan-li, LUO Lin

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11) : 146-154.

PDF(1703 KB)
PDF(1703 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11) : 146-154. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250929
ENGINEERING SAFETY AND DISASTER PREVENTION

Landslide Deformation Prediction Model Based on CEEMDAN Decomposition and BAS-HKELM and Its Application Analysis

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] The Beetle Antennae Search (BAS) algorithm features random oscillation and adaptive search mechanisms, demonstrating superior performance in global optimization and computational efficiency, particularly for high-dimensional complex problems. It offers unique optimization capabilities for the weight and regularization coefficients of the Hybrid Kernel Extreme Learning Machine (HKELM) model. Therefore, this study proposes utilizing BAS to optimize these two parameters to further enhance deformation prediction accuracy. [Method] Based on landslide deformation monitoring data, the Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN) was first employed to decompose the deformation data and reduce its complexity. Subsequently, a BAS-HKELM model was constructed by combining BAS and HKELM to predict the deformation of each component. The final landslide deformation prediction was obtained by superimposing the predicted results of all components. [Results] Following CEEMDAN decomposition, the signal-to-noise ratio ranged from 43.8 to 46.8 dB, and the root mean square error ranged from 0.202 to 0.216 mm, indicating robust data decomposition capability. The BAS-HKELM prediction model achieved a mean relative error of 1.55%-1.77% and a training time of 175.09-209.33 ms. These results demonstrate both high prediction accuracy and fast convergence, validating the model’s suitability for landslide deformation prediction. [Conclusions] (1) With the progressive optimization of the CEEMDAN structure, its data decomposition capability improves gradually. Compared with db wavelet, sym wavelet, and Kalman filtering, CEEMDAN demonstrates significantly superior decomposition performance, making it suitable for processing landslide deformation data. (2) Based on data decomposition, ablation, comparative, and generalization tests consistently showed that BAS-HKELM yields superior deformation prediction performance, fully confirming its applicability to landslide deformation prediction. (3) Subsequent landslide deformation is expected to continue increasing, with accelerated growth characteristics observed at the front edge. The future deformation trend is concerning, necessitating urgent prevention and control measures.

Key words

landslide / data decomposition / stability / extreme learning machine / deformation prediction

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Xiao-lei , LEI Yan-li , LUO Lin. Landslide Deformation Prediction Model Based on CEEMDAN Decomposition and BAS-HKELM and Its Application Analysis[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(11): 146-154 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250929

References

[1]
孙富强, 张永军, 喻生波, 等. 兰州皋兰山Ⅲ-2号滑坡变形特征及复活条件预测[J]. 西北地质, 2025, 58(3):267-276.
(Sun Fuqiang, Zhang Yongjun, Yu Shengbo, et al. Deformation characteristics and prediction of resurrection conditions of landslide Ⅲ-2 in Gaolan Mountain, Lanzhou[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2025, 58(3):267-276. (in Chinese))
[2]
吴爽爽, 董俊利. 基于变形演化特征呷爬滑坡预测预警研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2025, 44(增刊1):61-73.
(Wu Shuangshuang, Dong Junli. Forecasting and early warning of the Gapa landslide based on deformation and evolution characteristics[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2025, 44(S1):61-73. (in Chinese)) :61-73.(in Chinese))
[3]
袁维, 孙瑞峰, 钟辉亚, 等. 阶跃型滑坡综合变形预测及监测预警方法研究[J]. 水利学报, 2023, 54(4):461-473.
(Yuan Wei, Sun Ruifeng, Zhong Huiya, et al. Research on comprehensive deformation prediction and monitoring and early warning method for step-like landslide[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2023, 54(4): 461-473. (in Chinese))
[4]
雷恒, 周晓岚, 王永强. 基于多重分形特征和分项组合预测联合响应的滑坡预警预测研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2022, 42(9):885-891.
(Lei Heng, Zhou Xiaolan, Wang Yongqiang. Research on landslide early warning and prediction based on combined response of multifractal characteristics and sub item prediction[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2022, 42(9): 885-891. (in Chinese))
[5]
孙林煊, 邓龙胜, 汤冬, 等. 不同重现期降雨作用下陕西延安地区董家屯滑坡的变形规律和稳定性预测[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2025, 47(3): 331-343.
(Sun Linxuan, Deng Longsheng, Tang Dong, et al. Deformation law and stability prediction of dongjiatun landslides under rainfall during various recurrence periods in Yan’an area of Shaanxi, China[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2025, 47(3): 331-343. (in Chinese))
[6]
李晓斌, 白海军. 高位远程古滑坡既有变形特征和后续变形发展规律研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2023, 43(11):1129-1135.
(Li Xiaobin, Bai Haijun. Research on existing deformation characteristics and subsequent deformation development laws of high-elevation and long-runout ancient landslide[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2023, 43(11):1129-1135. (in Chinese))
[7]
吴益平, 滕伟福, 李亚伟. 灰色-神经网络模型在滑坡变形预测中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(3): 632-636.
(Wu Yiping, Teng Weifu, Li Yawei. Application of grey-neural network model to landslide deformation prediction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(3): 632-636. (in Chinese))
[8]
汪标, 易庆林, 邓茂林, 等. 基于累积位移特征与时间序列组合模型的滑坡位移预测[J]. 工程地质学报, 2024, 32(5): 1629-1639.
(Wang Biao, Yi Qinglin, Deng Maolin, et al. Landslide displacement prediction based on cumulative displacement features and time series combination model[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2024, 32(5): 1629-1639. (in Chinese))
[9]
赵林. 基于CE-EMD-GWO-RVM-CT模型的碎石土滑坡变形预测研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2025, 56(2): 179-188.
(Zhao Lin. Study on deformation prediction of gravel soil landslides based on CE-EMD-GWO-RVM-CT model[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2025, 56(2): 179-188. (in Chinese))
[10]
任文辉. 基于PFDGM(1, 1)-AR模型的老滑坡变形预测研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2023, 41(8): 180-184.
(Ren Wenhui. Study on deformation prediction of old landslides based on PFDGM (1, 1)-AR model[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2023, 41(8): 180-184. (in Chinese))
[11]
李潇. 基于EMD与GEP的滑坡变形预测模型[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2014, 34(2): 111-114.
(Li Xiao. Landslide deformation prediction model based on EMD and GEP[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2014, 34(2): 111-114. (in Chinese))
[12]
王晨辉, 赵贻玖, 郭伟, 等. 滑坡位移EEMD-SVR预测模型[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(10): 2196-2204.
Abstract
滑坡位移预测是滑坡灾害实时监测预警的重要组成部分,良好的滑坡位移预测模型有助于预测地质灾害发生。滑坡变形受多种外界因素影响呈现出随机性和非线性的特点,在现有的滑坡位移预测方法中,机器学习方法在滑坡位移预测中得到了广泛的应用。针对滑坡位移预测是趋势项位移和周期项叠加的特点,本文研究采用基于集成经验模态分解(EEMD)的滑坡趋势项和周期项位移提取方法,结合支持向量回归(SVR)模型实现对滑坡的位移预测。首先,详细介绍了该模型的构建过程和预测性能,并以均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和决定系数(R2)作为评估模型的预测性能指标。然后,分别利用EEMD-SVR、SVR、Elman模型对贵州省岩溶山区的一处滑坡进行位移预测,结果表明,EEMD-SVR模型连续1 d预测的RMSE值、MAPE值和R2值分别为0.648 mm、0.518%和0.996 8,可以提供更高可靠的滑坡位移预测精度,对同类滑坡的位移预测具有一定的参考价值。
(Wang Chenhui, Zhao Yijiu, Guo Wei, et al. Displacement prediction model of landslide based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and support vector regression[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2022, 51(10): 2196-2204. (in Chinese))
Landslide displacement prediction is an important part of real-time monitoring and early warning of landslide disasters. A good landslide displacement prediction model is helpful to predict the occurrence of geological disasters. The deformation of the landslide is affected by a variety of external factors and presents the characteristics of randomness and nonlinearity. Among the existing landslide displacement prediction methods, machine learning methods have been widely used in landslide displacement prediction. Prediction of landslide displacement is the superposition of trend displacement and periodic displacement. In this study, the displacement extraction method of landslide trend term and period term based on integrated empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and the support vector regression (SVR) model were used to predict the landslide displacement. The construction process and prediction performance of the model are introduced in detail, and the root mean square error (RMSE), average absolute error (MAE), average absolute percentage error (MAPE) and coefficient of determination (<i>R</i>2) are used as the predictive performance indicators of the evaluation model. The EEMD-SVR, SVR, and Elman models are used to predict the displacement of a landslide in the karst mountainous area of Guizhou province. The results showed that the RMSE, MAPE and <i>R</i>2 values of EEMD-SVR model were 0.648 mm, 0.518% and 0.996 8, respectively. This model can provide higher and more reliable landslide displacement prediction accuracy, and has certain reference value for the displacement prediction of similar landslide.
[13]
孙华芬, 曹念, 侯克鹏. 基于因果分析的滑坡位移预测模型[J]. 测绘科学, 2024, 49(3):47-57.
(Sun Huafen, Cao Nian, Hou Kepeng. Landslide displacement prediction model based on causal analysis[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2024, 49(3): 47-57. (in Chinese))
[14]
李晓斌, 白海军. 变质岩区大型高位滑坡的变形监测预报研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2023, 43(10):1045-1050.
(Li Xiaobin, Bai Haijun. Deformation monitoring and prediction of large high-level landslide in metamorphic rock area[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2023, 43(10): 1045-1050. (in Chinese))
[15]
曹博, 汪帅, 宋丹青, 等. 基于蚁群算法优化极限学习机模型的滑坡位移预测[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2022, 33(2): 172-178.
(Cao Bo, Wang Shuai, Song Danqing, et al. Landslide displacement prediction based on extreme learning machine optimized by ant colony algorithm[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2022, 33(2): 172-178. (in Chinese))
PDF(1703 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉