PDF(1815 KB)
Review of the Effects of Integrated Forecasting and Operation of Xin’anjiang Reservoir
WANG Shu-ying, LIU Fu-yao, WU Xiu-guang, PAN Shuang, WANG Hao
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 28-36.
PDF(1815 KB)
PDF(1815 KB)
Review of the Effects of Integrated Forecasting and Operation of Xin’anjiang Reservoir
[Objective] In 2024, the Xin’anjiang Reservoir experienced the largest inflow flood since its construction due to persistent and intense rainfall during the Meiyu season. The return periods of the maximum 5-day and 7-day inflow volumes both reached the 50-year level. This study conducts a post-event assessment based on the actual forecasting and operation process. [Methods] Multi-source and multi-model quantitative precipitation forecasts were assimilated to analyze the rainfall intensity characteristics of typical historical floods. Representative forecast rainfall time series were optimized under unfavorable, moderate, and favorable conditions with phased temporal distribution, extending forecast lead time while reducing rainfall uncertainty. The Xin’anjiang three-component runoff generation framework was applied to construct a basin-wide flood forecasting model, coupled with reservoir operation rules to form an integrated forecasting-operation modeling scheme. Hourly rolling forecasts were performed based on real-time rainfall and operational information. Considering multiple objectives such as controlling maximum reservoir level, ensuring downstream safety discharge, and managing flood-peak staggering with the mainstream, iterative forward-and-reverse scenario simulations generated 215 forecast scenarios, providing precise support for ten rounds of gate operation decisions. [Results] A comparative assessment of the two major floods in 2024 and 2020 shows that although the 2024 event involved larger rainfall and greater inflow volume, the forecasting was more refined, the regulation was earlier and more proactive, and the peak staggering with the Lan River was more precise. This demonstrates that the integrated forecasting-operation model can effectively support multi-objective risk control, achieving the systemic goal of “zero major disaster and zero casualty”. [Conclusion] The full-process summary highlights that dynamic and accurate forecasting is the key to scientific operation, comparative scenario analysis supports refined decision-making, and the principle of “early action, rapid response, and incremental adjustment” is more conducive to basin-wide flood risk reduction.
flood forecasting / integrated forecasting-operation / peak shaving / risk management / Xin’anjiang Reservoir
| [1] |
联合国减灾办公室. 2020年全球自然灾害评估报告[R]. 北京: 减灾与应急管理研究院、应急管理部国家减灾中心、红十字会与红新月会国际联合会, 2021.
(The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction(UNDRR). 2020 Global Natural Disaster Assessment Report[R]. Beijing: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) and National Disaster Reduction Centre of China Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, 2021.(in Chinese))
|
| [2] |
World Econormic Forum. The Global Risks Reprot 2021[R]. Davos: World Econormic Forum, 2021.
|
| [3] |
程晓陶, 刘昌军, 李昌志, 等. 变化环境下洪涝风险演变特征与城市韧性提升策略[J]. 水利学报, 2022(7):757-768,778.
(
|
| [4] |
王淑英, 孙英军, 王雨歌. 浙江省剡溪小流域“2023.7.22”短历时暴雨山洪致灾成因分析[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2024, 34(5): 32-37.
(
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
许乙青, 喻丁一, 冉静. 基于流域协同的国土空间雨洪安全格局构建方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9):2335-2349.
(
|
| [7] |
王协康. 极端降雨与强人类活动复合作用下山洪灾害研究构想和成果展望[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2024, 56(4): 1-9.
(
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
任明磊, 丁留谦, 何晓燕. 流域水工程防洪调度的认识与思考[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2020, 30(3): 37-40.
(
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
彭汉兴, 宋汉周, 严安康, 等. 新安江水电站坝址环境水特征与作用[J]. 水利学报, 1994, 25(2): 40-45.
(
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
赵新华, 杨登宇, 谢意乐, 等. 新安江水库流域降水时间演变特征[J]. 水电能源科学, 2024, 42(9): 17-20, 16.
(
|
| [19] |
贾志峰, 付恒阳, 王建莹, 等. 短期降雨预报失误对安康水库防洪预报调度的影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2013, 30(7): 29-32.
(
|
| [20] |
赵人俊. 流域水文模拟: 新安江模型与陕北模型[M]. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1984.
(
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
丁启, 王宗志, 刘克琳, 等. 基于水文模型的山东半岛典型流域产流模式探讨[J]. 水文, 2024, 44(3): 67-73.
(
|
| [27] |
白玉川, 万艳春, 黄本胜, 等. 河网非恒定流数值模拟的研究进展[J]. 水利学报, 2000, 31(12):43-47.
(
|
| [28] |
李毓湘, 逄勇. 珠江三角洲地区河网水动力学模型研究[J]. 水动力学研究与进展(A辑), 2001, 16(2):143-155.
(
|
| [29] |
刘心愿, 朱勇辉, 郭小虎, 等. 水库多目标优化调度技术比较研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2015, 32(7): 9-14.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |