Flood Discharge and Storage Effects of Typical Floodplains and Polders in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River

YUAN Yuan, MAO Bing, LIU Jia-ming, LIU Bao-nan, WANG Min

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4) : 10-17.

PDF(2774 KB)
PDF(2774 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4) : 10-17. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250230
RIVER-LAKE PROTECTION AND REGULATION

Flood Discharge and Storage Effects of Typical Floodplains and Polders in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] More than 700 floodplains and polders are distributed along the mainstream of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, with a total flood storage capacity of about 16.41 billion m3. These areas serve as important spaces for flood discharge and storage of the Yangtze River and are also home to millions of people. Difficulties in operation during major floods, insufficient safety guarantees during ordinary floods, and a lack of management policies have become the most notable weak links in the Yangtze River flood control system. Existing studies lack in-depth investigation into the operation sequence and activation timing of floodplains and polders. They also do not thoroughly examine the differences in flood discharge and storage effects arising from various combinations of different types of floodplains (mid-channel bars and outer floodplains). This study constructs a two-dimensional unsteady flow mathematical model to quantitatively analyze the flood diversion effects under different activation water levels and operation modes, aiming to provide a scientific basis for the hierarchical optimal operation and flood control management of floodplains and polders. [Methods] The lower Jingjiang reach and the Hukou-Datong reach were selected as typical areas. A two-dimensional unsteady flow mathematical model was established based on MIKE 21, and the flood evolution processes of floodplains and polders under different operation modes were simulated under the 1954 flood condition regulated by the Three Gorges Reservoir and the upstream reservoir group. [Results] The operation of floodplains and polders effectively reduced short-term flood water levels. In the lower Jingjiang reach, the maximum water level reduction at Shishou and Diaoguan stations reached 0.44 m and 0.36 m, respectively, and the duration with reductions exceeding 5 cm lasted about 5.7 days. In the Hukou-Datong reach, the maximum water level reduction at Balijiang, Anqing, and other stations ranged from 0.07 to 0.16 m, and the duration with reductions exceeding 5 cm lasted 1.4 to 3.2 days. After the floodplains were fully filled, the peak-reduction effect was significantly weakened. The backflow of stored water during the flood recession period caused a slight rise in water level (about 1-4 cm). Comparison of different activation water levels showed that when the activation water level in the Hukou reach was increased from 20.5 m to 22.0 m, the maximum water level reduction along the reach increased by 0.07-0.13 m, but the duration with reductions exceeding 5 cm was shortened by 8-24 hours, indicating that activation at a higher water level could cope with more severe floods but resulted in a shorter duration of water level reduction. In addition, the peak-reduction effect was weaker when the floodplains were used only for flood storage than when flood discharge and storage were applied in combination. [Conclusion] Floodplains and polders are effective regulators for dealing with short-term excessive floods. In operation scheduling, it is necessary to balance the peak-reduction magnitude and the duration of action. Further studies should focus on the comprehensive effects of the combined operation of different types of floodplains and the adaptive management strategies.

Key words

the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River / flood control safety / floodplain and polder / mathematical model / flood discharge and storage effects

Cite this article

Download Citations
YUAN Yuan , MAO Bing , LIU Jia-ming , et al . Flood Discharge and Storage Effects of Typical Floodplains and Polders in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(4): 10-17 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250230

References

[1]
徐兴亚, 要威, 刘佳明, 等. 新时期长江中下游洲滩民垸防洪治理思考[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2023, 33(9):14-18.
(Xu Xing-ya, Yao Wei, Liu Jia-ming, et al. Thoughts on Flood Control and Management of Floodplains and Polders in Themiddle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River in the New Era[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2023, 33(9): 14-18. (in Chinese))
[2]
马建华. 加强长江中下游干流洲滩管理的认识与思考[J]. 中国水利, 2014(16): 22-24.
(Ma Jian-hua. Understanding and Thinking on Strengthening Beach Management in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. China Water Resources, 2014(16): 22-24. (in Chinese))
[3]
宁磊. 长江中下游防洪形势变化历程分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2018, 35(6): 1-5, 18.
Abstract
认清长江中下游当前的防洪形势及其变化历程,对长江流域下一步的防洪治理和开发保护至关重要。水利工程建设是长江防洪形势改善的主要措施,同时河湖自然演变引起的江湖关系调整也会给防洪形势带来较大影响。基于此,分析了20世纪60年代以来不同时期长江中下游江湖关系变化,模拟分析江湖关系变化对长江防洪形势的影响,在此基础上分析了三峡水利工程及上游控制性水库群的投运对长江防洪形势的改善情况,得到不同时期长江中下游防洪形势的变化过程。根据当前长江防洪形势及其变化趋势,进一步探讨提高中下游防洪保障能力的措施,如完善防洪工程体系、提升水利工程联合调度管理能力等。
(Ning Lei. History of Flood Control Situation in the Midstream and Downstream of Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2018, 35(6): 1-5, 18. (in Chinese))
[4]
王乐, 徐兴亚, 李安强, 等. 长江超标洪水防御预案编制与思考[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(12): 129-134.
(Wang Le, Xu Xing-ya, Li An-qiang, et al. Practice and Reflection on Preparing Over-standard Flood Prevention Plan of Yangtze River Basin[J]. Yangtze River, 2020, 51(12): 129-134. (in Chinese))
[5]
金兴平, 王永忠, 谢作涛, 等. 加强长江中下游洲滩民垸防洪治理建议[J]. 长江技术经济, 2022, 6(2):1-5.
(Jin Xing-ping, Wang Yong-zhong, Xie Zuo-tao, et al. Suggestions on Strengthening the Flood Control and Control of the Banks in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Technology and Economy of Changjiang, 2022, 6(2): 1-5. (in Chinese))
[6]
尚全民, 褚明华, 骆进军, 等. 2020年长江流域性大洪水防御[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(12):15-20.
(Shang Quan-min, Chu Ming-hua, Luo Jin-jun, et al. Prevention of Basin Severe Flood of Yangtze River in 2020[J]. Yangtze River, 2020, 51(12): 15-20. (in Chinese))
[7]
毕祯珊, 李昌文, 伍岳, 等. 长江中游干流河段洲滩民垸行蓄洪能力研究[J]. 水利水电快报, 2024, 45(4):41-46.
(Bi Zhen-shan, Li Chang-wen, Wu Yue, et al. Characteristics of Flood Regulation and Storage Capacity of Floodplains and Polders in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Express Water Resources & Hydropower Information, 2024, 45(4): 41-46. (in Chinese))
[8]
张军, 皮凌华, 何永煜, 等. 东荆河洲滩民垸对河口进洪影响研究[J]. 人民长江, 2012, 43(增刊2):78-80.
(Zhang Jun, Pi Ling-hua, He Yong-yu, et al. Study on the Influence of the People’s Embankment on the Flood Inflow in the Estuary of Dongjing River[J]. Yangtze River, 2012, 43(Supp.2): 78-80. (in Chinese))
[9]
陈肃利, 侯卫国, 谢作涛. 长江中下游干流河道洲滩分段控制与分类管理[J]. 人民长江, 2013, 44(10): 44-47.
(Chen Su-li, Hou Wei-guo, Xie Zuo-tao. Sectional Control and Classified Management of Sandbars and Shoals in Main Channels of Middle and Lower Yangtze River[J]. Yangtze River, 2013, 44(10): 44-47. (in Chinese))
[10]
王涵, 刘佳明, 肖扬帆, 等. 长江中下游干流洲滩民垸运用分类指标体系研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2026, 43(1): 1-8.
Abstract
长江中下游洲滩民垸是长江防洪减灾体系的重要组成,发挥扩大河道行蓄洪能力、保障重点地区防洪安全的重要作用。当前洲滩民垸在调度运用中面临启用决策难、运用时机难把握等突出问题,已成为流域防洪体系中的短板。为实现洲滩民垸的精细化调度,以长江中下游干流洲滩民垸为研究对象,构建了一个包含防洪能力、规划属性、经济社会影响3个维度的递阶层次分类指标体系,涵盖堤防欠高、城市总体规划关系、平垸行洪规划关系、常住人口、重点保护区域、耕地面积和GDP等,分河段对洲滩民垸进行运用分类,细化各河段洲滩民垸启用次序。分类结果显示:长江中下游干流洲滩民垸分为4类,其中第一类洲滩民垸人口和GDP均较低,最先启用;第二类数量最多,可提供较大的蓄洪容积;第三类蓄洪容积最大,人口最多;第四类GDP总量较高,最后启用。以城陵矶河段洲滩民垸为例,分析了该分类指标体系的合理性及分类运用的防洪效果,其分类结果与实际防洪需求和经济社会特征高度吻合,且分类调度方案整体防洪效果提升显著。结果表明,提出的洲滩民垸运用分类指标体系具有较强的科学性与实用性,创新之处在于将规划属性、经济社会影响与防洪能力系统整合,实现了从“单一防洪导向”向“防洪-发展协同”的调度理念转变,可为洪水调度方案的编制与实际防汛会商决策提供支撑。
(Wang Han, Liu Jia-ming, Xiao Yang-fan, et al. Classification Index System for Use of Floodplains and Polders in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2026, 43(1): 1-8. (in Chinese))
[11]
尚钦, 潘文浩, 周冬妮. 河道洲滩民垸管理分析[J]. 水利水电快报, 2022, 43(5):45-48.
(Shang Qin, Pan Wen-hao, Zhou Dong-ni. Discussion on Management of Floodplains and Polders in River Channel[J]. Express Water Resources & Hydropower Information, 2022, 43(5):45-48. (in Chinese))
[12]
要威. 新形势下洞庭湖区一般垸治理思考[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(12):7-9,15.
(Yao Wei. Study on Management of General Polders in Dongting Lake Area[J]. Yangtze River, 2018, 49(12): 7-9, 15. (in Chinese))
[13]
张智端, 董亚辰. 洞庭湖和鄱阳湖湖区洲滩民垸管理对策研究[J]. 长江技术经济, 2023, 7(1): 23-29.
(Zhang Zhi-duan, Dong Ya-chen. Management Measures of Floodplains and Polders in Dongting Lake and Poyang Lake Regions[J]. Technology and Economy of ChangJiang, 2023, 7(1): 23-29. (in Chinese))
[14]
余启辉, 刘佳明, 卢程伟. 长江流域防洪规划修编关键问题探讨[J]. 中国水利, 2024(12): 29-34.
(Yu Qi-hui, Liu Jia-ming, Lu Cheng-wei. Discussion on Key Issues of Flood Control Planning Revision in Yangtze River Basin[J]. China Water Resources, 2024(12): 29-34. (in Chinese))
PDF(2774 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/