Assessment and Impact Attribution of Ecological Flow Guarantee in Huangpu River

GAN Yue-yun, JIANG Yue-mei, LIU Min, JI Hai-ping

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8) : 29-35.

PDF(6214 KB)
PDF(6214 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8) : 29-35. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250453
Water Resources

Assessment and Impact Attribution of Ecological Flow Guarantee in Huangpu River

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] Located in the core of the Yangtze River Delta, the Taihu Basin is a typical plain tidal river network region characterized by numerous lakes. As a key watercourse in this basin, the Huangpu River serves as a representative case for studying ecological flow, which is critical for maintaining the stability and health of river-lake ecosystems. [Methods] Utilizing flow monitoring data from the Songpu Bridge section and hydrological records (including typhoons and rainfall) from 2007 to 2023, this study analyzed instances where the daily average flow fell below the sensitive ecological flow threshold of 90 m3/s. The ecological flow compliance rate was calculated as the ratio of days meeting the assessment indicator (≥90 m3/s) to the total days in the evaluation year. To accurately determine compliance, the analysis comprehensively accounted for force majeure events and major natural disasters (e.g., droughts, floods, typhoons, and earthquakes). Furthermore, factor analysis was employed to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the factors contributing to flow deficits relative to the sensitive ecological threshold. [Results] (1) Daily average flows at the Songpu Bridge section dropping below the sensitive ecological threshold occurred most frequently between August and October (Gregorian calendar), peaking in September. These occurrences were also more prevalent prior to the semi-monthly high tides (specifically the 3rd and 18th days of the lunar month). (2) Factor analysis indicated that the primary causes for flows falling below the sensitive threshold were force majeure factors, specifically the backwater effect of astronomical tides and storm surge-induced water level rises caused by typhoons and cold air. (3) During periods of sub-threshold flow, chloride ion concentrations at the section remained significantly lower than 250 mg/L, satisfying the ecological protection targets for tide prevention and saltwater intrusion control. Consequently, after accounting for force majeure and water quality compliance, the ecological flow assessment compliance rate for the Huangpu River from 2007 to 2023 was 100%. [Conclusions] Adopting a basin-scale perspective, this study establishes a comprehensive methodology and mitigation strategies for evaluating ecological flow maintenance in tidal river systems. Given its critical geographical position, the Huangpu River is identified as a representative tidal watercourse within the Taihu Basin. This research elucidates the influence of tidal processes on riverine ecosystems, offering a reference framework for similar estuarine reaches. We recommend integrating digital twin watershed construction to facilitate a closed-loop management system characterized by “technological intelligence, refined dispatching, and diversified objectives”, providing a reference for establishing ecological flow guarantee systems in water-abundant regions.

Key words

ecological flow / guarantee rate assessment / influencing factors / tidal reach / Huangpu River

Cite this article

Download Citations
GAN Yue-yun , JIANG Yue-mei , LIU Min , et al. Assessment and Impact Attribution of Ecological Flow Guarantee in Huangpu River[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(8): 29-35 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250453

References

[1]
李国英. 为以中国式现代化全面推进强国建设、民族复兴伟业提供有力的水安全保障[J]. 水利发展研究, 2024, 24(3):1-3.
(Li Guoying. Improved Water Security for China’s Efforts to Build itself into a Stronger Country and Rejuvenate the Chinese Nation on all Fronts by Pursuing Chinese Modernization[J]. Water Resources Development Research, 2024, 24(3): 1-3. (in Chinese))
[2]
杨得瑞. 复苏河湖生态环境增强大江大河大湖生态保护治理能力[J]. 中国水利, 2022(7): 1-2, 8.
(Yang Derui. Restoration of Ecological Environment of Rivers and Lakes shall Greatly Enhance the Capability of Ecological Protection of Major Rivers and Lakes[J]. China Water Resources, 2022(7): 1-2, 8. (in Chinese))
[3]
王浩, 胡鹏. 基于二元视角的河湖生态环境复苏与生态流量保障路径[J]. 中国水利, 2022(7): 11-15.
(Wang Hao, Hu Peng. Recovery of Eco-environment and Safeguarding Path of Ecological Flow of Rivers and Lakes Based on Binary Perspective[J]. China Water Resources, 2022(7): 11-15. (in Chinese))
[4]
王建华, 胡鹏, 刘庆涛, 等. 我国重点河湖生态流量达标现状及管控建议[J]. 中国水利, 2022(1): 14-18.
(Wang Jianhua, Hu Peng, Liu Qingtao, et al. Current Status of Ecological Flow in Key Rivers and Lakes in China and Regulation Suggestions[J]. China Water Resources, 2022(1): 14-18. (in Chinese))
[5]
水利部关于印发第一批重点河湖生态流量保障目标的函(水资管函[2020]43号)[J]. 中华人民共和国水利部公报, 2020(2):26.
(Letter from the Ministry of Water Resources on Printing and Distributing the First Batch of Ecological Flow Guarantee Targets for Key Rivers and Lakes (Water Management Letter [2020] No.43)[J]. Gazette of the Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China, 2020(2):26. (in Chinese))
[6]
陈俊颖, 孟晓辰, 陈华鑫. 太湖流域片生态流量保障工作思考[J]. 水利发展研究, 2025, 25(6): 52-56.
(Chen Junying, Meng Xiaochen, Chen Huaxin. Thoughts on Ecological Flow Guarantee in Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Water Resources Development Research, 2025, 25(6): 52-56. (in Chinese))
[7]
尚钊仪, 李敏, 李博韬, 等. 对河湖生态流量保障全过程管理的思考与展望[J]. 水利发展研究, 2023, 23(6):11-16.
(Shang Zhaoyi, Li Min, Li Botao, et al. Thoughts and Prospects on the Whole Process Management of Ecological Flow Management in Rivers and Lakes[J]. Water Resources Development Research, 2023, 23(6): 11-16. (in Chinese))
[8]
吴浩云. 河湖幸福观指引下的太湖流域片生态流量保障实践与探索[J]. 中国水利, 2020(15): 59-61.
(Wu Haoyun. Practices and Explorations of Ecological Flow Guarantee in the Taihu Basin under the Guidance of Happy Rivers and Lakes Concept[J]. China Water Resources, 2020(15): 59-61. (in Chinese))
[9]
林育青, 陈求稳. 生态流量保障相关问题研究[J]. 中国水利, 2020(15): 26-28, 19.
(Lin Yuqing, Chen Qiuwen. The Study on Relevant Issues of Ecological Flow Assurance[J]. China Water Resources, 2020(15): 26-28, 19. (in Chinese))
[10]
刘金贵, 李谊纯, 仉天宇. 珠江河口咸潮入侵研究进展[J]. 广东海洋大学学报, 2023, 43(1): 134-140.
(Liu Jingui, Li Yichun, Zhang Tianyu. Review of Salinity Intrusion in the Pearl River Estuary[J]. Journal of Guangdong Ocean University, 2023, 43(1): 134-140. (in Chinese))
[11]
郭振仁, 袁丽蓉. 河口咸潮活动及其环境影响: 珠江口咸潮上溯问题与对策[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2012.
(Guo Zhenren, Yuan Lirong. Saltwater Intrusion in Estuaries and Its Environmental Impacts: Problems and Countermeasures of Saltwater Intrusion in the Pearl River Estuary[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2012. (in Chinese))
[12]
章运超, 柴朝晖, 王家生, 等. 量质结合的举水新洲段生态流量[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(7):1-7.
Abstract
研究满足水质和水量需求的生态流量对于河湖水环境治理保护很有必要。以水质性缺水的河流举水新洲段为例,基于实测河道断面数据和污染源调查结果,运用MIKE11软件建立了河道水量水质模型,并根据实测资料对模型进行了率定。利用率定后的模型,以COD、NH<sub>3</sub>-N、TN、TP作为主要污染物指标,通过试算法计算了现状排污条件下,各月份中控制断面水质达标的生态流量,同时运用Tennant法和流量频率曲线法计算了满足河流生态系统基本水量需求的生态流量。对3类方法计算结果综合比较讨论,得出了统筹水质水量的举水新洲段各月份生态流量。
(Zhang Yunchao, Chai Zhaohui, Wang Jiasheng, et al. Ecological Flow Involving Water Quantity and Water Quality: Case Study on Xinzhou Segment of Jushui River[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(7): 1-7. (in Chinese))
The governance and protection of lake and river water environment require the consideration of both the quantity and quality of water to preserve ecological flow. In this study we examine the Xinzhou segment of the Jushui River, a tributary of the Yangtze River, using the MIKE11 software to develop a water quantity and quality model. The model was calibrated using measured data and data from pollution source investigations. The model measured the main pollutants including COD, NH<sub>3</sub>-N, TN, and TP, and established the water demand for control sections to meet water quality standards on a monthly basis with consideration of current sewage discharge levels. In addition, we utilized the Tennant method and flow frequency curve method to calculate the ecological water demand to ensure the basic stability of the river ecosystem. By comparing and analyzing the results of Tennant method, flow frequency curve method, and the proposed model, we obtained the monthly ecological water flow for the Xinzhou segment of Jushui River.
[13]
毛兴华, 李琪, 陈澄. 感潮河流生态流量保障目标研究[J]. 水利发展研究, 2025, 25(9): 90-94.
(Mao Xinghua, Li Qi, Chen Cheng. Research on Ecological Flow Guarantee Targets Tive of Tidal Rivers[J]. Water Resources Development Research, 2025, 25(9): 90-94. (in Chinese))
[14]
宗虎城, 章卫胜, 张金善. 海平面上升对黄浦江风暴潮水位影响研究[J]. 人民长江, 2014, 45(9): 1-3, 7.
(Zong Hucheng, Zhang Weisheng, Zhang Jinshan. Study on Influence of Sea Level Rise on Storm Tidal Levels of Huangpu River[J]. Yangtze River, 2014, 45(9): 1-3, 7. (in Chinese))
[15]
季永兴. 黄浦江河口建闸研究40年回顾与展望[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2023, 43(5): 1-9, 87.
(Ji Yongxing. Review and Prospect of Research on Sluice Construction at Huangpu River Estuary in Past 40 Years[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2023, 43(5): 1-9, 87. (in Chinese))
[16]
韩景, 吴巍巍. 太湖及下游水源地安全评价指标体系和方法研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2020, 51(增刊2): 329-333.
(Han Jing, Wu Weiwei. Study on Safety Evaluation Index System and Method of Taihu Lake and Its Downstream Water Source Areas[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2020, 51(Supp.2): 329-333. (in Chinese))
[17]
吴浩云, 唐力, 秦忠, 等. 重点河湖生态流量管控下的美丽幸福太湖流域片建设[J]. 中国水利, 2019(20):4-6,10.
(Wu Haoyun, Tang Li, Qin Zhong, et al. Construction of the Beautiful and Happy Taihu Lake under the Control of Ecological Flow of Key Rivers and Lakes[J]. China Water Resources, 2019(20):4-6,10. (in Chinese))
[18]
龚李莉, 蔡梅, 王元元, 等. 新时期水资源保护面临的形势及对策建议: 以上海市为例[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(增刊1): 39-44.
(Gong Lili, Cai Mei, Wang Yuanyuan, et al. Situation and Countermeasures of Water Resources Protection in the New Era: A Case Study of Shanghai[J]. Yangtze River, 2023, 54(Supp.1): 39-44. (in Chinese))
[19]
吴传漫, 张孟康, 操丕军. 九龙河生态流量评估及保障措施探讨[J]. 四川水利, 2023, 44(1): 115-118.
(Wu Chuanman, Zhang Mengkang, Cao Pijun. Discussion on Ecological Flow Assessment and Guarantee Measures of Jiulong River[J]. Sichuan Water Resources, 2023, 44(1): 115-118. (in Chinese))
[20]
张睿, 李纪辉, 鲁春辉, 等. 考虑生态流量保证率的丹江口水库多目标优化调度[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(9): 192-201.
Abstract
随着汉江流域水资源开发程度的逐步提高及生态需求不断增加,流域内用水与流域外调水、水资源综合利用与生态用水的矛盾日益突出,亟需通过科学手段强化水资源配置能力,协同推进河湖生境修复与健康维持。为此,以南水北调中线工程供水量、水库发电量、生态流量保证率为目标,构建丹江口水库供水-发电-生态多目标优化调度模型,运用改进的NSGA-Ⅲ优化算法进行求解,得到不同来水频率条件下非劣调度方案集。结果显示:生态最优方案在丰、平、枯来水条件下生态流量保障率分别提升100%、46.65%、88.89%,优化效果明显,最大限度提升生态效益的同时强化了水资源配置能力。研究成果可为推进江河保护治理和水库综合效益发挥提供指导和借鉴。
(Zhang Rui, Li Jihui, Lu Chunhui, et al. Multi-objective Optimized Scheduling of Danjiangkou Reservoir Considering Ecological Flow Guarantee Rate[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(9): 192-201. (in Chinese))
[21]
刘水芹, 左一鸣, 季永兴. 太湖流域“引江济太”20年对上海水资源影响分析[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2024(8):18-23.
(Liu Shuiqin, Zuo Yiming, Ji Yongxing. Analysis of the Impact of the Taihu Lake Basin “Water Diversion from Yangtze River to Taihu Lake” on Shanghai Water Resourcesfor 20 Years[J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2024(8): 18-23. (in Chinese))
[22]
李凯轩, 李志威, 胡旭跃, 等. 洞庭湖区三口水系生态基流研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(8): 19-24.
Abstract
近年来大型水利工程的建设与运行、洞庭湖区三口水系分流量的持续减少和三口水系地区水资源的不合理利用,导致三口水系的生态流量严重不足。基于洞庭湖区三口水系的主要水文站2003—2018年逐日平均流量和1973—2002年逐月平均流量数据,提出一种综合考虑不同水文学法的生态基流确定方法,得出逐月和全年的生态基流推荐值,并分析其保证率和影响因素。结果表明:新江口站、沙道观站、弥陀寺站、康家岗站和管家铺站的全年生态基流分别为208.18、49.44、75.39、2.52、93.94 m<sup>3</sup>/s,全年生态基流保证率分别为84.83%、37.52%、51.88%、21.84%、42.60%;各水文站汛期的生态基流最高值均出现在7月份,8月份、9月份和6月份依次递减,汛期的生态基流及其保证率明显高于非汛期。研究提出的方法和计算结果可为洞庭湖区三口水系的水生态修复提供参考。
(Li Kaixuan, Li Zhiwei, Hu Xuyue, et al. Ecological Base Flow of Three Major Outlets Rivers of the Middle Yangtze River into the Dongting Lake Area[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(8): 19-24. (in Chinese))
[23]
赵辉, 戴贤波, 徐向阳, 等. 太湖流域降水量年内分配不均匀性分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2014, 32(8): 9-13.
(Zhao Hui, Dai Xianbo, Xu Xiangyang, et al. Intra-annual Inhomogeneity Analysis of Precipitation in Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2014, 32(8): 9-13. (in Chinese))
[24]
孙维康, 张志林, 毕军芳, 等. 长江口潮汐主要分潮振幅时空特征分析[J]. 人民长江, 2025, 56(2): 58-64.
(Sun Weikang, Zhang Zhilin, Bi Junfang, et al. Temporal-spatial Characteristics Analysis on Major Tidal Constituent Amplitudes at Changjiang River Estuary[J]. Yangtze River, 2025, 56(2): 58-64. (in Chinese))
[25]
柳子豪, 汪院生, 钟栗, 等. 外江潮位抬升背景下江苏省太湖地区雨潮遭遇分析[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2024, 34(9): 59-63, 75.
(Liu Zihao, Wang Yuansheng, Zhong Li, et al. Encounter Analysis of Rain and Tide in Taihu Lake Basin of Jiangsu Province under the Tidal Level Rise of the Yangtze River[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2024, 34(9): 59-63, 75. (in Chinese))
[26]
Ke Q, Jonkman S N, Van Gelder P H A J M, et al. Frequency Analysis of Storm-surge-induced Flooding for the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 70.
[27]
夏明嫣, 张帆一, 闻云呈, 等. 长江下游潮汐河段高精度潮位预报方法比较研究[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41(4):159-168.
(Xia Mingyan, Zhang Fanyi, Wen Yuncheng, et al. Comparative Study on High-precision Tidal Level Forecast Methods in Tidal Reach of the Lower Yangtze River[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2025, 41(4): 159-168. (in Chinese))
[28]
张翠娟, 冯学军, 盛敏. 因子分析开发步骤及R语言程序代码实现[J]. 安庆师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2013, 19(2):28-31.
(Zhang Cuijuan, Feng Xuejun, Sheng Min. Factor Analysis Development Steps and Realization of R Language[J]. Journal of Anqing Teachers College (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 19(2):28-31. (in Chinese))
[29]
何晓群. 现代统计分析方法与应用[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2012.
(He Xiaoqun. Modern Statistical Analysis Methods and Applications[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2012. (in Chinese))
[30]
汪倩, 袁波, 吴剑, 等. 基于主成分分析法与系统动力学的水资源承载力评价: 以庆阳市为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(6): 51-59.
Abstract
黄河流域资源型城市水资源承载力评价相关研究缺失,亟待填补以支撑黄河流域的生态保护与高质量发展战略。以油气资源城市庆阳市为例,其油气开发面临水资源短缺问题。结合庆阳市实际,融合动静评价法构建油气开发区水资源承载力评估体系,在静态评估中通过主成分分析法追溯历史变化并分析关键影响因素,动态评估则是采用系统动力学提出了4种优化方案,并对庆阳市2022—2035年水资源承载力趋势进行了预测。结果表明:2012—2022年,由于社会经济发展、水资源利用和生态建设等多方面因素的共同影响,庆阳市水资源承载力总体呈逐年下降趋势,年均下降幅度为18.78%;考虑节水、治污、经济调节等方面形成综合发展方案,认为可通过采取供需双向调整策略缓解水资源压力。研究成果可为庆阳市水资源调控提供参考。
(Wang Qian, Yuan Bo, Wu Jian, et al. Assessment of Water Resources Carrying Capacity Based on Principal Component Analysis and System Dynamics: a Case Study of Qingyang City[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(6): 51-59. (in Chinese))
[31]
李原园, 廖文根, 赵钟楠, 等. 新时期强化河湖生态流量管控的总体思路与对策措施[J]. 中国水利, 2020(15):12-14.
(Li Yuanyuan, Liao Wengen, Zhao Zhongnan, et al. The Whole Thought and Countermeasures to Enhance Rivers and Lakes Ecological Flow Control in the New Era[J]. China Water Resources, 2020(15): 12-14. (in Chinese))
PDF(6214 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/