PDF(5117 KB)
Water-Sediment Variation and Characteristics of Erosion and Deposition in Baihetan Reservoir Area
LUO Gang, XIAO Xiao, WU Di, JISHA Ri-fu, LU Jun
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 38-43.
PDF(5117 KB)
PDF(5117 KB)
Water-Sediment Variation and Characteristics of Erosion and Deposition in Baihetan Reservoir Area
[Objective] This study aims to investigate the dramatic changes in water-sediment processes within the Jinsha River reservoir area following the impoundment and operation of the Wudongde and Baihetan cascade hydropower stations. Using multi-source observational data, the study reveals the variation patterns of water and sediment fluxes between the two dams, the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of riverbed erosion and deposition, and their driving mechanisms. The findings provide scientific support for reservoir safety operation, navigation channel management, and ecological conservation. [Methods] The study was conducted using runoff-sediment transport data from 2015 to 2023 at the Wudongde and Baihetan hydrological stations, fixed cross-sectional topographic surveys from 2016 to 2023, and hydrodynamic measurements collected downstream of the Wudongde Dam in 2023. Water-sediment relationship analysis was employed to examine the response patterns between runoff and sediment transport. Erosion and deposition volumes were calculated using the cross-sectional method, with 825 m water level as the reference and the channel storage volume estimated via the frustum formula. Spatial variations of erosion and deposition were quantified by overlaying thalweg line and comparing morphological changes of typical cross-sections (JC199, JC153, JC126). [Results] 1) Water-sediment flux variations: Annual runoff exhibited a slight decrease, 2% at the Wudongde station and 17.8% at the Baihetan station. Annual sediment transport plummeted by more than 90%, primarily due to the “cumulative sediment retention effect” of upstream reservoirs. Intra-annual runoff distribution demonstrated a “peak-shaving and valley-filling” pattern, with a 22%-48% increase in December and a 16%-38% decrease in July. Sediment transport was concentrated from June to October (accounting for over 63%), yet monthly averages dropped by more than 95%. A progressive downstream sedimentation trend was observed in September. 2) Spatiotemporal evolution of erosion and deposition: erosion dominated during dry season (October-May), while deposition dominated the wet season (May-October). From 2021 to 2023, a net deposition volume reached 12.63 million m3, showing an overall cumulative trend. Spatially, a strong erosion zone formed at the reservoir tail driven by the high-kinetic-energy discharges from the Wudongde Dam. The core deposition area in the main reservoir was found 25-75 km upstream of the dam. In the tributary-affected zone, the Heishui River confluence showed prominent deposition. 3) Driving mechanisms of erosion and deposition: In terms of hydrodynamic forces, erosion was triggered by high flow velocities and strong sediment-carrying capacities within 20 km downstream of the Wudongde Dam, while beyond this zone, deposition was promoted by slower flows and weaker sediment-carrying capacities. Regarding tributary replenishment, tributaries such as the Pudu River, Xiaojiang River, and Heishui River contributed an average annual sediment transport of 5.73 million tons (2011-2022), accounting for over 46% of the deposition volume in the reservoir area. [Conclusions] The operation of cascade hydropower stations has restructured the water-sediment process. Although the runoff volume decreased slightly, its intra-annual redistribution was significant, and the sediment transport plummeted by 96% due to the “cumulative sediment retention effect”, with sediment being concentrated in flood season. The erosion and deposition in the reservoir area exhibit a spatial pattern of “erosion at the tail and deposition in the head”. The reservoir tail is eroded by the discharged flow, while the main reservoir experiences deposition due to reduced flow velocity and tributary replenishment, with the confluence of the Heishui River being a key source of deposition. A clear long-term deposition trend is observed, and it is necessary to focus on the high-risk deposition zone 25-75 km upstream of the dam and the sections with drastic morphological changes at tributary estuaries. These findings provide a quantitative basis for the joint operation of cascade reservoirs, navigation channel maintenance, and sediment management.
water-sediment relationship / erosion and deposition dynamics / erosion prediction / downstream of dam / Baihetan Reservoir Area
| [1] |
周银军, 王军, 徐育平, 等. 长江黄陵庙至南津关河段河势分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2015(1): 38-46.
(
|
| [2] |
史常乐, 牛兰花, 赵国龙, 等. 三峡大坝-葛洲坝河段水沙变化及冲淤特性[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(6):875-884.
(
|
| [3] |
杨成刚, 许全喜, 董炳江, 等. 三峡水库泥沙实时预报关键技术研究及应用: 以2020年汛期为例[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(12): 82-87.
(
|
| [4] |
姜利玲, 董炳江, 汤成友, 等. 长江上游三峡水库入库泥沙沙峰传播时间研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(7): 9-16.
(
|
| [5] |
王玉璇, 金中武, 陈鹏. 三峡水库汛期排沙效率研究[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(5): 14-19.
(
|
| [6] |
侯素珍, 胡恬, 杨飞, 等. 三门峡水库汛期排沙效果研究[J]. 水利学报, 2021, 52(4): 393-400.
(
|
| [7] |
黄仁勇, 王敏, 张细兵, 等. 溪洛渡、向家坝、三峡梯级水库汛期联合排沙调度方式初步研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2018, 35(8): 6-10, 26.
采用实测典型水沙过程,对溪洛渡、向家坝、三峡梯级水库基于沙峰调度和基于汛期“蓄清排浑”动态使用的联合排沙调度方式开展了计算研究。结果表明:基于沙峰调度的梯级水库联合排沙调度方式从定性分析来看有利于提高梯级水库出库沙量,但提高的幅度有限;基于汛期“蓄清排浑”动态使用的梯级水库联合排沙调度方式有利于提高梯级水库出库沙量,且提高的幅度相对较大。通过计算研究提出了基于沙峰调度和基于汛期“蓄清排浑”动态使用的溪洛渡、向家坝、三峡梯级水库联合排沙调度方案,研究成果可为溪洛渡、向家坝、三峡梯级水库汛期泥沙调度提供科技支撑。
(
According to typical water and sediment processes, we calculated the joint desilting scheduling of Xiluodu, Xiangjiaba and Three Gorges cascade reservoirs in two modes, respectively: sediment peak regulation mode, and dynamic mode of “storing clear water and releasing muddy water” in flood season. Results revealed that the scheduling of cascade reservoirs in sediment peak regulation mode could improve, to a limited extent, the outbound sediment discharge of cascade reservoirs in qualitative sense; the dynamic mode of “storing clear water and releasing muddy water” in flood season is conducive to improving the outbound sediment discharge to a large extent. Furthermore, we proposed corresponding joint desilting schemes in sediment peak regulation mode and dynamic mode of “storing clear water and releasing muddy water” in flood season for Xiluodu, Xiangjiaba and Three Gorges cascade reservoirs.
|
| [8] |
许全喜, 董炳江, 袁晶, 等. 三峡工程运用后长江中下游河道冲刷特征及其影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2023, 35(2):650-661.
(
|
| [9] |
袁晶, 许全喜, 董炳江, 等. 近20年来三峡水库泥沙淤积及其对库区的影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2023, 35(2):632-641.
(
|
| [10] |
朱玲玲, 董先勇, 陈泽方. 金沙江下游梯级水库淤积及其对三峡水库影响研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(3):1-7.
2012年以来,金沙江下游向家坝水电站、溪洛渡水电站相继蓄水运用,拦截了金沙江下游泥沙。为了解梯级水库泥沙淤积情况及其拦沙作用对下游三峡水库的影响,基于大量水沙、固定断面观测资料,采用输沙法和地形法,计算分析了向家坝水电站、溪洛渡水电站2库自运用以来的库区泥沙淤积量及分布特征,研究了梯级水库拦沙作用对三峡水库的影响。结果表明:向家坝、溪洛渡库区泥沙淤积量较小,金沙江下游梯级拦沙使得三峡入库沙量及库尾重点河段淤积强度均减小。研究成果对梯级水库运行、三峡水库运行及调度方式优化具有十分重要的意义。
(
|
| [11] |
朱玲玲, 陈迪, 杨成刚, 等. 金沙江下游梯级水库泥沙淤积和坝下河道冲刷规律[J]. 湖泊科学, 2023, 53(5): 1097-1110.
(
|
| [12] |
杨春瑞, 邓金运, 陈立. 复杂边界作用下三峡水库泥沙淤积特征与趋势[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, 34(3): 442-453.
(
|
| [13] |
曹双, 程龙, 李洁, 等. 2020年流域性大洪水下长江下游干流河道演变分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2023(4):1-11.
(
|
| [14] |
张成潇, 米博宇, 吕超楠, 等. 高洪水期运行水位对三峡水库泥沙淤积的影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(6):10-17,35.
三峡水库泥沙问题直接关系到水库库容的长效保持。选取典型高洪水期,基于数值模型探究入库水沙量级、水沙异步及运行水位对三峡库区沙峰输移和淤积排沙的影响。结果表明:入库洪峰的增大抑制了涪陵沙峰比的衰减,并导致更多泥沙输运至坝前,使得坝前沙峰降幅受运行水位的抬升更为显著;变动回水区较常年回水区更易受到入库水沙异步影响,且随着来沙系数的增大,由低水位抬升时淤积占比更高;水库排沙比受入库水沙异步影响有限,且随着入库洪峰、沙峰的增大,排沙比增加的同时对运行水位抬升导致的衰减更为敏感。研究成果初步揭示了入库水沙异步及运行水位对库区沙峰运动与淤积的影响,可为三峡水库汛期优化沙峰排沙调度提供参考。
(
|
| [15] |
张国帅, 邓安军, 张帮稳, 等. 水库运用对金沙江下游水沙变化的影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2024, 36(6): 1911-1921.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |