PDF(894 KB)
Study on Baseflow Variation Characteristics under Different Hydrological Frequency Years in the Upper Yangtze River Using Digital Filtering Method
SUN Zhi-wei, LIANG Yue, HU Xiao-qin
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 0
PDF(894 KB)
PDF(894 KB)
Study on Baseflow Variation Characteristics under Different Hydrological Frequency Years in the Upper Yangtze River Using Digital Filtering Method
[Objectives] Addressing critical gaps in understanding Upper Yangtze River Basin (UYRB) baseflow dynamics is vital for regional water security and ecological sustainability. This study provides the first comprehensive multi-station assessment across the mainstream (Jinsha River, Yangtze mainstem) and major tributaries (Min, Jialing, Wu) under defined hydrological frequency years (extremely dry P=95%, dry P=75%, normal P=50%, wet P=25%), integrating spatial scalability and hydrological variability to: quantify spatiotemporal baseflow trends; evaluate dry (Nov-Apr) and wet season baseflow volume (BFV) and index (BFI) characteristics; and assess groundwater's role in sustaining river flow during droughts. [Methods] Daily runoff data (1991-2016) from nine key hydrological stations (Batang, Shigu, Pingshan, Zhutuo, Gaochang, Beibei, Wulong, Cuntan, Wanxian), representing >85% of UYRB runoff, were analyzed. Baseflow was separated using the Lyne-Hollick digital filtering method (α = 0.925, three passes). The Mann-Kendall (MK) test (significance threshold |Z| > 1.96,| > 1.96, α = 0.05) identified α = 0.05) identified temporal trends and abrupt changes (UF/UB statistics). Annual baseflow series were fitted to the Pearson Type III distribution to determine BFV for each hydrological frequency year. Seasonal BFV and BFI were analyzed for defined dry and wet seasons. [Results] Spatially heterogeneous trends emerged: Significant increases occurred at upstream Jinsha stations (Batang, Shigu; UF > 1.96 post-2010), linked to accelerated glacier/snowmelt from Tibetan Plateau warming, while significant decreases characterized Wanxian near while significant decreases characterized Wanxian near the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR; UF < -1.96 post-2004), with a 2005 change-point aligning with TGR impoundment; mid-basin stations showed non-significant fluctuations. Dry-season showed non-significant fluctuations. Dry-season BFV exhibited exceptional stability between hydrological frequency years, with the ratio of BFV in extremely dry years to wet years ranging narrowly from 1.02 to 1.25. Conversely, wet-season BFV varied substantially (extremely dry to wet year ratio: 1.33 to 2.09), particularly in tributaries (Beibei: 1.88; Wulong: 2.09) due to rapid precipitation response. Wet-season BFV consistently exceeded dry-season BFV (mean annual ratio: 1.24 to 4.44), peaking August-October and minimizing March-aking August-October and minimizing March-May, with the highest seasonal amplitude in the Jinsha headwaters (Batang: 4.44) and reduced variability near TGR (Wanxian: 1.94-2.94). Crucially, baseflow consistently sustained >50% of dry-season river flow across all stations and frequency years (BFI range: 0.51-0.78), exhibiting.51-0.78), exhibiting a distinct V-shaped annual pattern peaking January-March. Dry-season BFI ranked extremely dry > dry > normal > wet years, confirming groundwater's amplified role during droughts. [Conclusions] This integrated assessment yields key advances: 1) It resolves contrasting baseflow responses driven by climate change (increases in glacier-fed headwaters) versus reservoir regulation (decreases near TGR); 2) Dry-season baseflow demonstrates exceptional stability between extremely dry and wet years (BFV ratio ≤1.25), acting as a reliable water source; 3) Wet-season baseflow is highly sensitive to precipitation variability (BFV ratio up to 2.BFV ratio up to 2.09), with tributaries more vulnerable; 4) Most critically, groundwater-derived baseflow consistently provides >50% of dry-season flow across all hydrological conditions, confirming its indispensable role as a climate-resilient resource that buffers droughts, securing ecological flows and informing sustainable water allocation policies in the UYRB.
upper Yangtze River basin / digital filtering method / frequency year / baseflow index / dry season
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
孙志伟, 梁越, 喻金桃. 长江上游流域土壤容重的空间分异特征[J]. 河南科学, 2022, 40(12): 1927-1933.
(
|
| [3] |
牛文静, 王正华, 冯志州, 等. 长江上游梯级水库群防洪库容互用方式研究[J]. 水利学报, 2025, 56(7): 874-884.
|
| [4] |
孙博凯, 郭生练, 钟斯睿, 等. 考虑长江上游水库群调蓄影响的寸滩站设计洪水计算分析[J]. 水利学报, 2025, 56(8): 1002-1011.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
董薇薇. 河西内陆河山区流域基流过程研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2015.
(
|
| [7] |
田沉. 汾河上中游生态基流与敏感生态需水研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2022.
(
|
| [8] |
韩鹏, 王艺璇, 李岱峰. 黄河中游河龙区间河川基流时空变化及其对水土保持响应[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2020, 28(3): 505-521.
|
| [9] |
冯夏婷, 张佳鹏, 连炎清, 等. 基于季节性变化的数字滤波基流分割方法评价-以伊河栾川流域为例[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2025, (1): 118-129.
(
|
| [10] |
娄晶智, 罗娅, 舒栋才, 等. 贵州高原喀斯特流域基流分割及其演变特征分析-以猫跳河上游流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(19): 1-12.
|
| [11] |
王冠, 鲁程鹏, 李姝蕾, 等. 五种基流分割方法在长江螺山站的应用对比研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2015, 26(3): 118-123.
|
| [12] |
董晓华, 邓霞, 薄会娟, 等. 平滑最小值法与数字滤波法在流域径流分割中的应用比较[J]. 三峡大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 32(2): 1-4.
|
| [13] |
雷宇宽. 酉阳河流域典型年汛期的基流分割研究[J]. 水文, 2021, 41(1): 35-41.
|
| [14] |
李光录, 樊立娟. 长江源区基流分割方法对比分析及基流特征分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(4): 185-190.
|
| [15] |
黄珊珊, 董前进. 长江流域上中下游基流演变规律及与降水量关联分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2022, 40(7): 10-13.
|
| [16] |
孙志伟, 梁越, 钮新强. 基于数字滤波法的长江上游流域基流时空分布特征[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(11): 23-28,35.
(
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
刘树超, 邵全琴, 牛丽楠, 等. 长江上游生态状况变化及其服务功能权衡与协同[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(3): 1028-1039.
|
| [28] |
沈嘉聚, 杨汉波, 刘志武, 等. 长江上游径流对气象要素变化的敏感性分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2023, 39(1): 119-126.
|
| [29] |
胡文韬, 余钟波, 陈松峰, 等. 长江上游卫星反演与再分析降水数据的适用性评估[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 52(3): 15-24.
|
| [30] |
赵义. 基于机器学习的屏山水文站中长期径流预报研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2022.
( ZHAO Yi, Medium and Long-term Runoff Forecast Research ofPingshan Hydrological Station Based onMachine Learning[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2022.). (in Chinese)
|
| [31] |
李凌琪, 熊立华, 江聪, 等. 气温对长江上游巴塘站年径流的影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, (7): 1142-1149.
(
|
| [32] |
张为, 朱敬一, 薛居理, 等. 三峡水库1990-2021年洪峰沙峰异步特性分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, (6): 850-857.
(
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
张洪波, 李哲浩, 席秋义, 等. 基于改进过白化的Mann-Kendall趋势检验法[J]. 水力发电学报, 2018, (6): 34-46.
(
|
| [37] |
陈帅, 鲁程鹏, 李姝蕾, 等. 长江干流朱沱站-大通站基流变化特征分析[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2015, 13(5): 823-826,836.
(
|
| [38] |
柏露, 姚宜斌, 雷祥旭, 等. 近40年青藏高原地区地表温度的年际及季节性变化特征分析[J]. 测绘地理信息, 2018, (2): 15-18.
(
|
| [39] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |