PDF(3650 KB)
Adaptability of Typical Bank Protection Structures in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River
YAN Yang-tian, ZHU Yong-hui, DENG Cai-yun, GUO Chao
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 11-20.
PDF(3650 KB)
PDF(3650 KB)
Adaptability of Typical Bank Protection Structures in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River
[Objective] This study comprehensively investigated the applicability, failure mechanisms, and adaptability characteristics of different bank protection structures to provide theoretical basis and technical support for structural optimization, engineering design, and the development of new ecological revetment technologies under complex river conditions in the middle reaches of Yangtze River. [Methods] Typical bank collapse cases and operational data from engineering practices in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River were collected and analyzed. Representative revetment structures, including riprap, articulated concrete mattresses, gabions, geotextile sand pillows, pebble mattresses, precast concrete blocks, Reno mattresses, geogrid stone mattresses, and vegetative revetments, were systematically investigated. Their mechanical properties, protection mechanisms, failure modes, and improvement measures were summarized by integrating previous physical experiments, numerical simulations, field observations, and engineering applications. A comprehensive evaluation framework accounting for ecological, hydrological and sediment conditions and riverbed evolution processes was established. [Results] Riprap revetment remains the most widely used protection type in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, while ecological concrete, Reno mattresses, and gabions have been increasingly adopted, reflecting a shift from conventional engineering protection to environmentally oriented designs. Revetment stability is jointly influenced by hydrodynamic conditions, water level fluctuations, riverbed deformation, bank material properties, structural parameters, and construction quality, among which flow scouring is the dominant factor responsible for structural failures. After bank protection works are implemented, channel deformation tends to shift from lateral migration to vertical erosion, resulting in deep-channel encroachment and severe toe scour. Consequently, failures usually initiate from underwater toe protection. Different revetment structures exhibit distinct characteristics. Traditional structures such as riprap and dry masonry show favorable economic performance but relatively poor ecological adaptability, whereas vegetative revetments provide the highest ecological benefits but insufficient resistance to strong hydraulic disturbances. Articulated concrete mattresses, gabions, and Reno mattresses exhibit balanced flexibility and integrity. Geogrid stone mattresses possess strong hydraulic adaptability but relatively high construction and maintenance costs. Comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that ecological concrete revetments perform well in hydraulic, ecological, and economic aspects and exhibit obvious advantages in overall adaptability. [Conclusions] The adaptability of bank protection engineering in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River is characterized by the coupling effects of multiple factors, and structural stability depends not only on the properties of the revetment itself but also on river regime evolution, hydrological conditions, and maintenance practices. For reaches subjected to severe scouring and strong flow attacks, rigid-flexible combined structures with high erosion resistance should be preferentially adopted, whereas ecological revetments with good permeability and environmental compatibility are more suitable for relatively stable reaches. Compared with traditional structures, new ecological revetments integrating structural stability and ecological functions exhibit better comprehensive adaptability, among which ecological concrete shows great development potential. The proposed multi-dimensional evaluation framework enables a systematic comparison of different revetment types and provides a new analytical approach for revetment optimization and bank collapse prevention. Future studies should strengthen the integration of bank protection engineering with river regime prediction and intelligent monitoring technologies to improve the long-term adaptability of revetment systems under continuously changing hydrological and sediment conditions.
bank protection engineering / bank protection type / adaptability of bank protection / failure mechanisms / ecological bank protection / the middle reaches of the Yangtze River
| [1] |
余文畴, 卢金友. 长江河道崩岸与护岸[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2008: 174-185.
(
|
| [2] |
卢金友, 周银军, 邓彩云, 等. 长江中下游崩岸险情智能感知预警与防治关键技术研究构想及成果展望[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2024, 56(5): 1-9.
(
|
| [3] |
陈益民, 林荡, 阳甜甜, 等. 2023年下荆江湖南段“天字一号”护岸段崩岸分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(6): 8-13, 20.
(
|
| [4] |
卢金友, 朱勇辉, 岳红艳, 等. 长江中下游崩岸治理与河道整治技术[J]. 水利水电快报, 2017, 38(11):6-14.
(
|
| [5] |
夏军强, 周悦瑶, 邓珊珊, 等. 荆江段抛石护岸稳定性计算及其影响因素分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2022, 41(8): 1-11.
(
|
| [6] |
费晓昕, 张幸农. 平顺抛石护岸水毁速率试验研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(11): 207-211.
(
|
| [7] |
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Hydraulic Design of Flood Control Channels[M]. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1994.
|
| [8] |
毛佩郁, 毛昶熙. 抛石护岸防冲的几个问题[J]. 水利水运科学研究, 1999(2): 146-157.
(
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
姚仕明, 卢金友. 两种护岸新材料的应用技术试验研究[J]. 泥沙研究, 2006, 31(2): 17-21.
(
|
| [12] |
刘同宦, 李振青, 胡胜刚. 混凝土铰链排护岸应力变化特性及适应条件分析[J]. 水利水电快报, 2017, 38(11): 75-78.
(
|
| [13] |
范玉洁, 杨中华, 邹明哲, 等. 长江中下游钢丝网石笼护坡生态恢复效果评价[J]. 水运工程, 2021(1):129-135.
(
|
| [14] |
贺映全. 钢丝网石笼在岸坡防护工程中的应用[J]. 天津建设科技, 2021, 31(1):45-46,74.
(
|
| [15] |
黄伟. 钢丝石笼混合式护岸结构在长江航道整治工程中的应用[J]. 水运工程, 2012(10): 123-127.
(
|
| [16] |
邓传贵, 甘磊, 庄雪飞. 南京八卦洲袋装砂抛枕防护施工技术研究与应用[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(11): 150-154, 174.
(
|
| [17] |
侯悦, 马剑波, 朱昊, 等. 基于三维水动力模型的砂枕漂距预测研究[J]. 水运工程, 2023(12): 87-93, 117.
(
|
| [18] |
余洪江, 赵凤超, 王满兴. 水下网模卵石排护岸施工实践与探讨[J]. 人民长江, 2014, 45(19): 38-40.
(
|
| [19] |
李先炳. 已建干砌石护岸工程质量检查与评价探讨[J]. 人民长江, 2005, 36(7): 15-17.
(
|
| [20] |
黄晓洪, 俞汇, 汪云飞, 等. 砂浆流失下长期服役砌石渡槽稳定性规律研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2024, 55(增刊1):103-108.
(
|
| [21] |
卢金友. 长江中下游河道整治理论与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020: 341-353.
(
|
| [22] |
吴雅佩, 傅志敏, 张凯. 基于正交试验法的混凝土护坡稳定性因素敏感性分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2018(1): 140-144.
(
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
杨玉宝, 潘毅, 徐振山, 等. 现浇型生态混凝土护岸抗水力冲刷性能试验研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2017, 48(11): 122-127.
(
|
| [25] |
周丁, 曾敬龙, 杨嘉兴, 等. 锚杆-混凝土预制格网结构的护岸稳定性数值分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024(6): 203-208.
(
|
| [26] |
李火坤, 杜磊, 李怡静, 等. 土堤加糙透水式预制块护坡消浪效果模型试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(4):146-152.
(
|
| [27] |
徐立君, 王敦格, 刘延飞, 等. 雷诺护垫护岸对粉细砂岸坡的防护效果数值模拟分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2023(12): 195-200, 206.
(
|
| [28] |
杨涛. 植被—雷诺护垫防护边坡稳定性分析[D]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2017.
(
|
| [29] |
姜学红, 陈家琪. 塑料土工格栅的性能及应用[J]. 工程塑料应用, 2005, 33(3): 50-52.
(
|
| [30] |
冯波, 郑中, 白琳, 等. 西南山区某电厂高填方边坡加固措施研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2020, 53(增刊1): 313-318.
(
|
| [31] |
闵祥宇, 魏素娟, 张钰. 土工格栅石笼在古城河整治工程中的应用研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(19): 10442-10444.
(
|
| [32] |
朱洁, 陆立国, 顾靖超, 等. 土工格栅石笼在黄河中卫段治理工程中的应用[J]. 人民黄河, 2018, 40(4): 27-31.
(
|
| [33] |
李凌云, 野博超, 刘心愿. 河道生态护坡技术研究现状[J]. 水运工程, 2022(7):205-210,245.
(
|
| [34] |
王晓春, 王远明, 张桂荣, 等. 粉砂土岸坡三维加筋生态护坡结构力学效应研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(增刊2):91-95.
(
|
| [35] |
程虎, 李蒙, 杨劭, 等. 水陆交错带护坡植物固土抗蚀能力比较分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2024, 22(3):56-63.
(
|
| [36] |
王连锐, 严亚, 商崇菊, 等. 两种草本植物对红黏土边坡的固土护坡效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024, 44(2): 146-154.
(
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
姚仕明, 岳红艳, 何广水, 等. 长江中游河道崩岸机理与综合治理技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 255-280, 353-366.
(
|
| [40] |
孙晓初, 裴青宝, 刘世思, 等. 中小河流生态岸线评价体系研究[J]. 人民长江, 2025, 56(4): 99-104.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |