Hydraulic Characteristics at Water Intake of Low-Head Large-Discharge Hydropower Station under Trash Rack Effects

ZENG Hui, WEI Hong-yan, YANG Jin, YU Feng, CHEN Duan

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9) : 62-68.

PDF(4694 KB)
PDF(4694 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9) : 62-68. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250717
Hydraulic

Hydraulic Characteristics at Water Intake of Low-Head Large-Discharge Hydropower Station under Trash Rack Effects

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] The power generation efficiency of low-head, large-discharge hydropower stations is highly sensitive to head loss. Reducing the head loss at the intake of such stations is essential to improve their hydraulic energy utilization. This study aims to 1) investigate the distribution of flow velocity, pressure, and turbulent kinetic energy in low-head riverbed-type intakes, 2) examine the sources of head loss at the intake, 3) quantify head losses in different sections of the intake and the head loss coefficients of the trash racks, and 4) finally provide guidance for the design and optimization of similar intakes. [Methods] We established a three-dimensional model encompassing the intake (including the trash rack), the flow passage from the intake to the turbine spiral case, and the upstream intake channel. Hydraulic simulations of these regions were performed using the k-ε turbulence model in ANSYS Fluent. A hydrostatic pressure boundary condition was applied at the inlet, while a flow velocity boundary condition was specified at the outlet of the turbine spiral case. [Results] (1) When the bottom sediment outlets were not in operation, the flow velocity before the trash rack at the middle orifice was the highest (ranging from 1.4 m/s to 2.7 m/s), while the velocities before the trash rack at the left and right orifices were lower (ranging from 0.5 m/s to 1.9 m/s). After the left bottom sediment outlet was activated, the flow area in front of the trash rack at the left orifice decreased, with the maximum flow velocity increasing to approximately 2 m/s. (2) The overall pressure was slightly higher before the trash rack and slightly lower after it. The maximum pressure differences across the beams, intermediate support, and rack bars were 0.3 m, 0.3 m, and 0.08 m, respectively. (3) Across the operating conditions, the head losses at the intake were 0.121 m, 0.229 m, 0.385 m, and 0.376 m, respectively. The corresponding average head losses for the trash rack sections were 0.078 m, 0.120 m, 0.172 m, and 0.174 m. (4) When the bottom sediment outlets were not in operation, the head loss coefficients for the trash racks of the left, middle, and right orifices were 2.1, 0.9, and 1.7, respectively. After the bottom sediment outlet was activated, the head loss coefficient for the trash rack at the corresponding orifice decreased to 1.2. [Conclusion] The operation of a bottom sediment outlet reduces the flow area before the trash rack of the corresponding orifice, making the velocity distribution more uniform and increasing the average flow velocity. Low-pressure zones and high turbulent kinetic energy zones occur at the tails of beams, intermediate support, and rack bars, as well as at the turning corners of the separation pier heads for each orifice and at the intake sill. These regions are the primary locations of head loss in the intake and trash rack. As a result, head losses in the intake entrance section and trash rack section are significant, with the trash rack section accounting for approximately 50% of the total head loss at the intake. When the bottom sediment outlets are not in operation, the head loss coefficient for the left orifice's trash rack is the highest, followed by the right orifice, with the middle orifice being the smallest. After the bottom sediment outlet is activated, the flow velocity distribution at the pre-rack cross-section becomes more uniform, resulting in an approximately 43% reduction in the head loss coefficient for the trash rack at the corresponding orifice.

Key words

hydraulic characteristics / head loss coefficient / 3D flow model / water intake / trash rack / low-head large-discharge hydropower station

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZENG Hui , WEI Hong-yan , YANG Jin , et al . Hydraulic Characteristics at Water Intake of Low-Head Large-Discharge Hydropower Station under Trash Rack Effects[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(9): 62-68 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250717

References

[1]
尼珂, 陈景祥. 前置拦污栅在大流量低水头电站中的应用[J]. 人民珠江, 2013, 34(4): 65-66.
(Ni Ke, Chen Jingxiang. Application of front trash rack in large flow and low head power station[J]. Pearl River, 2013, 34(4): 65-66. (in Chinese))
[2]
卜建欣. 三峡电站进水口拦污栅设计[J]. 人民长江, 1998, 29(增刊1):53-54,62.
(Bu Jianxin. Design of trash rack at intake of Three Gorges Hydropower Station[J]. Yangtze River, 1998, 29(S1):53-54,62. (in Chinese))
[3]
NB/T 10858—2021 水电站进水口设计规范[S].
(NB/T 10858—2021 Code for design of hydropower station Intakes[S]. (in Chinese))
[4]
童金虎, 彭小川, 王景涛, 等. 进水口水头损失计算探讨[J]. 水利水电工程设计, 2015, 34(2): 17-18.
(Tong Jinhu, Peng Xiaochuan, Wang Jingtao, et al. Discussion on calculation of head loss at intake[J]. Design of Water Resources & Hydroelectric Engineering, 2015, 34(2): 17-18. (in Chinese))
[5]
苗臣伟, 兰凤, 王龙强, 等. 杜童水电站进水口水头损失试验研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2016, 34(2):98-101.
(Miao Chenwei, Lan Feng, Wang Longqiang, et al. Experimental study of head loss in intake of dutong hydropower station[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2016, 34(2): 98-101. (in Chinese))
[6]
章军军, 毛欣炜, 毛根海, 等. 侧式短进出水口水力试验及体型优化[J]. 水力发电学报, 2006, 25(2): 38-41.
(Zhang Junjun, Mao Xinwei, Mao Genhai, et al. Experimental research and shape optimization on lateral short inlet/outlet[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2006, 25(2): 38-41. (in Chinese))
[7]
刘际军. 抽水蓄能电站进/出水口双向水流特性研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2015.
(Liu Jijun. Study on two-direction flow characteristics for inlet/outlet of pumped storage plants[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2015. (in Chinese))
[8]
戴杰, 戴启璠, 李晗玫. 水电站叠梁门进水口水力特性数值模拟研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2023, 45(1):140-144,150.
(Dai Jie, Dai Qifan, Li Hanmei. Numerical simulation study on hydraulic characteristics of stop-log gates intake of hydropower stations[J]. Yellow River, 2023, 45(1): 140-144, 150. (in Chinese))
[9]
黄锋. 大型电站叠梁门分层取水进水口水力特性数值模拟研究[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2022.
(Huang Feng. Numerical simulation study on hydraulic characteristics of stratified intake of stoplog gate in large power station[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese))
[10]
任玉珊, 高金花, 杨敏. 水电站进水口拦污栅水头损失试验研究[J]. 大坝与安全, 2003(4): 51-54.
(Ren Yushan, Gao Jinhua, Yang Min. Study on the headloss of trashrack of intake in hydropower stations[J]. Dam & Safety, 2003(4): 51-54. (in Chinese))
[11]
高学平, 袁野, 刘殷竹, 等. 拦污栅结构对进出水口水力特性影响试验研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2023, 42(2):74-86.
(Gao Xueping, Yuan Ye, Liu Yinzhu, et al. Experimental study on effect of trash rack structure on hydraulic characteristics of inlet and outlet[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2023, 42(2):74-86. (in Chinese))
[12]
曹婷, 曾莹, 张贵金, 等. 东坪水电站进水口流态改善技术方案模拟研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2018, 36(2):121-123,143.
(Cao Ting, Zeng Ying, Zhang Guijin, et al. Simulation study on technical scheme for improvement of intake flow in Dongping hydropower station[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2018, 36(2):121-123,143. (in Chinese))
[13]
梁康. 水电站薄壁进水口水流流态特征及其数值模拟研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2021.
(Liang Kang. Study on flow pattern characteristics and numerical simulation of thin wall intake of hydropower station[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University of Technology, 2021. (in Chinese))
[14]
郭臣, 朱大勇, 王列, 等. 某电站进水口体型优化水力学试验研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 36(3): 324-326, 364.
(Guo Chen, Zhu Dayong, Wang Lie, et al. Hydraulic experimental study of a hydropower station’s inlet shape optimization[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2013, 36(3): 324-326, 364. (in Chinese))
[15]
陆德源. 葛洲坝工程大江电站设计[J]. 人民长江, 1987, 18(5): 5-11.
(Lu Deyuan. Design of dajiang power station in gezhouba project[J]. Yangtze River, 1987, 18(5): 5-11. (in Chinese))
PDF(4694 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉