Inversion Method for Unsteady Seepage Permeability Coefficients Based on Reduced-Order Projection

QIAN Wu-wen, CHAI Jun-rui, ZENG Chuan-yue, WU Bang-bin, LI Shuang-long

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 126-135.

PDF(8496 KB)
PDF(8496 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 126-135. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20241148
Rock-Soil Engineering

Inversion Method for Unsteady Seepage Permeability Coefficients Based on Reduced-Order Projection

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] During the parameter inversion process of groundwater models, frequent calls to the forward model result in excessive computational demand and prolonged processing time, which severely limits their practical applicability. To address the high time consumption in groundwater model inversion, this study proposes a coupled inversion algorithm capable of rapidly identifying unsteady permeability coefficients. [Methods] The proposed algorithm coupled the parameter inversion process with reduced-order model training, where the reduced-order model was employed instead of the original model for parameter inversion calculation, thereby reducing total inversion time. During the iteration process, the sum of squared errors between the reduced-order model calculation values and observations was used as the objective function, and an improved differential evolution algorithm with strong global search capability was employed as the optimization method for parameter inversion. In each iteration, the parameters that best matched the observations were identified as optimal, and snapshots of these optimal parameters were calculated to train the reduced-order model, thereby enhancing the inversion accuracy in the next generation. To enable the reduced-order model to accurately capture the time-domain response characteristics of the original model, a uniform snapshot strategy was employed to collect time-step snapshots. Based on the characteristics of the coupled inversion algorithm, the relative error of the reduced-order solution corresponding to the optimal parameters was calculated at all nodes within the time domain, and iteration was terminated when the maximum error fell below a preset threshold. [Results] Taking a two-dimensional pumping well model as an example, the proposed method was compared with an inversion approach based on the original model. The results indicated that: (1) For unsteady seepage parameter inversion, compared with the optimal time snapshot strategy, using a uniform snapshot collection strategy to construct the reduced-order model could achieve higher computational accuracy, while the reduced-order model had a lower average order. (2) While maintaining inversion accuracy comparable to that of the original model, the proposed algorithm could reduce computational time by approximately 95.37%. (3) Near the optimal parameters, the reduced-order model obtained by the proposed method showed almost identical responses to the original model. However, the error increased significantly when moving away from the optimal solution. (4) The effects of observation error, mesh density, and inversion dimensionality on the inversion accuracy of the proposed algorithm were consistent with those of the original model, but the computational time of the proposed algorithm was less than 5% of that of the original model. (5) The proposed algorithm was less affected by the order of the original model, and the increase in the computational time was proportionally smaller than the increase in model order, indicating higher computational efficiency for high-order models than for low-order ones. (6) Compared with low-dimensional inversion problems, the proposed algorithm exhibited greater time-saving efficiency in handling high-dimensional cases, suggesting stronger robustness against the curse of dimensionality. (7) Under different convergence accuracies, the proposed algorithm could consistently reproduce the results of the original model without a significant increase in computational time even as accuracy improved. [Conclusion] The proposed coupled inversion algorithm in this study, as a deterministic finite element-based inversion framework, innovatively couples the training process of the reduced-order model with the parameter inversion process and significantly improves the computational efficiency of parameter inversion.Characterized by a simple structure,ease of implementation, and no need for posterior error calculation,the algorithm has significant engineering application value and promising prospects for broad application.

Key words

unsteady seepage / reduced-order model / parameter inversion / optimization algorithm / permeability coefficient / groundwater simulation

Cite this article

Download Citations
QIAN Wu-wen , CHAI Jun-rui , ZENG Chuan-yue , et al . Inversion Method for Unsteady Seepage Permeability Coefficients Based on Reduced-Order Projection[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(1): 126-135 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20241148

References

[1]
刘长吉, 陈建生, 陈亮, 等. 库坝区地下水渗流场模式识别模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(增刊1):2808-2814.
(LIU Chang-ji, CHEN Jian-sheng, CHEN Liang, et al. Study on Pattern Recognition Model of Groundwater Seepage Field in Reservoir and Dam Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock MechAanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(Supp. 1): 2808-2814.) (in Chinese)
[2]
孙超伟, 柴军瑞, 许增光, 等. 金川水电站地下厂房裂隙围岩渗控效应数值模拟与评价[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(5): 786-797.
(SUN Chao-wei, CHAI Jun-rui, XU Zeng-guang, et al. Numerical Simulation and Assessment of Seepage Control Effects on Surrounding Fractured Rocks of Underground Powerhouse in Jinchuan Hydropower Station[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(5): 786-797.) (in Chinese)
[3]
周建平, 杜效鹄, 周兴波, 等. 世界高坝研究及其未来发展趋势[J]. 水力发电学报, 2019, 38(2): 1-14.
(ZHOU Jian-ping, DU Xiao-hu, ZHOU Xing-bo, et al. Research on High Dams and Developing Trends[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2019, 38(2): 1-14.) (in Chinese)
[4]
LUO Y, CHEN J, CHEN Y, et al. Longitudinal Deformation Profile of a Tunnel in Weak Rock Mass by Using the back Analysis Method[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71: 478-493.
[5]
DHAR A, DATTA B. Saltwater Intrusion Management of Coastal Aquifers. I: Linked Simulation-optimization[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(12): 1263-1272.
[6]
陈益峰, 周创兵, 胡冉, 等. 大型水电工程渗流分析的若干关键问题研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(9): 1448-1454.
(CHEN Yi-feng, ZHOU Chuang-bing, HU Ran, et al. Key Issues on Seepage Flow Analysis in Large Scale Hydropower Projects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(9): 1448-1454.) (in Chinese)
[7]
余红玲, 王晓玲, 王成, 等. 贝叶斯框架下大坝渗流参数反演组合代理模型研究[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(3): 306-315, 324.
(YU Hong-ling, WANG Xiao-ling, WANG Cheng, et al. Research on Ensemble Surrogate Models of Dam Seepage Parameters Inversion under Bayesian Framework[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(3): 306-315, 324.) (in Chinese)
[8]
余红玲, 王晓玲, 任炳昱, 等. 土石坝渗流性态分析的IAO-XGBoost集成学习模型与预测结果解释[J]. 水利学报, 2023, 54(10):1195-1209.
(YU Hong-ling, WANG Xiao-ling, REN Bing-yu, et al. IAO-XGBoost Ensemble Learning Model for Seepage Behavior Analysis of Earth-rock Dam and Interpretation of Prediction Results[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2023, 54(10): 1195-1209.) (in Chinese)
[9]
蒋水华, 熊威, 朱光源, 等. 暴雨及水位骤降条件下渗流参数空间变异的水库滑坡概率分析[J]. 地球科学, 2024, 49(5): 1679-1691.
(JIANG Shui-hua, XIONG Wei, ZHU Guang-yuan, et al. Probabilitic Analysis of Reservoir Landslides Considering the Spatial Variation of Seepage Parameters under the Conditions of Rainstorm and Sudden Drop of Water Level[J]. Earth Science, 2024, 49(5): 1679-1691.) (in Chinese)
[10]
李雅琦, 杨杰, 程琳, 等. 基于RVM-CS的工程区地层渗透系数反演分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(11): 121-127, 135.
Abstract
为了准确确定工程区各地层渗透系数,基于相关向量机(RVM)与布谷鸟算法(CS)建立反演分析模型,对研究区域内各地层的渗透系数进行反演分析。首先,基于均匀设计法构造渗透系数组合,利用有限元计算测点水位值并生成RVM学习样本;随后,通过训练RVM构建渗透系数与水头之间的映射关系,使其能够代替有限元方法快速地完成渗流计算;最后,根据工程区钻孔的实测水位值,利用CS算法搜索确定区域内各地层的渗透系数。将建立的渗流反演模型应用于某大型抽水蓄能电站工程区的初始渗流场中,结果表明:所建立的渗流反演模型能够考虑多地层渗透系数和钻孔水头间的非线性,RVM能代替有限元模型,可快速、精确地确定渗透系数;此渗流反演模型在大型抽水蓄能电站工程区反演结果合理,精度满足工程要求。
(LI Ya-qi, YANG Jie, CHENG Lin, et al. Inversion Analysis on Permeability Coefficient of Stratum in Engineering Area Based on RVM-CS[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2020, 37(11): 121-127, 135.) (in Chinese)
An inversion analysis model integrating relevance vector machine (RVM) and cuckoo search (CS) is established to accurately determine the permeability coefficients of strata in engineering area. Firstly, the uniform design method is employed to construct combinations of permeability coefficients, and the finite element method is used to calculate the water head values and generate RVM learning samples. In subsequence, the mapping relation between permeability coefficient and water head is constructed by RVM training which replaces the finite element method in calculating seepage. According to the measured water head values of drilling holes in the project area, the CS algorithm is adopted to search and determine the permeability coefficient of stratum. The seepage inversion model is applied to the inversion of initial seepage field of a large pumped storage power station project. Results demonstrate that the proposed model reflects the nonlinear relation between water head in borehole and permeability coefficient of multiple strata. RVM could replace the finite element method to determine quickly and accurately the permeability coefficient. The inversion results for the large pumped storage power station are reasonable and the accuracy of the proposed model meets engineering requirements.
[11]
邓志平, 邹艺, 潘敏, 等. 考虑多参数空间变异性的非饱和土石坝坝坡可靠度分析[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2024, 32(4):1108-1123.
(DENG Zhi-ping, ZOU Yi, PAN Min, et al. Reliability Analysis of Unsaturated Earth-rock Dam Slope Considering Multi-parameter Spatial Variability[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2024, 32(4): 1108-1123.) (in Chinese)
[12]
RAO P P. Inverse Parameter Estimation Using Compressed Sensing and POD-RBF Reduced Order Models[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 422: 116820.
[13]
ULLMANN S, ROTKVIC M, LANG J. POD-Galerkin Reduced-order Modeling with Adaptive Finite Element Snapshots[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 325: 244-258.
[14]
梅冠华, 康灿, 张家忠. 二维壁板颤振的本征正交分解降阶模型研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(23): 144-151.
(MEI Guan-hua, KANG Can, ZHANG Jia-zhong. Reduced Order Model Based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition for Two-dimensional Panel Flutter[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(23): 144-151.) (in Chinese)
[15]
胡金秀, 郑保敬, 高效伟. 基于特征正交分解降阶模型的瞬态热传导分析[J]. 中国科学:物理学力学天文学, 2015, 45(1):73-84.
(HU Jin-xiu, ZHENG Bao-jing, GAO Xiao-wei. Reduced Order Model Analysis Method via Proper Orthogonal Decomposition for Transient Heat Conduction[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica), 2015, 45(1): 73-84.) (in Chinese)
[16]
CLÉNET S, HENNERON T, IDA N. Reduction of a Finite-element Parametric Model Using Adaptive POD Methods-Application to Uncertainty Quantification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2016, 52(3): 7000704.
[17]
HINZE M, KUNKEL M. Residual Based Sampling in POD Model Order Reduction of Drift-diffusion Equations in Parametrized Electrical Networks[J]. ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 2012, 92(2): 91-104.
[18]
STANKO Z P, BOYCE S E, YEH W W G. Nonlinear Model Reduction of Unconfined Groundwater Flow Using POD and DEIM[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2016, 97: 130-143.
[19]
方卫华, 李琳, 周克明. 基于特征正交分解的土坝变形安全监控模型[J]. 水电能源科学, 2016, 34(8): 99-102, 98.
(FANG Wei-hua, LI Lin, ZHOU Ke-ming. Safety Monitoring Model of Earth Dam Based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2016, 34(8): 99-102, 98.) (in Chinese)
[20]
GOSSES M, NOWAK W, WÖHLING T. Explicit Treatment for Dirichlet, Neumann and Cauchy Boundary Conditions in POD-based Reduction of Groundwater Models[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2018, 115: 160-171.
[21]
刘营, 李鸿光, 李韵, 等. 基于子结构的参数化模型降阶方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(16): 148-154.
(LIU Ying, LI Hong-guang, LI Yun, et al. A Component-based Parametric Model Order Reduction Method[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(16): 148-154.) (in Chinese)
[22]
BOYCE S E, NISHIKAWA T, YEH W W. Reduced Order Modeling of the Newton Formulation of MODFLOW to Solve Unconfined Groundwater Flow[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2015, 83: 250-262.
[23]
USHIJIMA T T, YEH W W. Experimental Design for Estimating Unknown Hydraulic Conductivity in an Aquifer Using a Genetic Algorithm and Reduced Order Model[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2015, 86: 193-208.
[24]
USHIJIMA T T, YEH W W. A Proposed Fast Algorithm to Construct the System Matrices for a Reduced-order Groundwater Model[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2017, 102: 68-83.
[25]
HAASDONK B, OHLBERGER M. Efficient Reduced Models and a Posteriori Error Estimation for Parametrized Dynamical Systems by Offline/Online Decomposition[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, 2011, 17(2): 145-161.
[26]
CLÉNET S, HENNERON T. Error Estimation for Model-order Reduction of Finite-element Parametric Problems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2016, 52(8): 7403510.
[27]
钱武文, 赵新宇, 陈柏全, 等. 基于降阶投影的初始渗流场反演方法[J]. 南昌工程学院学报, 2024, 43(1): 27-33.
(QIAN Wu-wen, ZHAO Xin-yu, CHEN Bai-quan, et al. Inversion Method of Initial Seepage Field Based on Reduced Order Projection[J]. Journal of Nanchang Institute of Technology, 2024, 43(1): 27-33.) (in Chinese)
[28]
QIAN W, CHAI J, ZHAO X, et al. Inversion Method of Hydraulic Conductivity for Steady-state Problem Based on Reduced-order Model Constructed by Improved Greedy Sampling Method[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2022, 166: 104260.
[29]
QIAN W, CHAI J, XU Z, et al. Differential Evolution Algorithm with Multiple Mutation Strategies Based on Roulette Wheel Selection[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2018, 48(10): 3612-3629.
[30]
SIADE A J, PUTTI M, YEH W W G. Snapshot Selection for Groundwater Model Reduction Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition[J]. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(8): 2009WR008792.
[31]
MADAY Y, STAMM B. Locally Adaptive Greedy Approximations for Anisotropic Parameter Reduced Basis Spaces[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2013, 35(6):A2417-A2441.
[32]
LAKSHMI PRASAD K, RASTOGI A K. Estimating Net Aquifer Recharge and Zonal Hydraulic Conductivity Values for Mahi Right Bank Canal Project Area, India by Genetic Algorithm[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 243(3/4): 149-161.
PDF(8496 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/