Stability Analysis of Rock Ridge Considering Seepage-Stress Coupling During Cofferdam Blasting Demolition

SANG Xing-xu, YANG Yong, ZHONG Ping, HU Wei

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 175-181.

PDF(2644 KB)
PDF(2644 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 175-181. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250594
Rock-Soil Engineering

Stability Analysis of Rock Ridge Considering Seepage-Stress Coupling During Cofferdam Blasting Demolition

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] To address the stability issues of rock ridges during the blasting demolition of the large cofferdam for the unit expansion project at Wuqiangxi Hydropower Station, this study proposes an optimized blasting scheme, aiming to prevent the sliding instability of the remaining thin rock ridge after layered blasting under the influence of fracture seepage. [Method] A discrete fracture seepage-stress coupling model was employed to evaluate the excavation sequence, slope height-to-width ratios, and seepage stability of the downstream slope of the rock ridge. The stability of the rock ridge under various blasting schemes and slope height-to-width ratios was analyzed considering fracture seepage. By integrating safety factors and failure slip modes, the optimal blasting sequence and a reasonable downstream slope height-to-width ratio were determined, providing precursor information on potential failure modes of bedded rock masses under seepage conditions. [Result] (1) Based on the engineering characteristics and blasting challenges, a demolition design for the intake cofferdam was formulated: blasting the outer earth-rock cofferdam during the dry season, thinning the inner side of the cofferdam, removing the top concrete cofferdam, and blasting the remaining rock ridge in a single pass. This scheme prevents the instability of the remaining thin bedded rock ridge under fracture seepage while minimizing risks to existing structures. (2) At slope height-to-width ratios of 1∶0, 1∶0.3, and 1∶0.5, the failure mode was global, with failure boundaries comprising a composite slip surface of the concrete-rock interface, weak interlayers, and bedding planes. At ratios of 1∶0.7, 1∶0.9, 1∶1.1, and 1∶1.3, the failure mode transitioned to local bedding slip instability. As the ratio increased, the tensile failure boundary at the trailing edge moved further from the toe of the excavated slope, and the thickness of the unstable rock layer decreased, indicating an evolution toward shallow bedding slip failure. [Conclusion] Considering both the safety factor and the failure slip mode, a slope height-to-width ratio of 1∶0.7 was determined to be optimal for the downstream slope excavation, as the safety factor exceeded 1 and the failure mode transitioned from global to local. The proposed scheme effectively controls the deformation and instability risks of the reserved thin-walled rock ridge. These findings provide valuable references for the demolition of large cofferdams and the stability evaluation of rock ridges under fracture seepage conditions.

Key words

cofferdam / blasting demolition / rock ridge / stability analysis / seepage-stress coupling / demolition scheme

Cite this article

Download Citations
SANG Xing-xu , YANG Yong , ZHONG Ping , et al. Stability Analysis of Rock Ridge Considering Seepage-Stress Coupling During Cofferdam Blasting Demolition[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(7): 175-181 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250594

References

[1]
吴梦喜, 宋世雄, 吴文洪. 拉哇水电站上游围堰渗流与应力变形动态耦合仿真分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(4):613-623.
(Wu Meng-xi, Song Shi-xiong, Wu Wen-hong. Dynamic Coupled Simulation Analysis of Seepage and Stress Deformation of Upstream Cofferdam of Lava Hydropower Station[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(4):613-623.(in Chinese))
[2]
包承纲. 三峡二期围堰创新及其对我国高围堰建设的意义[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2014, 31(9):33-42,64.
(Bao Cheng-gang. Technical Advances in Second Stage Cofferdam of TGP and Its Significance for High Cofferdam Construction in China[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2014, 31(9):33-42,64.(in Chinese))
[3]
鲁晓兵, 郭易圆, 李世海. 爆炸载荷下三峡三期纵向围堰响应的离散元分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(2):158-162.
(Lu Xiao-bing, Guo Yi-yuan, Li Shi-hai. Dem Analysis on the Third Period Longitudinal Cofferdam of the Three Gorges under Blast Loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(2): 158-162.(in Chinese))
[4]
张家发, 林水生, 吴德绪, 等. 论土石围堰和基坑渗流场调控[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2013, 30(2): 20-26.
(Zhang Jia-fa, Lin Shui-sheng, Wu De-xu, et al. Seepage Field Regulation for Rockfill Cofferdam and Foundation Pit[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2013, 30(2): 20-26.(in Chinese))
[5]
张超, 蒋陶. 上游水电站围堰漫顶溃决条件下施工中期度汛水位数值模拟[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2018, 35(1): 52-56, 62.
(Zhang Chao, Jiang Tao. Numerical Simulation of Flood Level during Mid-stage Construction of Hyropower Station in the Presence of Overtopping Failure of Upstream Cofferdam[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2018, 35(1): 52-56, 62.(in Chinese))
[6]
蒋跃飞, 王璞, 刘桐, 等. 30万吨级船坞宽厚型基岩围堰爆破拆除技术[J]. 爆破, 2022, 39(1):107-114.
(Jiang Yue-fei, Wang Pu, Liu Tong, et al. Blasting Demolition Technology of Wide and Thick Bedrock Cofferdam in 300000-ton Dock[J]. Blasting, 2022, 39(1): 107-114.(in Chinese))
[7]
吴发名, 段兴平, 徐进鹏, 等. 白鹤滩水电站尾水出口围堰拆除爆破设计与施工[J]. 爆破, 2023, 40(1):100-107.
(Wu Fa-ming, Duan Xing-ping, Xu Jin-peng, et al. Design and Construction of Demolition Blasting for Cofferdam at Tailrace Outlet of Baihetan Hydropower Station[J]. Blasting, 2023, 40(1): 100-107.(in Chinese))
[8]
汪洋, 吴新霞, 尹健民, 等. 土石围堰分期拆除过程中的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2012, 29(8): 93-99.
(Wang Yang, Wu Xin-xia, Yin Jian-min, et al. Slope Stability of Earth-rock Cofferdam during Phased Demolition[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2012, 29(8): 93-99.(in Chinese))
[9]
邵晓宁, 张道振, 周恩泉, 等. 电厂机组循环水取水口预留岩坎围堰拆除爆破[J]. 工程爆破, 2014, 20(3): 25-28.
(Shao Xiao-ning, Zhang Dao-zhen, Zhou En-quan, et al. Demolition Blasting of Reserved Rock Ridge Cofferdam for Intake of Circulating Water of Units in Electric Power Plant[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2014, 20(3): 25-28.(in Chinese))
[10]
李高正, 田娜, 李军, 等. 观音岩水电站导流底孔出口围堰爆破拆除技术[J]. 人民长江, 2015, 46(20):48-52.
(Li Gao-zheng, Tian Na, Li Jun, et al. Blast Demolition Technology of Cofferdam of Diversion Bottom Outlet of Guanyinyan Hydropower Station[J]. Yangtze River, 2015, 46(20): 48-52.(in Chinese))
[11]
孙开畅, 田斌, 孙志禹. 高土石围堰堰体材料力学特性及变形研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2011, 28(2): 60-64, 73.
(Sun Kai-chang, Tian Bin, Sun Zhi-yu. Mechanical Character and Deformation of Material of Three Gorges Project’s Phase II Cofferdam[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2011, 28(2): 60-64, 73.(in Chinese))
[12]
张家发, 李少龙, 潘家军, 等. 深厚覆盖层上土石围堰渗流控制体系及结构安全研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2011, 28(10): 122-126.
(Zhang Jia-fa, Li Shao-long, Pan Jia-jun, et al. Seepage Control System and Structure Safety of Rockfill Cofferdam on Thick Overburden[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2011, 28(10): 122-126.(in Chinese))
[13]
张飞, 卢晓春, 陈博夫, 等. 深厚覆盖层土石围堰防渗墙结构设计研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2016, 33(4): 120-124.
(Zhang Fei, Lu Xiao-chun, Chen Bo-fu, et al. Design on Structure of Cutoff Wall in Deep Overburden Earth-rock Cofferdam[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2016, 33(4): 120-124.(in Chinese))
[14]
王克忠, 金志豪, 杨麦珍, 等. 取水塔基坑开挖过程倒悬岩坎围堰渗透稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018(增刊2): 415-422.
(Wang Ke-zhong, Jin Zhi-hao, Yang Mai-zhen, et al. Permeability Stability Study of Overhang Rock Cofferdam during Excavating Foundation Pit of Water Intake Tower[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018(S2): 415-422.(in Chinese))
[15]
黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 等. 考虑封底效应的圆形围堰渗流场解析解及应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(12): 2510-2518.
(Huang Juan, He Zhen, Yu Jun, et al. Analytical Solutions and Application of Circular Cofferdams Considering Backseal Effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(12): 2510-2518.(in Chinese))
[16]
孙士国, 周鑫, 彭是焱. 基于残余位移增量判据的土石围堰边坡稳定性分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2024, 42(2):81-84.
(Sun Shi-guo, Zhou Xin, Peng Shi-yan. Stability Analysis of Earth-rockfill Cofferdam Slope Based on Average Residual Displacement Increment Criterion[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2024, 42(2):81-84.(in Chinese))
[17]
刁海鹏, 侍克斌, 白现军, 等. 考虑渗流应力耦合效应土石围堰断面方案研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2021, 43(7):130-136.
(Diao Hai-peng, Shi Ke-bin, Bai Xian-jun, et al. Study on Selection of Cross Section Scheme of Earth Rock Cofferdam Considering the Coupling Effect of Seepage and Stress[J]. Yellow River, 2021, 43(7):130-136.(in Chinese))
[18]
徐晗, 李波, 潘家军, 等. 不同铺设及联接型式的复合土工膜围堰应力变形特性[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(4):111-115.
(Xu Han, Li Bo, Pan Jia-jun, et al. Stress and Deformation Characteristics of Composite Geomembrane Cofferdam with Different Patterns of Laying and Connection[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(4):111-115.(in Chinese))
[19]
徐晗, 陈云, 饶锡保, 等. 高土石围堰复合土工膜防渗三维有限元分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(2):110-113.
(Xu Han, Chen Yun, Rao Xi-bao, et al. Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis on Composite Geomembrane of High Earth Rockfill Cofferdam[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2017, 34(2): 110-113.(in Chinese))
[20]
杨昕光, 徐唐锦, 徐晗, 等. 高土石围堰复合土工膜与防渗墙联接型式研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(2): 104-109.
(Yang Xin-guang, Xu Tang-jin, Xu Han, et al. Patterns of the Joint between Composite Geomembrane and Impervious Wall of High Earth-rockfill Cofferdam[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2017, 34(2): 104-109.(in Chinese))
[21]
Tanaka T, Tachimura R, Kusumi S, et al. Experimental Findings of 3D Seepage Failure of Soil within a Cofferdam[J]. Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication, 2016, 2(45): 1608-1613.
[22]
赵根, 陆少锋, 杨招伟, 等. 水下钻孔爆破技术新发展[J]. 工程爆破, 2024, 30(5):102-111.
(Zhao Gen, Lu Shao-feng, Yang Zhao-wei, et al. New Development of Underwater Drilling and Blasting Technology[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2024, 30(5):102-111.(in Chinese))
PDF(2644 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/