PDF(6506 KB)
Sedimentation Patterns in Mountainous Reservoirs under the Combined Influence of Suspended Load and Bed Load: A Case Study of Tianzishan Reservoir in Hunan
ZENG Xin, ZHANG Wen-hai, GONG Ping, YUAN Yuan
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8) : 11-18.
PDF(6506 KB)
PDF(6506 KB)
Sedimentation Patterns in Mountainous Reservoirs under the Combined Influence of Suspended Load and Bed Load: A Case Study of Tianzishan Reservoir in Hunan
[Objectives] This study aims to quantify the respective contributions of suspended load and bed load to reservoir sedimentation over different operational periods, and to evaluate the impacts of upstream bed load supply rate, grain size distribution, and intra-annual distribution on reservoir sedimentation. The findings are intended to provide scientific support for the design, long-term operation, and numerical modeling of reservoir projects, especially in data-scarce mountainous regions. [Methods] The study takes the Tianzishan Reservoir in Hunan Province, China, as a case study. A one-dimensional water-sediment mathematical model, “HELIU-2” developed by the Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute (CRSRI), is employed to simulate reservoir sedimentation over a 300-year operational period. The model is set up using measured cross-sectional profiles along the entire reservoir reach (12.23 km, 31 sections), sediment gradation data from the dam site, and hydrological data at the dam site, with key empirical parameters adopted from established practices. Scenarios are designed to assess the influences of upstream bed load supply, bed load gradation, and intra-annual distribution of bed load supply. [Results] During the early operational period (first 10 years), bed load primarily deposits near the reservoir inlet (10 229-12 230 m from the dam), while suspended load dominates overall reservoir sedimentation, accounting for 89.78%-91.04% of total deposition over different operational years. In the near-dam reach (0-3 534 m from the dam), the proportion of bed load deposition increases gradually with operation time, reaching 40.98% at 300 years. In the inlet reach, bed load deposition reaches 100% after 100 years. In contrast, in the middle reaches (e.g., 5 884-7 110 m from the dam), the bed load deposition proportion declines after an initial increase, eventually disappearing as bed load migrates further downstream. Among the three factors examined—upstream bed load supply rate, bed load gradation, and intra-annual distribution of bed load supply—the supply rate has the greatest impact on reservoir sedimentation. A higher bed load supply rate leads to higher along-channel bed elevation and a steeper riverbed slope near the dam. The effect is more pronounced in reaches with initially milder bed slopes, where sediment deposition is more sensitive to changes in bed load supply. The influence of bed load supply rate becomes increasingly significant with longer operation time.In contrast, bed load gradation has a limited effect: coarser bed load gradation results in slightly higher bed elevation in the near-dam reach, but the overall impact on the longitudinal sedimentation profile is small. Similarly, the intra-annual distribution of bed load supply (flood-season-only versus year-round) shows negligible influence on both the sedimentation profile and bed slope. [Conclusions] (1) In the early stage of reservoir operation, bed load mainly deposits near the reservoir inlet, while suspended load dominates sedimentation in the reservoir area. As operation time increases, the proportion of bed load deposition in the near-dam reach gradually rises and reaches 100% in the inlet reach after 100 years. In the middle reaches, the proportion of bed load deposition first increases and then decreases.(2) The upstream bed load supply rate has a greater impact on reservoir sedimentation than bed load gradation and intra-annual distribution. A higher bed load supply rate leads to higher along-channel bed elevation and a steeper riverbed slope near the dam, with the effect being more pronounced in reaches of milder initial bed slope. This influence becomes increasingly significant with longer operation time. (3) Coarser bed load gradation results in slightly higher bed elevation in the near-dam reach, but its overall impact on the sedimentation profile is limited. The intra-annual distribution of bed load supply also shows negligible influence. For reservoirs with moderate sedimentation, neither factor is a controlling element.
reservoir sedimentation / suspended load / bed load / 1D mathematical model / Tianzishan reservoir in Hunan Province
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
左芸. 合成库容法分析小型水库多年调节的兴利库容[J]. 甘肃水利水电技术, 2015, 51(1): 31-33.
(
|
| [5] |
陶冶, 刘天成. 基于一维水沙模型的三峡库区泥沙预报初探[J]. 人民长江, 2011, 42(6): 65-68.
(
|
| [6] |
姜利玲, 张小峰, 蒋陶, 等. 云南大桥水电站泥沙淤积及回水影响分析[J]. 人民长江, 2013, 44(增刊1): 13-16.
(
|
| [7] |
许全喜. 三峡水库蓄水以来水库淤积和坝下冲刷研究[J]. 人民长江, 2012, 43(7): 1-6.
(
|
| [8] |
韩其为, 沈锡琪. 水库的锥体淤积及库容淤积过程和壅水排沙关系[J]. 泥沙研究, 1984, 9(2): 33-51.
(
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
王平, 胡恬, 楚卫斌. 托帕水库淤积过程模型试验研究[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39(5):40-44.
(
|
| [11] |
邓春艳, 吴卫民, 夏军强. 岩滩水库泥沙淤积计算数学模型[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2013, 46(1): 19-25.
(
|
| [12] |
卢金友, 黄悦. 三峡水库淤积计算预测与原型实测结果比较分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2013, 30(12): 1-6, 27.
在分析三峡工程蓄水运行10a以来水库淤积规律的基础上,对长江科学院在三峡工程初步设计、技术设计以及三峡后续工作规划等不同阶段的水库淤积预测成果与三峡工程蓄水运行以来库区淤积量、淤积分布以及排沙比的实测结果进行了对比分析。结果表明,各阶段预测的水库淤积规律与实测的相同,由于预测采用的入库水沙条件及水库运用方式与三峡工程运用以来实际发生的差别较大,因此预测的库区淤积量及排沙比较实测的大,如近似将预测采用的入库水沙条件换算至与实际发生的相近时,则预测成果与实测值接近,表明预测采用的数学模型及预测成果是可靠的。今后需进一步研究揭示水库泥沙运动机理,改进和完善预测模型,并随着实测资料的积累,对数学模型进行不断地率定与改进,以提高预测精度。
(
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
吕祖珩. 刘家峡水电站泄水道2号孔磨蚀破坏的修复[J]. 西北水电, 2001(3):61-65.
(
|
| [17] |
杜祖恒, 白绍学, 张绍春. 漫湾水电站库区泥沙模型试验研究[J]. 人民珠江, 1993, 14(4):22-27.
(
|
| [18] |
胡文励. 三门峡库区冲淤演变分析及上游河网水沙数值模拟研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2021.
(
|
| [19] |
田震. 近坝支流入汇对水库泥沙淤积影响研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2015.
(
|
| [20] |
万建蓉, 宫平, 王成. 乌江银盘水电站库区泥沙淤积研究[J]. 人民长江, 2008, 39(4): 94-95.
(
|
| [21] |
蔺秋生, 万建蓉, 黄莉. 金沙江白鹤滩水库泥沙淤积计算分析[J]. 人民长江, 2009, 40(7): 1-3, 17.
(
|
| [22] |
万建蓉, 宫平. 嘉陵江亭子口水库泥沙淤积研究[J]. 人民长江, 2006, 37(11): 47-48.
(
|
| [23] |
金中武, 卢金友, 姚仕明. 长江上游推移质泥沙输沙率公式的检验[J]. 水利学报, 2009, 40(11):1299-1306.
(
|
| [24] |
邵学军, 王兴奎. 河流动力学概论[M]. 2版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2013.
(
|
| [25] |
赵克玉, 王小艳. 水库纵向淤积形态分类研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2005, 12(1): 186-188.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |