Game-Theoretic Analysis and NetLogo Simulation of “Ten-Year Fishing Ban” Enforcement in Yangtze River: A Case Study of the Poyang Lake

WU Zhi-long, QU Li-miao, YANG Chang-ming, CAO Si-han

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10) : 201-210.

PDF(8572 KB)
PDF(8572 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10) : 201-210. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250396
Special Column Of Constructing River Ethics

Game-Theoretic Analysis and NetLogo Simulation of “Ten-Year Fishing Ban” Enforcement in Yangtze River: A Case Study of the Poyang Lake

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] The “Ten-Year Fishing Ban” is a critical ecological conservation strategy designed to restore the Yangtze River ecosystem in China. However, its implementation and management have been hindered by persistent challenges and recurrent issues. Taking Poyang Lake as a case study, this study integrates field investigations with NetLogo to simulate enforcement dynamics. It further explores the impact of strategy probability combinations, levels of economic penalties, and land-water patrol resource allocation on enforcement effectiveness, aiming to provide insights for long-term management strategies of the fishing ban. [Methods] This study employed a game-theoretic framework, constructing a payoff matrix to model the strategic interactions between law enforcers and poachers. Nash equilibrium solutions were derived from field data and government statistics to inform resource allocation strategies for subsequent multi-agent simulations. Key policy variables, including the apprehension frequency, levels of economic penalties, and the ratio of terrestrial to aquatic enforcement resources, were evaluated through parameter sensitivity analysis. [Results] (1) the probability distribution of different law enforcement strategy combinations significantly influenced the intensity of illegal fishing activities. Intelligent surveillance was identified as a critical tool for the long-term management of the fishing ban. The simulation also reflected common poacher tactics, including equipment upgrading, coordinated operations, and exploitation of familiar fishing areas. Consequently, local enforcement should rely primarily on high-tech intelligent surveillance, supplemented by manual patrols and public education, with an apprehension frequency exceeding 0.41 to effectively deter illegal fishing. (2) Both the levels of economic penalties and the apprehension frequency exerted a suppressive effect on poaching activities, with the apprehension frequency demonstrating a more pronounced impact. Moreover, a clear substitution effect between these two factors was observed: in terms of enforcement effectiveness, increasing the apprehension frequency by 0.01 was equivalent to raising economic penalties by 2 000 yuan, approximately 0.07 times the illegal gains. Therefore, imposing high economic penalties and maintaining a high apprehension frequency were confirmed as primary measures to deter illegal fishing. Specifically, economic penalties must exceed 1.53 times the illegal fishing income to effectively deter violations. Moreover, increasing the apprehension frequency (even through verbal warnings and education) was found to exert a stronger deterrent effect than imposing economic penalties. (3) Analysis of optimal enforcement efficiency revealed that, regardless of whether a high economic penalty or a high apprehension frequency strategy was adopted, 84%-86% of law enforcement resources should be allocated to shoreline areas. This was attributed to the complex topography of the shoreline, which limited the effectiveness of technical surveillance and increased the difficulty of manual patrols. This allocation recommendation also aligned with empirical observations that productive poaching in open waters had decreased significantly since the fishing ban, while illegal fishing activities along the shore had continued to increase. [Conclusions] To ensure the long-term maintenance of the fishing ban, the following key strategies are proposed. (1) Enhanced intelligent surveillance: integrating drones, satellite remote sensing, radar, and optoelectronic thermal imaging to establish a 24/7 all-weather surveillance network is recommended. (2) Optimized penalty-prevention mechanisms: scientifically adjusting penalties based on violation severity, frequency, and ecological impact is proposed, aiming to address the issues of low-cost and recurrent illegal fishing. Innovative and diversified punitive measures that combine participatory education (e.g., mandatory community patrols) and deterrent sanctions (e.g., ecological restoration through fish stock enhancement) should be implemented to raise ecological awareness and enhance compliance among fishermen. (3) Cross-sector collaborative governance: a multi-jurisdictional data-sharing platform should be developed, and violation heatmaps should be utilized for precise allocation of enforcement resources. Interagency coordination among water administration, public security, and market regulatory agencies must be strengthened to establish a tiered and efficient regulatory framework. Furthermore, regional cooperation across city, town, and village levels should be enhanced, informed by international fishery management practices, and regular fishery resource surveys should be institutionalized.

Key words

fishing ban enforcement / game-theoretic analysis / strategy optimization / NetLogo simulation / Poyang Lake

Cite this article

Download Citations
WU Zhi-long , QU Li-miao , YANG Chang-ming , et al. Game-Theoretic Analysis and NetLogo Simulation of “Ten-Year Fishing Ban” Enforcement in Yangtze River: A Case Study of the Poyang Lake[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(10): 201-210 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250396

References

[1]
高小玲, 孙晓瑜. 生计资本对退捕渔民家庭收入质量的影响研究:以湖南省退捕渔民为例[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2023, 44(3):501-512.
(GAO Xiao-ling, SUN Xiao-yu. The Impacts of Livelihood Capital on the Income Quality of Fishermen Withdrawing from Fishing: A Case Study of Hunan Fishermen[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2023, 44(3): 501-512. (in Chinese))
[2]
ZHENG S, WANG S, XU W, et al. Research on the Job Transfer Pathway of Chinese Marine Fishermen and Its Driving Factors[J]. Marine Policy, 2021, 129: 104572.
[3]
李冬. 中央环保督察的生成逻辑、制度演进与实践反思[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 47(2):91-96.
(LI Dong. The Generation Logic, Institutional Evolution of and Practical Reflection on the Central Environmental Protection Inspection[J]. Journal of Xiangtan University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2023, 47(2):91-96. (in Chinese))
[4]
赖明苒, 齐海丽, 李强华. 退捕渔民利益补偿政策中政府失灵及其矫正: 以长江大保护背景下洪湖自然保护区为例[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2019, 37(1): 71-78.
(LAI Ming-ran, QI Hai-li, LI Qiang-hua. Government Failure and Its Correction in the Compensation Policy for Exit-fishermen’s Interests: Taking Honghu Nature Reserve under the Background of Yangtze River Great Protection as an Example[J]. Chinese Fisheries Economics, 2019, 37(1): 71-78. (in Chinese))
[5]
许继军, 陈述. 新时期长江流域水资源保护利用管理体制机制研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(7): 1-6.
Abstract
针对当前长江流域水资源保护利用管理存在的问题和诸多难题,对新时期长江流域水资源管理体制机制重构和完善路径进行了探讨。为破解制约流域水资源保护利用可持续发展的体制机制障碍,长江流域水资源管理应遵循流域整体性和复杂性规律,在流域协调机制框架上,健全统分结合、整体联动的管理体制,打造多元参与的流域治理共同体,健全完善多元化生态补偿机制、跨省河湖长制监督机制、控制性水工程统一调度管理机制、流域水资源保护利用空间管控及市场运行机制,从而推动长江流域治理体系现代化。
(XU Ji-jun, CHEN Shu. Management System and Mechanism of Water Resources Protection and Utilization in the Yangtze River Basin in the New Era[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39(7): 1-6. (in Chinese))
Protecting and utilizing the water resources in Yangtze River Basin has seen many problems and difficulties. In view of this,we discussed the paths of reconstructing and improving the management system and mechanism in the new era. To break the system and mechanism barriers in sustainable development,the management of water resources in the Yangtze River Basin should conform to the integrity and complexity of the basin. In the framework of coordination across the basin,we recommend to 1)build a sound system which integrates unified and separate management with overall linkage and interactions to forge a governance community for the basin with multiple stakeholders;2)enhance the mechanisms of diversified ecological compensation,cross-provincial river-lake-chief supervision,unified dispatch and management of controlling water projects,as well as spatial control and market operation. With such endeavors,the governance of water resources in Yangtze River Basin is expected to be further modernized.
[6]
王小军, 王露, 李文潞. 渔业行政执法与刑事司法衔接机制问题研究:以非法捕捞水产品罪为例[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2023, 45(6):198-207.
Abstract
加强渔业行政执法与刑事司法衔接,是打击渔业违法犯罪行为的必然要求,对于强化依法治渔,促进依法行政,维护生态安全具有重要意义。文章以非法捕捞水产品罪为切入点,探讨我国渔业执法实践中存在的行刑衔接问题。经分析发现造成问题的原因有:立法不完善、移送程序和证据收集使用存在问题、监督缺位、信息共享机制不完善,应当从完善相关立法、完善程序机制、完善监督机制、完善信息共享机制四个方面完善我国渔业行刑衔接机制。
(WANG Xiao-jun, WANG Lu, LI Wen-lu. Studies on the Fishery Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Convergence Mechanism: the Crime of illegally Catching Aquatic Products as an example[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2023, 45(6):198-207. (in Chinese))
Strengthening the convergence of fishery administrative punishment with criminal justice is an inevitable requirement for effectively combating fishery illegal and criminal activities. It is of great significance for strengthening fishery management according to law and maintaining ecological safety. In this article, we take the crime of illegally fishing aquatic products as the starting point and analyze the problem of poor connection of execution in the practice of fishery law enforcement in our country. At present, the main reason for the poor connection of fishery law enforcement in our country is the incoordination of relevant legislation and the uncoordinated mechanism of fishery execution connection procedures. It is necessary to improve relevant legislation, clarify the transfer procedures and evidence conversion standards of fishery execution connection cases, and establish a law enforcement information sharing mechanism. We must improve the fishery administrative punishment and criminal justice convergence mechanism in three aspects.
[7]
刘子飞, 韩杨. 长江退捕渔民转产就业政策:目标、进展与建议:基于长江禁捕典型省域的调查[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021(8):42-51.
(LIU Zi-fei, HAN Yang. Policies on Transferring Fishermen’s Job on the Yangtze River:Target,Progress and Recommendations:Investigations on Typical Provinces with Fishing Ban in the Yangtze River[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021(8):42-51. (in Chinese))
[8]
熊莉莉. 长江流域(锦江河)禁捕政策执行研究:基于史密斯政策执行过程模型的分析[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2023.
(XIONG Li-li. Research on the Implementation of No-fishing Policy in the Yangtze River Basin (Jinjiang River) : An Analysis based on Smith’s policy Implementation Process Model[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2023. (in Chinese))
[9]
郭倩, 俞潜. 非法捕捞行为“情节严重”认定因素研究[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2024, 42(4):42-50.
(GUO Qian, YU Qian. Study on the Factors for Determining the “Serious Circumstances” of Illegal Fishing Behavior[J]. Chinese Fisheries Economics, 2024, 42(4):42-50. (in Chinese))
[10]
陈廷贵, 刘芳. 资源衰退背景下长江中下游渔民退捕意愿分析[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2019, 37(3): 1-7.
(CHEN Ting-gui, LIU Fang. Willingness of Fishermen to Quit Catching in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Chinese Fisheries Economics, 2019, 37(3): 1-7. (in Chinese))
[11]
AMALI INFANTINA J, PRIYA P, DEEPAK SAMUEL V K, et al. Sustainability at a Cost: An Inceptive Analysis of “Extended” Fishing Ban on the Livelihoods of Fishers of Tamil Nadu[J]. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 2020, 27(4): 336-344.
[12]
邬志龙, 吴玮, 余进祥, 等. 长江十年禁渔背景下鄱阳湖流域渔业发展时空演变及其驱动机制研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2024, 45(11):104-118.
(WU Zhi-long, WU Wei, YU Jin-xiang, et al. Spalial-temporal Evolution and Driving Mechanism of Fishery Development in Poyang Lake Basin Under the Background of Ten-year Fishing ban in Yangtze River[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2024, 45(11):104-118. (in Chinese))
[13]
韩杨, 冯文猛, 刘子飞. 长江退捕渔民养老保障政策逻辑与完善建议[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2022, 36(4): 10-19.
(HAN Yang, FENG Wen-meng, LIU Zi-fei. The Policy Logic and Improvement Suggestions of the Pension Policy for Fishermen Who Have Withdrawn from Fishing in the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Social Science), 2022, 36(4): 10-19. (in Chinese))
[14]
NAPATA R P, ESPECTATO L N, SEROFIA G D. Closed Season Policy in Visayan Sea,Philippines:A Second Look[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2020, 187: 105115.
[15]
MACUSI E D, RAFON J K A, MACUSI E S. Impact of COVID-19 and Closed Fishing Season on Commercial Fishers of Davao Gulf, Mindanao, Philippines[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2022, 217: 105997.
[16]
赵旭, 向恒星, 赵菲菲. 长江流域生态退捕渔民生计脆弱性评价及生计风险预测[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(5):1854-1867.
(ZHAO Xu, XIANG Heng-xing, ZHAO Fei-fei. Livelihood Vulnerability Assessment and Risk Prediction for Fishermen of Ecological Fish withdrawal in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(5):1854-1867. (in Chinese))
[17]
陈廷贵, 刘芳, 杨杨. 长江流域禁捕生态补偿政策绩效评价及影响因素分析l以湖北和贵州为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(12):3144-3155.
Abstract
渔民作为我国长江流域禁捕生态补偿政策的对象,渔民的满意程度是衡量禁捕生态补偿政策的重要指标。选取的研究地区是首批推行并完成禁捕生态补偿政策的贵州省赤水河流域和湖北省洪湖市,基于退捕渔民调研结果,先使用TOPSIS法的数学模型求出最优解,再进行障碍度计算,并对禁捕政策实施效果和相关影响因素进行了实证分析。结果表明:(1)关于禁捕生态补偿政策渔民评价的最优解,贵州省赤水河流域为0.45,绩效一般,湖北省洪湖市为0.27,对应的绩效水平为较差;(2)影响两个地区绩效评价的前三位主要因素是实施禁捕后,政府部门工作跟踪力度满意度(B<sub>4</sub>)、生活水平满意度(D<sub>2</sub>)、社会活动与社会地位满意度(E<sub>2</sub>)。研究结论为评价禁捕生态补偿政策绩效提供一个可选分析框架,为其他地区提高禁捕生态补偿政策绩效提供参考依据。
(CHEN Ting-gui, LIU Fang, YANG Yang. Performance Evaluation and Influence Factors of Ecological Compensation Policy in the Yangtze River Basin:The Case Study of Hubei and Guizhou Provinces[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(12):3144-3155. (in Chinese))

Fishermen are the core role of the ecological compensation policy for the fishing ban in the Yangtze River, so their satisfaction is related to the performance of the ecological compensation policy introduces with the fishing ban. Chishui River and Honghu, which were the first places in China to implement the policy, were selected as the research areas. Based on survey data from fishermen who have withdrawn from fishing, the TOPSIS which improved by entropy weights combined with the obstacle degree model was employed to evaluate the policy performance and to diagnose its influence factors. The results indicate that: (1) The values of positive and ideal solutions of fishermen's evaluation for the policy in Chishui River and Honghu is 0.45, 0.27 respectively, indicating the performance in the poor level; (2) The top three main factors are the social activities, social status, and living standards of the family, which may related to the satisfaction with government work after the fishing ban, This study provides an alternative analysis framework for the assetment of the performance of the fishing ban's ecological compensation policy, and provides a reference for other regions to improve the performance of policy.

[18]
崔晶. 基层治理中政策的搁置与模糊执行分析: 一个非正式制度的视角[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(1): 83-91.
(CUI Jing. Analysis on the Suspension and Ambiguous of Policy Implementation in Local Governance—A Perspective from Informal Institutions[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2020(1): 83-91. (in Chinese))
[19]
顾向一, 窦梓宁. 长江流域生态环境治理司法协同创新机制[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(2):9-15.
Abstract
环境司法协同是长江流域生态环境治理的有力抓手,长江流域作为生态巨系统,在司法保护理念及司法协同措施中均需突出强调流域特殊性。美丽中国建设对生态环境治理提出了更高要求,长江流域内各省市在司法协同实践中积极探索,绩效斐然。但通过对沿江代表性省市环境司法实践样态的检视也可发现目前各地改革步调不一,焦点侧重不同,长江流域立法供给不足、审判机制建设不完善以及协同主体职责衔接不畅等问题凸现。立足长江流域整体性及系统性,通过流域共同立法的推动,流域环境司法专门化机构的设立以及司法与执法工作衔接长效化机制的健全可以有效创新长江流域环境治理司法协同机制,为长江流域生态环境共保联治和经济社会高速发展的平衡提供司法智慧。
(GU Xiang-yi, DOU Zi-ning. Innovative Mechanism of Judicial Cooperation for Ecological Environmental Governance in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(2):9-15. (in Chinese))
[20]
盛方富, 李志萌, 龚梦玲. 长江“十年禁渔” 长效机制建构研究[J]. 生态经济, 2023, 39(6): 197-202.
(SHENG Fang-fu, LI Zhi-meng, GONG Meng-ling. Study on the Construction of Long-term Mechanism of “Ten-year Fishing Ban” in Yangtze River[J]. Ecological Economy, 2023, 39(6): 197-202. (in Chinese))
[21]
PHELPS Q E, HUPFELD R N, WHITLEDGE G W. Lake Sturgeon Acipenser Fulvescens and Shovelnose Sturgeon Scaphirhynchus Platorynchus Environmental Life History Revealed Using Pectoral Fin-ray Microchemistry: Implications for Interjurisdictional Conservation through Fishery Closure Zones[J]. Journal of Fish Biology, 2017, 90(2): 626-639.
This study inferred that the majority of shovelnose sturgeon Scaphirhynchus platorynchus captured in the upper Mississippi River probably originated from locations outside the upper Mississippi River (Missouri River, middle Mississippi River); whereas, lake sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens exhibit infrequent movement outside of the upper Mississippi River, but may move throughout these interconnected large rivers at various life stages. By using pectoral fin-ray microchemistry (a non-lethal alternative to using otoliths), it is suggest that interjurisdictional cooperation will probably be needed to ensure sustainability of the S. platorynchus commercial fishery and the success of A. fulvescens reintroduction in the upper Mississippi River. Additionally, fin-ray microchemistry can provide invaluable data to make informed management decisions regarding large river fishes, that cross jurisdictional boundaries or that move outside of closure zones, without causing further mortality to compromised fish populations (e.g. threatened and endangered species).© 2016 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.
[22]
PROBST W N, KEMPF A, TAYLOR M, et al. Six Steps to Produce Stock Assessments for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Compliant with Descriptor 3[J]. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2021, 78(4): 1229-1240.
[23]
徐跃峰, 陈廷贵, 徐明昊. 十年禁渔背景下长江流域休闲垂钓业高质量发展路径研究[J/OL]. 上海海洋大学学报,(2025-02-17)[2025-04-01]. https://kns.cnki.net/kns8s.
(XU Yue-feng, CHEN Ting-gui, XU Ming-hao. Research on the High-quality Development Path of Recreational Fishing Industry in the Yangtze River Basin under the Background of the 10-year Fishing Ban Policy[J/OL]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,(2025-02-17)[2025-04-01]. https://kns.cnki.net/kns8s. (in Chinese))
[24]
裴兆斌, 孙馨. 法律视阈下破坏渔业资源的非法捕捞行为探究[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2023, 41(4):1-7.
(PEI Zhao-bin, SUN Xin. Research on Illegal Fishing Behavior of Destroying Fishery Resources from a Legal Perspective[J]. Chinese Fisheries Economics, 2023, 41(4):1-7. (in Chinese))
[25]
谢雄伟, 李福顺. 非法捕捞水产品罪司法认定的法教义学研究[J]. 法治社会, 2016(3): 19-27.
(XIE Xiong-wei, LI Fu-shun. Study on the Jurisprudence of Judicial Determination of the Crime of Illegal Fishing of Aquatic Products[J]. Law-Based Society, 2016(3): 19-27. (in Chinese))
[26]
陈立云, 曾砺锋. 非法捕捞水产品犯罪案件的特点与侦查对策[J]. 中国水产, 2024(12):57-59.
(CHEN Li-yun, ZENG Li-feng. Characteristics and Investigation Strategies of Illegal Fishing Crime[J]. China Fisheries, 2024(12):57-59. (in Chinese))
[27]
卢青青. 县级跨部门协作困境的新解释:基于A区综合行政执法改革的研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2025, 41(2):82-93.
(LU Qing-qing. A New Explanation of the Dilemma of Inter-departmental Collaboration at the County:Research on Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Reform in Area A[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2025, 41(2):82-93. (in Chinese))
[28]
董传举, 贾颖颖. 我国渔业行政执法问题与对策研究[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2022, 40(2):21-30.
(DONG Chuan-ju, JIA Ying-ying. Research on Fishery Administrative Law Enforcement Problems and Countermeasures in China[J]. Chinese Fisheries Economics, 2022, 40(2):21-30. (in Chinese))
[29]
何羽丰, 陈廷贵, 杨杨. 长江禁捕补偿政策满意度影响因素及提升策略研究:模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(9):210-220.
(HE Yu-feng, CHEN Ting-gui, YANG Yang. Influencing Factors and Improvement Strategies for the Satisfaction with the Fishing Ban Policy in the Yangtze River Basin:A Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2022, 43(9):210-220. (in Chinese))
[30]
本清松, 彭小兵. 人工智能应用嵌入政府治理: 实践、机制与风险架构: 以杭州城市大脑为例[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2020(3): 29-42, 125.
(BEN Qing-song, PENG Xiao-bing. Government Governance Embedded in AI Applications: Practice, Mechanism, and Risk Architecture:A Case Study of Hangzhou City Brain[J]. Journal of Gansu Administration Institute, 2020(3): 29-42, 125. (in Chinese))
[31]
梁志勋, 易云飞, 莫燕斌, 等. 一种自供电多传感器无线环境质量监测系统的设计[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 37(1):86-92.
(LIANG Zhi-xun, YI Yun-fei, MO Yan-bin, et al. Design of a Self-power Wireless Environmental Quality Monitoring System with Multi-sensor[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2019, 37(1): 86-92. (in Chinese))
[32]
李学渊, 黄森慰, 蔡祖梅, 等. 政策机制对农村居民环境治理参与行为及效果影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(2):84-94.
(LI Xue-yuan, HUANG Sen-wei, CAI Zu-mei, et al. The Impact of Policy Mechanisms on the Participation Behavior and Effectiveness of Rural Residents in Environmental Governance[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University(Social Sciences), 2023, 25(2):84-94. (in Chinese))
[33]
江西省法院网. 这十人因非法捕捞水产品获刑![EB/OL].(2020-12-14)[2025-04-30]. https://jxgy.jxfy.gov.cn/article/detail/2020/12/id/5665583.shtml.
(Jiangxi Provincial Court Website. These Ten Individuals were Sentenced for Illegally Harvesting Aquatic Products[EB/OL].(2020-12-14)[2025-04-30]. (in Chinese))
[34]
冯紫荆. Z省非法捕捞犯罪特征与防控对策: 以192份已判决刑事案例为样本[J]. 浙江万里学院学报, 2021, 34(6): 47-53.
(FENG Zi-jing. Characteristics and Prevention and Control Countermeasures of Illegal Fishing Crime in Z Province: Taking 192 Convicted Criminal Cases as Samples[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University, 2021, 34(6): 47-53. (in Chinese))
PDF(8572 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/