PDF(1142 KB)
Assessment and impact attribution of ecological flow guarantee in Huangpu River
GAN Yue-yun, JIANG Yue-mei
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025
PDF(1142 KB)
PDF(1142 KB)
Assessment and impact attribution of ecological flow guarantee in Huangpu River
[Objectives] The Taihu Basin is located in the core area of the Yangtze River Delta, characterized by numerous lakes and a typical plain tidal river network region. The Huangpu River is one of the key rivers in the Taihu Basin. The study of the ecological flow in the Huangpu River holds a strong representativeness and is of great significance for maintaining the stability and health of the river and lake ecosystem. [Methods] By collecting the flow monitoring data of the Songpu Bridge section and hydrological data such as typhoons and rainfall in the Taihu Basin from 2007 to 2023, we analyze the instances where the daily average flow at the Songpu Bridge cross-section fell below the sensitive ecological flow threshold of 90 m³/s over the years, and evaluates the compliance rate of the ecological flow target of the Huangpu River. The compliance rate is calculated as the number of days meeting the assessment indicator (90 ) divided by the total number of days in the evaluation year. It is necessary to comprehensively consider factors such as major natural disasters (such as droughts, floods, typhoons, earthquakes, et al.) or force majeure, so as to reasonably determine the number of days when the sensitive ecological flow is met and the number of days when it is lower than the target flow. We conducted a comprehensive assessment using SPSS data analysis method on factors below the sensitive ecological flow and the impact factors of sensitive events. [Results] (1) The results indicate that the periods when the daily average flow at the Songpu Bridge section of the Huangpu River drops below the sensitive ecological flow occur most frequently between August and October in the Gregorian calendar (corresponding to the 7th to 9th lunar months), with the highest incidence in September. Such occurrences are also more prevalent prior to the high tide days of each month (specifically the 3th and 18th days of lunar month). (2) A comprehensive evaluation and analysis of the influencing factors associated with events where flow falls below the sensitive ecological flow, conducted using SPSS data analysis methods, indicates that the primary causes are force majeure factors such as the backwater effect of astronomical tides and storm surge-induced water level rises (resulting from typhoons and cold air). (3) During the periods when the daily average flow at the Songpu Bridge section is below the sensitive ecological flow, the chloride ion concentration at this section remains significantly lower than 250, which meets the ecological protection target of tide prevention and saltwater intrusion control in the Huangpu River. Considering factors including force majeure and the compliance of chloride ion concentrations, the compliance rate of the ecological flow assessment index for the Huangpu River from 2007 to 2023 is 100 satisfied. [Conclusions] Starting from the basin scale and overall perspective, this study innovatively establishes a comprehensive methodology and mitigation strategies for evaluating ecological flow maintenance in tidal river systems..As a tidal river at the confluence of its basin, the Huangpu River is regarded as one of the key watercourses in the Taihu Basin, given its critical geographical position and typicality as a tidal water body. Research on the safeguard of its ecological flow contributes to elucidating the influence of tidal processes on riverine ecosystems, thereby offering a reference framework for studies on other analogous estuarine reaches. We recommend integrating the construction of a digital twin watershed to promote the realization of the whole chain closed-loop management of 'technological intelligence, refined dispatching and diversified objectives, which can serve as a reference for the establishment of ecological flow guarantee system in water-abundant regions.
ecological flow / assessment / influencing factors / tidal / guarantee / Huangpu River
| [1] |
李国英. 为以中国式现代化全面推进强国建设、民族复兴伟业提供有力的水安全保障[J]. 水利发展研究, 2024, 24(3):1-3.
(
|
| [2] |
杨得瑞. 复苏河湖生态环境增强大江大河大湖生态保护治理能力[J]. 中国水利, 2022, (7): 1-2,8.
|
| [3] |
王浩, 胡鹏. 基于二元视角的河湖生态环境复苏与生态流量保障路径[J]. 中国水利, 2022, (7): 11-15.
(
|
| [4] |
王建华, 胡鹏, 刘庆涛, 等. 我国重点河湖生态流量达标现状及管控建议[J]. 中国水利, 2022, (1): 14-18.
(
|
| [5] |
水利部关于印发第一批重点河湖生态流量保障目标的函[J]. 中国水利, 2020, (15): 5-7.
|
| [6] |
陈俊颖, 孟晓辰, 陈华鑫. 太湖流域片生态流量保障工作思考[J]. 水利发展研究, 2024, 1-6.
|
| [7] |
尚钊仪, 李敏, 李博韬, 等. 对河湖生态流量保障全过程管理的思考与展望[J]. 水利发展研究, 2023, 23 (6): 11-16.
(
|
| [8] |
吴浩云. 河湖幸福观指引下的太湖流域片生态流量保障实践与探索[J]. 中国水利, 2020, (15): 59-61.
(
|
| [9] |
林育青, 陈求稳. 生态流量保障相关问题研究[J]. 中国水利, 2020, (15): 26-28,19.
(
|
| [10] |
刘金贵, 李谊纯, 仉天宇. 珠江河口咸潮入侵研究进展[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2023, 43 (1): 134-140.
(
|
| [11] |
郭振仁, 袁丽蓉. 河口咸潮活动及其环境影响[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2012.
|
| [12] |
章运超, 柴朝晖, 王家生, 等. 量质结合的举水新洲段生态流量[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40 (7): 1-7.
(
|
| [13] |
毛兴华, 李琪, 陈澄. 感潮河流生态流量保障目标研究[J]. 水利发展研究, 2024,1-5.
|
| [14] |
宗虎城, 章卫胜, 张金善. 海平面上升对黄浦江风暴潮水位影响研究[J]. 人民长江, 2014, 45 (9): 1-3,7.
(
|
| [15] |
季永兴. 黄浦江河口建闸研究40年回顾与展望[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2023, 43 (5): 1-9,87.
(
|
| [16] |
韩景, 吴巍巍. 太湖及下游水源地安全评价指标体系和方法研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2020, 51 (S2): 329-333.
(
|
| [17] |
吴浩云, 唐力, 秦忠, 等. 重点河湖生态流量管控下的美丽幸福太湖流域片建设[J]. 中国水利, 2019, (20): 4-6,10.
|
| [18] |
龚李莉, 蔡梅, 王元元, 等. 新时期水资源保护面临的形势及对策建议——以上海市为例[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54 (S1): 39-44.
|
| [19] |
吴传漫, 张孟康, 操丕军. 九龙河生态流量评估及保障措施探讨[J]. 四川水利, 2023, 44 (1): 115-118.
|
| [20] |
张睿, 李纪辉, 鲁春辉, 等. 考虑生态流量保证率的丹江口水库多目标优化调度研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 1-12.(ZHANG Rui, LI Ji-hui, LU Chun-hui et al. Study on multi-objective optimal operation of Danjiangkou Reservior considering the guarantee rate of ecological flow[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 1-12. ) (in Chinese)
|
| [21] |
刘水芹, 左一鸣, 季永兴. 太湖流域“引江济太”20年对上海水资源影响分析[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2024, (8): 18-23.
|
| [22] |
李凯轩, 李志威, 胡旭跃, 等. 洞庭湖区三口水系生态基流研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38 (8): 19-24.
(
|
| [23] |
赵辉, 戴贤波, 徐向阳, 等. 太湖流域降水量年内分配不均匀性分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2014, 32 (8): 9-13.
(
|
| [24] |
孙维康, 张志林, 毕军芳, 等. 长江口潮汐主要分潮振幅时空特征分析[J]. 人民长江, 2025, 56 (2): 58-64.
(
|
| [25] |
柳子豪, 汪院生, 钟栗, 等. 外江潮位抬升背景下江苏省太湖地区雨潮遭遇分析[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2024, 34 (9): 59-63,75.
|
| [26] |
Frequency Analysis of Storm-Surge-Induced Flooding for the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China [J]. Qian K,Sebastiaan N,et al. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2018
|
| [27] |
夏明嫣, 张帆一, 闻云呈, 等. 长江下游潮汐河段高精度潮位预报方法比较研究[J]. 水资源保护, 1-14.(XIA Ming-yan, ZHANG fan-yi, WENG Yun-cheng, et al. Comparison of Different Short-Term High-Precision Water Level Forecasting Methods in the Tidal Reach of the Yangtze River[J]. Water Resources Protection, 1-14. ) (in Chinese)
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
张翠娟, 冯学军, 盛敏. 因子分析开发步骤及R语言程序代码实现[J]. 安庆师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2013, 19 (2): 28-31.
|
| [30] |
何晓群. 现代统计分析方法与应用, 第3版[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2012.
|
| [31] |
汪倩, 袁波, 吴剑, 等. 基于主成分分析法与系统动力学的水资源承载力评价——以庆阳市为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42 (6): 51-59.
(
|
| [32] |
李原园, 廖文根, 赵钟楠, 等. 新时期强化河湖生态流量管控的总体思路与对策措施[J]. 中国水利, 2020, (15): 12-14.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |