PDF(8010 KB)
Evaluation Methods and Engineering Applications of Suitability for Water and Sand Inrush Treatment Schemes in Disintegrated Dolomite Tunnels
CHENG Xi, LI Jian-guo, YANG Ji, DAI Pei-xuan, ZHANG Sheng-wei, ZHANG Lei, DONG Jia-xing
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 218-226.
PDF(8010 KB)
PDF(8010 KB)
Evaluation Methods and Engineering Applications of Suitability for Water and Sand Inrush Treatment Schemes in Disintegrated Dolomite Tunnels
[Objective] During the construction of water-rich disintegrated dolomite tunnels, water and sand inrush disasters are prone to occur frequently, seriously affecting construction progress and project safety. [Methods] The Chenaju Tunnel of the Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project was taken as the research object. Considering the main factors affecting the suitability of water and sand inrush treatment schemes, and in combination with the characteristics of disintegrated dolomite strata and the formation mechanism of water and sand inrush, ten evaluation indicators were selected from four aspects: rock mass characteristics, groundwater conditions, tunnel length and burial depth, and the environmental impact of water and sand inrush. Key factors such as the disintegration degree of dolomite, unfavorable geological structures, external water pressure, and water richness were incorporated into the evaluation system, compensating for the insufficient consideration of disintegrated dolomite characteristics in existing evaluation systems. A suitability evaluation system for water and sand inrush treatment schemes applicable to disintegrated dolomite strata was established. A game theory-based combined weighting method was adopted to balance the weights calculated by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the CRITIC method, thereby improving the scientific rationality of weight allocation for evaluation indicators. The TOPSIS method was applied to rank the suitability of treatment schemes, and the suitability was classified into four levels: Grade Ⅰ (excellent), Grade Ⅱ (moderate), Grade Ⅲ (low), and Grade Ⅳ (poor). Combined with obstacle factor diagnosis, the key factors restricting suitability were quantified and identified. [Results] The results showed that, by comprehensively considering the main disaster-causing factors of water and sand inrush in disintegrated dolomite tunnels—such as the deterioration of rock mass characteristics, groundwater seepage and external water pressure driving effects, and the hydraulic channel effect of unfavorable geological structures—as well as engineering constraints including technical feasibility, economic efficiency, and treatment difficulty, the established evaluation system was able to accurately reflect the particularity of disintegrated dolomite strata, identify the main factors restricting the suitability of water and sand inrush treatment schemes in disintegrated dolomite tunnels, and produce evaluation results that were consistent with actual engineering conditions. [Conclusion] The key factors included in the evaluation system, such as the disintegration degree of dolomite, unfavorable geological structures, external water pressure, and water richness, fully reflect the characteristics of disintegrated dolomite rock masses, including low strength, poor self-stability, and high sensitivity to external disturbances, highlighting the complexity of water and sand inrush formation in disintegrated dolomite strata and its constraining effect on treatment schemes. When disintegrated dolomite tunnels pass through water-rich tunnel sections, the risk of water and sand inrush increases significantly. Under special unfavorable geological conditions, when disintegrated dolomite tunnels encounter high-frequency and large-scale water and sand inrush events, rerouting to avoid high-risk areas shows superior suitability.
disintegrated dolomite / suitability evaluation / game theory-based combined weighting method / TOPSIS method / water and sand inrush treatment / obstacle factor diagnosis
| [1] |
王志杰, 杜逸文, 姜逸帆, 等. 砂化白云岩地层隧道掌子面失稳机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(增刊2): 3118-3126.
(
|
| [2] |
董家兴, 杨吉, 周伦顺, 等. 砂化白云岩隧洞围岩致灾构造分类、孕灾及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(5): 1064-1079.
(
|
| [3] |
蒋于波, 赵伟, 刘福生, 等. 堵水注浆在引汉济渭工程岭南TBM施工段的应用研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2017, 48(2):67-73.
(
|
| [4] |
杜俊, 廖健都, 韩成力. 调水工程富水破碎洞段综合超前地质预报技术[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(12):15-20.
为避免或减小隧洞穿越富水破碎岩体发生突涌水、塌方等造成的危害,提出了基于地质分析、隧道地震预报(TSP)法与超前钻探结合的综合超前预报体系。首先通过地质分析对不良地质进行评估,之后利用TSP法对前方不良地质体进行定位,确认有不良地质构造存在,最后利用超前钻探进行预报。滇中引水工程富水破碎洞段的两个工程实例表明,此预报技术可准确地预测不良地质段以及涌水段位置和规模大小,可帮助工程技术人员及时地制定相对应的预警措施和处理对策,从而减少施工过程中突泥、涌水、塌方等地质灾害出现的概率,保证隧洞安全施工。
(
To mitigate or even avoid water inrush and collapses caused by tunnels crossing water-rich broken rock mass, a comprehensive advanced prediction system based on geological analysis, TSP (tunnel seismic prediction) method and advanced drilling is proposed. The unfavorable geology is evaluated through geological analysis, and then the TSP method is used to locate the unfavorable geological body in front. Subsequently, advanced drilling is used to predict the location and scale of the unfavorable geological structure after it is confirmed. Two engineering examples of the water-rich fractured segment of the Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project demonstrate that the proposed technology could accurately predict the location and scale of unfavorable geology and water inrush. Corresponding early warning measures and countermeasures can be made in time to reduce the probability of geological disasters such as mud inrush, water inrush, and landslides in the construction process and to ensure the safe construction of the tunnel.
|
| [5] |
张宇弛, 李进, 赖勇. 岩溶区隧洞突泥处理方案及近暗河段穿越措施[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(增刊2):139-142.
(
|
| [6] |
王吉亮, 向家菠, 颜慧明, 等. 引江补汉工程输水线路工程地质选线研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(5): 100-105.
引江补汉工程是南水北调中线工程的后续工程,可行性研究阶段坝下方案输水隧洞初拟4条线路进行比选,比选线路区地形地质条件和工程地质问题复杂,具有线路长、埋深大,地层岩性复杂多样、可溶岩和软质岩分布较多,地质构造背景复杂、总体地应力水平高等地质特点,深埋长隧洞工程可能涉及的工程地质问题均有可能出现,有必要选择一条地质条件相对较优的线路。经分析研究,将线路比选考虑的地质因素分为关键地质因素、重要地质因素、一般地质因素,并建立多因子条件下的线路比选模型,经工程地质综合比选,龙安1线输水隧洞方案总体较优,地质选线成果为工程设计综合选线提供了重要依据,地质比选研究思路与方法可为同类工程提供借鉴。
(
|
| [7] |
吴文博, 曹亮, 刘健, 等. 苏州地下空间开发地质环境因素的分析评价[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2013, 33(2): 131-139.
(
|
| [8] |
The deep drainage tunnel project is an important measure to alleviate urban waterlogging. The construction of a deep drainage tunnel is a complicated process, involving many influencing factors, and there are correlations among these influencing factors, so the risk assessment is difficult. In this study, the ISM method, CRITIC method and cloud model are combined to build a risk assessment model for the small-diameter shield construction of a deep drainage tunnel. Firstly, the risk index system of small-diameter shield construction in a deep drainage tunnel is put forward. Secondly, the ISM method is used to divide the risk indicators and extract the key risk factors. Then, these key risk factors are weighted with the CRITIC method, and the cloud model is used to evaluate the construction risk of a small-diameter shield of a deep drainage tunnel. Finally, the feasibility and accuracy of the proposed method are verified by a practical case. It was found that the risk assessment method proposed in this study can not only effectively assess the level of security risk, but also identify the key risk factors and rank the importance of these factors. The results of this study can reduce the interference items and workload of risk assessment to a certain extent, and help provide managers with an accurate decision-making basis.
|
| [9] |
张社荣, 尚超, 王超. 基于IAHP扩展TOPSIS法引水隧洞实时风险识别[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2021, 41(4):15-20.
(
|
| [10] |
董家兴, 周志强, 赵永川, 等. 滇中引水工程砂化白云岩隧洞围岩地质特征与破坏机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(增刊1): 3464-3476.
(
|
| [11] |
董家兴, 张晟玮, 程娟, 等. 模糊层次分析法在白云岩砂化等级划分中的应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(2): 109-114, 123.
砂化白云岩地层在滇中引水工程玉溪段输水隧洞中广泛分布,该地层中修建的小扑、扯纳苴等隧洞常出现塌方、突水涌砂等地质灾害,严重影响施工安全。科学合理地划分白云岩砂化等级,对施工过程中的灾害防控具有重要意义。从3个方面选取12个能够准确描述白云岩砂化程度的指标,建立白云岩砂化等级划分层次结构模型,将白云岩划分为微砂化、弱砂化(下段和上段)、强烈砂化(下段和上段)、剧烈砂化4个等级,运用模糊层次分析法进行白云岩砂化等级划分。选取小扑2#主洞上游部分洞段建立模型并划分砂化等级。结果表明,该方法通过定性与定量相结合的方式实现了白云岩砂化等级划分,其划分结果与工程实际情况基本相符。
(
|
| [12] |
侯东赛, 张霄, 王磊. 基于综合赋权-TOPSIS法隧道突涌水风险评价及应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(6):691-699.
(
|
| [13] |
董家兴, 龚欣月, 米健, 等. 砂化白云岩隧洞围岩分类方法SHF构建及应用[J]. 地球科学, 2024, 49(8):2813-2825.
(
|
| [14] |
JTG B01—2014,公路工程技术标准[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2015.
(JTG B01-2014, Technical Standard of Highway Engineering[S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2015.) (in Chinese)
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |